Optimal dose determination of enerisant (TS-091) for patients with narcolepsy: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The histamine H3 receptor has emerged as one of the most promising targets of novel pharmacotherapy for narcolepsy. Studies now aim to investigate the optimal dose of enerisant, a novel H3 antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy. METHODS: We conducted two phase 2, fixed-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with narcolepsy. The first phase 2 study (Study 1) was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of enerisant at dosages of 25, 50, and 100 mg/day administered for 3 weeks based on the results of a phase 1 study conducted on healthy volunteers. The primary endpoint was mean sleep latency in maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT), and the secondary endpoint was the total score on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The dosages of enerisant in the second phase 2 study (Study 2) were set at 5 and 10 mg/day based on the simulation of receptor occupancy results from positron emission tomography study. RESULTS: Forty-six and fifty-three patients were randomized in Study 1 and Study 2, respectively. The efficacy of enerisant was partially confirmed in Study 1 with ESS; however, the doses were not tolerated, and there were many withdrawals due to adverse events (mainly insomnia, headache, and nausea). The doses in Study 2 were well tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events in Study 2 than in Study 1, although the efficacy could not be confirmed with MWT and ESS in Study 2. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal dose of enerisant could not be determined in these two studies. Although enerisant has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, it is thought to have large interindividual variabilities in terms of efficacy and safety, suggesting the necessity of tailored dosage adjustments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03267303 ; Registered 30 August 2017 (Study 2). Japic identifier: JapicCTI-142529 ; Registered 7 May 2014 (Study 1) and JapicCTI-173689 ; Registered 30 August 2017, https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/ShowDirect.jsp?clinicalTrialId=29277 (Study 2).

Drug-drug interaction potential and clinical pharmacokinetics of enerisant, a novel potent and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist.

We evaluated the in vitro drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of enerisant (TS-091), a histamine H3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) and transporters, as well as the pharmacokinetics of enerisant in healthy male subjects.Enerisant did not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, or CYP3A4 and did not induce CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4. Enerisant inhibited organic cation transporter 2, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein (MATE) 1, and MATE2-K, but not P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein, organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, OATP1B3, organic anion transporter (OAT) 1, or OAT3. Enerisant was a substrate for P-gp, but not for eight other transporters.In healthy male subjects, enerisant was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, and the plasma concentration increased dose-dependently. The urinary excretion of enerisant within 48 h after administration was 64.5% to 89.9% of the dose, indicating that most of the absorbed enerisant was excreted in the urine without being metabolized.Based on the plasma concentrations at the estimated clinical dose, enerisant is unlikely to cause CYP-mediated, clinically relevant DDI. Although the possibility of transporter-mediated, clinically relevant DDI cannot be ruled out, there is little or no risk of side effects.

Validity and reliability of a driving simulator for evaluating the influence of medicinal drugs on driving performance.

RATIONALE: Although driving simulators (DS) are receiving increasing attention due to concern over traffic accidents under the influences of drugs, few DS are recognized for their reliability and validity. Therefore, the development of an evaluation system using DS for driving performance is urgently needed. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) increases with blood alcohol concentration (BAC) using a DS with reliability and calculate the SDLP threshold from the difference between BAC levels of 0 and 0.05%. METHODS: Twenty healthy Japanese men performed the DS tasks up to 60 min in Study 1 and DS tasks twice at 1-week intervals in Study 2. Twenty-six healthy men conducted the same DS tasks under BAC level (0, 0.025, 0.05, and 0.09%) in double-blind, randomized, crossover trial in Study 3. The primary outcome was SDLP in a road-tracking test. The test-retest reliability of DS data was assessed, and the estimated difference in SDLP between BAC levels of 0 and 0.05% was calculated using a linear regression model. RESULTS: The cumulative SDLP values at 5-min intervals were stable, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for its values was 0.93. SDLP increased with BAC in a concentration-dependent manner. The predicted ΔSDLP value for the difference between BAC levels of 0 and 0.05% was 9.23 cm. No participants dropped out because of simulator sickness. CONCLUSIONS: The new DS used in these studies has reliability, validity, and tolerability and is considered suitable for evaluating the influence of drugs on driving performance.