Monitoring of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients during long-time administration and comparison to a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

PURPOSE: In this study, a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients was performed over 50 weeks to reveal possible alterations in erlotinib plasma concentrations. Additionally, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was created to assess such variations in silico. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received a chemotherapeutic combination of 100 mg erlotinib q.d., 500-900 mg capecitabine b.d. and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab q.2wks. Samples were analyzed by HPLC and the results were compared to a PBPK model, built with the software GastroPlus™ and based on calculated and literature data. RESULTS: The erlotinib plasma concentrations did not show any accumulation, but displayed a high inter-patient variability over the whole investigated period. Trough plasma concentrations ranged from 0.04 to 1.22 µg/ml after day 1 and from 0.01 to 2.4 µg/ml in the long-term assessment. 7% of the patients showed concentrations below the necessary activity threshold of 0.5 µg/ml during the first week. The impact of some co-variates on the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and AUC0-24 were shown in a PBPK model, including food effects, changes in body weight, protein binding or liver function and the concomitant intake of gastric acid reducing agents (ARAs). CONCLUSION: This study presents the approach of combining TDM and PBPK modeling for erlotinib, a drug with a high interaction potential. TDM is an important method to monitor drugs with increased inter-patient variability, additionally, the PBPK model contributed valuable insights to the interaction mechanisms involved, resulting in an effective combination from a PK perspective to ensure a safe treatment.

Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Capecitabine and Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

AIM: This study focuses on the plasma disposition and metabolic activation of capecitabine (CCB) when administered alone or when combined with cetuximab (CTX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four chemo-naïve patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer were randomized into two arms and received either CCB alone (1,000 mg/m(2) bid p.o.), followed by CCB plus CTX (loading dose (LD)=400 mg/m(2) followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly i.v. maintenance dose) (Arm A; n=12 patients (patients)) or CCB plus CTX followed by CCB alone (Arm B; n=12 patients). Plasma samples were collected from the cubital vein and CCB, 5'-desoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR) and 5'-desoxy-5 fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) were quantified by a sensitive, selective reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Non-compartment pharmacokinetic parameters have been calculated by Phoenix WinNonlin. RESULTS: No clinically relevant impact of CTX on CCB pharmacokinetic parameters and metabolic conversion could be detected in both arms after statistical evaluation (ANOVA). CONCLUSION: From the pharmacokinetic point of view, co-administration of CTX to CCB seems to be safe.

Impact of co-administered drugs on drug monitoring of capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Drug monitoring is a useful tool for obtaining detailed information about the disposition of a drug in an individual patient during chemotherapy. According to the international guidelines, the analytical assay for quantification of a compound in biological samples must be validated. Among a number of parameters, peak purity is an important requirement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed pharmacokinetics in patients who received chemotherapy with capecitabine and up to 10 various co-medications. RESULTS: Out of seven investigated co-administered drugs, we found evidence that the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole causes peak interferences with capecitabine during high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Therefore quantification of capecitabine in plasma samples can be inaccurate. CONCLUSION: We recommend an altered time schedule for co-administered drugs or changing the mobile phase used in the assay.