The Pressure Reactivity Index as a Measure for Cerebrovascular Autoregulation: Validation in a Porcine Cranial Window Model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pressure reactivity index (PRx) has been proposed as a metric associated with cerebrovascular autoregulatory (CA) function and has been thoroughly investigated in clinical research. In this study, PRx is validated in a porcine cranial window model, developed to visualize pial arteriolar autoregulation and its limits. METHODS: We measured arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, pial arteriolar diameter, and red blood cell (RBC) velocity in a closed cranial window piglet model during gradual balloon catheter-induced arterial hypotension (n = 10) or hypertension (n = 10). CA limits were derived through piecewise linear regression of calculated RBC flux vs cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), leading for each arteriole to 1 lower limit of autoregulation (LLA) and 2 upper limits of autoregulation (ULA1 and ULA2). Autoregulation limits were compared with PRx thresholds, and receiver operating curve analysis was performed with and without CPP binning. A linear mixed effects model of PRx was performed. RESULTS: Receiver operating curve analysis indicated an area under the curve (AUC) for LLA prediction by a PRx of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.64-0.67) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86) without and with CPP binning, respectively. The AUC for ULA1 prediction by PRx was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.68-0.69) without and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82) with binning. The AUC for ULA2 prediction was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.55-0.58) without and 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.72) with binning. The sensitivity and specificity of binned PRx were 65%/90% for LLA, 69%/71% for ULA1, and 59%/74% for ULA2, showing wide interindividual variability. In the linear mixed effects model, pial arteriolar diameter changes were significantly associated with PRx changes (P = .002), whereas RBC velocity (P = .28) and RBC flux (P = .24) were not. CONCLUSION: We conclude that PRx is predominantly determined by pial arteriolar diameter changes and moderately predicts CA limits. Performance to detect the CA limits varied highly on an individual level. Active therapeutic strategies based on PRx and the associated correlation metrics should incorporate these limitations.

Decompressive craniectomy as a second/third-tier intervention in traumatic brain injury: A multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVES: RESCUEicp studied decompressive craniectomy (DC) applied as third-tier option in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in a randomized controlled setting and demonstrated a decrease in mortality with similar rates of favorable outcome in the DC group compared to the medical management group. In many centers, DC is being used in combination with other second/third-tier therapies. The aim of the present study is to investigate outcomes from DC in a prospective non-RCT context. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of 2 patient cohorts: one from the University Hospitals Leuven (2008-2016) and one from the Brain-IT study, a European multicenter database (2003-2005). In thirty-seven patients with refractory elevated intracranial pressure who underwent DC as a second/third-tier intervention, patient, injury and management variables including physiological monitoring data and administration of thiopental were analysed, as well as Extended Glasgow Outcome score (GOSE) at 6 months. RESULTS: In the current cohorts, patients were older than in the surgical RESCUEicp cohort (mean 39.6 vs. 32.3; p < 0.001), had higher Glasgow Motor Score on admission (GMS < 3 in 24.3% vs. 53.0%; p = 0.003) and 37.8% received thiopental (vs. 9.4%; p < 0.001). Other variables were not significantly different. GOSE distribution was: death 24.3%; vegetative 2.7%; lower severe disability 10.8%; upper severe disability 13.5%; lower moderate disability 5.4%; upper moderate disability 2.7%, lower good recovery 35.1%; and upper good recovery 5.4%. The outcome was unfavorable in 51.4% and favorable in 48.6%, as opposed to 72.6% and 27.4% respectively in RESCUEicp (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Outcomes in DC patients from two prospective cohorts reflecting everyday practice were better than in RESCUEicp surgical patients. Mortality was similar, but fewer patients remained vegetative or severely disabled and more patients had a good recovery. Although patients were older and injury severity was lower, a potential partial explanation may be in the pragmatic use of DC in combination with other second/third-tier therapies in real-life cohorts. The findings underscore that DC maintains an important role in managing severe TBI.

Differential Hemodynamic Response of Pial Arterioles Contributes to a Quadriphasic Cerebral Autoregulation Physiology.

Background Cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) regulates cerebral vascular tone to maintain near-constant cerebral blood flow during fluctuations in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Preclinical and clinical research has challenged the classic triphasic pressure-flow relationship, leaving the normal pressure-flow relationship unclear. Methods and Results We used in vivo imaging of the hemodynamic response in pial arterioles to study CA in a porcine closed cranial window model during nonpharmacological blood pressure manipulation. Red blood cell flux was determined in 52 pial arterioles during 10 hypotension and 10 hypertension experiments to describe the pressure-flow relationship. We found a quadriphasic pressure-flow relationship with 4 distinct physiological phases. Smaller arterioles demonstrated greater vasodilation during low CPP when compared with large arterioles (P<0.01), whereas vasoconstrictive capacity during high CPP was not significantly different between arterioles (P>0.9). The upper limit of CA was defined by 2 breakpoints. Increases in CPP lead to a point of maximal vasoconstriction of the smallest pial arterioles (upper limit of autoregulation [ULA] 1). Beyond ULA1, only larger arterioles maintain a limited additional vasoconstrictive capacity, extending the buffer for high CPP. Beyond ULA2, vasoconstrictive capacity is exhausted, and all pial arterioles passively dilate. There was substantial intersubject variability, with ranges of 29.2, 47.3, and 50.9 mm Hg for the lower limit, ULA1, and ULA2, respectively. Conclusions We provide new insights into the quadriphasic physiology of CA, differentiating between truly active CA and an extended capacity to buffer increased CPP with progressive failure of CA. In this experimental model, the limits of CA widely varied between subjects.

Effects of Norepinephrine, Propofol, and Hemoglobin Concentration on Dynamic Measurements of Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Acute Brain Injury.

Effects of treatment-associated variables on cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) in acute brain injury patients remain unclear. As deficient CA is associated with worse outcomes and ideas about CA-steered management are emerging, this question is relevant. We investigated effects of norepinephrine and propofol infusion rates and hemoglobin concentration on dynamic measurements of cerebrovascular reactivity as surrogate for CA. A retrospective analysis of 91 traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 13 stroke patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Leuven University Hospitals was performed. Low-resolution autoregulation index (LAx) and high-frequency pressure reactivity index (PRx) were calculated as measurements of cerebrovascular reactivity. Data was binned into 5-, 15-, and 60-min intervals. Bivariate time-series analysis using lagged cross-correlations were calculated after pre-whitening and differencing. Linear mixed models evaluated effects of age, gender, cardiovascular risk, brain comorbidity, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pupil reactivity, and type of injury. Median dose of norepinephrine, propofol and hemoglobin concentration was 7.8 µg/kg/h (Q1 3.6-Q3 13.8), 3 mg/kg/h (Q1 1.9-Q3 4.3), and 9.2 g·dL-1 (Q1 8.2-Q3 10.5), respectively. Mean cross-correlations for 24 lags were close to zero and not significant for all variables. No significant differences as function of age, gender, cardiovascular risk, brain comorbidity, GCS, pupil reactivity, and type of injury were found. Dynamic intracranial pressure-based measurements of cerebrovascular reactivity in acute brain injured patients are not affected by gradually adjusted norepinephrine or propofol infusion rates or slow changes in hemoglobin concentration within the typical ranges during ICU admission. Future trials on cerebrovascular reactivity-steered management and treatment of CA impairment may not have to take these variables into account.