Reconstitution of 3' end processing of mammalian pre-mRNA reveals a central role of RBBP6.

The 3' ends of almost all eukaryotic mRNAs are generated in an essential two-step processing reaction: endonucleolytic cleavage of an extended precursor followed by the addition of a poly(A) tail. By reconstituting the reaction from overproduced and purified proteins, we provide a minimal list of 14 polypeptides that are essential and two that are stimulatory for RNA processing. In a reaction depending on the polyadenylation signal AAUAAA, the reconstituted system cleaves pre-mRNA at a single preferred site corresponding to the one used in vivo. Among the proteins, cleavage factor I stimulates cleavage but is not essential, consistent with its prominent role in alternative polyadenylation. RBBP6 is required, with structural data showing it to contact and presumably activate the endonuclease CPSF73 through its DWNN domain. The C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II is dispensable. ATP, but not its hydrolysis, supports RNA cleavage by binding to the hClp1 subunit of cleavage factor II with submicromolar affinity.

Establishment of 5'-3' interactions in mRNA independent of a continuous ribose-phosphate backbone.

Functions of eukaryotic mRNAs are characterized by intramolecular interactions between their ends. We have addressed the question whether 5' and 3' ends meet by diffusion-controlled encounter "through solution" or by a mechanism involving the RNA backbone. For this purpose, we used a translation system derived from Drosophila embryos that displays two types of 5'-3' interactions: Cap-dependent translation initiation is stimulated by the poly(A) tail and inhibited by Smaug recognition elements (SREs) in the 3' UTR. Chimeric RNAs were made consisting of one RNA molecule carrying a luciferase coding sequence and a second molecule containing SREs and a poly(A) tail; the two were connected via a protein linker. The poly(A) tail stimulated translation of such chimeras even when disruption of the RNA backbone was combined with an inversion of the 5'-3' polarity between the open reading frame and poly(A) segment. Stimulation by the poly(A) tail also decreased with increasing RNA length. Both observations suggest that contacts between the poly(A) tail and the 5' end are established through solution, independently of the RNA backbone. In the same chimeric constructs, SRE-dependent inhibition of translation was also insensitive to disruption of the RNA backbone. Thus, tracking of the backbone is not involved in the repression of cap-dependent initiation. However, SRE-dependent repression was insensitive to mRNA length, suggesting that the contact between the SREs in the 3' UTR and the 5' end of the RNA might be established in a manner that differs from the contact between the poly(A) tail and the cap.