Baseline Interleukin-6 as a Preoperative Biomarker for Liver Fibrosis.

Introduction: Liver (hepatic) fibrosis (LF) is characterized by impaired function and regenerative capacity of the liver and can lead to significantly increased morbidity and mortality in the context of surgical liver resection (LR). For this reason, it is crucial to identify the extent of LF preoperatively. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is known to play a key role in the pathogenesis of LF, but its exact value as a preoperative marker is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between preoperatively determined IL-6 and the presence of LF. Methods: In this prospective study, IL-6 was determined in 134 consecutive patients undergoing LR. Patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and patients with clinical or laboratory signs of inflammation were excluded. LF was graded by a blinded pathologist with regard to the degree of LF according to the Desmet classification (0-4). Baseline IL-6 and degree of LF were correlated. Results: A total of 134 patients were prospectively included prior to LR. For 104 patients, LF was graded and inflammatory parameters were available. Thirty-five of these patients showed LC (Desmet 4), and another 33 patients showed preoperatively elevated inflammatory markers. Two of the remaining patients were liver transplant patients. These patients were excluded from the final analysis. According to Desmet, the remaining 34 patients had LF grade 0 or 1 (none or minimal LF) in 26 cases and LF grade 2 or 3 (moderate-to-severe LF) in 8 cases. Correlation of LF with preoperatively determined IL-6 yielded significantly higher IL-6 levels in the group of patients with moderate-to-severe LF (Desmet 2 or 3) compared to the group with none or minimal LF (Desmet 0 or 1; p = 0.0495). Conclusion: In the context of LR, our results showed a correlation of preoperatively determined IL-6 with the extent of LF present. Higher serum baseline IL-6 concentrations were associated with a higher degree of LF, whereas no other blood parameter or score was that predictive for LF. Our results suggest that baseline IL-6 might serve as a valuable parameter to assess LF prior to LR. More patients need to be analyzed to further evaluate and confirm the predictive accuracy of IL-6 for LF.

Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion (HOPE) Prior to Liver Transplantation Mitigates Post-Reperfusion Syndrome and Perioperative Electrolyte Shifts.

(1) Background: Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) and electrolyte shifts (ES) represent considerable challenges during liver transplantation (LT) being associated with significant morbidity. We aimed to investigate the impact of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) on PRS and ES in LT. (2) Methods: In this retrospective study, we compared intraoperative parameters of 100 LTs, with 50 HOPE preconditioned liver grafts and 50 grafts stored in static cold storage (SCS). During reperfusion phase, prospectively registered serum parameters and vasopressor administration were analyzed. (3) Results: Twelve percent of patients developed PRS in the HOPE cohort vs. 42% in the SCS group (p = 0.0013). Total vasopressor demand in the first hour after reperfusion was lower after HOPE pretreatment, with reduced usage of norepinephrine (−26%; p = 0.122) and significant reduction of epinephrine consumption (−52%; p = 0.018). Serum potassium concentration dropped by a mean of 14.1% in transplantations after HOPE, compared to a slight decrease of 1% (p < 0.001) after SCS. The overall incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was reduced by 44% in the HOPE group (p = 0.04). (4) Conclusions: Pre-transplant graft preconditioning with HOPE results in higher hemodynamic stability during reperfusion and lower incidence of PRS and EAD. HOPE has the potential to mitigate ES by preventing hyperpotassemic complications that need to be addressed in LT with HOPE-pre-treated grafts.

Liver transplantation versus watchful waiting in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with complete response to bridging therapy - a retrospective observational study.

Bridging therapy to prevent progression on the waiting list can result in a sustained complete response (sCR). In some patients, the liver transplantation (LT) risk might exceed those of tumor recurrence. We thus evaluated whether a watchful waiting (CR-WW) strategy could be a feasible alternative to transplantation (CR-LT). We performed a retrospective analysis of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with a sCR (CR > 6 months). Permitted bridging included thermoablation, resection, and combinations of either with transarterial chemoembolization. Patients were divided into the intended treatment strategies CR-WW and CR-LT. 39 (18.40%) sCR patients from 212 were investigated. 22 patients were treated with a CR-LT and 17 patients a CR-WW strategy. Five-year RFS was lower in the CR-WW than in the CR-LT group [53.3% (22.1%; 77.0%) and 84.0% (57.6%; 94.7%)]. 29.4% (5/17) CR-WW patients received salvage transplantation because of recurrence. OS (5-year) was 83.9% [56.8%; 94.7%] after LT and 75.4% [39.8%; 91.7%] after WW. Our analysis shows that the intuitive decision made by our patients in agreement with their treating physicians for a watchful waiting strategy in sCR can be justified. Applied on a larger scale, this strategy could help to reduce the pressure on the donor pool.