Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 59
Filtrar
1.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(2)2024 Jan 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400115

RESUMEN

A global outbreak of predominantly sexually transmitted mpox infections, outside endemic regions, was reported in May 2022. Thereafter, risk groups were vaccinated against smallpox, a structurally related orthopoxvirus. In the current study, we analyzed T cell responses against peptides derived from orthopoxviruses in 33 HIV-positive patients after two vaccinations against smallpox and in 10 patients after mpox infection. We established an ELISpot assay, detecting either the secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon (IFN)-γ or interleukin (IL)-2. After vaccination, 21 out of 33 patients (64%) showed specific IFN-γ secretion and 18 (55%) specific IL-2 secretion, defined as >3-fold higher specific value than negative control and at least 4 spots above the negative control. After mpox infection, all patients showed specific IFN-γ secretion and 7 out of 10 (70%) IL-2 secretion. In vaccinated patients, IFN-γ responses were significantly lower than in patients with mpox infection (median response 4.5 vs. 21.0 spots, p < 0.001). The same trend was observed for IL-2 responses. After mpox infection, IL-2 ELISpot results positively correlated with CD8+ T cells (p < 0.05). Thus, T cell responses were detectable in two thirds of HIV-positive patients after vaccination and were even more abundant and vigorous after mpox infection.

2.
Haematologica ; 109(3): 799-808, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37767566

RESUMEN

Human cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is an extrahepatic key enzyme involved in estrogen metabolism, steroid synthesis, and pro-carcinogen activation. In a single-center retrospective study, 382 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation and their donors were genotyped for CYP1B1 C432G polymorphism by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. One hundred and sixty-nine patients (44%) were homozygous wild-type (wt) gene CC, 157 (41%) heterozygous CG and 56 (15%) homozygous gene mutated GG. Of interest, mutated CYP1B1 was more common in male (62%) than in female patients (48%) P=0.006, unlike in donors. Five-year estimate for overall survival (OS) was 58±4% (CC) versus 48±3% (CG and GG), P=0.048. Surprisingly, this difference was only evident in males (P=0.024): OS 58±6% versus 42±4%, whereas it was virtually absent in females. Importantly, this difference was only evident in male patients with advanced disease (AD) (n=118, P=0.002): OS 44±8% (CC) versus 32±6% (CG) versus 6±6% (GG), whereas it was virtually absent in male patients with early disease. One-year non-relapse mortality in male patients with AD was 8±4% (CC) versus 21±5% (CG) versus 50±12% (GG), P=0.002. Three-year relapse rate in male patients with AD was 31±7% (wt) versus 42±6% (mut), P=0.04. Multivariate analysis for OS in male patients with AD revealed CYP1B1 polymorphism as the only prognostic factor: RR 1.78, P=0.001. In conclusion, these results suggest that male patients with AD and mutant CYP1B1 polymorphism have lower OS after allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation due to a higher non-relapse mortality and a higher relapse rate.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Genotipo , Heterocigoto , Recurrencia , Citocromo P-450 CYP1B1/genética
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(8): 1813-1826, 2023 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37311136

RESUMEN

Patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are at high risk of developing invasive fungal disease (IFD) with high morbidity and attributable mortality. We reviewed data published until September 2021 to update the 2017 antifungal prophylaxis recommendations of the German Society of Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). The strong recommendation to administer antifungal prophylaxis in patients with HM with long-lasting neutropenia, i.e. <500 cells/µL for >7 days remains unchanged. Posaconazole remains the drug of choice for mould-active prophylaxis in these patients. Novel treatment options in HM, such as CAR-T-cell treatment or novel targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were considered, however, data are insufficient to give general recommendations for routine antifungal prophylaxis in these patients. Major changes regarding specific recommendations compared to the 2017 edition are the now moderate instead of mild support for the recommendations of isavuconazole and voriconazole. Furthermore, published evidence on micafungin allows recommending it at moderate strength for its use in HM. For the first time we included recommendations for non-pharmaceutical measures regarding IFD, comprising the use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, smoking, measures during construction work and neutropenic diets. We reviewed the impact of antifungal prophylaxis with triazoles on drug-drug interactions with novel targeted therapies that are metabolized via cytochrome p450 where triazoles inhibit CYP3A4/5. The working group recommends reducing the dose of venetoclax when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inhibiting antifungals. Furthermore, we reviewed data on the prophylactic use of novel antifungal agents. Currently there is no evidence to support their use in a prophylactic setting in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Hematología , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/prevención & control , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/microbiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Oncología Médica , Triazoles/uso terapéutico
4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(4)2023 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37112757

RESUMEN

The BK virus (BKV) causes severe hemorrhagic cystitis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. To eliminate reactivated BKV, symptomatic patients can be treated with a reduction of the immunosuppressive therapy, with the antiviral drug cidofovir, or with virus-specific T cells (VSTs). In the current study, we compared the effect of VSTs to other treatment options, following up specific T cells using interferon-gamma ELISpot assay. We observed BKV large T-specific cellular responses in 12 out of 17 HSCT recipients with BKV-related cystitis (71%). In recipients treated with VSTs, 6 out of 7 showed specific T-cell responses, and that number in those without VSTs was 6 out of 10. In comparison, 27 out of 50 healthy controls (54%) responded. In HSCT recipients treated for BKV-related cystitis, absolute CD4+ T-cell numbers and renal function correlated with BKV-specific cellular responses (p = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). In one patient, BKV-specific cellular immunity could already be detected at baseline, on day 35 after HSCT and prior to VSTs, and remained increased until day 226 after VSTs (78 vs. 7 spots increment). In conclusion, the ELISpot appears to be suitable to sensitively monitor BKV-specific cellular immunity in HSCT recipients, even early after transplantation or in the long term after VSTs.

5.
Eur J Cancer ; 181: 102-118, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36652889

RESUMEN

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and the associated infectious disease COVID-19 pose a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Patients with cancer have been identified as a high-risk population for severe infections, rendering prophylaxis and treatment strategies for these patients particularly important. Rapidly evolving clinical research, resulting in the recent advent of various vaccines and therapeutic agents against COVID-19, offers new options to improve care and protection of cancer patients. However, ongoing epidemiological changes and rise of new virus variants require repeated revisions and adaptations of prophylaxis and treatment strategies to meet these new challenges. Therefore, this guideline provides an update on evidence-based recommendations with regard to vaccination, pharmacological prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 in cancer patients in light of the currently dominant omicron variants. It was developed by an expert panel of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) based on a critical review of the most recent available data.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Neoplasias , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/complicaciones , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunación
6.
Front Immunol ; 13: 980698, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36311723

RESUMEN

Immunocompromised patients are at increased risk for a severe course of COVID-19. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has become widely accepted. However, the effects of mAb treatment on the long-term primary cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 are unknown. In the following study, we investigated the long-term cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1, Membrane (M) and Nucleocapsid (N) antigens using the ELISpot assay in unvaccinated, mAb-treated immunocompromised high-risk patients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAb untreated though vaccinated COVID-19 immunocompromised patients, vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 immunocompromised patients without COVID-19 and vaccinated healthy control subjects served as control groups. The cellular immune response was determined at a median of 5 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data suggest that immunocompromised patients develop an endogenous long-term cellular immune response after COVID-19, although at low levels. A better understanding of the cellular immune response will help guide clinical decision making for these vulnerable patient cohorts.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunidad Celular
7.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(6)2022 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35746580

RESUMEN

Protecting vulnerable groups from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is mandatory. Immune responses after a third vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are insufficiently studied in patients after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We analyzed immune responses before and after a third vaccination in HSCT patients and healthy controls. Cellular immunity was assessed using interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) ELISpots. Furthermore, this is the first report on neutralizing antibodies against 11 variants of SARS-CoV-2, analyzed by competitive fluorescence assay. Humoral immunity was also measured by neutralization tests assessing cytopathic effects and by ELISA. Neither HSCT patients nor healthy controls displayed significantly higher SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ or IL-2 responses after the third vaccination. However, after the third vaccination, cellular responses were 2.6-fold higher for IFN-γ and 3.2-fold higher for IL-2 in healthy subjects compared with HSCT patients. After the third vaccination, neutralizing antibodies were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in healthy controls, but not in HSCT patients. Healthy controls vs. HSCT patients had 1.5-fold higher concentrations of neutralizing antibodies against variants and 1.2-fold higher antibody concentrations against wildtype. However, half of the HSCT patients exhibited neutralizing antibodies to variants of SARS-CoV-2, which increased only slightly after a third vaccination.

8.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(5)2022 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35632565

RESUMEN

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients have a high risk of developing primary varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection and reactivation. VZV vaccination may prevent infection and reactivation. In the current study, recipients of allogeneic HSCT (34 females, 45 males) were vaccinated with adjuvanted, recombinant zoster vaccine Shingrix™, which contains the VZV glycoprotein E. Cellular immunity against various VZV antigens was analyzed by interferon-gamma ELISpot. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of recipients with versus without prior shingles (n = 36 and n = 43, respectively) showed approximately twofold higher VZV-specific responses prior to and post vaccination. After the first and second vaccination, ELISpot responses towards the glycoprotein E were significantly higher in males versus females (median of spots increment 18 versus 1 and 17 versus 4, respectively, p ≤ 0.02 each). Multivariate analysis showed that shingles and sex both impacts significantly on VZV immunity. Whereas vaccination-induced changes could hardly be detected after stimulation with a whole VZV antigen, there was a significant increase in responses towards glycoprotein E after vaccination (p < 0.005). These data indicate that vaccination with Shingrix™ augmented cellular, VZV-specific immunity in HSCT recipients. Shingles and male sex could both be identified as factors leading to increased immunity.

9.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(10)2021 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34696183

RESUMEN

The cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients is not yet clear. In the current study, HSCT recipients prior to and post vaccination were tested for SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity. Antibodies against spike (S) 1 were assessed by Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA (Euroimmun). Cellular immunity was analyzed by an in house interferon-gamma ELISpot and T-SPOT.COVID (Oxford Immunotec), using altogether seven SARS-CoV-2-specific antigens. In 117 HSCT patients vaccinated twice, SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were significantly higher than in HSCT controls pre vaccination (p < 0.0001). After the second vaccination, we observed a median antibody ratio of 4.7 and 68% positive results, whereas 35 healthy controls reached a median ratio of 9.0 and 100% positivity. ELISpot responses in patients were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced to ≤33% of the controls. After the second vaccination, female HSCT patients and female healthy controls showed significantly higher antibody responses than males (6.0 vs. 2.1 and 9.2 vs. 8.2, respectively; p < 0.05). Cellular immunity was diminished in patients irrespective of sex. In conclusion, especially male HSCT recipients showed impaired antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Changing the vaccine schedule or composition could help increase vaccine responses.

10.
J Pers Med ; 11(9)2021 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34575647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This monocentric study conducted at the University Hospital of Essen aims to describe maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes in sickle cell disease (SCD) documented between 1996 to 2021 (N = 53), reflecting the largest monocentric analysis carried out in Germany. METHODS/RESULTS: 46 pregnancies in 22 patients were followed. None of the patients died. In total, 35% (11/31) of pregnancies were preterm. 15 pregnancies in eight patients were conceived on hydroxycarbamide (HC), of which nine had a successful outcome and three were terminated prematurely. There was no difference regarding the rate of spontaneous abortions in patients receiving HC compared to HC-naive patients prior to conception. In patients other than HbS/C disease, pregnancies were complicated by vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs)/acute pain crises (APCs) (96%, 23/24); acute chest syndrome (ACS) (13%, 3/24), transfusion demand (79%, 19/24), urinary tract infections (UTIs) (42%, 10/24) and thromboembolic events (8%, 2/24). In HbS/C patients complications included: VOCs/APCs (43%, 3/7; ACS: 14%, 1/7), transfusion demand (14%, 1/7), and UTIs (14%, 1/7). Independent of preterm deliveries, a significant difference with respect to neonatal growth in favor of neonates from HbS/C mothers was observed. CONCLUSION: Our data support the results of previous studies, highlighting the high rate of maternal and fetal/neonatal complications in pregnant SCD patients.

12.
Blood Adv ; 5(6): 1760-1769, 2021 03 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755092

RESUMEN

The inclusion of mutation status improved risk stratification for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative treatment option, and patient selection is critical because of relevant transplant-related morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of mutation status together with clinical presentations on posttransplant outcome. Our study included 240 patients with a median follow-up of 5.5 years. A significant association with worse survival was identified for the presence of mutations in ASXL1 and/or NRAS. In multivariable analysis, ASXL1- and/or NRAS-mutated genotype (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63), marrow blasts >2% (HR, 1.70), and increasing comorbidity index (continuous HR, 1.16) were independently associated with worse survival. A prognostic score (CMML transplant score) was developed, and the following points were assigned: 4 points for an ASXL1- and/or NRAS-mutated genotype or blasts >2% and 1 point each for an increase of 1 in the comorbidity index. The CMML transplant score (range, 0-20) was predictive of survival and nonrelapse mortality (P < .001 for both). Up to 5 risk groups were identified, showing 5-year survival of 81% for a score of 0 to 1, 49% for a score of 2 to 4, 43% for a score of 5 to 7, 31% for a score of 8 to 10, and 19% for a score >10. The score retained performance after validation (concordance index, 0.68) and good accuracy after calibration. Predictions were superior compared with existing scores designed for the nontransplant setting, which resulted in significant risk reclassification. This CMML transplant score, which incorporated mutation and clinical information, was prognostic in patients specifically undergoing transplantation and may facilitate personalized counseling.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/terapia , Mutación , Pronóstico , Trasplante de Células Madre
13.
Transfusion ; 61(5): 1394-1403, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33784412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may be life-threatening, and specific antiviral drugs are currently not available. However, first studies indicated that convalescent plasma treatment might improve the clinical outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In the current study, we investigated the efficacy of convalescent plasma treatment in eight COVID-19 patients. All the patients were critically ill, and seven of them were SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive when starting treatment. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detecting immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the S1 protein (Euroimmun), and the neutralizing titers were determined with a cell-culture-based neutralization assay. Plasma treatment started between 4 and 23 days after the onset of symptoms. The patients were usually treated by three plasma units, each containing 200-280 ml, which was applied at day 1, 3, and 5. RESULTS: Donor sera had on average lower IgG antibody ratios and neutralizing titers than the COVID-19 patients before the onset of treatment (median ratio of 5.8 and neutralizing titer of 1:320 vs. 7.5 and 1:640, respectively). Nevertheless, we observed an increase of antibody ratios in seven and of neutralizing titers in five patients after treatment; which did, however, not correlate with patient survival. Plasma treatment was effective in three patients, but five deceased despite treatment. Patients who deceased had a later treatment onset than survivors and finally died from multiple organ failure. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the efficacy of convalescent plasma treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients who already had developed strong antiviral immune responses and organ complications is limited.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Donantes de Sangre , COVID-19/terapia , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , COVID-19/sangre , Chlorocebus aethiops , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células Vero , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
14.
J Fungi (Basel) ; 7(2)2021 Feb 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33670173

RESUMEN

This is the first study comparing three commercially available PCR assays for the detection of Aspergillus DNA from respiratory specimen of immunocompromised patients and the presence of cyp51A gene mutations. Bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs, N = 103) from patients with haematological/oncological underlying diseases were retrospectively investigated. The performance of three PCR assays, namely MycoGENIE®Aspergillus fumigatus Real-Time PCR Kit (Adamtech), Fungiplex®Aspergillus Azole-R IVD Real-Time PCR Kit (Bruker Daltonik GmbH) and AsperGenius® (PathoNostics B.V.), were evaluated. All patients were categorised following current EORTC/MSG criteria, with exclusion of the PCR-results. From the 11 invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) probable samples, eight were detected with MycoGENIE®, resulting in a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 73%. Furthermore, Fungiplex® resulted in six positive BALs with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 91% and AsperGenius® in seven positive BAL samples, with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 97%. No proven IPA was detected. One isolate showed phenotypically an azole-resistance, which was also detected in each of the tested PCR assays with the mutation in TR34. The here tested PCR assays were capable of reliably detecting A. fumigatus DNA, as well as differentiation of the common cyp51A gene mutations. However, evaluation on the AsperGenius® assay revealed a low risk of false positive results.

15.
Eur J Cancer ; 147: 154-160, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33676266

RESUMEN

The worldwide spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated infectious coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed a unique challenge to medical staff, patients and their families. Patients with cancer, particularly those with haematologic malignancies, have been identified to be at high risk to develop severe COVID-19. Since publication of our previous guideline on evidence-based management of COVID-19 in patients with cancer, research efforts have continued and new relevant data has come to light, maybe most importantly in the field of vaccination studies. Therefore, an update of our guideline on several clinically important topics is warranted. Here, we provide a concise update of evidence-based recommendations for rapid diagnostics, viral shedding, vaccination and therapy of COVID-19 in patients with cancer. This guideline update was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology by critically reviewing the currently available data on these topics applying evidence-based medicine criteria.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/normas , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Neoplasias , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Esparcimiento de Virus/fisiología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virología , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/virología , Hematología/organización & administración , Hematología/normas , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos , Inmunización Pasiva/normas , Infectología/organización & administración , Infectología/normas , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/normas , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/virología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/normas , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
16.
Am J Hematol ; 96(4): 436-445, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439488

RESUMEN

Even in the era of PCR-based monitoring, prophylaxis, and preemptive therapy, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia remains a relevant cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, studies using binary analysis (presence/absence of CMV) reported contradicting data for NRM, overall survival and leukemia relapse. Here, we analyzed CMV replication kinetics in 11 508 whole blood PCR samples of 705 patients with HCT between 2012 and 2017. Using two independent models based on CMV peak titers and on the time point of first CMV reactivation, we stratified patients into risk cohorts. Each cohort had distinct cellular immune reconstitution profiles and differentiated for relevant clinical outcomes. Patients with high CMV peak titers had significantly reduced overall survival (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.53-2.96; p < .0001), due to high NRM. Early impaired T cell reconstitution was a risk factor for high CMV peak titers, however relevant CMV viremia also related to boosted T cell reconstitution. Importantly, intermediate CMV peak titers associated with a significantly reduced relapse probability (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.91; p = .022). In short, CMV kinetics models distinguished relevant clinical outcome cohorts beyond the R+ serostatus with distinct immune reconstitution patterns and resolve in part contradicting results of previous studies exclusively focused on the presence or absence of CMV.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , Citomegalovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Carga Viral , Viremia/virología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Reconstitución Inmune , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Cinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Viremia/inmunología , Activación Viral , Adulto Joven
17.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 27(1): 95.e1-95.e4, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33039516

RESUMEN

The critical question in the management of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is which patients may benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Using ad hoc statistical analysis, we designed a multicenter retrospective study to determine outcomes in 261 patients age ≤70 years at diagnosis who underwent allo-HCT (n = 119) compared with those who did not (n = 142) according to the current CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS). Categorizing patients as lower risk (CPSS low/intermediate-1) or higher risk (intermediate-2/high) showed significantly improved outcomes after transplantation in higher-risk patients, with a 37% reduced hazard for death. However, although higher CPSS was associated with worse outcomes in the nontransplantation group, the score was of limited utility for post-transplantation risk stratification. This study may provide further support for the potentially beneficial role of allo-HCT in terms of long-term survival in higher-risk patients but also underscores the need for transplantation-specific risk assessment. Recognizing limitations of retrospective comparisons, larger and prospective comparisons are needed to further refine the indication for allo-HCT and thus counseling of patients with CMML.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Anciano , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo
18.
Ann Hematol ; 100(1): 239-259, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997191

RESUMEN

Cancer patients frequently require central venous catheters for therapy and parenteral nutrition and are at high risk of central venous catheter-related infections (CRIs). Moreover, CRIs prolong hospitalization, cause an excess in resource utilization and treatment cost, often delay anti-cancer treatment, and are associated with a significant increase in mortality in cancer patients. We therefore summoned a panel of experts by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) and updated our previous guideline on CRIs in cancer patients. After conducting systematic literature searches on PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, video- and meeting-based consensus discussions were held. In the presented guideline, we summarize recommendations on definition, diagnosis, management, and prevention of CRIs in cancer patients including the grading of strength of recommendations and the respective levels of evidence. This guideline supports clinicians and researchers alike in the evidence-based decision-making in the management of CRIs in cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Hematología/normas , Oncología Médica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/normas , Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Alemania/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos
19.
Ann Hematol ; 100(4): 959-968, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33191481

RESUMEN

Treatment of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) remains a great challenge. Aiming to evaluate the combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents (HMAClax) for the treatment of relapse of myeloid malignancies after alloHSCT, we retrospectively collected data from 32 patients treated at 11 German centers. Venetoclax was applied with azacitidine (n = 13) or decitabine (n = 19); 11 patients received DLI in addition. HMAClax was the first salvage therapy in 8 patients. The median number of cycles per patient was 2 (1-19). All but 1 patient had grade 3/4 neutropenia. Hospital admission for grade 3/4 infections was necessary in 23 patients (72%); 5 of these were fatal. In 30 evaluable patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 47% (14/30, 3 CR MRDneg, 5 CR, 2 CRi, 1 MLFS, 3 PR). ORR was 86% in first salvage patients versus 35% in later salvage patients (p = 0.03). In 6 patients with molecular relapse (MR), ORR was 67% versus 42% in patients with hematological relapse (HR) (n = 24, p = n.s.). After a median follow-up of 8.4 months, 25 patients (78%) had died and 7 were alive. Estimated median overall survival was 3.7 months. Median survival of patients with HMAClax for first versus later salvage therapy was 5.7 and 3.4 months (p = n.s.) and for patients with MR (not reached) compared to HR (3.4 months, p = 0.024). This retrospective case series shows that venetoclax is utilized in various different combinations, schedules, and doses. Toxicity is substantial and patients who receive venetoclax/HMA combinations for MR or as first salvage therapy derive the greatest benefit.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa , Aloinjertos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Azacitidina/administración & dosificación , Azacitidina/efectos adversos , Azacitidina/farmacología , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Metilación de ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Decitabina/administración & dosificación , Decitabina/efectos adversos , Decitabina/farmacología , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Neutropenia Febril/sangre , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Recuento de Leucocitos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Trombocitopenia/sangre , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Síndrome de Lisis Tumoral/etiología
20.
Eur J Cancer ; 140: 86-104, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068941

RESUMEN

Since its first detection in China in late 2019 the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated infectious disease COVID-19 continue to have a major impact on global healthcare and clinical practice. Cancer patients, in particular those with haematological malignancies, seem to be at an increased risk for a severe course of infection. Deliberations to avoid or defer potentially immunosuppressive therapies in these patients need to be balanced against the overarching goal of providing optimal antineoplastic treatment. This poses a unique challenge to treating physicians. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding prevention, diagnostics and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 as well as strategies towards safe antineoplastic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) by critically reviewing the currently available data on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in cancer patients applying evidence-based medicine criteria.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Atención a la Salud/normas , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/virología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , Pronóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...