Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Nutr Food Res ; 56(1): 30-52, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21823220

RESUMEN

Alkaloid-containing plants are an intrinsic part of the regular Western diet. The present paper summarizes the occurrence of alkaloids in the food chain, their mode of action and possible adverse effects including a safety assessment. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are a reason for concern because of their bioactivation to reactive alkylating intermediates. Several quinolizidine alkaloids, ß-carboline alkaloids, ergot alkaloids and steroid alkaloids are active without bioactivation and mostly act as neurotoxins. Regulatory agencies are aware of the risks and have taken or are considering appropriate regulatory actions for most alkaloids. These vary from setting limits for the presence of a compound in feed, foods and beverages, trying to define safe upper limits, advising on a strategy aiming at restrictions in use, informing the public to be cautious or taking specific plant varieties from the market. For some alkaloids known to be present in the modern food chain, e.g., piperine, nicotine, theobromine, theophylline and tropane alkaloids risks coming from the human food chain are considered to be low if not negligible. Remarkably, for many alkaloids that are known constituents of the modern food chain and of possible concern, tolerable daily intake values have so far not been defined.


Asunto(s)
Alcaloides/efectos adversos , Dieta , Cadena Alimentaria , Alcaloides de Pirrolicidina/efectos adversos , Carbolinas/efectos adversos , Alcaloides de Claviceps/efectos adversos , Alimentos , Humanos , Neurotoxinas/efectos adversos , Ornitina/química , Piperidinas/química , Alcaloides de Pirrolicidina/química , Quinolizidinas/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Tropanos/efectos adversos
2.
J Chromatogr A ; 1210(2): 121-34, 2008 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18849036

RESUMEN

Screening for antioxidants requires simple in vitro model systems to investigate antioxidant activity. High resolution screening (HRS), combining a separation technique like HPLC with fast post-column (bio)chemical detection can rapidly pinpoint active compounds in complex mixtures. In this paper both electrochemical and chemistry-based assays are reviewed and discussed. The focus is on the mechanisms involved and differences between the assays, rather than on the matrix or analytes. With 45 applications high resolution antioxidant screening has now become an almost routine tool for the rapid identification of antioxidants in plant extracts, foods and beverages. The methods based on true reactive oxygen species (ROS) provide the most realistic measure of antioxidant activity. Unfortunately these methods are difficult to set up and control and have not been applied since they were reported. The methods based on electrochemical detection are more practical, but have still received only limited attention for practical screening purposes. The methods based on a single relatively stable reagent such as DPPH and ABTS(+) have become most popular, because of their simple set-up and ease of control. The methods have been combined with on-line DAD, MS and NMR detection for rapid identification of active constituents.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/análisis , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Electroquímica/métodos , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/análisis
3.
Phytochem Anal ; 13(1): 8-17, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11899609

RESUMEN

Three methods widely employed in the evaluation of antioxidant activity, namely 2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method, static headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) and beta-carotene bleaching test (BCBT), have been compared with regard to their application in the screening of plant extracts. The strengths and limitations of each method have been illustrated by testing a number of extracts, of differing polarity, from plants of the genus Sideritis, and two known antioxidants (butylated hydroxytoluene and rosmarinic acid). The sample polarity was important for the exhibited activity in the BCBT and HS-GC methods but not for the DPPH method. The complex composition of the extracts and partition phenomena affected their activity in each assay. The value of the BCBT method appears to be limited to less polar samples. Although slow, the HS-GC method is preferable for assessing the antioxidant inhibitory properties on the formation of unwanted secondary volatile products. Being rapid, simple and independent of sample polarity, the DPPH method is very convenient for the quick screening of many samples for radical scavenging activity.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/aislamiento & purificación , Cromatografía de Gases/métodos , Radicales Libres/metabolismo , Lamiaceae/química , Extractos Vegetales/química , beta Caroteno/metabolismo , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Depuradores de Radicales Libres/metabolismo , Picratos , Plantas Medicinales/química , Estándares de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...