RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Active inflammatory bowel disease (A-IBD) but not remission (R-IBD) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. OBJECTIVES: Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), this study aims to assess adverse myocardial remodeling in patients with IBD in correlation with disease activity. METHODS: Forty-four IBD patients without cardiovascular disease (24 female, median-age: 39.5 years, 26 A-IBD, 18 R-IBD) and 44 matched healthy volunteers (HV) were prospectively enrolled. The disease stage was determined by endoscopic and patient-reported criteria. Participants underwent CMR for cardiac phenotyping: cine imaging and strain analysis were performed to assess ventricular function. T1 mapping, extracellular volume and late-gadolinium enhanced images were obtained to assess focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Simultaneous T1 and T2 elevation (T1 > 1049.3 ms, T2 > 54 ms) was considered to indicate a myocardial segment was inflamed. RESULTS: 16/44 (16.4%) IBD patients described dyspnea on exertion and 10/44 (22.7%) reported chest pain. A-IBD patients showed impaired ventricular function, indicated by reduced global circumferential and radial strain despite preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction. 16% of all IBD patients had focal fibrosis in a non-ischemic pattern. A-IDB patients had increased markers of diffuse left ventricular fibrosis (T1-values: A-IBD: 1022.0 ± 34.83 ms, R-IBD: 1010.10 ± 32.88 ms, HV: 990.61 ± 29.35 ms, p < .01). Significantly more participants with A-IDB (8/26, 30.8%) had at least one inflamed myocardial segment than patients in remission (0/18) and HV (1/44, 2.3%, p < .01). Markers of diffuse fibrosis correlated with disease activity. CONCLUSION: This study, using CMR, provides evidence of myocardial involvement and patterns of adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with IBD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN30941346.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the only established serum biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). To facilitate therapy decisions and improve the overall survival of CRC patients, prognostic biomarkers are required. OBJECTIVE: We studied the prognostic value of five different cell free circulating DNA (fcDNA) fragments. The potential markers were ALU115, ALU247, LINE1-79, LINE1-300 and ND1-mt. METHODS: The copy numbers of the DNA fragments were measured in the peripheral blood serum of 268 CRC patients using qPCR, the results were compared to common and previously described markers. RESULTS: We found that ALU115 and ALU247 fcDNA levels correlate significantly with several clinicopathological parameters. An increased amount of ALU115 and ALU247 fcDNA fragments coincides with methylation of HPP1 (P< 0.001; P< 0.01), which proved to be a prognostic marker itself in former studies and also with increased CEA level (both P< 0.001). ALU115 and ALU247 can define patients with poor survival in UICC stage IV (ALU115: HR = 2.9; 95% Cl 1.8-4.8, P< 0.001; ALU247: HR = 2.2; 95% Cl 1.3-3.6; P= 0.001). Combining ALU115 and HPP1, the prognostic value in UICC stage IV is highly significant (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that an increased level of ALU fcDNA is an independent prognostic biomarker for advanced colorectal cancer disease.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Suero , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Using data collected in the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy, the present study aimed at identifying predictors of adverse events (AEs) following transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres for liver tumours. METHODS: We analysed 1027 patients enrolled between January 2015 and December 2017 and followed up for 24 months. Four hundred and twenty-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 120 with intrahepatic carcinoma (ICC), 237 with colorectal liver metastases and 248 with liver metastases from other primaries were included. Prognostic factors were calculated with a univariable analysis by using the overall AEs burden score (AEBS). RESULTS: All-cause AEs were reported in 401/1027 (39.1%) patients, with AEs associated with TARE, such as abdominal pain (16.6%), fatigue (17%), and nausea (11.7%) reported most frequently. Grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 92/1027 (9%) patients. Reports on grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal ulcerations (0.4%), gastritis (0.3%), radiation cholecystitis (0.2%) or radioembolization-induced liver disease (0.5%) were uncommon. Univariable analysis showed that in HCC, AEBS increased for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 (p = 0.0045), 1 tumour nodule (0.0081), > 1 TARE treatment (p = 0.0224), no prophylactic embolization (p = 0.0211), partition model dosimetry (p = 0.0007) and unilobar treatment target (0.0032). For ICC, > 1 TARE treatment was associated with an increase in AEBS (p = 0.0224), and for colorectal liver metastases, ECOG 0 (p = 0.0188), > 2 prior systemic treatments (p = 0.0127), and 1 tumour nodule (p = 0.0155) were associated with an increased AEBS. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that TARE is a safe treatment with low toxicity and a minimal impact on quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Microesferas , Calidad de Vida , Radioisótopos de Itrio/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapiaRESUMEN
Background & Aims: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres is an established treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, optimising treatment application and patient selection remains challenging. We report here on the effectiveness, safety and prognostic factors, including dosing methods, associated with TARE for HCC in the prospective observational CIRT study. Methods: We analysed 422 patients with HCC enrolled between Jan 2015 and Dec 2017, with follow-up visits every 3 months for up to 24 months after first TARE. Patient characteristics and treatment-related data were collected at baseline; adverse events and time-to-event data (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and hepatic PFS) were collected at every 3-month follow-up visit. We used the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model and propensity score matching to identify independent prognostic factors for effectiveness outcomes. Results: The median OS was 16.5 months, the median PFS was 6.1 months, and the median hepatic PFS was 6.7 months. Partition model dosimetry resulted in improved OS compared to body surface area calculations on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.46-0.92; p = 0.0144), which was confirmed in the exact matching propensity score analysis (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.35-0.89; p = 0.0136). Other independent prognostic factors for OS were ECOG-performance status >0 (p = 0.0018), presence of ascites (p = 0.0152), right-sided tumours (p = 0.0002), the presence of portal vein thrombosis (p = 0.0378) and main portal vein thrombosis (p = 0.0028), ALBI grade 2 (p = 0.0043) and 3 (p = 0.0014). Adverse events were recorded in 36.7% of patients, with 9.7% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events. Conclusions: This large prospective observational dataset shows that TARE is an effective and safe treatment in patients with HCC. Using partition model dosimetry was associated with a significant improvement in survival outcomes. Impact and implications: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a form of localised radiation therapy and is a potential treatment option for primary liver cancer. We observed how TARE was used in real-life clinical practice in various European countries and if any factors predict how well the treatment performs. We found that when a more complex but personalised method to calculate the applied radiation activity was used, the patient responded better than when a more generic method was used. Furthermore, we identified that general patient health, ascites and liver function can predict outcomes after TARE. Clinical trial number: NCT02305459.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, increasing options for systemic HCC treatment have become available. The development of therapy-specific prognostic scores has been encouraged. Tailoring therapy to individual patients requires prognostic scores for treatment success in addition to the Barcelona-Clinic-Liver-Cancer (BCLC) classification. We have developed and validated a prognostic score for patients treated with sorafenib. METHODS: Prognostic factors identified in a multivariate analysis of 108 sorafenib patients were used to construct the Munich Sorafenib Evaluation (M-SE) score. M-SE and 9 established HCC prognostic systems were ranked according to concordance-index and AIC. External M-SE validation was performed in an independent HCC sorafenib cohort (n = 101) derived from the prospective multicenter randomized controlled SORAMIC trial. RESULTS: Ascites (p < 0.0001; HR 2.923), tumor burden ≥50% of the liver (p = 0.0033; HR 1.946), and GOT (p < 0.0001; HR 1.716) were identified as independent prognostic parameters. All three M-SE stages were characterized by significantly different survival times (p < 0.0001). M-SE stage-A patients had a median OS of 18.7 months (95% CI: 15.6-21.8); patients in stage B and C showed a significantly shorter survival of 5.7 (2.7-8.7) and 2.0 months (1.6-2.4), respectively. M-SE (c-index 0.70; AIC 621) outperformed all other prognostic systems. External validation in a prospective cohort confirmed its superior prognostic performance. CONCLUSION: The M-SE score allows classification of sorafenib patients in three distinct prognostic stages. Provided that M-SE successfully passes prospective validation, it can help to predict the outcome of patients evaluated for sorafenib treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres is a treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the liver (mCRC). A better understanding of the prognostic factors and treatment application can improve survival outcomes. METHODS: We analysed the safety and effectiveness of 237 mCRC patients included in the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy (CIRT) for independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) using the Cox proportional-hazard model. RESULTS: The median OS was 9.8 months, median PFS was 3.4 months and median hPFS was 4.2 months. Independent prognostic factors for an improved overall survival were the absence of extra-hepatic disease (P= .0391), prior locoregional procedures (P= .0037), an Aspartate transaminase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) value of ≤0.40 (P< .0001) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤1 (P= .0078). Partition model dosimetry resulted in improved OS outcomes compared to the body surface area model (P = .0120). Independent predictors for PFS were APRI >0.40 (P = .0416) and prior ablation (P = .0323), and for hPFS these were 2 to 5 tumor nodules (P = .0148), Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 3 (P = .0075) and APRI >0.40 (P = .0207). During the study, 95 of 237 (40.1%) patients experienced 197 adverse events, with 28 of 237 (11.8%) patients having a grade 3 or higher adverse events. CONCLUSION: Including easy-to-acquire laboratory markers INR, APRI, ALBI and using partition model dosimetry can identify mCRC patients that may benefit from TARE.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Itrio , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , BilirrubinaRESUMEN
Tumors are composed of the tumor cells and the surrounding microenvironment. Both are closely interwoven and interact by a complex and multifaceted cross-talk which plays an integral part in tumor initiation, growth, and progression. Dro1/Ccdc80 has been shown to be a potent suppressor of colorectal cancer and ubiquitous inactivation of Dro1/Ccdc80 strongly promoted colorectal carcinogenesis in ApcMin/+ mice and in a chemically-induced colorectal cancer model. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether Dro1/Ccdc80's tumor suppressive function is tumor-cell-autonomous. Expression of Dro1/Ccdc80 in cancer cells had no effect on both colon tumor development in ApcMin/+ mice and formation of xenograft tumors. In contrast, DRO1/CCDC80 loss in the microenvironment strongly increased tumor growth in xenograft models, inhibited cancer cell apoptosis, and promoted intestinal epithelial cell migration. Moreover, stromal Dro1/Ccdc80 inactivation facilitated formation of intestinal epithelial organoids. Expression analyses showed Dro1/Ccdc80 to be significantly down-regulated in murine gastric cancer associated fibroblasts, in ApcMin/+ colon tumor primary stromal cells and in microdissected stroma from human colorectal cancer compared to normal, non-tumor stroma. Our results demonstrate epithelial derived DRO1/CCDC80 to be dispensable for intestinal tissue homeostasis and identify Dro1/Ccdc80 as tumor suppressor in the tumor microenvironment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Proteínas de la Matriz Extracelular , Animales , Apoptosis , Carcinogénesis/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Proteínas de la Matriz Extracelular/genética , Genes Supresores de Tumor , Humanos , Ratones , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a local treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its exact role next to other HCC therapies has yet to be defined. In order to identify patients most suitable for SIRT, a SIRT-specific prognostic score should be developed. METHODS: A cohort of 72 SIRT patients treated at the University Hospital of Munich was retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic performance of 12 HCC staging systems and prognostic scores was assessed. Cox-regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors, which formed the basis of the Munich-SIRT score (M-SIRT). All scores were ranked by calculating the c-Index and Akaike information criterion (AIC). External validation was performed in a cohort of 128 SIRT patients treated at the University Hospital of Pamplona, Spain. RESULTS: median overall survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval 9.9-21.9). AFP (p = 0.005; hazard ratio [HR] 2.38), albumin (p < 0.001; HR 5.87), and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.001; HR 8.38) were identified as independent prognostic factors. M-SIRT comprises 3 prognostic groups with a median survival of 38.9, 14.6, and 7.7 months, respectively (I vs. II: p = 0.003, II vs. III: p < 0.001). AIC (318) and concordance index (0.711) ranked M-SIRT superior to the established HCC staging systems, and the score successfully passed external validation in an independent SIRT cohort (I vs. II: p = 0.03; II vs. III: p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Therapy-specific prognostic scores can facilitate treatment decisions and prognostication for HCC patients. Considering its performance in 200 SIRT patients, M-SIRT is a promising prognostic tool for HCC patients evaluated for SIRT.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Systemic treatment with sorafenib has been the standard of care (SOC) in patients with advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for more than a decade. TACE has been reported to allow better local tumor control in selected patients with BCLC stage C HCC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with BCLC stage C HCC that were treated with sorafenib and TACE was conducted; they were compared to BCLC stage C patients treated either with TACE or sorafenib in the same period of time outside a clinical trial. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients with BCLC stage C were identified, who were treated with either sorafenib and TACE (group A; n = 54), sorafenib (group B; n = 82) or TACE (group C; n = 65). No significant difference in baseline characteristics was observed. Time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.3-9.7), 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.6-4.7) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.9-7.1) in groups A, B and C, respectively, and overall survival was 16.5 months (95% CI: 15.0-18.1), 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.0-10.8) and 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.5-13.6), respectively (group A vs. group B: p < 0.001; group A vs. group C: p = 0.0023). Adverse events of grade 3/4 occurred in 34% of patients in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Although sorafenib is a SOC in patients with BCLC stage C HCC, TACE is frequently used as an additional locoregional treatment in selected patients. This combined approach resulted in a significant overall survival benefit in selected patients, although randomized trials have not yet proven this benefit.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We assessed the usefulness of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) pre- or post-treatment initiation for outcome prediction and treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Droplet digital PCR was used to measure absolute mutant V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene ((mut)KRAS) ctDNA concentrations in 214 healthy controls (plasma and sera) and in 151 tissue-based mutKRAS positive patients with mCRC from the prospective multicenter phase 3 trial AIO KRK0207. Serial mutKRAS ctDNA was analyzed prior to and 2-3 weeks after first-line chemotherapy initiation with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with mCRC and correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS: mut KRAS ctDNA was detected in 74.8% (113/151) of patients at baseline and in 59.6% (90/151) at follow-up. mutKRAS ctDNA at baseline and follow-up was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] =1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.95; HR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.47-3.15) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.44-4.46; HR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.23-2.95), respectively. mutKRAS ctDNA clearance at follow-up conferred better disease control (P = 0.0075), better OS (log-rank P = 0.0018), and PFS (log-rank P = 0.0018). Measurable positive mutKRAS ctDNA at follow-up was the strongest and most significant independent prognostic factor on OS in multivariable analysis (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.40-3.25). CONCLUSIONS: Serial analysis of circulating mutKRAS concentrations in mCRC has prognostic value. Post treatment mutKRAS concentrations 2 weeks after treatment initiation were associated with therapeutic response in multivariable analysis and may be an early response predictor in patients receiving first-line combination chemotherapy. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00973609.
Asunto(s)
ADN Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Biomarcadores de Tumor , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Humanos , Mutación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical features of a presumed capsaicin intoxication have not been reported so far. Case Presentation. A 27-year-old man took part in a qualifying for a competition in spicy food tolerance. During this qualifying, he swallowed 4 chili peppers type Bhut jolokia (about 1 million Scoville units) and other extremely spicy foods; the total amount of capsaicin ingested (roughly calculated retrospectively) accounted for at least 600 mg. After 2½ hours, the patient developed severe abdominal pain, which led to hospital admission. In contrast to the severe symptoms, clinical, laboratory, and imaging examinations (ultrasound and plain X-ray of the abdomen) did not reveal any significant abnormalities. Treatment with analgesics resulted in complete regression of the abdominal pain within 30 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical picture in the view of pharmacological investigations on intestinal capsaicin infusions suggests that excessive doses of capsaicin can induce severe abdominal pain; the prolonged symptoms were probably due to the failure to vomit. Thus, a capsaicin intoxication must be considered in the differential diagnosis of an acute abdomen.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: People with a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (CRC) are recommended to start CRC screening at age 40. However, there is limited information on how many people in different age groups have a known family history of CRC and how many of them have had a colonoscopy. METHODS: We set up a multicenter, cross-sectional, population-based study in Germany to determine what proportions of persons in age groups from 40 to 54 years old have a known family history of CRC. We invited 160,000 persons to participate in an online survey from 2015 through 2016. We investigated what proportions of persons in each age group reported a family history of CRC and what proportions of persons underwent a colonoscopy examination using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 28,711 responders to the online questionnaire (8428 were age 40-44 years, 9879 were age 45-49 years, and 10,404 were age 50-54 years), 2705 stated that they had a first-degree relative with CRC (9.4%). The prevalence of a first-degree relative with CRC increased with age: 7.5%, 9.6%, and 10.9% for people 40 to 44 years old, 45 to 49 years old, and 50 to 54 years old, respectively. The prevalence of a first-degree relative who received a diagnosis of CRC at age 70 years or older increased steadily with each age group. Although a greater proportion of people with a family history of CRC had undergone a colonoscopy examination (54.5%) than people without a family history of CRC (25.7%; P < .0001), large proportions of people within this risk group were not in compliance with the guidelines (54.8%, 47.6%, and 38.6% for ages 40-44 y, 45-49 y, and 50-54 y, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: One in 10 persons in Germany age 40 to 54 years old has a first-degree relative with CRC. Guidelines recommend initiation of screening at ages 40 to 45 years for people with a family history, yet at this age many people do not have a family history of CRC yet, and almost half of persons 40 to 54 years old with a family history of CRC have not yet received a screening colonoscopy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We want to present information about response patterns obtained by Web-based survey in a large-scale epidemiological study. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Within the RAPS (Risk Adapted Prevention Strategies for colorectal cancer [CRC]) study, we invited 160,000 randomly selected persons aged 40-54 years in three large German cities from 2015 to 2016 to complete a Web-based questionnaire on CRC risk factors and screening (97 items, average time for completion 15 minutes). Invitation letters and up to two reminder letters were sent to each individual. RESULTS: A total of 21.4% of women and 18.0% of men completed the questionnaire. Overall cumulative response rates were 7.5%, 14.3%, and 19.6% after the initial invitation letter, and the first and second reminder, respectively, with prevalence of and associations of key epidemiological parameters (such as family history of cancer, previous colonoscopy, etc.) being remarkably stable across waves of responses. For example, the sex and age distribution of the sample did not change with additional answers gained from additional letters. CONCLUSION: Web-based questionnaires are feasible, cost-effective, and time effective in the setting of large-scale epidemiological studies. Although response patterns were remarkably stable over several rounds of reminders with substantially increasing cumulative response rates, future research should address possibilities to further enhance response rates.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Internet , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recently proposed Munich-transarterial chemoembolisation-score (M-TACE) was tailored to suit hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients evaluated for TACE. M-TACE outperformed the established HCC-staging-systems and successfully passed external validation. Modifications of staging-systems through the rearrangement of stages or by adding prognostic factors are methods of improving prognostic power. M-TACEs performance compared to scores modified this way should be tested. METHODS: Seven well-known HCC staging-systems (including Cancer of the Liver Italian Program-score [CLIP] and Barcelona Clinic liver cancer [BCLC]) and 2 TACE-specific scores (Selection for Transarterial Chemoembolisation Treatment [STATE] and Hepatoma Arterial embolisation Prognostic [HAP]) were rearranged in a cohort of 186 TACE-patients through score-point-analysis and subsequent linking of non-significant adjacent score-points. Additionally, a new score was constructed by combining the top established staging-system in TACE patients (CLIP-TACE) and the prognostic parameter with the highest hazard ratio for death in the TACE-cohort [C-reactive protein (CRP)]. Additionally, the TACE-tailored-scores were applied to an external TACE-cohort (n = 71). -Results: Rearrangement resulted in optimal stratification and monotonicity. CLIP-TACE demonstrated the best prognostic capability of all rearranged scores (c-index 0.668, AIC 1294) and the addition of CRP yielded further prognostic improvement (c-index 0.680, AIC 1289). However, superiority over M-TACE could not be achieved by any of the new scores in the internal and external cohort. CONCLUSION: M-TACE outperforms TACE-tailored modifications of all relevant HCC-staging-systems. Prospective validation of M-TACE to promote its role as the preferred staging-system for TACE-patients is therefore justified.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People aged 40-60 years with a family history (FH) of colorectal cancer (CRC) in 1st degree relatives (FDRs) have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of CRC compared to the average risk population. Therefore, experts recommend starting CRC screening earlier for this high-risk group. However, information on prevalence of relevant colonoscopic findings in this group is sparse, and no risk adapted screening offers are implemented in the German health care system. For example, screening colonoscopy is uniformly offered from age 55 on, regardless of family history. Thus, we initiated a multicenter epidemiological study - the RaPS study (Risk adapted prevention strategies for colorectal cancer) - with the following aims: to determine the prevalence of having a FH of CRC in FDR in the German population aged 40-54 years; to investigate the prevalence of colorectal neoplasms among people with a FDR; and to develop risk-adapted prevention strategies for this high-risk group based on the collected information. METHODS/DESIGN: A random sample of 160.000 persons from the general population aged 40-54 years from the catchment areas of three study centers in Germany (Dresden, Munich and Stuttgart) are contacted to assess FH of CRC by an online-questionnaire. Those with a FH of CRC in FDRs are invited to the study centers for individual consultation regarding CRC prevention. Participants are asked to donate blood and stool samples and medical records of colonoscopies will be obtained. Prevalence of CRC and its precursors will be evaluated. Furthermore, genetic, epigenetic and proteomic biomarkers in blood and microbiomic biomarkers in stool will be investigated. Risk markers and their eligibility for risk adapted screening offers will be examined. DISCUSSION: This study will provide data on the prevalence of colorectal neoplasms among persons with a FH of CRC in the age group 40-54 years, which will enable us to derive evidence based screening strategies for this high-risk group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered retrospectively in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 29th of December 2016: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00007842 .
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Familia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , RiesgoRESUMEN
Colorectal carcinogenesis is a progressive multistep process involving the sequential accumulation of genetic alterations in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Downregulated by oncogenes 1 (Dro1/Ccdc80) has been shown to be a potent tumor suppressor of colorectal carcinogenesis in the genetic ApcMin/+ mouse model. In ApcMin/+ mice, loss of DRO1 strongly increases colonic tumor multiplicity and leads to the regular formation of adenocarcinoma in the colon. To investigate DRO1's role in chemically induced as well as inflammation-associated colorectal carcinogenesis, the effect of Dro1 inactivation was studied in mice subjected to the carcinogen azoxymethane (AOM) and upon combined treatment with AOM and the proinflammatory agent dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), respectively. Loss of DRO1 increases multiplicity of preneoplastic aberrant crypt foci and colonic tumors upon administration of AOM. Combined treatment with AOM and DSS leads to increased colonic tumor number and promotes formation of adenocarcinoma in the colon. Moreover, Dro1 inactivation aggravates histological signs of acute and chronic DSS-induced colitis, strongly enlarges the size of ulcerative lesions in the intestinal lining, and exacerbates clinical signs and morbidity by DSS. Our results demonstrate DRO1 to be a strong tumor suppressor in the chemically induced colon carcinogenic mouse model. Additionally, we demonstrate DRO1 to inhibit colitis-associated colon cancer formation and uncover a novel putative role for DRO1 in inflammatory bowel disease.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Carcinogénesis/genética , Colitis/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Glicoproteínas/genética , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Animales , Azoximetano/toxicidad , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Sulfato de Dextran/toxicidad , Transición Epitelial-Mesenquimal/genética , Proteínas de la Matriz Extracelular , Genes Supresores de Tumor , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones NoqueadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and diagnostic and therapeutic outcome of the single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy (SOC) with SpyGlassDS™. METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter study between November 2015 and January 2017, SpyGlassDS™ procedures were analyzed in participating centers. Indications, accuracy of SOC-guided biopsies, management of large bile duct stones, and complications were analyzed. Follow-up was 4 months. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients out of 250 examinations were evaluated. Indications were biliary stones (n = 132), bile duct stenosis (n = 93), stones and stenosis combined (n = 24), and bile duct leakage (n = 1). Of the 117 cases which were suspicious of malignancy, in 99 cases the lesion could be stratified into benign (n = 55) or malignant (n = 44) indicating a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 94.5% for the indication tumor. SOC-guided biopsies revealed a sensitivity of 57.7% with a specificity of 100%. In 107 examinations, biliary stones were visualized and could be completely removed in 91.1% with a need of three procedures (range 1-6) to achieve final stone clearance. In 75 cases, lithotripsy was performed and was successful in 71 cases (95%). Four out of 45 patients (8.9%) underwent cholecystectomy with surgical bile duct revision as a final therapy. Adverse Event (AE) occurred in 33/250 patients (13.2%) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) occurred in 1/250 patients (0.4%). Cholangitis was 1% (n = 102) after peri-interventional administration of antibiotics and 12.8% (n = 148) without antibiotic prophylaxis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SOC with SpyGlassDS™ became a new standard for the diagnosis of indefinite biliary lesions and therapy of large bile duct stones. The diagnostic yield of SOC-guided biopsies facilitated a definite diagnosis in most cases and should be improved by standardized biopsy protocols. SOC-guided interventions allowed removal of large biliary stones by SOC-guided lithotripsy. The complication rate of 13.2% can be considerably reduced by use of a single-shot antibiotic treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Colestasis , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Cálculos Biliares , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colecistectomía , Colestasis/diagnóstico , Colestasis/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Humanos , Litotricia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a soluble receptor of the pro-apoptotic cytokine TRAIL which is thought to contribute to tumour development by inhibiting apoptosis or affecting other aspects of tumour biology, including cell proliferation and immune response. Although immunohistochemical studies suggest that OPG correlates with survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), only scarce data are available on serum OPG in CRC patients. METHODS: In this pilot study, we assessed the prognostic significance of serum OPG and CEA (Carcinoembryonic antigen) in 81 patients with UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stage-IV mCRC. OPG was additionally assessed by immunohistochemistry in primary tissue samples from 33 patients of the same cohort. RESULTS: Baseline serum OPG correlated with CEA (r=0.36, p=0.0011), but independently predicted survival of mCRC patients. Life expectancy was poorer in patients with OPG levels above the median concentration of 51ng/ml (median overall survival [95% confidence interval] 1.8 years [1.3-3.0] vs. 1.0 [0.7-1.2] p=0.013). Patients with high levels of both OPG and CEA had an even poorer life expectancy vs. low-OPG/low-CEA patients (0.9 years [0.6-1.5] vs. 3 years [1.2-4.4], p=0.015), indicating that CEA and OPG have additive prognostic significance. Immunohistochemical analysis of OPG failed to show a correlation between OPG staining and survival (p=0.055) or OPG concentration from matched serum samples. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study provides evidence of independent prognostic significance of serum OPG in patients with advanced mCRC and warrants its further prospective validation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Osteoprotegerina/sangre , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Allocation of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to the adequate therapy is determined by both tumor burden and liver function. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system and therapeutic algorithm recommends transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) based on the best evidence available to patients with intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC-B). However, many centers also treat subgroups of patients outside these recommendations and with more advanced disease by TACE. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors in a TACE cohort, including BCLC-B patients, as well as patients treated outside of BCLC-B, to test the prognostic capabilities of published staging systems and to optimize prognostication for TACE patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 186 first-line TACE patients was analyzed. Independent prognostic factors were identified and used to construct the Munich-TACE score (M-TACE). M-TACE was tested against established staging systems (including BCLC and two recently published TACE-specific scores) and a ranking using concordance index and Akaike Information Criterion was performed. Finally, an external validation in an independent TACE cohort (n=71) was conducted. RESULTS: Bilirubin, Quick/international normalized ratio, C-reactive protein, creatinine, α-feto protein, and tumor extension were identified as independent prognostic factors and used to construct M-TACE. M-TACE identifies three distinct subgroups (P<0.0001) with median survival times of 35.2, 16.9, and 8.6 months, respectively. Compared with established staging systems, M-TACE showed the best prognostic capabilities in both cohorts of patients (cohort 1: c-index, 0.71; Akaike Information Criterion: 1276; cohort 2: c-index, 0.754). CONCLUSION: We identified independent risk factors for patients treated with TACE. The newly constructed M-TACE score is superior to established staging systems and might prove helpful to identify patients who are most suitable for TACE.