RESUMEN
Background: The causative microorganisms of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the clinical characteristics of these patients have not yet been fully identified. Therefore, this study investigated IBD patients who developed BSI to determine their clinical characteristics and identify the BSI-causing bacteria. Methods: The subjects were IBD patients who developed bacteremia between 2015 and 2019 at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to IBD type (Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC)). The medical records of the patients were reviewed to determine their clinical backgrounds and identify the BSI-causing bacteria. Results: In total 95 patients, 68 CD and 27 UC patients were included in this study. The detection rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) were higher in the UC group than in the CD group (18.5% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.021; 11.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.019, respectively). Immunosuppressive drugs use was higher in the CD group than in the UC group (57.4% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.00003). Hospital stay length was longer in the UC group than in the CD group (15 vs. 9 days; P = 0.045). Conclusions: The causative bacteria of BSI and clinical backgrounds differed between patients with CD and UC. This study showed that P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae had higher abundance in UC patients at the onset of BSI. Furthermore, long-term hospitalized patients with UC required antimicrobial therapy against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae.
RESUMEN
A nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is recommended to determine whether or not patients have a Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) when the glutamate dehydrogenase activity assay is positive and the rapid membrane enzyme immunoassays for toxins is negative. In our hospital, a NAAT was introduced to diagnose CDI precisely in April 2020. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a NAAT on the clinical outcomes in patients with CDI at our hospital. Seventy-one patients diagnosed with CDI between April 2017 and March 2022 were included in our study. Patients with CDI were divided into two groups: before (pre-NAAT) and after (post-NAAT) the introduction of NAAT. The clinical outcome was compared between the two groups. Of the 71 patients with CDI, 41 were sorted into the pre-NAAT group and 30 into the post-NAAT group. The clinical cure rate was significantly higher in the post-NAAT group compared to the pre-NAAT group (76.7% vs. 48.8%, p = 0.018). In the multivariable analysis, the clinical cure was significantly associated with the introduction of NAAT (p = 0.022). Our findings suggest that the introduction of NAAT can improve the clinical outcomes in CDI patients.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: The need for, and ideal frequency of, the vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) of previously infected individuals have not yet been sufficiently evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody status and adverse reactions after vaccination among medical staff with or without a history of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: A single-center prospective study was performed at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital. We investigated the presence of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer among medical staff before and after mRNA vaccination with the BNT162b2. The levels of immunoglobulin G antibody were quantitatively measured at six points-before vaccination, after the first vaccination, at three points after the second vaccination, and finally, after the third vaccination-and the levels were then compared based on the COVID-19 infection history. Results: The previously infected (before the first vaccination) subjects (n = 17) showed a marked increase in antibody titers two weeks after the first vaccination and four weeks after the second vaccination. Although they were able to maintain a certain level of antibody titers until 30 weeks after the second vaccination, the titers fell in the same way as observed in the non-infected subjects. The subjects who did not receive the third vaccination due to adverse reactions to previous vaccines (n = 1) or who were positive for COVID-19 prior to the third vaccination (n = 2) were excluded from the subsequent analyses. Among non-infected subjects (n = 36), smokers had lower peak antibody titers than the others. The previously infected subjects had a significantly higher incidence of adverse reactions after the first vaccination but had a similar incidence of adverse reactions after the second and third vaccinations compared to the non-infected subjects. Conclusions: A history of COVID-19 may influence only the initial increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and the occurrence of adverse reactions after the first vaccination.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A rapid membrane enzyme immunoassays (EIA) are frequently used to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). If EIA does not provide a definitive CDI diagnosis, whether treatment with anti-CD agents is to be performed depends on the pathogenesis and severity of the disease. In Japan, "MN criteria" have been proposed for the classification of disease severity. In this study, we investigated the association between disease severity and CDI prognosis when MN criteria are used. METHODS: This study included 102 patients diagnosed with CDI between April 2015 and March 2020. The disease serverity classification accorditng to MN criteria was divided into two groups: non-severely ill (mild to moderate) and severely ill (severe to critical) group. RESULTS: Mortality was significantly higher in severely ill patients than non-severely ill patients (46.7% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.0025). Multivariable analysis showed that the mortality of patients with CDI was significantly associated with advanced age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.2; p = 0.019) and disease severity (OR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.2-14.8; p = 0.023). DISCUSSION: The classification of disease severity according to the MN criteria would be particularly useful in predicting the patients' prognoses.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the trends and antimicrobial resistance profile of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) clinical isolates. METHODS: A total of 1,303 E. coli isolates from January 2012 to December 2017 at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Japan, were analyzed. The rate of resistance to cefmetazole (CMZ), flomoxef (FMOX), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEPM), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GM), minocycline (MINO), ciprofloxacin (CPFX), and levofloxacin (LVFX) was compared between non-ESBL-producing E. coli (non-ESBL-EC) and ESBL-EC. RESULTS: The proportion of ESBL-EC among all the E. coli isolates was 24.6% (320/1,303), and the proportion remained stable throughout the study period. There was no difference in the rate of resistance to CMZ, FMOX, IPM, MEPM, and AMK between non-ESBL-EC and ESBL-EC; however, the rate of resistance to GM, MINO, CPFX, and LVFX was higher in ESBL-EC than in non-ESBL-EC (17.5% vs. 10.0%, 19.1% vs. 7.7%, 87.5% vs. 24.2%, and 87.5% vs. 23.5%, respectively; P < 0.01). The rate of resistance to CPFX and LVFX in ESBL-EC increased throughout the study course. The rate of E. coli isolates susceptible to all the antibiotics was significantly higher in non-ESBL-EC than in ESBL-EC (68.2% vs. 7.5%; P < 0.01), and this rate decreased significantly from 10.0% in 2012 to 3.8% in 2017 in ESBL-EC (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a changing antimicrobial resistance profile of ESBL-EC, particularly to fluoroquinolones. Determination of the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of ESBL-EC will help physicians in selecting the initial empirical treatment for patients with ESBL-EC infections.