Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma harbours characteristic copy number variations and a distinct DNA methylation signature closely related to mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the female genital tract is an uncommon histotype that can arise in both the endometrium and the ovary. The exact cell of origin and histogenesis currently remain unknown. Here, we investigated whole genome DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations (CNVs) in a series of MLAs in the context of a large cohort of various gynaecological carcinoma types. CNV analysis of 19 MLAs uncovered gains of chromosomes 1q (18/19, 95%), 10 (15/19, 79%), 12 (14/19, 74%), and 2 (10/19, 53%), as well as loss of chromosome 1p (7/19, 37%). Gains of chromosomes 1q, 10, and 12 were also identified in the majority of mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix (MAs) as well as subsets of endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) and low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary (LGSCs) but only in a minority of serous carcinomas of the uterine corpus (USCs), clear cell carcinomas (CCCs), and tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). While losses of chromosome 1p together with gains of chromosome 1q were also identified in both MA and LGSC, gains of chromosome 2 were almost exclusively identified in MLA and MA. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and t-SNE analysis of DNA methylation data (Illumina EPIC array) identified a co-clustering for MLAs and MAs, which was distinct from clusters of ECs, USCs, CCCs, LGSCs, and HGSCs. Group-wise comparisons confirmed a close epigenetic relationship between MLA and MA. These findings, in conjunction with the established histological and immunophenotypical overlap, suggest bona fide mesonephric differentiation, and support a more precise terminology of mesonephric-type adenocarcinoma instead of MLA in these tumours. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cellular context determines DNA methylation profiles in SWI/SNF-deficient cancers of the gynecologic tract.

SWI/SNF (SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable) complex deficiency has been reported in a wide variety of cancers and is often associated with an undifferentiated phenotype. In the gynecologic tract SWI/SNF-deficient cancers are diagnostically challenging and little is known about their cellular origins. Here we show that undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UDEC), SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma (SDUS), and ovarian small cell carcinoma, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) harbor distinct DNA methylation signatures despite shared morphology and SWI/SNF inactivation. Our results indicate that the cellular context is an important determinant of the epigenetic landscape, even in the setting of core SWI/SNF deficiency, and therefore methylation profiling may represent a useful diagnostic tool in undifferentiated, SWI/SNF-deficient cancers. Furthermore, applying copy number analyses and group-wise differential methylation analyses including endometrioid endometrial carcinomas and extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors, we uncover analogous molecular features in SDUS and SCCOHT in contrast to UDEC. These results suggest that SDUS and SCCOHT represent chromosomally stable SWI/SNF-deficient cancers of the gynecologic tract, which are within the broader spectrum of malignant rhabdoid tumors. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8+ TIL infiltration, and provides no independent prognostic value in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas.

ARID1A (BAF250a) is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin modifying complex, plays an important tumour suppressor role, and is considered prognostic in several malignancies. However, in ovarian carcinomas there are contradictory reports on its relationship to outcome, immune response, and correlation with clinicopathological features. We assembled a series of 1623 endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas, including 1078 endometrioid (ENOC) and 545 clear cell (CCOC) ovarian carcinomas, through combining resources of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, the Canadian Ovarian Unified Experimental Resource (COEUR), local, and collaborative networks. Validated immunohistochemical surrogate assays for ARID1A mutations were applied to all samples. We investigated associations between ARID1A loss/mutation, clinical features, outcome, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+ TILs), and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). ARID1A loss was observed in 42% of CCOCs and 25% of ENOCs. We found no associations between ARID1A loss and outcomes, stage, age, or CD8+ TIL status in CCOC. Similarly, we found no association with outcome or stage in endometrioid cases. In ENOC, ARID1A loss was more prevalent in younger patients (p = 0.012) and was associated with MMRd (p < 0.001) and the presence of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.008). Consistent with MMRd being causative of ARID1A mutations, in a subset of ENOCs we also observed an association with ARID1A loss-of-function mutation as a result of small indels (p = 0.035, versus single nucleotide variants). In ENOC, the association with ARID1A loss, CD8+ TILs, and age appears confounded by MMRd status. Although this observation does not explicitly rule out a role for ARID1A influence on CD8+ TIL infiltration in ENOC, given current knowledge regarding MMRd, it seems more likely that effects are dominated by the hypermutation phenotype. This large dataset with consistently applied biomarker assessment now provides a benchmark for the prevalence of ARID1A loss-of-function mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers and brings clarity to the prognostic significance. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Endometrial stromal sarcomas with BCOR-rearrangement harbor MDM2 amplifications.

Recently a novel subtype of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) defined by recurrent genomic alterations involving BCOR has been described (HGESS-BCOR). We identified a case of HGESS-BCOR with a ZC3H7B-BCOR gene fusion, which harbored an amplification of the MDM2 locus. This index case prompted us to investigate MDM2 amplification in four additional cases of HGESS-BCOR. Tumors were analyzed for MDM2 amplification by array-based profiling of copy number alterations (CNAs) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as for MDM2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Additionally, a cohort of other mesenchymal uterine neoplasms, including 17 low-grade ESS, 6 classical high-grade ESS with YWHAE-rearrangement, 16 uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors, 7 uterine leiomyomas and 8 uterine leiomyosarcomas, was analyzed for CNAs in MDM2. Copy number profiling identified amplification of the 12q15 region involving the MDM2 locus in all five HGESS-BCOR. Subsequent validation analyses of three tumors confirmed MDM2 amplification using MDM2 FISH. Accordingly, IHC showed MDM2 overexpression in all analyzed cases. None of the other uterine neoplasms in our series, including tumors that are in the histopathological differential diagnoses of HGESS-BCOR, showed copy number gains of MDM2. Together, our results indicate that HGESS-BCOR carries MDM2 amplifications, which has diagnostic implications and could potentially be used for targeted therapies in these clinically aggressive tumors.

L1CAM further stratifies endometrial carcinoma patients with no specific molecular risk profile.

BACKGROUND: The newly developed Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) has consistently been shown to be prognostically significant in endometrial carcinomas (EC). Recently, we and others have demonstrated L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM) to be a significant indicator of high-risk disease in EC. In the current study, it was our aim to determine the prognostic significance of aberrant L1CAM expression in ProMisE subgroups in a large, single centre, population-based EC cohort. METHODS: ProMisE (POLE; MMR-D; p53 wt/NSMP; p53 abn) classification results from a cohort of 452 EC were available for analysis. L1CAM expression was studied by immunohistochemistry on whole slides. Correlations between clinicopathological data and survival were calculated. RESULTS: Expression of L1CAM was most frequent in p53 abnormal tumours (80%). L1CAM status was predictive of worse outcome among tumours with no specific molecular profile (p53 wt/NSMP) (p < 0.0001). Among p53 wt/NSMP EC, L1CAM remained a significant prognosticator for disease-specific survival after multivariate analysis (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: L1CAM status was able to significantly stratify risk among tumours of the large p53 wt/NSMP ProMisE subgroup of EC. Furthermore, our study confirms a highly significant correlation between mutation-type p53 immunostaining and abnormal L1CAM expression in EC.