A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial of the effects of antithrombin on disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: To test the hypothesis that the administration of antithrombin concentrate improves disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), resulting in recovery from DIC and better outcomes in patients with sepsis, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled multicenter trial at 13 critical care centers in tertiary care hospitals. METHODS: We enrolled 60 DIC patients with sepsis and antithrombin levels of 50 to 80% in this study. The participating patients were randomly assigned to an antithrombin arm receiving antithrombin at a dose of 30 IU/kg per day for three days or a control arm treated with no intervention. The primary efficacy end point was recovery from DIC on day 3. The analysis was conducted with an intention-to-treat approach. DIC was diagnosed according to the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) scoring system. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score, platelet count and global markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis were measured on day 0 and day 3. RESULTS: Antithrombin treatment resulted in significantly decreased DIC scores and better recovery rates from DIC compared with those observed in the control group on day 3. The incidence of minor bleeding complications did not increase, and no major bleeding related to antithrombin treatment was observed. The platelet count significantly increased; however, antithrombin did not influence the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score or markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis on day 3. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate doses of antithrombin improve DIC scores, thereby increasing the recovery rate from DIC without any risk of bleeding in DIC patients with sepsis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000000882.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) diagnosed based on the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine criteria is a dependent continuum to overt DIC in patients with sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is the most common disease associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). To test the hypothesis that DIC diagnosed by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC scoring system (JAAM DIC) constitutes a dependent continuum to overt DIC diagnosed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) overt DIC scoring system (ISTH overt DIC) in patients with sepsis, we conducted a retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The databases from two prospective, multicenter clinical investigations were analyzed. The inclusion criteria comprised patients with sepsis-related DIC, who met the JAAM DIC criteria. RESULTS: The present study enrolled 166 patients, of whom 67 met the ISTH overt DIC criteria. All patients with sepsis who developed to overt DIC during the study period could be identified by the JAAM DIC diagnostic criteria in the first study. While the overall 28-day mortality was 31.3%, mortality (40.3%, p=0.0040) and the incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (70.1%, p=0.008) of the patients with the ISTH overt DIC was approximately one and a half times that of the patients associated with only the JAAM DIC. A stepwise increase in the ISTH overt DIC scores and the incidence of the ISTH overt DIC were also observed in accordance with the increase in the JAAM DIC scores. CONCLUSION: DIC diagnosed based on the JAAM DIC diagnostic criteria exists in a dependent continuum to the ISTH overt DIC in patients with sepsis, thus enabling them to receive early treatment.

Natural history of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosed based on the newly established diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: results of a multicenter, prospective survey.

OBJECTIVE: To survey the natural history of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in patients diagnosed according to the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC scoring system in a critical care setting. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study during a 4-month period. SETTING: General critical care center in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: All patients were enrolled when they were diagnosed as DIC by the JAAM DIC scoring system. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Platelet counts, prothrombin time ratio, fibrinogen, and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products were measured, and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria met by the patients were determined following admission. Of 3,864 patients, 329 (8.5%) were diagnosed with DIC and the 28-day mortality rate was 21.9%, which was significantly different from that of the non-DIC patients (11.2%) (p < .0001). The progression of systemic inflammation, deterioration of organ function, and stepwise increase in incidence of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) DIC and its scores all correlated with an increase in the JAAM DIC score as demonstrated by the patients on day 0. There were significant differences in the JAAM DIC score and the variables adopted in the scoring system between survivors and nonsurvivors. The logistic regression analyses showed the JAAM DIC score and prothrombin time ratio on the day of DIC diagnosis to be predictors of patient outcome. The patients who simultaneously met the ISTH DIC criteria demonstrated twice the incidence of multiple organ dysfunction (61.1 vs. 30.5%, p < .0001) and mortality rate (34.4 vs. 17.2%, p = .0015) compared with those without the ISTH DIC diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective survey demonstrated the natural history of DIC patients diagnosed by the JAAM DIC diagnostic criteria in a critical care setting. The study provides further evidence of a progression from the JAAM DIC to the ISTH overt DIC.

Clinical course and outcome of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosed by Japanese Association for Acute Medicine criteria. Comparison between sepsis and trauma.

The Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) study group recently announced new diagnostic criteria for DIC. These criteria have been prospectively validated and demonstrated to progress to overt DIC as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Although an underlying condition is essential for the development of DIC, it has never been clarified if patients with different underlying disorders have a similar course. Among 329 patients with DIC diagnosed by the JAAM criteria, those with underlying sepsis (n = 98) or trauma (n = 95) were compared. The 28-day mortality rate was significantly higher in sepsis patients than trauma patients (34.7% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.0001). Within three days of fulfilling the JAAM criteria, sepsis patients had a lower platelet count, higher prothrombin time ratio, higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score compared with trauma patients. On day 3, a significantly higher percentage of trauma patients than sepsis patients showed improvement of DIC (64.2% vs. 30.6%, p < 0.001). These differences were mainly due to patients with lower JAAM DIC scores. More than 50% of the JAAM DIC patients with sepsis who died within 28 days could not be detected by ISTH DIC criteria during the initial three days. In contrast, most trauma patients who died within 28 days had DIC simultaneously diagnosed by JAAM and ISTH criteria, except for those with brain death. These findings suggest that coagulation abnormalities, organ dysfunction, and the outcome of JAAM DIC differ between patients with sepsis and trauma.

Predicting the severity of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-associated coagulopathy with hemostatic molecular markers and vascular endothelial injury markers.

INTRODUCTION: The changes in biomarkers of coagulation or fibrinolysis, anticoagulation, inflammation, and endothelial damage occur in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic value of these markers in patients with SIRS-associated hypercoagulopathy. METHODS: Sixty-six SIRS patients with a platelet count less than 15.0 x 10(4)/mm3 in three university hospital intensive care units were enrolled in this prospective, comparative study. Blood samples were obtained on day 0 and day 2. Twelve hemostatic, inflammatory, and vascular endothelial indices were measured and the data were compared between the severe group (patients with a total maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 10 or more and nonsurvivors; n = 25) and the less-severe group (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score <10; n = 41). RESULTS: Significant changes between the groups were observed in platelet count, fibrin or fibrinogen degradation products, interleukin-6, soluble thrombomodulin, antithrombin (AT) activity, and protein C activity, both on day 0 and on day 2. In contrast, the d-dimer, soluble fibrin, plasmin-[alpha]2-antiplasmin complex, and E-selectin levels were higher in the severe group only on day 2. No significant difference was seen regarding the thrombin-AT complex and total plasminogen activator inhibitor on both days. A comparison of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed the AT activity to be the best predictor of a progression of organ dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The changes in some hemostatic molecular markers and vascular endothelial markers were conspicuous in patients with organ dysfunction. The AT activity is considered to be the most useful predictor of organ dysfunction.

SIRS-associated coagulopathy and organ dysfunction in critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia often occur in critically ill patients, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) can lead to multiple organ dysfunction and a poor outcome. However, the relation between coagulopathy and systemic inflammatory response has not been thoroughly clarified. Thus, we evaluated coagulative activity, organ dysfunction, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia and examined the balance between coagulopathy and systemic inflammation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-three patients, who were admitted to 13 critical care centers in Japan and fulfilled the criteria of platelet count of less than 150*10(9)/L, were included. Coagulative variables (platelet count, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, and DIC scores), organ dysfunction index (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score), and SIRS score in each patient were evaluated for 4 consecutive days after fulfilling the above entry criteria. The effect of SIRS on coagulopathy and organ dysfunction was evaluated in these patients. RESULTS: Both the maximum SIRS score and entry SIRS score had significant relation to the maximum SOFA score during the observation period. Coagulation disorders indicated by the minimum platelet count, maximum DIC scores, and positivity for DIC worsened gradually with increases in SIRS scores. Both the minimum platelet count and maximum DIC scores were significantly correlated with the maximum SOFA score, indicating that a relation exists between coagulopathy and organ dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy and organ dysfunction progress with significant mutual correlation, depending on the increase in SIRS scores. The SIRS-associated coagulopathy may play a critical role in inducing organ dysfunction after severe insult.

A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria.

OBJECTIVES: To validate scoring algorithm criteria established by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and to evaluate its diagnostic property by comparing the two leading scoring systems for DIC, from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study during a 3-month period. SETTING: General critical care center in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-three patients with platelet counts<150x109/L were enrolled. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The JAAM, JMHW, and ISTH DIC scoring algorithms were prospectively applied within 12 hrs of patients meeting the inclusion criteria (day 0) to days 1-3, by global coagulation tests. The numbers of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were determined simultaneously. Mortality associated with any cause was also assessed 28 days after the enrollment. All global coagulation tests and SIRS criteria adopted in the JAAM criteria and their cutoff points were validated with use of SOFA scores and mortality rate. DIC diagnostic rate of the JAAM DIC scoring system was significantly higher than that of the other two criteria (p<.001). The JAAM DIC algorithm was the most sensitive for early diagnosis of DIC (p<.001). PATIENTS who fulfilled the JAAM DIC criteria included almost all those whose DIC was diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH scoring systems. The JAAM DIC scores showed significant correlation with SOFA scores ([rho]=0.499; p<.001). SOFA score and mortality rate worsened in accordance with an increase in the JAAM DIC score. Fibrinogen criteria had little effect in predicting outcome for the DIC patients, and a total score of 4 points in the JAAM scoring system without fibrinogen was closely related to poor prognosis. According to the results, we revised the JAAM criteria by excluding fibrinogen and confirmed that the DIC diagnostic properties of original criteria remained unchanged in the revised JAAM criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The JAAM scoring system has an acceptable property for the diagnosis of DIC. The scoring system identified most of the patients diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH criteria. Revised JAAM DIC criteria preserved all properties of the original criteria for DIC diagnosis. The revised scoring system can be useful for selecting DIC patients for early treatment in a critical care setting.

Evaluation of new Japanese diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill patients.

New Japanese diagnostic criteria were prepared for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in critically ill patients and their usefulness was compared with the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and those of the Japan Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW). In a retrospective study of patients with platelet counts of less than 150 x10(3)/mL, 52 cases (33.3%), 66 cases (42.3%), and 101 cases (64.7%) were diagnosed as DIC by the ISTH, JMHW, and new Japanese DIC criteria, respectively. The DIC state as diagnosed by the new Japanese DIC criteria included both DIC states as diagnosed by ISTH or JMHW criteria. Some DIC states diagnosed by the JMHW criteria included those diagnosed by ISHT criteria but this was not universal. The mortality of DIC as diagnosed by the ISTH or JMHW criteria was markedly high, compared to that for DIC diagnosed by the new Japanese criteria. The mortality of patients without DIC by ISTH was also high when they were diagnosed as DIC by the new Japanese criteria. The frequency of DIC by each set of diagnostic criteria was significantly higher in patients with infection than in those without infection. The mortality of DIC by each set of diagnostic criteria was significantly higher in patients with infection than in those without infection, and the mortality of overt-DIC by ISTH diagnostic criteria was also high in patients without infection.