Nonspecific abdominal pain: A follow-up survey.

INTRODUCTION: Little data have been published on the outcome of patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) after being diagnosed with nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP). This study aimed to investigate short-term follow-up of patients discharged with a diagnosis of NSAP from the ED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted in the University-based ED and enrolled all consecutive adult patients who were diagnosed as NSAP out of patients presented with abdominal pain (AP). The main outcome measure was the presence of recurrent AP resulting in referral to the ED and specific diagnoses within the first 3- and 90-day postdischarge. On the 3rd and 90th days, all patients discharged with NSAP from the ED were asked questions, and their response entered into a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 684 patients presented with AP, of which 299 (46%) had a diagnosis of NSAP within the 4-month period. Fifty cases (16%) could not be included due to inability to access. Eighty-one out of 249 patients (32.5%) complained of recurrent AP within the first 3 days. Twenty-two cases (8.8%) were readmitted to ED once again in the meantime, and ten received specific diagnoses including three with acute abdomen. Within 90 days, additional nine patients out of 20 (45%) with recurrent AP received specific diagnoses including two with acute abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: Certain specific underlying entities can be missed in patients considered to have NSAP and discharged from the ED. Adherence to timely follow-up and repeated examinations are of vital importance in these patients.

A multicenter case-control study of diagnostic tests for urinary tract infection in the presence of urolithiasis.

Urinary stone disease (USD) alone can cause much morbidity, but when present in conjunction with urinary tract infection, complications and morbidity increase even more. This study investigated the clinical and laboratory findings in patients who had USD with and without infection and evaluated the most suitable diagnostic value for urinary tract infection parameters before urine culture results were available. In a prospective fashion, patients who presented to the emergency department with a complaint of colicky flank pain (with or without hematuria) and who were diagnosed as having urolithiasis with ultrasound were evaluated for 1 year. The gold standard for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection was urine culture. The most suitable diagnostic value for urinary tract infection parameters was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Logistic regression was used to identify independent variables that predicted a positive urine culture. Of the 192 eligible patients, 177 agreed to participate in the study. Of the clinical and laboratory characteristics analyzed, urine WBC, blood WBC, and fever were significantly different between culture positive and negative patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.04 p = 0.012, respectively). Using ROC curve analysis, pyuria (over 10 WBCs per HPF), fever over 37.9°C, and leucocytosis over 11,300 were the best predictors of a positive culture result. The logistic regression model for leukocytosis >11,300 (OR 2.1), pyuria (OR 2.8), and temperature >37.9°C (OR 3.1) showed a significantly increased risk of having a positive urine culture (correct class 87.9%). While a single physical examination or laboratory finding cannot predict urinary tract infection in USD patients with complete reliability, the presence of pyruria, fever, and leukocytosis significantly increases the odds of a positive urine culture.

An unusual cause of chest pain: foreign body in the oesophagus.

This article reports on two patients with unsuspected oesophageal foreign body ingestion, with chest pain as the main symptom. The patients had extensive cardiac evaluation to rule out myocardial ischaemia. Further evaluation showed an impacted oesophageal foreign body. Oesophageal foreign bodies should be considered as factors in chest pain.

Analysis of factors affecting pain in intravenous catheter placement: a survey of 925 patients.

The aim of the study was to determine some factors affecting pain during intravenous (i.v.) catheter placement in an emergency department (ED). A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at an academic ED. Nine hundred and twenty five adult patients who had a 20 gauge i.v. catheter placed were enrolled the study. Patients were excluded for the following conditions: more than one i.v. attempt, altered mental status, head trauma, lack of contact due to visual impairment, hearing or speech disorder, intoxication, distracting injury or physical abnormality at the i.v. site. The magnitude of pain of i.v. catheter placement was not related to age, sex, experience of the individual placing the i.v. catheter, site of i.v. catheter insertion and use of analgesic or antidepressive drugs (p > 0.05). Patients with a history of depression reported significantly higher pain than non-depressive patients (p = 0.001). Depressive patients reported higher severity of pain during i.v. catheter placement than nondepressed ones. This may influence the decision on whether or not to use local anaesthesia for catheter insertion.

Factors affecting pain in intravenous catheter placement: role of depression illness.

The aim of the study was to examine factors affecting pain during intravenous (IV) catheter placement in an emergency department. A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at an academic emergency department. Nine hundred and twenty-five adult patients who had a 20-gauge IV catheter placed were enrolled in the study. Patients were excluded for the following conditions: more than one IV attempt, altered mental status, head trauma, lack of contact due to visual impairment, hearing or speech disorder, intoxication, distracting injury or physical abnormality at the IV site. The magnitude of pain in IV catheter placement was not related to age, sex, experience of the individual placing the IV catheter, site of IV catheter insertion and use of analgesic or antidepressant drugs (p > 0.05). Patients with a history of depression reported significantly higher pain than non-depressed patients (p = 0.001). Depressed patients reported higher severity of pain during IV catheter placement than non-depressed ones. This may influence the decision on whether or not to use local anaesthesia for catheter insertion.