RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdown measures disrupted global healthcare provision, including opioid prescribing. In North America, opioid sales declined while opioid-related deaths increased. In Europe, the effect of the pandemic on prescribing is not yet known. Given the ongoing increase in opioid-related harm and mortality, it is crucial to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 crisis and lockdown measures on opioid prescribing. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterise opioid prescribing in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: A nationwide register-based study characterising opioid prescribing using aggregated insurance reimbursement data. SETTING: Dutch healthcare during the first 2 years of the COVID lockdown. PARTICIPANTS: The whole Dutch population. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparing the number of opioid prescriptions during the pandemic with a prepandemic period using a risk ratio (RR), with separate analysis on the prescription type (first-time or repeat prescription), patients' sex, age and socioeconomic status. We also explored lockdown effects. RESULTS: During the first lockdown, the total number of new opioid prescriptions and prescriptions to young patients (briefly) decreased (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.89 and RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.75, respectively), but the overall number of opioid prescriptions remained stable throughout the pandemic compared with prepandemic. Women, older patients and patients living in lower socioeconomic areas received more opioids per capita, but the pandemic did not amplify these differences. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic appears to have had a limited impact on opioid prescribing in the Netherlands. Yet, chronic use of opioids remains an important public health issue.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , COVID-19 , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , NiñoRESUMEN
Background: In observational studies, high levels of desphospho-uncarboxylated matrix gla protein (dp-ucMGP) that result from vitamin K deficiency were consistently associated with poor clinical outcomes during COVID-19. Vitamin K-activated matrix gla protein (MGP) is required to protect against elastic fibre degradation, and a deficiency may contribute to pathology. However, intervention trials assessing the effects of vitamin K supplementation in COVID-19 are lacking. Methods: This is a single-centre, phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of vitamin K2 supplementation in 40 hospitalised COVID-19 patients requiring supplemental oxygen. Individuals were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 999 mcg of vitamin K2-menaquinone-7 (MK-7)-or a placebo daily until discharge or for a maximum of 14 days. Dp-ucMGP, the rate of elastic fibre degradation quantified by desmosine, and hepatic vitamin K status quantified by PIVKA-II were measured. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were collected daily. As an exploratory objective, circulating vitamin K2 levels were measured. Results: Vitamin K2 was well tolerated and did not increase the number of adverse events. A linear mixed model analysis showed that dp-ucMGP and PIVKA-II decreased significantly in subjects that received supplementation compared to the controls (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0017, respectively), reflecting improved vitamin K status. The decrease in dp-ucMGP correlated with higher plasma MK-7 levels (p = 0.015). No significant effect on desmosine was found (p = 0.545). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that vitamin K2 supplementation during COVID-19 is safe and decreases dp-ucMGP. However, the current dose of vitamin K2 failed to show a protective effect against elastic fibre degradation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Ibogaine is a hallucinogenic drug that may be used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). The relationships between pharmacokinetics (PKs) of ibogaine and its metabolites and their clinical effects on side effects and opioid withdrawal severity are unknown. We aimed to study these relationships in patients with OUD undergoing detoxification supported by ibogaine. METHODS: The study was performed in 14 subjects with OUD. They received a single dose of 10mg/kg ibogaine hydrochloride. Plasma PKs of ibogaine, noribogaine, and noribogaine glucuronide were obtained during 24 h. Cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotyping was performed. The PKs were analyzed by means of nonlinear mixed effects modeling and related with corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation, cerebellar ataxia, and opioid withdrawal severity. RESULTS: The PK of ibogaine were highly variable and significantly correlated to CYP2D6 genotype (p < 0.001). The basic clearance of ibogaine (at a CYP2D6 activity score (AS) of 0) was 0.82 L/h. This increased with 30.7 L/h for every point of AS. The relation between ibogaine plasma concentrations and QTc was best described by a sigmoid Emax model. Spearman correlations were significant (p < 0.03) for ibogaine but not noribogaine with QTc (p = 0.109) and cerebellar effects (p = 0.668); neither correlated with the severity of opioid withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The clearance of ibogaine is strongly related to CYPD2D6 genotype. Ibogaine cardiac side effects (QTc time) and cerebellar effects are most likely more driven by ibogaine rather than noribogaine. Future studies should aim at exploring lower doses and/or applying individualized dosing based on CYP2D6 genotype.