Factors Associated With Low Procedural Pain Scores Among 1- to 5-Year-Old Patients Undergoing Facial Laceration Repair.

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to quantify pain experienced by young children undergoing facial laceration repair and identify factors associated with low procedural pain scores. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of children's distress among a convenience sample of children aged 1 to 5 years undergoing facial or scalp laceration repair in 2 pediatric emergency departments. We reviewed video recordings and documented pain scores at 15-second intervals using the Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability-Revised (FLACC-r) scale. We dichotomized FLACC-r into low/high scores (≤3 and >3) to evaluate practice variables. RESULTS: We included 11,474 FLACC-r observations from 258 procedures in the analysis. Two-thirds of 3- to 5-year-olds completed their laceration repair without the use of restraint, sedation, or anxiolytics. Mean distress scores were low (≤2.5 out of 10) across all procedure phases for 2- to 5-year-old patients. One-year-old patients experienced significantly more distress than their older counterparts (mean ≤4.2 out of 10). Odds of having low FLACC scores (≤3) were greater for patients with an expert clinician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.84). Wound infiltration (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93), patient observation of a needle (aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.33), and restraint (aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02-0.06) were negatively associated with low FLACC score. CONCLUSION: The majority of 3- to 5-year-old patients were able to undergo facial laceration repair without restraint, sedation, or anxiolytics and with low mean distress scores. Our findings suggest that children's risk of experiencing moderate and severe distress during facial and scalp laceration repair may be reduced by prioritizing wound closure by expert-level clinicians, ensuring effective lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine application, avoiding restraint, and concealing needles from patient view.

Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Compliance With National Testing Guidelines in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines regarding group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis advise against routine testing for patients younger than 3 years, patients without pharyngitis, and patients with symptoms suggesting a viral infection. Group A streptococcal testing may be overused in some clinical settings; thus, we conducted this study to evaluate compliance with the IDSA guidelines in a pediatric emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study describes patients younger than 18 years presenting to 2 urban pediatric EDs in 2016 who underwent rapid antigen detection testing for GAS pharyngitis. Testing was classified as noncompliant with the IDSA guidelines if the chief complaint was not indicative of GAS infection and/or the patient age was younger than 3 years. Appropriate nonparametric tests compared groups by IDSA testing compliance status. RESULTS: A total of 13,585 patient encounters met inclusion criteria; 5255 (39%) were noncompliant with the IDSA testing guidelines, the majority due to a chief complaint inconsistent with GAS pharyngitis (67%) and secondarily due to the age of younger than 3 years (48%). Among the patients with noncompliant testing, 51% were prescribed an antibiotic, and return encounters were more likely to occur (13% vs 10%, P < 0.001). Return encounters more commonly resulted in respiratory diagnoses in those with noncompliant GAS testing (60% vs 45%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 40% of all pediatric ED encounters with GAS testing were noncompliant with the IDSA guidelines and were associated with greater return encounter rates. Potential negative outcomes from noncompliant GAS testing include misdiagnosis, inappropriate use of antibiotics, allergic reactions, and loss of school days. Informed interventions to reduce unnecessary GAS testing are warranted.

Quality Indicators for Children With Traumatic Brain Injury After Transition to an American College of Surgeons Level I Pediatric Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare quality indicators, including frequency of acute surgical and emergent interventions, and resource utilization before and after American College of Surgeons (ACS) level I trauma verification among children with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients younger than 18 years treated for moderate or severe TBI, as determined by International Classification of Disease codes. Our institution obtained ACS level I trauma verification in 2013. Outcomes during the pre-ACS (June 2003-May 2008), interim (June 2008-May 2013), and post-ACS (June 2013-May 2018) periods were compared via nonparametric tests. Tests for linear trend were conducted using Cochran-Armitage tests for categorical data and by linear regression for continuous variables. RESULTS: There were 677 children with moderate or severe TBIs (pre-ACS, 125; interim, 198; post-ACS, 354). Frequency of any surgical intervention increased significantly in the post-ACS period (12.2%) compared with interim (5.1%) and pre-ACS periods (5.6%, P = 0.007). More children in the post-ACS period required intracranial pressure monitoring (P = 0.017), external ventricular drain placement (P = 0.003), or endotracheal intubation (P = 0.001) compared with interim and pre-ACS periods. There was no significant change in time to operating room (P = 0.514), frequency of decompression (P = 0.096), or time to decompression (P = 0.788) between study periods. The median time to head CT decreased significantly in the post-ACS period (26 minutes; interquartile range [IQR], 9-60) compared with interim (36 minutes; IQR, 21-69) and pre-ACS periods (53 minutes; IQR, 36-89; P < 0.001). Frequency of repeat head computed tomography decreased significantly in the post-ACS period (30.2%) compared with interim (56.1%) and pre-ACS periods (64.0%, Ptrend = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Transition to an ACS level I trauma verification was associated with improvements in quality indicators for children with moderate or severe TBI.

Utilization of the electrocardiogram in the pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Review pediatric electrocardiogram (ECG) result severity classification and describe the utilization of ECG testing, and rate of clinically significant results, in the pediatric emergency department (PED). METHODS: This was a review of patients ≤18 years who had an ECG performed in a tertiary children's hospital PED 2005-2017. Using established guidelines and expert consultation, ECG results were categorized: Class 0 = normal, Class I = mild abnormality (no cardiology follow-up), Class II = moderate abnormality (cardiology follow-up), Class III = severe abnormality (immediate intervention). Chi-square tests were used to examine differences between patients with clinically insignificant (Class 0/I) and clinically significant (Class II/III) results. Multivariable regression was used to examine factors associated with clinically significant results. RESULTS: 16,147 unique PED encounters with ECG performed were included for analysis. The most common ECG indications were chest pain (32.5%), syncope (22.0%), arrhythmia (11.8%), toxicology/ingestion (9.4%), and seizure (5.7%). Overall, 12.7% (n = 2056) of ECGs had clinically significant (Class II/III) results, and only 2.0% (n = 325) had severe abnormality (Class III) that would require immediate intervention or cardiologist input. Factors associated with increased odds of clinically significant ECG were age ≤ 1 year (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.41), male (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.20-1.46), and indications of arrhythmia (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.59-2.13), cardiac (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.99-3.31), blank indication (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.98), and electrolyte abnormality (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.95). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we provided a valuable review of ECG result severity classification in the pediatric population. We found that chest pain and syncope represented over half of all ECGs performed. We found that clinically significant results are rare in the pediatric population at 12.7% of all ECGs performed, and very few (2.0%) have severe abnormalities that would require immediate intervention. Those with increased odds of a clinically significant ECG include young patients ≤1 year of age, male patients, and certain ECG indications.

Outcome of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Reductions Performed by Pediatric Emergency Medicine Providers Compared With Reductions Performed by Orthopedic Surgeons: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the outcome differences between board-certified orthopedists and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians conducting forearm fracture reductions. METHODS: We performed an analysis of patients between 1 and 14 years of age who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a forearm fracture requiring reduction. Data collected included reducing provider (PEM or orthopedist) and prereduction, postreduction, and follow-up fracture angles and displacements of both radius and ulna. We collected costs of care, both in the ED and at follow-up, as well as length-of-stay data. χ Tests and Fisher exact test compared associations between categorical variables; 2-sample t tests compared the PEM and orthopedic groups. Regression models were used to control for injury severity confounders. RESULTS: Of the 222 fractures, orthopedists reduced 135, and PEM doctors reduced 87. Based on fracture angle and displacement, the orthopedic group tended to have slightly more complicated cases. After adjusting for age and time to follow-up, fractures reduced by orthopedists were less likely to require remanipulation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; P = 0.020). The PEM group had a significantly lower length of stay (59.4 minutes shorter; P < 0.001) and a small overall saving in charges ($273.90; P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopedists performed better in maintaining fracture reductions compared with PEM physicians but lengthened the ED stay for our patients. There was no significant difference in cost.

Implementation of Electronic Clinical Decision Support for Pediatric Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are commonly used in patients with acute abdominal pain. We sought to standardize care and reduce CT use while maintaining patient safety through implementation of a multicomponent electronic clinical decision support tool for pediatric patients with possible appendicitis. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study of children 3 to 18 years old who presented with possible appendicitis to the pediatric emergency department (ED) between January 2011 and December 2013. Outcomes were use of CT and US. Balancing measures included missed appendicitis, ED revisits within 30 days, appendiceal perforation, and ED length of stay. RESULTS: Of 2803 patients with acute abdominal pain over the 3-year study period, 794 (28%) had appendicitis and 207 (26.1% of those with appendicitis) had a perforation. CT use during the 10-month preimplementation period was 38.8% and declined to 17.7% by the end of the study (54% relative decrease). For CT, segmented regression analysis revealed that there was a significant change in trend from the preimplementation period to implementation (monthly decrease -3.5%; 95% confidence interval: -5.9% to -0.9%; P = .007). US use was 45.7% preimplementation and 59.7% during implementation. However, there was no significant change in US or total imaging trends. There were also no statistically significant differences in rates of missed appendicitis, ED revisits within 30 days, appendiceal perforation, or ED length of stay between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Our electronic clinical decision support tool was associated with a decrease in CT use while maintaining safety and high quality care for patients with possible appendicitis.

Analysis of radiation dose to pediatric patients during computed tomography examinations.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) utilization has increased rapidly over the past 15 years. CT is the most common source for radiation exposure. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to measure the effective dose of radiation delivered during routine head and abdominal CT examinations at a children's hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of emergency department (ED) patients < 20 years of age who underwent head or abdominal CT scans in 2012 at a single children's hospital. The authors abstracted the dose-length product from the CT scanners and calculated the effective radiation dose delivered. Patient demographics were abstracted from the medical record. The relationship between effective dose and age, patient weight, and reason for examination were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 478 subjects were included: 255 underwent head CT, and 223 underwent abdominal CT. The median age was 8.1 years (interquartile range = 2.71 to 14.40 years) and 56.9% were male. The median effective dose for head CT was 2.68 mSv (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.54 to 2.84 mSv) and decreased as age increased. For abdominal CT, the median effective dose was 5.06 mSv (95% CI = 4.58 to 6.03 mSv) and increased as age increased (3.67 to 11.12 mSv, p < 0.001). For abdominal CT, 8% of 5- to 10-year-olds, 28% of those 10 to 15 years, and 60% of patients over age 15 years received effective doses over 10 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of radiation delivered to pediatric patients during routine CT examinations of the head and abdomen was low. Regardless, a large proportion of older patients were exposed to elevated effective doses of radiation during abdominal CT.

Pediatric lateral patellar dislocation: is there a role for plain radiography in the emergency department?

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral fractures are reported to complicate patellar dislocations in 5-95% of patients. For this reason, post-reduction radiographs are recommended for the routine evaluation of patellar dislocations in all patients. To date, no data have been reported regarding the impact plain radiography has on the Emergency Department (ED) management of pediatric patients with lateral patellar dislocations. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of fractures detected by post-reduction plain radiographs in pediatric patients presenting with unreduced lateral patellar dislocations and to examine differences in ED management between patients with and without radiographically apparent fractures. METHODS: Retrospective review of records for pediatric patients who presented to an ED, received a diagnosis of lateral patellar dislocation, and underwent a reduction procedure. RESULTS: Of 80 patients who met criteria for inclusion in the study, 8 patients (10%; 95% CI 3-17) had a fracture identified. All patients, regardless of their radiographic findings, had their dislocation reduced uneventfully and were discharged with knee immobilization and a plan for outpatient follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between those patients who had a detected fracture as compared to those without in terms of intravenous line placement (p = 1.000), parenteral analgesic administration (p = 0.965), procedural sedation administration (p = 0.922), ED length of stay (p = 0.706), or provision of a prescription for an oral analgesic upon discharge (p = 0.103). CONCLUSION: Osteochondral fractures were detected by plain radiography in 10% of patients presenting with lateral patellar dislocation and did not alter ED management. Pediatric patients with lateral patellar dislocations may be candidates for discharge from the ED after reduction without plain radiography. The modality by which to best determine the presence of a complicating osteochondral fracture (i.e., plain radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or arthroscopy) may be left to the discretion of the orthopedic surgeon accepting the child in follow-up. Further study is needed to determine if forgoing plain radiographs in the ED decreases length of stay and reduces patient costs.

Traumatic deaths in children: is there a difference between urban and rural populations?

OBJECTIVE: Trauma is a leading cause of death among children. Detailed knowledge of the epidemiology of traumatic childhood deaths is necessary for allocating available treatment resources and for preventing injuries at both community and regional levels. To our knowledge, there has been no report comparing urban to rural pediatric deaths of this nature. METHODS: A retrospective review of all deceased patients who were treated in an urban pediatric emergency department was performed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups, namely, urban versus rural, during analyses for comparison in this study. RESULTS: A total of 1498 patients died at our institution during the study period, with 124 being attributable to an injury for a rate of 9.5 injury-related deaths per study period year. Overall, most injury-related deaths were accidental. Urban deaths involved younger patients and were more likely to be abusive and more likely to have been seen for an injury in a clinic or emergency department within 2 months of their death. Rural deaths involved older patients and were more likely to be a result of an accidental injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of injury have been linked with injury locales that can aid the emergency provider in the assessment of children who die as a result of injury. Despite the challenges involved, there is a clear need to further identify differences in patterns of fatal injuries in urban and rural areas and to better translate and evaluate prevention and intervention programs in rural communities.