RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has been proven effective in anterior circulation stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, translation from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with highly selected patients to real-world requires confirmation, particularly to identify associations outside of strict selection criteria. AIMS: This study aims to compare functional outcomes after EVT in real-world with those reported in RCTs, and to identify associations with functional outcome after EVT outside RCT-criteria. METHODS: This study analyzed longitudinal German real-world data from the Stroke Research Consortium in Northern Bavaria (STAMINA) cohort from January, 2015 to June, 2019. We conducted a trial emulation, comparing patients with anterior circulation stroke and LVO meeting selection criteria for RCTs investigating EVT (1) predominantly within 6 hours with those from HERMES meta-analysis, and (2) within 6-24 hours with those from AURORA meta-analysis. We (3) analyzed treatment effects of EVT and association with functional outcome in patients treated outside RCT criteria. RESULTS: Of 598 patients, 281 (47.0%) met RCT-criteria for treatment within 6 hours (hereinafter STAMINA-HERMES), 74 (12.4%) met RCT-criteria for treatment within 6-24 hours (STAMINA-AURORA), and 277 (46.3%) patients received EVT outside RCT-criteria. We observed no difference in rates of functional independence or mortality, comparing STAMINA-HERMES with HERMES meta-analysis (mRS 0-1: n=120/281 [43%] vs. 291/633 [46%], p=0.36; mortality: n=34/281 [12%] vs. 97/633 [15%], p=0.20), and STAMINA-AURORA with AURORA meta-analysis (mRS 0-1: n=26/74 [35%] vs. 122/266 [46%], p=0.10, mortality: n=10/74 [14%] vs. 45/266 [17%], p=0.48). Patients treated outside RCT-criteria had worse outcome (mRS 0-1: n=38/277 [14%], mortality: n=90/277 [32%], both p<0.001); possibly driven by pre-existing functional dependence (n=172/277 [62%]). Compared to matched controls, EVT outside of RCT-criteria was associated with lower mortality (absolute treatment effect: -14%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -23 to -5, p<0.01), but not with recovery to functional independence or premorbid functional status (treatment effect: 4%, CI -4 to 11, p=0.34), which was associated with lower NIHSS (Odds ratio [OR] 0.86, CI 0.80-0.92, p<0.001) and age (OR 0.95, CI 0.93-0.98, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Translation of EVT outcomes reported in RCTs into real-world is possible, however, almost half of patients did not meet trial criteria. Identification of patients who functionally benefit from frequently performed EVT outside RCT-criteria requires further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04357899.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperdense lesions in CT after EVT of LVO are common. These lesions are predictors for haemorrhages and an equivalent of the final infarct. The aim of this study based on FDCT was the evaluation of predisposing factors for these lesions. METHODS: Using a local database, 474 patients with mTICI ≥ 2B after EVT were recruited retrospectively. A postinterventional FDCT after recanalisation was analysed regarding such hyperdense lesions. This was correlated with a variety of items (demographics, past medical history, stroke assessment/treatment and short-/long-term follow-up). RESULTS: Significant differences were present in NHISS at admission, regarding time window, ASPECTS in initial NECT, location of the LVO, CT-perfusion (penumbra, mismatch ratio), haemostatic parameters (INR, aPTT), duration of EVT, number of EVT attempts, TICI, affected brain region, volume of demarcation and FDCT-ASPECTS. The ICH-rate, the volume of demarcation in follow-up NECT and the mRS at 90 days differed in association with these hyperdensities. INR, the location of demarcation, the volume of demarcation and the FDCT-ASPECTS could be demonstrated as independent factors for the development of such lesions. CONCLUSION: Our results support the prognostic value of hyperdense lesions after EVT. We identified the volume of the lesion, the affection of grey matter and the plasmatic coagulation system as independent factors for the development of such lesions.
RESUMEN
Importance: It is uncertain whether thrombectomy is associated with benefits in patients with prestroke disability. Objective: To evaluate the use of thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion and prestroke disability. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and prestroke disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 3 or 4) admitted to a single tertiary care center between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2019 (controls: 2006-2015; thrombectomy: 2015-2019). Follow-up was conducted at 90 days. Data analysis was performed from November 1 to December 31, 2021. Exposures: Use of thrombectomy vs no thrombectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was functional recovery at 90 days defined as clinical recovery to the functional status before stroke onset. Secondary outcomes included functional dependency, mortality, early neurologic improvement, and recanalization. Results: Among 205 patients (149 women [72.7%]; median age, 82 years [IQR, 75-87 years]), 102 individuals (49.8%) received thrombectomy and 103 (50.2%) were controls. Thrombectomy was significantly associated with functional recovery (thrombectomy, 20 [19.6%]; controls, 8 [7.8%]; adjusted difference, 9.4%; 95% CI, 2.2% to 16.7%; P = .005). Secondary outcomes showed differences in mortality, early neurologic improvement, and recanalization in favor of thrombectomy treatment. The rate of functional dependency did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (adjusted difference, 8.9%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 20.2%; P = .13). The rate of functional recovery after thrombectomy was 44.0% for patients with early neurologic improvement, 29.4% for patients with small infarct volume (<50 mL), and 7.0% for patients with neither of these parameters. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this study suggest that selected patients with prestroke disability may benefit from thrombectomy. However, the thrombectomy-associated increase in functional recovery was small. Therefore, routine use of thrombectomy may not be beneficial among patients with a large ischemic core and infarct volumes less than 50 mL may be necessary to obtain functional recovery. Patients with higher chances of functional recovery are also at an increased risk of survival with substantial disability, indicating potential harms from the intervention; further studies are needed.
