Clinical evaluation of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC in comparison to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

INTRODUCTION: [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC is a new radiolabelled somatostatin-analogue for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of neuroendocrine tumours. Its advantage over DOTA-conjugated compounds is the possibility for high-efficiency labelling with gallium-68 quickly at room temperature with high reliability and without the need for product purification, which enables the development of an instant kit-type labelling method. We evaluated its imaging characteristics in patients with neuroendocrine tumours in comparison to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC. METHODS: 19 patients imaged with [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC were retrospectively analysed and uptake in normal tissues was compared with a group of 19 patients imaged with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC. 10 patients imaged with [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC had a history of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC imaging before and were additionally analysed to obtain biodistribution data of both tracers in the same patients. In 5 patients showing stable disease between both examinations, tumour uptake, lesion detectability and lesion conspicuity of both tracers were evaluated. RESULTS: Uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC in normal organs with expression of the somatostatin receptor was 25-47% lower compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC. Background of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC was 40-41% lower in the liver. A higher retention of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC was observed in the blood (up to 67%) and in the lungs (up to 44%). Tumour uptake (SUV) was 22-31% lower for [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC. However, no significant differences were observed for tumour-to-background ratios and lesion detectability. Regarding liver metastases, [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC uptake (SUV) reached 69-73% of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC uptake, but tumour-to-background ratios of [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC were 105-110% of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC ratios. CONCLUSIONS, ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: We demonstrated the feasibility of the new PET tracer [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC for imaging of patients with neuroendocrine tumours, showing a comparable performance to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC. [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC has the potential for development of an instant kit-type labelling method at room temperature similar to 99mTc-labelled radiopharmaceuticals, which might help to increase the availability of 68Ga-labelled somatostatin analogues for clinical routine use.

[PET-CT in head and neck cancer]. / PET-CT bei Karzinomen im Kopf­Hals­Bereich.

The importance of 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the diagnosis of malignant disease is increasing. On one hand, this is due to the high sensitivity of this method, on the other, because the entire body can be examined. FDG-PET can be particularly advantageous for the diagnosis of head and neck tumors, where tumor staging is an important prognostic parameter and essentially determines the therapeutic regimen. This article presents the different possibilities for combined evaluation with PET and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of patients with head and neck cancer. Special focus is placed on primary staging and tumor follow-up, as well as on the role of PET-CT in the diagnosis of patients with cancer of unknown primary origin (CUP). The use of PET-CT for radiotherapy planning and new aspects of PET technology are also discussed.

Podoplanin expression in oral leukoplakia: prognostic value and clinicopathological implications.

OBJECTIVES: Current clinicopathological parameters cannot predict the risk of malignant transformation in oral leukoplakia sufficiently. Recent studies have shown that podoplanin is expressed in oral cancer and precancerous lesions. The aim of our study was to assess whether podoplanin expression in pretreatment biopsies could serve as a biomarker to predict the risk of malignant transformation in patients with oral leukoplakia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, podoplanin expression was analysed in 60 patients with previously untreated oral leukoplakia by immunohistochemistry. We investigated the associations between podoplanin expression and various clinicopathological variables including oral cancer-free survival (OCFS) and the SIN-classification. RESULTS: The chi-square-test revealed that high expression of podoplanin in pretreatment biopsies was associated with malignant transformation (P = 0.003) and increasing SIN-classification (P = 0.009). In univariate analysis, podoplanin expression in oral leukoplakia had a significant impact on OCFS (P = 0.009). The 5-year OCFS rate decreased from 100% for patients with no podoplanin expression to 41.7% for patients with the highest level of podoplanin expression. CONCLUSION: Although podoplanin expression and the SIN-classification served as factors to predict malignant transformation in patients with oral leukoplakia in univariate analysis, no significant impact was found for both factors in multivariate analysis.