RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal gestational age to deliver pregnant people with chronic hypertension to improve perinatal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of chronic hypertension treatment to different blood pressure goals. Participants with term, singleton gestations were included. Those with fetal anomalies and those with a diagnosis of preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation were excluded. The primary maternal composite outcome included death, serious morbidity (heart failure, stroke, encephalopathy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, intensive care unit admission, intubation, renal failure), preeclampsia with severe features, hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, or abruption. The primary neonatal outcome included fetal or neonatal death, respiratory support beyond oxygen mask, Apgar score less than 3 at 5 minutes, neonatal seizures, or suspected sepsis. Secondary outcomes included intrapartum cesarean birth, length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn, and hypoglycemia. Those with a planned delivery were compared with those expectantly managed at each gestational week. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs are reported. RESULTS: We included 1,417 participants with mild chronic hypertension; 305 (21.5%) with a new diagnosis in pregnancy and 1,112 (78.5%) with known preexisting hypertension. Groups differed by body mass index (BMI) and preexisting diabetes. In adjusted models, there was no association between planned delivery and the primary maternal or neonatal composite outcome in any gestational age week compared with expectant management. Planned delivery at 37 weeks of gestation was associated with RDS (7.9% vs 3.0%, aOR 2.70, 95% CI, 1.40-5.22), and planned delivery at 37 and 38 weeks was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia (19.4% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.27-3.08 in week 37; 14.4% vs 7.7%, aOR 1.82, 95% CI, 1.06-3.10 in week 38). CONCLUSION: Planned delivery in the early-term period compared with expectant management was not associated with a reduction in adverse maternal outcomes. However, it was associated with increased odds of some neonatal complications. Delivery timing for individuals with mild chronic hypertension should weigh maternal and neonatal outcomes in each gestational week but may be optimized by delivery at 39 weeks.
Asunto(s)
Edad Gestacional , Hipertensión , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Recién Nacido , Parto Obstétrico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/terapia , Resultado del Embarazo , Factores de Tiempo , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crónica , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by type of antihypertensive used in participants of the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy) trial. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP, an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment compared with standard care (no treatment unless severe hypertension developed) in pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-104 mm Hg before 20 weeks of gestation) and singleton pregnancies. We performed three comparisons based on medications prescribed at enrollment: labetalol compared with standard care, nifedipine compared with standard care, and labetalol compared with nifedipine. Although active compared with standard care groups were randomized, medication assignment within the active treatment group was not random but based on clinician or patient preference. The primary outcome was the occurrence of superimposed preeclampsia with severe features, preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The key secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We also compared medication adverse effects between groups. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with log binomial regression to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: Of 2,292 participants analyzed, 720 (31.4%) received labetalol, 417 (18.2%) received nifedipine, and 1,155 (50.4%) received no treatment. The mean gestational age at enrollment was 10.5±3.7 weeks; nearly half of participants (47.5%) identified as non-Hispanic Black; and 44.5% used aspirin. The primary outcome occurred in 217 (30.1%), 130 (31.2%), and 427 (37.0%) in the labetalol, nifedipine, and standard care groups, respectively. Risk of the primary outcome was lower among those receiving treatment (labetalol use vs standard adjusted RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; nifedipine use vs standard adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), but there was no significant difference in risk when labetalol was compared with nifedipine (adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.82-1.18). There were no significant differences in SGA or serious adverse events between participants receiving labetalol and those receiving nifedipine. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in predetermined maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected on the basis of the use of labetalol or nifedipine for treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02299414.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Labetalol , Nifedipino , Resultado del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Labetalol/administración & dosificación , Labetalol/efectos adversos , Labetalol/uso terapéutico , Nifedipino/administración & dosificación , Nifedipino/efectos adversos , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Recién Nacido , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Preeclampsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
As the diagnosis and treatment of patients with inborn errors of metabolism has improved dramatically over the years, more people with these conditions are surviving into child-bearing years. Given the changes in metabolism throughout pregnancy, this time presents a unique challenge in their care. Overall metabolic shifts in pregnancy go from anabolism to catabolism driven by endocrinologic changes, along with changes in rates of gluconeogenesis, glucose consumption, amino acid transport, protein consumption, and lipid breakdown, result in a complicated metabolic picture. Additionally, maternal inborn errors of metabolism can affect a fetus, as in phenylketonuria, and fetal inborn errors of metabolism can affect the mother, as in certain fatty acid oxidation disorders. Data on these conditions is often very limited. A summary of the current literature, risks associated with pregnancy in inborn errors of metabolism, and suggestions for management of these conditions will be presented.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between mean arterial pressure during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in participants with chronic hypertension using data from the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy) trial. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the CHAP trial, an open-label, multicenter randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy, was conducted. The CHAP trial enrolled participants with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 140-159/90-104 mm Hg) and singleton pregnancies less than 23 weeks of gestation, randomizing them to active treatment (maintained on antihypertensive therapy with a goal BP below 140/90 mm Hg) or standard treatment (control; antihypertensives withheld unless BP reached 160 mm Hg systolic BP or higher or 105 mm Hg diastolic BP or higher). We used logistic regression to measure the strength of association between mean arterial pressure (average and highest across study visits) and to select neonatal outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (per 1-unit increase in millimeters of mercury) of the primary neonatal composite outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4) and individual secondary outcomes (neonatal intensive care unit admission [NICU], low birth weight [LBW] below 2,500 g, and small for gestational age [SGA]) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 2,284 participants were included: 1,155 active and 1,129 control. Adjusted models controlling for randomization group demonstrated that increasing average mean arterial pressure per millimeter of mercury was associated with an increase in each neonatal outcome examined except NEC, specifically neonatal composite (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), NICU admission (aOR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.06-1.08), LBW (aOR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.11-1.14), SGA below the fifth percentile (aOR 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and SGA below the 10th percentile (aOR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.04). Models using the highest mean arterial pressure as opposed to average mean arterial pressure also demonstrated consistent associations. CONCLUSION: Increasing mean arterial pressure was positively associated with most adverse neonatal outcomes except NEC. Given that the relationship between mean arterial pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes may not be consistent at all mean arterial pressure levels, future work should attempt to further elucidate whether there is an absolute threshold or relative change in mean arterial pressure at which fetal benefits are optimized along with maternal benefits. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Embarazo , Presión Arterial , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between maternal blood pressure (BP) below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy), an open label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Participants with mean BP below 140/90 mm Hg were grouped as below 130/80 mm Hg compared with 130-139/80-89 mm Hg by averaging postrandomization clinic BP throughout pregnancy. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA). RESULTS: Of 2,408 patients in CHAP, 2,096 met study criteria; 1,328 had mean BP 130-139/80-89 mm Hg and 768 had mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg were more likely to be older, on antihypertensive medication, in the active treatment arm, and to have lower BP at enrollment. Mean clinic BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with lower frequency of the primary outcome (16.0% vs 35.8%, adjusted relative risk 0.45; 95% CI 0.38-0.54) as well as lower risk of severe preeclampsia and indicated birth before 35 weeks of gestation. There was no association with SGA. CONCLUSION: In pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension, mean BP below 130/80 mm Hg was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes without increased risk of SGA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Preeclampsia , Nacimiento Prematuro , Embarazo , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Preeclampsia/etiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Placenta , Resultado del Embarazo , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increased duration of breastfeeding improves maternal cardiovascular health and may be especially beneficial in high-risk populations, such as those with chronic hypertension. Others have shown that individuals with hypertension are less likely to breastfeed, and there has been limited research aimed at supporting breastfeeding goals in this population. The impact of perinatal blood pressure control on breastfeeding outcomes among people with chronic hypertension is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether breastfeeding initiation and short-term duration assessed at the postpartum clinic visit differed according to perinatal blood pressure treatment strategy (targeting blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg vs reserving antihypertensive treatment for blood pressure ≥160/105 mm Hg). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial. This was an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial where pregnant participants with mild chronic hypertension were randomized to receive antihypertensive medications with goal blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg (active treatment) or deferred treatment until blood pressure ≥160/105 mm Hg (control). The primary outcome was initiation and duration of breastfeeding, assessed at the postpartum clinic visit. We performed bivariate analyses and log-binomial and cumulative logit regression models, adjusting models for variables that were unbalanced in bivariate analyses. We performed additional analyses to explore the relationship between breastfeeding duration and blood pressure measurements at the postpartum visit. RESULTS: Of the 2408 participants from the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial, 1444 (60%) attended the postpartum study visit and provided breastfeeding information. Participants in the active treatment group had different body mass index class distribution and earlier gestational age at enrollment, and (by design) were more often discharged on antihypertensives. Breastfeeding outcomes did not differ significantly by treatment group. In the active and control treatment groups, 563 (77.5%) and 561 (78.1%) initiated breastfeeding, and mean durations of breastfeeding were 6.5±2.3 and 6.3±2.1 weeks, respectively. The probability of ever breastfeeding (adjusted relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.05), current breastfeeding at postpartum visit (adjusted relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.10), and weeks of breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.12) did not differ by treatment group. Increased duration (≥2 vs <2 weeks) of breastfeeding was associated with slightly lower blood pressure measurements at the postpartum visit, but these differences were not significant in adjusted models. CONCLUSION: In a secondary analysis of the cohort of Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial participants who attended the postpartum study visit and provided breastfeeding information (60% of original trial participants), breastfeeding outcomes did not differ significantly by treatment group. This suggests that maintaining goal blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg throughout the perinatal period is associated with neither harm nor benefit for short-term breastfeeding goals. Further study is needed to understand long-term breastfeeding outcomes among individuals with chronic hypertension and how to support this population in achieving their breastfeeding goals.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Hipertensión , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Presión Sanguínea , Periodo PospartoRESUMEN
Although pregnancy is generally contraindicated in advanced heart failure (AHF), successful pregnancies have been observed in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The number of pregnancies in patients with LVADs is increasing, yet optimal management strategies remain undefined. Additionally, no successful pregnancies have been reported with the HeartMate 3 (HM3) (Abbott) LVAD. A systematic review of pregnancy in patients with LVADs was prepared utilizing 3 major scientific databases. We also present the first reported case of successful pregnancy and delivery in a patient supported by an HM3 LVAD. The systematic search yielded 95 results. After filtering to include only relevant citations, eight unique cases were identified. Cases were compared on the basis of several clinical factors. Although pregnancies supported by LVADs are medically complex, several cases of successful deliveries have been observed. Clinical management between cases, however, did vary significantly. Several areas requiring further study were identified.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Active treatment for periviable infants may be influenced by neonatal and obstetric provider perceptions of prognosis. The two aims of this study are to (1) quantify prognostic discordance between provider and data-driven survival estimates and (2) evaluate if prognostic discordance is associated with the threshold probability of survival at which neonatal providers recommend active treatment or obstetric providers recommend antenatal corticosteroids. STUDY DESIGN: Provider survival estimates and threshold probabilities of survival for active treatment and antenatal steroid use were obtained from a case-based survey for an infant or pregnancy at 22 weeks' gestation that was administered at two Atlanta hospitals. Data-driven survival estimates, including ranges, were acquired through the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Extremely Preterm Birth Outcomes Tool. Prognostic discordance was calculated as the difference between a provider and data-driven estimates and classified as pessimistic (provider estimate below data-driven estimate range), accurate (within range), or optimistic (above range). The association between prognostic discordance and the threshold probability of survival was evaluated using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: We had 137 neonatal respondents (51% response rate) and 57 obstetric responses (23% response rate). The overall median prognostic discordance was 1.5% (interquartile range: 17, 13) and 52 (27%) of all respondents were pessimistic, 100 (52%) were accurate, and 42 (22%) were optimistic. The survival threshold above which neonatal and obstetric providers recommended active treatment or antenatal corticosteroids was 30% (20-45%) and 10% (0-20%), respectively. Thresholds did not significantly differ among the three prognostic discordance groups (p = 0.45 for neonatal and p = 0.53 for obstetric providers). There was also no significant correlation between the magnitude of prognostic discordance and thresholds. CONCLUSION: Prognostic discordance exists among both neonatal and obstetric providers. However, this discordance is not associated with the threshold probability of survival at which providers recommend active treatment or antenatal corticosteroids at 22 weeks' gestation. KEY POINTS: · Prognostic discordance at 22 weeks' gestation exists for neonatal and obstetric providers.. · Prognostic discordance is not associated with survival thresholds for neonatal active treatment.. · Prognostic discordance is not associated with survival thresholds for the use of antenatal corticosteroids..
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The benefits and safety of the treatment of mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure, <160/100 mm Hg) during pregnancy are uncertain. Data are needed on whether a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg reduces the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes without compromising fetal growth. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension and singleton fetuses at a gestational age of less than 23 weeks to receive antihypertensive medications recommended for use in pregnancy (active-treatment group) or to receive no such treatment unless severe hypertension (systolic pressure, ≥160 mm Hg; or diastolic pressure, ≥105 mm Hg) developed (control group). The primary outcome was a composite of preeclampsia with severe features, medically indicated preterm birth at less than 35 weeks' gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The safety outcome was small-for-gestational-age birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Secondary outcomes included composites of serious neonatal or maternal complications, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. RESULTS: A total of 2408 women were enrolled in the trial. The incidence of a primary-outcome event was lower in the active-treatment group than in the control group (30.2% vs. 37.0%), for an adjusted risk ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.92; P<0.001). The percentage of small-for-gestational-age birth weights below the 10th percentile was 11.2% in the active-treatment group and 10.4% in the control group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.31; P = 0.76). The incidence of serious maternal complications was 2.1% and 2.8%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.26), and the incidence of severe neonatal complications was 2.0% and 2.6% (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.30). The incidence of any preeclampsia in the two groups was 24.4% and 31.1%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.89), and the incidence of preterm birth was 27.5% and 31.4% (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension, a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg was associated with better pregnancy outcomes than a strategy of reserving treatment only for severe hypertension, with no increase in the risk of small-for-gestational-age birth weight. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; CHAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02299414.).
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión , Resultado del Embarazo , Desprendimiento Prematuro de la Placenta/epidemiología , Desprendimiento Prematuro de la Placenta/prevención & control , Peso al Nacer , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Recién Nacido , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Preeclampsia/prevención & control , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or in the first postpartum year. Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies to occur during pregnancy. As more women delay childbearing, the incidence of breast cancer in pregnancy is increasing. This article provides an overview of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Recommendations for management of breast cancer in pregnancy are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/terapia , SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Female childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes related to their cancer- or treatment-associated sequelae. Optimal care for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors can be facilitated by clinical practice guidelines that identify specific adverse pregnancy outcomes and the clinical characteristics of at-risk subgroups. However, national guidelines are scarce and vary in content. Here, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group offers recommendations for the counseling and surveillance of obstetrical risks of childhood, adolescent, and young adult survivors. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE database (through PubMed) to identify all available evidence published between January 1990 and December 2018. Published articles on pregnancy and perinatal or congenital risks in female cancer survivors were screened for eligibility. Study designs with a sample size larger than 40 pregnancies in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors (diagnosed before the age of 25 years, not pregnant at that time) were eligible. This guideline from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group systematically appraised the quality of available evidence for adverse obstetrical outcomes in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology and formulated recommendations to enhance evidence-based obstetrical care and preconception counseling of female childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors. Healthcare providers should discuss the risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes based on cancer treatment exposures with all female childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors of reproductive age, before conception. Healthcare providers should be aware that there is no evidence to support an increased risk of giving birth to a child with congenital anomalies (high-quality evidence). Survivors treated with radiotherapy to volumes exposing the uterus and their healthcare providers should be aware of the risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes such as miscarriage (moderate-quality evidence), premature birth (high-quality evidence), and low birthweight (high-quality evidence); therefore, high-risk obstetrical surveillance is recommended. Cardiomyopathy surveillance is reasonable before pregnancy or in the first trimester for all female survivors treated with anthracyclines and chest radiation. Female cancer survivors have increased risks of premature delivery and low birthweight associated with radiotherapy targeting the lower body and thereby exposing the uterus, which warrant high-risk pregnancy surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Consejo , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Atención Preconceptiva/normas , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo , Hipertensión , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/clasificación , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/clasificación , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/terapia , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/terapia , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess risk of an adverse perinatal outcome for women with a low fetal fraction (LFF) result on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study whereby women with an LFF result were compared with women who had a sufficient fetal fraction (SFF) result on NIPT. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with quantification of fetal fraction and pregnancy outcome information. Primary outcome was a composite of any of the following: miscarriage, fetal demise, neonatal death, preterm birth, pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorder, placental abruption, and low birth weight. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight (94%) women had an SFF result, and 22 (6%) women had an LFF result. The mean gestational age at the time of NIPT was comparable for both groups. Women with an LFF result were more likely to be African American (86% vs 52%; p = 0.007) and have a higher body mass index (BMI) (mean BMI = 37 kg/m(2) vs BMI = 29 kg/m(2) ; p ≤ 0.001) than women with an SFF result. The composite outcome was significantly more common in the LFF group (59.1% vs 29%; p = 0.003). After adjusting for race and BMI, LFF remained independently associated with adverse perinatal outcome with adjusted odds ratio = 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.01-6.2; p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Women with an LFF result have an increased likelihood of an adverse pregnancy outcome.
Asunto(s)
ADN/aislamiento & purificación , Feto/química , Técnicas Genéticas , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistema Libre de Células/química , Sistema Libre de Células/metabolismo , ADN/metabolismo , Femenino , Feto/metabolismo , Técnicas Genéticas/normas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Manejo de Especímenes/normas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background. Crisscross heart (CCH) is a complex, rare, congenital, rotational, cardiac abnormality that accounts for <0.1% of congenital heart defects (CHD). CCH is characterized by the crossing of the inflow streams of the two ventricles due to an abnormal twisting of the heart. A case of maternal CCH has not been previously reported. Case. We report a case of a primigravida with a CCH, who was separated at birth from her thoracopagus conjoined twin. Pregnancy was managed by congenital cardiology, maternal-fetal medicine, anesthesiology, and obstetrics. She underwent a 39-week vaginal delivery without maternal or neonatal complication. Conclusion. A successful term pregnancy outcome was achieved in a patient with CCH using a multidisciplinary approach to address her cardiac condition.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in the quantity of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) before the onset of preeclampsia. It would be beneficial if the quantity of cffDNA predicted preeclampsia in order to implement preventative trials and strategies to decrease maternal and fetal morbidity. Our objective was to review the literature on using cffDNA levels as a predictor of preeclampsia. METHODS: We performed a systematic review following the Meta-analyses and Systematic Review of Observational Studies guidelines. Included studies evaluated cffDNA levels in pregnant women before the clinical onset of preeclampsia. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity between included studies, and all received a quality grade of C on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation scale. Of the 13 studies, 11 found an increase in cffDNA among pregnant women who subsequently developed preeclampsia. In addition, all four studies analyzing early-onset or severe preeclampsia found significantly elevated cffDNA levels prior to disease onset. CONCLUSION: Cell-free fetal DNA quantification is a promising marker for preeclampsia prediction, especially for the development of early-onset or severe preeclampsia. However, because of the heterogeneity in published studies, a precise conclusion about the statistical and clinical relevance cannot be made.
Asunto(s)
ADN/sangre , Feto/metabolismo , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Preeclampsia/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , PronósticoRESUMEN
Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or in the first postpartum year. Breast cancer is one of the more common malignancies to occur during pregnancy and, as more women delay childbearing, the incidence of breast cancer in pregnancy is expected to increase. This article provides an overview of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Recommendations for management of breast cancer in pregnancy are discussed.