Serum small RNAs in metastatic colorectal cancer predict response to chemotherapy and characterize high-risk patients.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) presents significant challenges in clinical management due to its heterogeneity and variable response to treatment. In this study, we conducted comprehensive small RNA (sRNA) sequencing analyses to identify sRNA biomarkers associated with survival and treatment response in mCRC patients. We measured serum sRNAs before and after chemotherapy treatment in a discovery cohort of 189 mCRC patients. Our analysis revealed 25 microRNAs (miRNA) as significantly associated with overall survival at baseline. We found that 11 of the 25 significant miRNAs were also significant in an independent validation cohort of 20 mCRC patients, including the top five miRNAs from the discovery cohort. Importantly, all but four of the 25 significant miRNAs from the discovery cohort had hazard ratios in the same direction in the validation cohort. Among the 25 significant miRNAs, we identified the miR-320 family of miRNAs as the strongest independent prognostic marker, with high baseline levels correlating with poor survival outcomes. Furthermore, post-treatment levels of the same miRNAs were even more predictive of overall survival, emphasizing the prognostic value of serum changes in miRNA levels before and after treatment. Moreover, we observed significant changes in serum miRNAs and other sRNAs when comparing samples before and after chemotherapy, with distinct expression patterns between responders and non-responders. Leveraging these differential expression patterns, we established a serum sRNA signature that accurately predicts response to chemotherapy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8. In summary, our study highlights the prognostic and predictive potential of sRNA biomarkers in mCRC, offering valuable insights into patient stratification and personalized treatment approaches.

Do older patients with colorectal cancer experience more deterioration in health-related quality of life than younger patients during the first year of palliative chemotherapy? A prospective real-world observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim was to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a real-life population among younger (< 70 years) and older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) during the first year of palliative chemotherapy. The secondary aims were to assess the impact of chemo-break on HRQoL and to report overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed mCRC, ≥ 18 years, and scheduled for first line palliative chemotherapy were included in this multicentre longitudinal observational study. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (0-100) was filled in at baseline and every second month. Changes or differences in QoL scores of >20, 10-20, and 5-10 points were considered to be of large, moderate, and small clinical magnitude, respectively. Comparing means of different QoL scores between groups or over time, a threshold of 5-10 was considered the minimally important difference (MID). Treatments, patient characteristics, and tumour characteristics were prospectively registered. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were included, and 146 were alive after one year. Four months after start of treatment, large deteriorations in fatigue and physical functioning were reported by 40% and 25% of the patients, respectively. Changes in global QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting were not significantly different between the age groups and reached baseline levels after one year. Patients on chemo-break reported significant improvements in several HRQoL domains. Median OS was 17.5 months [95% confidence interval 14.4-20.5] with no difference between younger and older patients. DISCUSSION: Older patients did not experience more deterioration in HRQoL than younger patients during the first year of palliative chemotherapy. Measures to mitigate the deteriorations in fatigue and physical functioning observed during the first months of palliative treatment are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02395224, March 23, 2015, retrospectively registered.

Trajectory of health-related quality of life during the last year of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to assess the trajectory of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the last year of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to explore when and to what degree deterioration of symptoms and physical functioning accelerate towards the end of life. METHODS: Data from two RCTs of first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC was analyzed. HRQOL was assessed repeatedly using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13. Changes in HRQOL scores were investigated relative to the time of death. RESULTS: The study sample included 730 patients, with a median of four HRQOL assessments per patient (range 1-9). Fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, and cough were the most pronounced symptoms in all phases of the disease trajectory. The deterioration rates of global quality of life, physical function, and key symptoms were relatively slow until 4 months before death. Then, the decline accelerated, and for physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea, there was a very rapid decline in the last 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced NSCLC experience a high symptom burden that worsens over time, especially in the last 4 months. Regular symptom monitoring may help identify where patients are in the disease trajectory, serve as a trigger for changes in anticancer and symptomatic treatment, and facilitate discussions about end-of-life care.

Associations between hematologic toxicity and health-related quality of life during first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Many patients experience toxicity from chemotherapy that may negatively impact their health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but side effects often go undetected by health care personnel. Our aim was to investigate whether hematologic toxicity (HT) was associated with HRQoL impairment, and, consequently, if blood counts could be used to identify patients with the highest need for supportive care during chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from two phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were analyzed (n = 873). Blood counts were measured weekly in the treatment period. We categorized patients as having severe (CTCAE grade 3-4) or non-severe (grade 0-2) HT during the first chemotherapy cycle. HRQoL was reported on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 before and at the end of the cycle. The primary endpoints were changes in global quality of life, fatigue, nausea/vomiting and dyspnea (LC13). RESULTS: Of the 766 patients with complete data set, 177 (23%) developed severe HT during the first chemotherapy cycle. Changes in fatigue and nausea/vomiting were significantly worse for patients experiencing severe compared to patients with non-severe HT (difference in mean change of 4.9 points; p = .01, and 6.4 points; p = .01, respectively), but this association was limited to neutropenia, not thrombocytopenia or anemia. There were no significant associations between HT and global quality of life or dyspnea (difference in mean change of 2.1 points; p = .28, and 3.3 points; p = .053, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients developing severe HT had worse changes in two out of four of the primary HRQoL endpoints, but the association was not strong enough to use blood counts to identify patients who need more clinical attention and supportive care during chemotherapy.

International validation of the EORTC QLQ-PRT20 module for assessment of quality of life symptoms relating to radiation proctitis: a phase IV study.

BACKGROUND: Although patients experience radiation proctitis post radiotherapy no internationally tested instruments exist to measure these symptoms. This Phase IV study tested the scale structure, reliability and validity and cross-cultural applicability of the EORTC proctitis module (QLQ-PRT23) in patients who were receiving pelvic radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 358) from six countries completed the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-PRT23 and EORTC Quality of Life Group debriefing questions. Clinicians completed the EORTC Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. Questionnaires were completed at four time-points. The module's scale structure was examined and validated using standard psychometric analysis techniques. RESULTS: Three items were dropped from the module (QLQ-PRT23 → QLQ-PRT20). Factor analysis identified five factors in the module: bowel control; bloating and gas; emotional function/lifestyle; pain; and leakage. Inter-item correlations were within r = 0.3-0.7. Test-Retest reliability was high. All multi-item scales discriminated between patients showing symptoms and those without symptomology. The module discriminated symptoms from the clinician completed scoring and for age, gender and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The EORTC QLQ-PRT20 is designed to be used in addition to the EORTC QLQ-C30 to measure quality of life in patients who receive pelvic radiotherapy. The EORTC QLQ-PRT20 is quick to complete, acceptable to patients, has good content validity and high reliability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12609000972224 .

Measurement of health-related quality of life during chemotherapy - the importance of timing.

BACKGROUND: Side effects of chemotherapy may occur at different time-points in the treatment cycle, and the exact assessment time relative to chemotherapy may affect HRQoL scores. The current study examined the variation of HRQoL during chemotherapy cycles, and whether differences in HRQoL scores varied at selected time-points between patients allocated to two different chemotherapy regimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of carboplatin plus vinorelbine (VC) or gemcitabine (GC) every 3 weeks. HRQoL was reported on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 on days 1, 4, 8, 11 and 15 of every cycle. Global health status, nausea/vomiting, fatigue and dyspnea (LC13) were defined as the HRQoL scales of primary interest. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled. Variation of mean scores of global health status, nausea/vomiting and fatigue showed a consistent pattern during chemotherapy. Day 4 appeared to be the time-point when chemotherapy influenced HRQoL the most. The differences in mean HRQoL scores between the two treatment arms varied at the different time-points, especially for nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSION: There was a clinically relevant variation of HRQoL during chemotherapy cycles, with increased symptom burden the first week following treatment. Our results suggest that timing of HRQoL assessment can influence the chances of detecting differences between the treatment regimens.