Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pain Med ; 15(9): 1558-68, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24828968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop metrics to assess opioid prescribing behavior as part of the evaluation of the Extended-Release/Long-Acting (ER/LA) Opioid Analgesic Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). DESIGN: Candidate metrics were selected using published guidelines, examined using sensitivity analyses, and applied to cross-sectional rolling cohorts of Medicare patients prescribed with extended-release oxycodone (ERO) between July 2, 2006 and July 1, 2011. Potential metrics included prescribing opioid-tolerant-only ER/LA opioid analgesics to non-opioid-tolerant patients, prescribing early fills to patients, and ordering drug screens. RESULTS: Proposed definitions for opioid tolerance were seven continuous days of opioid usage of at least 30 mg oxycodone equivalents, within the 7 days (primary) or 30 days (secondary) prior to first opioid-tolerant-only ERO prescription. Forty-four percent of opioid-tolerant-only ERO episodes met the primary opioid tolerance definition; 56% met the secondary definition. Fills were deemed "early" if a prescription was filled before 70% (primary) or 50% (secondary) of the prior prescription's days' supply was to be consumed. Five percent (primary) and 2% (secondary) of episodes had more than or equal to two early fills during treatment. At least one drug screen was billed in 14% of episodes. Stratified analyses indicated that older patients were less likely to be opioid tolerant at the time of the first opioid-tolerant-only ERO prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators propose three metrics to monitor changes in prescribing behaviors for opioid analgesics that might be used to evaluate the ER/LA Opioid Analgesics REMS. Low frequencies of patients, particularly those >85 years, were likely to be opioid tolerant prior to receiving prescriptions for opioid-tolerant-only ERO.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Médica Continua , Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Oxicodona/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Monitoreo de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Tolerancia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narcóticos/análisis , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Oxicodona/análisis , Oxicodona/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Epidemiol ; 178(6): 962-73, 2013 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23652165

RESUMEN

Given the increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) found with the 1976 swine influenza vaccine, both active surveillance and end-of-season analyses on chart-confirmed cases were performed across multiple US vaccine safety monitoring systems, including the Medicare system, to evaluate the association of GBS after 2009 monovalent H1N1 influenza vaccination. Medically reviewed cases consisted of H1N1-vaccinated Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized for GBS. These cases were then classified by using Brighton Collaboration diagnostic criteria. Thirty-one persons had Brighton level 1, 2, or 3 GBS or Fisher Syndrome, with symptom onset 1-119 days after vaccination. Self-controlled risk interval analyses estimated GBS risk within the 6-week period immediately following H1N1 vaccination compared with a later control period, with additional adjustment for seasonality. Our results showed an elevated risk of GBS with 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccination (incidence rate ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 5.11; attributable risk = 2.84 per million doses administered, 95% confidence interval: 0.21, 5.48). This observed risk was slightly higher than that seen with previous seasonal influenza vaccines; however, additional results that used a stricter case definition (Brighton level 1 or 2) were not statistically significant, and our ability to account for preceding respiratory/gastrointestinal illness was limited. Furthermore, the observed risk was substantially lower than that seen with the 1976 swine influenza vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Respiratorias/complicaciones , Anciano , Femenino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/clasificación , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Síndrome de Miller Fisher/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Miller Fisher/clasificación , Síndrome de Miller Fisher/epidemiología , Síndrome de Miller Fisher/etiología , Distribución de Poisson , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...