RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to summarize the available evidence examining the association between prenatal ultrasound findings and adverse fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to evaluate whether the predictive value of ultrasound findings for adverse outcomes varies between T1DM and T2DM pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of the existing literature through August 12, 2024. We included articles in English that reported associations between ultrasound findings and fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes in pregnant people with T1DM and T2DM. The primary outcome of interest was stillbirth; secondary outcomes were neonatal demise, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory distress syndrome, polycythemia, hyperbilirubinemia, organomegaly, electrolyte disturbances, shoulder dystocia, permanent brachial plexus injury, cord gas, Apgar scores, large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA), and preterm birth. Two independent reviewers examined articles at the abstract level and, if eligible, at the full-text level; disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. RESULTS: Of the 2,088 unique citations reviewed, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria describing associations between ultrasound findings and fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes among a total of 1,165 pregnant people with T1DM and 489 pregnant people with T2DM. Most studies (10/12) examined the association between ultrasound measures of growth, including estimated fetal weight and its individual components, abdominal wall thickness, head circumference to abdominal circumference ratio, and birth weight, LGA or SGA. Studies did not examine stillbirth, neonatal demise, or maternal outcomes other than cesarean section. CONCLUSION: This systematic review synthesizes the available literature on ultrasound risk markers of adverse fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes separately in pregnant people with T1DM and T2DM. We identified very few studies that distinguished between pregnant people with T1DM and T2DM, and the majority focused on surrogate outcomes (e.g., LGA, SGA) of morbidity. Our findings highlight the need for further studies investigating these distinct diseases to provide evidence for antenatal management recommendations. KEY POINTS: · This systematic review compares ultrasound risk markers for adverse outcomes in pregnancies with T1DM and T2DM.. · Few studies compare ultrasound risk markers for adverse outcomes among pregnancies with T1DM and T2DM.. · Additional targeted studies to inform antenatal ultrasound care are necessary..
RESUMEN
Our objective was to identify birth hospitalization severe maternal morbidity (SMM) diagnoses that were also coded during prior encounters and, thus, potentially falsely carried forward as de novo SMM events. This retrospective cohort study included pregnant patients with births between 2016 and 2020. We applied the SMM algorithm to the birth hospitalization and encounters occurring prepregnancy, antepartum, and postpartum. The primary outcome was the rate of SMM diagnoses recorded during the birth hospitalization that were also coded on previous encounters. There were 1,380 (1.8%) birthing patients with SMM. Of patients with SMM codes at the birth hospitalization, 19.0% had the same SMM code during a prior encounter. Certain SMM events may be prone to carry-forward errors and may not signify a de novo birth hospitalization event.
Asunto(s)
Alta del Paciente , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Hospitalización , Hospitales , MorbilidadRESUMEN
Importance: The incidence of pregnancy-related acute kidney injury is increasing and is associated with significant maternal morbidity including progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Little is known about characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients who develop pregnancy-related ESKD. Objectives: To examine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with pregnancy-related ESKD and to investigate associations between pre-ESKD nephrology care and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cohort study of 183â¯640 reproductive-aged women with incident ESKD between January 1, 2000, and November 20, 2020, from the US Renal Data System and maternal data from births captured in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publicly available natality data. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to June 2023. Exposure: Pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD, per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes reported at ESKD onset by the primary nephrologist on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 2728. Main Outcomes Measures: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models were constructed to examine time to (1) mortality, (2) access to kidney transplant (joining the waiting list or receiving a live donor transplant), and (3) receipt of transplant after joining the waitlist. Results: A total of 341 patients with a pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD were identified (mean [SD] age 30.2 [7.3]). Compared with the general US birthing population, Black patients were overrepresented among those with pregnancy-related ESKD (109 patients [31.9%] vs 585â¯268 patients [16.2%]). In adjusted analyses, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had similar or lower hazards of mortality compared with those with glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19), diabetes or hypertension (aHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61), or other or unknown primary causes of ESKD (aHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48-0.75). Despite this, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had significantly lower access to kidney transplant compared with those with other causes of ESKD, including (1) glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.43-0.66), (2) diabetes or hypertension (aSHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98), and (3) other or unkown cause (aSHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99). Those with pregnancy-related ESKD were less likely to have nephrology care or have a graft or arteriovenous fistula placed before ESKD onset (nephrology care: adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.56; graft or arteriovenous fistula placed: aRR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.57). Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, those with pregnancy-related ESKD had reduced access to transplant and nephrology care, which could exacerbate existing disparities in a disproportionately Black population. Increased access to care could improve quality of life and health outcomes among these young adults with high potential for long-term survival.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Diabetes Mellitus , Glomerulonefritis , Hipertensión , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas , Fallo Renal Crónico , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Calidad de Vida , Medicare , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/complicaciones , Fístula Arteriovenosa/complicacionesRESUMEN
A more granular donor kidney grading scale, the kidney donor profile index (KDPI), has recently emerged in contradistinction to the standard criteria donor/expanded criteria donor framework. In this paper, we built a Markov decision process model to evaluate the survival, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and cost advantages of using high-KDPI kidneys based on multiple KDPI strata over a 60-month time horizon as opposed to remaining on the waiting list waiting for a lower-KDPI kidney. Data for the model were gathered from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the United States Renal Data System Medicare parts A, B, and D databases. Of the 129,024 phenotypes delineated in this model, 65% of them would experience a survival benefit, 81% would experience an increase in QALYs, 87% would see cost-savings, and 76% would experience cost-savings per QALY from accepting a high-KDPI kidney rather than remaining on the waiting list waiting for a kidney of lower-KDPI. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) revealed the main drivers of increased survival in accepting high-KDPI kidneys were wait time ≥30 months, panel reactive antibody (PRA) <90, age ≥45 to 65, diagnosis leading to renal failure, and prior transplantation. The CART analysis showed the main drivers of increased QALYs in accepting high-kidneys were wait time ≥30 months, PRA <90, and age ≥55 to 65.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Supervivencia de Injerto , Medicare , Riñón , Donantes de Tejidos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Unilateral absence of a pulmonary artery (UAPA) is a rare congenital malformation associated with hemoptysis, pulmonary hypertension, and infection. Little is known about the impact on pregnancy outcomes. We sought to synthesize the existing literature on pregnancy outcomes in patients with maternal UAPA. STUDY DESIGN: We report a case of maternal UAPA and performed a systematic review of the existing literature. Articles in English reporting pregnancy outcomes among women with unilateral absence or hypoplasia of the pulmonary artery were included. Articles were reviewed at the abstract level and, if eligible, at the full-text level by two independent reviewers with disagreements adjudicated by a third reviewer. Data were abstracted by two independent reviewers. Outcomes of interest were mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, intensive care admission, maternal death, and length of stay. Summary statistics for each outcome are presented. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, including the presented case, reporting outcomes in 22 pregnancies impacted by maternal UAPA. Median age at diagnosis was 21 years. Concurrent cardiac comorbidities were reported in 6/13 (46.2%) with pulmonary hypertension in 5/20 (25%) of cases where this information was reported. We observed high rates of preterm birth (4/12, 33.3%), cesarean delivery (10/15, 66.7%), and operative vaginal delivery (2/5, 40.0%). There was one maternal death occurring in the immediate postpartum period for a mortality rate of 4.5%. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a comprehensive review of existing literature on maternal UAPA. Our findings suggest increased rates of adverse outcomes and underscore the importance of early diagnosis, identification of pulmonary hypertension, and multidisciplinary care. KEY POINTS: · There may be increased adverse outcomes in maternal UAPA.. · Concurrent cardiac abnormalities are common in maternal UAPA.. · Early diagnosis, identification of pulmonary hypertension, and multidisciplinary care are important..
RESUMEN
Unacceptably high rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States and stark racial disparities in outcomes are generating efforts to improve both research capacity and quality improvement in obstetrical care. Comprehensive, high-quality datasets on which to build these efforts are crucial to the success of obstetrical quality improvement efforts. However, existing data sources in obstetrics have notable limitations. Other medical and surgical specialties have addressed similar challenges through the creation of national registries, and we argue that obstetrics must take the same approach to improve outcomes. In this article, we summarized the current availability and limitations of large-scale data in obstetrics research and compared the data with registries developed in other specialties. Moreover, we have outlined the guiding principles for the development of a national obstetrics registry and have proposed future directions.
Asunto(s)
Obstetricia , Embarazo , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Grupos Raciales , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has recently emerged as a major threat to human health. Infections range from asymptomatic to severe (increased respiratory rate, hypoxia, significant lung involvement on imaging) or critical (multi-organ failure or dysfunction or respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula). Current evidence suggests that pregnancy women are at increased risk of severe disease, specifically the need for hospitalization, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation, and the already complex management of infection with an emerging pathogen may be further complicated by pregnancy. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of what is known about the clinical course of COVID-19 in pregnancy, drawing on (a) experience with other coronaviruses such as SARS and MERS, (b) knowledge of immunologic and physiologic changes in pregnancy and how these might impact infection with SARS-CoV-2, and (c) the current literature reporting outcomes in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2. We also briefly summarize considerations in management of severe COVID-19 in pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología , Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Pandemias , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at increased risks of rejection and graft failure. The optimal induction agent for this population remains controversial, particularly regarding concerns that antithymocyte globulin (ATG) might increase HCV-related complications. METHODS: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims data, we studied 6780 HCV+ and 139 681 HCV- KT recipients in 1999-2016 who received ATG or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) for induction. We first examined the association of recipient HCV status with receiving ATG (versus IL2RA) using multilevel logistic regression. Then, we studied the association of ATG (versus IL2RA) with KT outcomes (rejection, graft failure, and death) and hepatic complications (liver transplant registration and cirrhosis) among HCV+ recipients using logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS: HCV+ recipients were less likely to receive ATG than HCV- recipients (living donor, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.640.770.91; deceased donor, aOR = 0.710.810.92). In contrast, HCV+ recipients who received ATG were at lower risk of acute rejection compared to those who received IL2RA (1-y crude incidence = 11.6% versus 12.6%; aOR = 0.680.820.99). There was no significant difference in the risks of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.861.001.17), death (aHR = 0.850.951.07), liver transplant registration (aHR = 0.580.971.61), and cirrhosis (aHR = 0.730.921.16). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ATG, as compared to IL2RA, may lower the risk of acute rejection without increasing hepatic complications in HCV+ KT recipients. Given the higher rates of acute rejection in this population, ATG appears to be safe and reasonable for HCV+ recipients.
Asunto(s)
Suero Antilinfocítico/administración & dosificación , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Hepacivirus/inmunología , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/inmunología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores de Interleucina-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Interleucina-2/inmunología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) based on reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are being used to rule out infection among high-risk persons, such as exposed inpatients and health care workers. It is critical to understand how the predictive value of the test varies with time from exposure and symptom onset to avoid being falsely reassured by negative test results. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the false-negative rate by day since infection. DESIGN: Literature review and pooled analysis. SETTING: 7 previously published studies providing data on RT-PCR performance by time since symptom onset or SARS-CoV-2 exposure using samples from the upper respiratory tract (n = 1330). PATIENTS: A mix of inpatients and outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. MEASUREMENTS: A Bayesian hierarchical model was fitted to estimate the false-negative rate by day since exposure and symptom onset. RESULTS: Over the 4 days of infection before the typical time of symptom onset (day 5), the probability of a false-negative result in an infected person decreases from 100% (95% CI, 100% to 100%) on day 1 to 67% (CI, 27% to 94%) on day 4. On the day of symptom onset, the median false-negative rate was 38% (CI, 18% to 65%). This decreased to 20% (CI, 12% to 30%) on day 8 (3 days after symptom onset) then began to increase again, from 21% (CI, 13% to 31%) on day 9 to 66% (CI, 54% to 77%) on day 21. LIMITATION: Imprecise estimates due to heterogeneity in the design of studies on which results were based. CONCLUSION: Care must be taken in interpreting RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection-particularly early in the course of infection-when using these results as a basis for removing precautions intended to prevent onward transmission. If clinical suspicion is high, infection should not be ruled out on the basis of RT-PCR alone, and the clinical and epidemiologic situation should be carefully considered. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins Health System, and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Teorema de Bayes , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Humanos , Pandemias , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction is a common quality-of-life issue among patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer, but patients report deficiencies in sexual health counseling. AIM: We sought to characterize provider-led sexual health counseling of patients undergoing RC and whether provider practice differs by patient gender. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of members of the Society of Urologic Oncology to assess topics included in provider-led sexual health counseling and barriers to counseling. OUTCOMES: Nonroutine counseling regarding each sexual health topic was compared for female vs male patients using chi-squared tests. Modified Poisson regression was used to examine associations between provider characteristics and nonroutine counseling of female patients. RESULTS: Among 140 urologists, the majority did not routinely counsel patients about sexual orientation, partner sexual dysfunction, or referral options to sexual health services. Providers were significantly more likely to not provide routine counseling to female patients compared to male patients about the following topics: baseline sexual activity (20.6% vs 9.7%, respectively, P = 0.04), baseline sexual dysfunction (60.8% vs 20.2%, respectively, P < 0.05), the risk of sexual dysfunction after RC (20.0% vs 6.5%, respectively, P = 0.006), the potential for nerve-sparing RC (70.8% vs 35.5%, respectively, P = 0.002), and postoperative sexual health and dysfunction (42.6% vs 21.1%, respectively, P = 0.01). Overall, 41.2% of providers did not routinely discuss the potential for pelvic organ-preserving RC with sexually active female patients. Provider sex, age, practice type, urologic oncology fellowship training, years in practice, or female RC volume were not predictive of nonroutine or disparate counseling of female patients. The most common barriers to counseling female patients were older patient age (50.7%), inadequate time (47.1%), and uncertainty about baseline sexual function (37.1%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Urologists acknowledge key deficiencies and gender disparities in sexual health counseling of patients undergoing RC. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Although cross-sectional, to our knowledge, this is the first study to examine provider practice patterns regarding sexual health counseling of patients undergoing RC. CONCLUSION: Future efforts should be directed towards reducing barriers to sexual health counseling of patients undergoing RC to improve deficiencies and gender disparities. Gupta N, Kucirka LM, Semerjian A, et al. Comparing Provider-Led Sexual Health Counseling of Male and Female Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy. J Sex Med 2020;17:949-956.
Asunto(s)
Salud Sexual , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Estudios Transversales , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Conducta Sexual , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) is a cytokine mediator of perinatal brain injury. The effect of sub-chronic systemic IL-1ß exposure in perinatal and offspring outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of maternal IL-1ß exposure on pregnancy and offspring outcomes. At E15, CD1 dams were allocated to receive intraperitoneal injection of phosphate buffered saline or mouse recombinant IL-1ß (1â¯mcg) for four consecutive days. We analyzed pup survivaland neurobehavioral status. At E18, placental H&E staining and fetal brain Nissl staining was performed. Placental gene expression was analyzed by qPCR and T cell infiltration was analyzed by flow cytometry. Effects of inflammation on feto-placental blood flow were analyzed by Doppler ultrasonography. IL-1ß decreased pup survival (Pâ¯<â¯.0001) and adversely affected offspring performance on neurodevelopmental tests (Pâ¯<â¯.05). Placentas of exposed dams exhibited significant thinning of maternal and fetal sides, and fetal brain exhibited cortical thinning. Placental qPCR analysis revealed significant upregulation of NFκB2 (Pâ¯=â¯.0021) and CXCL11 (Pâ¯=â¯.0401). While maternal IL-1ß exposure did not affect feto-placental blood flow, placental flow cytometry showed an increase in placental infiltration of CD4+ T cells at 24â¯h post-injection (hpi, Pâ¯<â¯.0001) and CD8+ T cells at 72â¯hpi (Pâ¯=â¯.0217). Maternal sub-chronic, systemic inflammation with IL-1ß decreased pup survival and played a key role in perinatal brain injury. The mechanisms behind these outcomes may involve immune system activation and alterations in placental T cell trafficking.
Asunto(s)
Interleucina-1beta/efectos adversos , Placenta/inmunología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inmunología , Animales , Lesiones Encefálicas/metabolismo , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Femenino , Feto/metabolismo , Inflamación/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/fisiología , Lipopolisacáridos/farmacología , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
With new practice guidelines, it is important to understand how liver transplant (LT) centers have incorporated direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) into the management of hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) candidates and recipients. To explore how DAAs have affected LT centers' willingness to treat HCV+ candidates and recipients and to use HCV+ donors, we surveyed high volume US LT centers (11/2014-12/2015) regarding practices for HCV+ candidates, recipients, and donors, before vs after DAAs. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to compare centers' number of LTs, HCV+ recipients, and HCV+ donors in the years before (1/1/2012-12/31/2013) and after (1/1/2016-12/31/2017) survey administration. Of 80 centers contacted, 57 (71.3%) responded, representing 69.0% of the total volume of LTs in 2013. After DAAs, most centers increased treating candidates with low (≤15) model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) (85.2%), intermediate/high (>15) MELD (92.6%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (79.6%). There was consensus to treat low MELD candidates (90.8% "most of the time/always"), but less certainty for intermediate/high MELD candidates (48.2% "sometimes"). Universal post-LT HCV treatment increased (7.4% vs 57.4%). After DAAs, 42.6% were more willing to use HCV+ donors for HCV+ candidates, and 38.9% were willing to consider using HCV+ donors for HCV- candidates. Overall, with DAAs, centers were more willing to treat HCV+ candidates and recipients and to use HCV+ donors; recent recommendations may help to guide treatment decisions for intermediate/high MELD candidates.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Antivirales/normas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Selección de Donante/normas , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/virología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/virología , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado , Selección de Paciente , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The availability of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy might have impacted use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected (HCV+) deceased donor kidneys for transplantation. METHODS: We used 2005 to 2018 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to identify 18 936 candidates willing to accept HCV+ kidneys and 3348 HCV+ recipients of HCV+ kidneys. We compared willingness to accept, utilization, discard, and posttransplant outcomes associated with HCV+ kidneys between 2 treatment eras (interferon [IFN] era, January 1, 2005 to December 5, 2013 vs DAA era, December 6, 2013 to August 2, 2018). Models were adjusted for candidate, recipient, and donor factors where appropriate. RESULTS: In the DAA era, candidates were 2.2 times more likely to list as willing to accept HCV+ kidneys (adjusted odds ratio, 2.072.232.41; P < 0.001), and HCV+ recipients were 1.95 times more likely to have received an HCV+ kidney (adjusted odds ratio, 1.761.952.16; P < 0.001). Median Kidney Donor Profile Index of HCV+ kidneys decreased from 77 (interquartile range [IQR], 59-90) in 2005 to 53 (IQR, 40-67) in 2017. Kidney Donor Profile Index of HCV- kidneys remained unchanged from 45 (IQR, 21-74) to 47 (IQR, 24-73). After adjustment, HCV+ kidneys were 3.7 times more likely to be discarded than HCV- kidneys in the DAA era (adjusted relative rate, 3.363.674.02; P < 0.001); an increase from the IFN era (adjusted relative rate, 2.783.023.27; P < 0.001). HCV+ kidney use was concentrated within a subset of centers; 22.5% of centers performed 75% of all HCV+ kidney transplants in the DAA era. Mortality risk associated with HCV+ kidneys remained unchanged (aHR, 1.071.191.32 in both eras). CONCLUSIONS: Given the elevated risk of death on dialysis facing HCV+ candidates, improving quality of HCV+ kidneys, and DAA availability, broader utilization of HCV+ kidneys is warranted to improve access in this era of organ shortage.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Selección de Donante , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/sangre , Hepatitis C/prevención & control , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Hepatitis C/sangre , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Hepatitis C/virología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
Background: The epidemic of drug overdose deaths in the United States has led to an increase in organ donors. Objective: To characterize donors who died of overdose and to analyze outcomes among transplant recipients. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2017. Participants: 138 565 deceased donors; 337 934 transplant recipients at 297 transplant centers. Measurements: The primary exposure was donor mechanism of death (overdose-death donor [ODD], trauma-death donor [TDD], or medical-death donor [MDD]). Patient and graft survival and organ discard (organ recovered but not transplanted) were compared using propensity score-weighted standardized risk differences (sRDs). Results: A total of 7313 ODDs and 19 897 ODD transplants (10 347 kidneys, 5707 livers, 2471 hearts, and 1372 lungs) were identified. Overdose-death donors accounted for 1.1% of donors in 2000 and 13.4% in 2017. They were more likely to be white (85.1%), aged 21 to 40 years (66.3%), infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (18.3%), and increased-infectious risk donors (IRDs) (56.4%). Standardized 5-year patient survival was similar for ODD organ recipients compared with TDD organ recipients (sRDs ranged from 3.1% lower to 3.9% higher survival) and MDD organ recipients (sRDs ranged from 2.1% to 5.2% higher survival). Standardized 5-year graft survival was similar between ODD and TDD grafts (minimal difference for kidneys and lungs, marginally lower [sRD, -3.2%] for livers, and marginally higher [sRD, 1.9%] for hearts). Kidney discard was higher for ODDs than TDDs (sRD, 5.2%) or MDDs (sRD, 1.5%); standardization for HCV and IRD status attenuated this difference. Limitation: Inability to distinguish between opioid and nonopioid overdoses. Conclusion: In the United States, transplantation with ODD organs has increased dramatically, with noninferior outcomes in transplant recipients. Concerns about IRD behaviors and hepatitis C among donors lead to excess discard that should be minimized given the current organ shortage. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Epidemias , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedades Transmisibles/transmisión , Selección de Donante , Supervivencia de Injerto , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dialysis-dependent patients and kidney transplant recipients may be at increased risk for Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). METHODS: We studied Medicare patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from 1999 through 2013. Patients were categorized as waitlisted for a transplant, not waitlisted, or received a transplant. We performed multivariate negative binomial regression using demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and year of study entry to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs), identify ATR risk factors, and determine treatment patterns and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 1091 ATRs (incidence, 3.80/10 000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.58-4.03). Compared with transplant recipients, nonwaitlisted patients had a lower incidence (aIRR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.37-0.53), and waitlisted patients had a similar incidence (aIRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.12) of ATR. ATR incidence was higher among patients taking fluoroquinolones (aIRR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.32-1.84) and corticosteroids (aIRR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.44-2.05) compared with those who did not. Patients with ATR were younger, had higher mean body mass index, and had fewer comorbidities than patients without ATR. Seventeen percent of patients received operative treatment within 14 days of ATR diagnosis. The 30-day cumulative incidence of operative site infections was 6.5%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ATR was higher among transplant recipients and waitlisted patients compared with nonwaitlisted patients. Younger age, higher body mass index, fewer comorbidities, fluoroquinolone use, and corticosteroid use were risk factors for ATR. Patients were more likely to receive nonoperative than operative treatment for ATR. Those who underwent operative treatment had a low incidence of operative site infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III, comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Tendón Calcáneo/lesiones , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Traumatismos de los Tendones/terapia , Tendón Calcáneo/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Diálisis Renal , Factores de Riesgo , Rotura/etiología , Factores Sexuales , Traumatismos de los Tendones/epidemiología , Traumatismos de los Tendones/etiología , Traumatismos de los Tendones/cirugíaRESUMEN
Importance: Over the past 2 decades, there has been increased attention and effort to reduce disparities in live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) for black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with end-stage kidney disease. The goal of this study was to investigate whether these efforts have been successful. Objective: To estimate changes over time in racial/ethnic disparities in LDKT in the United States, accounting for differences in death and deceased donor kidney transplantation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A secondary analysis of a prospectively maintained cohort study conducted in the United States of 453â¯162 adult first-time kidney transplantation candidates included in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2014, with follow-up through December 31, 2016. Exposures: Race/ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary study outcome was time to LDKT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models were constructed to assess changes in racial/ethnic disparities in LDKT among adults on the deceased donor kidney transplantation waiting list and interaction terms were used to test the statistical significance of temporal changes in racial/ethnic differences in receipt of LDKT. The adjusted subhazard ratios are estimates derived from the multivariable competing risk models. Data were categorized into 5-year increments (1995-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014) to allow for an adequate sample size in each analytical cell. Results: Among 453â¯162 adult kidney transplantation candidates (mean [SD] age, 50.9 [13.1] years; 39% were women; 48% were white; 30%, black; 16%, Hispanic; and 6%, Asian), 59â¯516 (13.1%) received LDKT. Overall, there were 39â¯509 LDKTs among white patients, 8926 among black patients, 8357 among Hispanic patients, and 2724 among Asian patients. In 1995, the cumulative incidence of LDKT at 2 years after appearing on the waiting list was 7.0% among white patients, 3.4% among black patients, 6.8% among Hispanic patients, and 5.1% among Asian patients. In 2014, the cumulative incidence of LDKT was 11.4% among white patients, 2.9% among black patients, 5.9% among Hispanic patients, and 5.6% among Asian patients. From 1995-1999 to 2010-2014, racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of LDKT increased (P < .001 for all statistical interaction terms in adjusted models comparing white patients vs black, Hispanic, and Asian patients). In 1995-1999, compared with receipt of LDKT among white patients, the adjusted subhazard ratio was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.42-0.48) among black patients, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.88) among Hispanic patients, and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.50-0.63) among Asian patients. In 2010-2014, compared with receipt of LDKT among white patients, the adjusted subhazard ratio was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.26-0.28) among black patients, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.50-0.54) among Hispanic patients, and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.39-0.45) among Asian patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adult first-time kidney transplantation candidates in the United States who were added to the deceased donor kidney transplantation waiting list between 1995 and 2014, disparities in the receipt of live donor kidney transplantation increased from 1995-1999 to 2010-2014. These findings suggest that national strategies for addressing disparities in receipt of live donor kidney transplantation should be revisited.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etnología , Trasplante de Riñón/tendencias , Donadores Vivos , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Asiático , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Listas de Espera , Población BlancaRESUMEN
Transplant candidates who accept a kidney labeled increased risk for disease transmission (IRD) accept a low risk of window period infection, yet those who decline must wait for another offer that might harbor other risks or never even come. To characterize survival benefit of accepting IRD kidneys, we used 2010-2014 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to identify 104 998 adult transplant candidates who were offered IRD kidneys that were eventually accepted by someone; the median (interquartile range) Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of these kidneys was 30 (16-49). We followed patients from the offer decision until death or end-of-study. After 5 years, only 31.0% of candidates who declined IRDs later received non-IRD deceased donor kidney transplants; the median KDPI of these non-IRD kidneys was 52, compared to 21 of the IRDs they had declined. After a brief risk period in the first 30 days following IRD acceptance (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] accept vs decline: 1.22 2.063.49 , P = .008) (absolute mortality 0.8% vs. 0.4%), those who accepted IRDs were at 33% lower risk of death 1-6 months postdecision (aHR 0.50 0.670.90 , P = .006), and at 48% lower risk of death beyond 6 months postdecision (aHR 0.46 0.520.58 , P < .001). Accepting an IRD kidney was associated with substantial long-term survival benefit; providers should consider this benefit when counseling patients on IRD offer acceptance.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Selección de Donante/métodos , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Infecciones/transmisión , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Incidencia , Infecciones/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trauma is the leading nonobstetric cause of death in women of reproductive age, and pregnant women in particular may be at increased risk of violent trauma. Management of trauma in pregnancy is complicated by altered maternal physiology, provider expertise, potential disparate imaging, and distorted anatomy. Little is known about the impact of trauma on maternal mortality. OBJECTIVE: We sought to: (1) characterize nonviolent and violent trauma among pregnant women; (2) determine whether pregnancy is associated with increased mortality following traumatic injury; and (3) identify risk factors for trauma-related death in pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 1148 trauma events among pregnant girls and women and 43,608 trauma events among nonpregnant girls and women of reproductive age (14-49 years) who presented to any accredited trauma center in Pennsylvania for treatment of trauma-related injuries from 2005 through 2015, as captured in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study. Traumas were categorized as violent (eg, homicide or assault) or nonviolent (eg, motor vehicle accident or accidental fall). We used modified Poisson regression to estimate relative rate of trauma-related death, adjusting for demographic characteristics and severity of trauma. RESULTS: Compared to nonpregnant women, pregnant women and girls had a lower injury severity score (8.9 vs 10.9, P < .001) and were significantly more likely to experience violent trauma (15.9% vs 9.8%, P < .001). Pregnant trauma victims had a 1.6-fold higher rate of mortality compared to their nonpregnant counterparts (P < .001), and were both more likely to be dead on arrival and to die during their hospital course (adjusted relative risk, 2.33, P < .001, and adjusted relative risk, 1.79, P = .004, respectively). Pregnancy was associated with increased mortality in both victims of nonviolent and violent trauma (adjusted relative risk, 1.69, P = .002, and adjusted relative risk, 1.60, P = .007, respectively). Pregnant trauma victims were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted relative risk, 0.70, P = .001) and more likely to be transferred to another facility (adjusted relative risk, 1.72, P < .001). Even after adjusting for demographics and injury severity score, violent trauma was associated with 3.14-fold higher mortality in pregnant women and girls compared to nonviolent trauma (adjusted relative risk, 3.14, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women and girls are nearly twice as likely to die after trauma and twice as likely to experience violent trauma. Universal screening for violence and trauma during pregnancy may provide an opportunity to identify women at risk for death during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Accidentes por Caídas/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Mortalidad Materna , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión , Riesgo , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After kidney transplantation, early readmission is independently associated with graft loss and mortality. The mechanism of this association is poorly understood. Understanding the timeline of risk, that is, during the readmission hospitalization versus periods postreadmission, will provide additional insights. METHODS: We used national registry data to study 56 076 adult Medicare-primary first-time kidney transplant recipients from December 1999 to October 2011. Piecewise Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between graft loss, mortality, and readmission for 2 periods: readmission hospitalization and postreadmission. RESULTS: During the readmission hospitalization, graft loss was substantially higher (deceased donor kidney transplant [DDKT] without delayed graft function [DGF] hazard ratio: 24.634.447.9, P < 0.001; with DGF: 10.815.221.4, P < 0.001; live donor kidney transplant [LDKT]: 18.136.774.2, P < 0.001) and mortality was substantially higher (DDKT without DGF: 14.120.830.7, P < 0.001; with DGF: 9.0312.818.0, P < 0.001; LDKT: 9.0018.241.3, P < 0.001). Immediately after readmission discharge, graft loss (DDKT without DGF: 2.082.402.77, P < 0.001; with DGF: 1.832.142.51, P < 0.001; LDKT: 2.002.503.13, P < 0.001), and mortality (DDKT without DGF: 2.162.432.73, P < 0.001; with DGF: 1.832.162.88, P < 0.001; LDKT: 1.902.342.88, P < 0.001) remained elevated, but much less so. After readmission, the hazard of graft loss remained, but decreased 19% per year for DDKT recipients (time varying coefficient 0.780.810.85, P < 0.001) and 14% per year for LDKT recipients (0.790.860.93, P < 0.001). The hazard of mortality remained, but decreased 14% per year for DDKT recipients (0.830.860.89, P < 0.001) and 9% per year for LDKT recipients (0.850.910.98, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, readmission is most strongly associated with graft loss and mortality during the readmission hospitalization, but also portends a lasting, albeit attenuated, risk postreadmission.
Asunto(s)
Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto/epidemiología , Predicción , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To test whether frailty, a novel measure of physiologic reserve, is associated with longer kidney transplant (KT) length of stay (LOS), and modifies the association between LOS and mortality. BACKGROUND: Better understanding of LOS is necessary for informed consent and discharge planning. Mortality resulting from longer LOS has important regulatory implications for hospital and transplant programs. Which recipients are at risk of prolonged LOS and its effect on mortality are unclear. Frailty is a novel preoperative predictor of poor KT outcomes including delayed graft function, early hospital readmission, immunosuppression intolerance, and mortality. METHODS: We used registry-augmented hybrid methods, a novel approach to risk adjustment, to adjust for LOS risk factors from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (n = 74,859) and tested whether (1) frailty, measured immediately before KT in a novel cohort (n = 589), was associated with LOS (LOS: negative binomial regression; LOS ≥2 weeks: logistic regression) and (2) whether frailty modified the association between LOS and mortality (interaction term analysis). RESULTS: Frailty was independently associated with longer LOS [relative risk = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.29; P = 0.01] and LOS ≥2 weeks (odds ratio = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.06-2.33; P = 0.03) after accounting for registry-based risk factors, including delayed graft function. Frailty also attenuated the association between LOS and mortality (nonfrail hazard rate = 1.55 95% CI: 1.30-1.86; P < 0.001; frail hazard rate = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19, P = 0.80; P for interaction = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Frail KT recipients are more likely to experience a longer LOS. Longer LOS among nonfrail recipients may be a marker of increased mortality risk. Frailty is a measure of physiologic reserve that may be an important clinical marker of longer surgical LOS.