Inter-laboratory comparison of gene expression biodosimetry for protracted radiation exposures as part of the RENEB and EURADOS WG10 2019 exercise.

Large-scale radiation emergency scenarios involving protracted low dose rate radiation exposure (e.g. a hidden radioactive source in a train) necessitate the development of high throughput methods for providing rapid individual dose estimates. During the RENEB (Running the European Network of Biodosimetry) 2019 exercise, four EDTA-blood samples were exposed to an Iridium-192 source (1.36 TBq, Tech-Ops 880 Sentinal) at varying distances and geometries. This resulted in protracted doses ranging between 0.2 and 2.4 Gy using dose rates of 1.5-40 mGy/min and exposure times of 1 or 2.5 h. Blood samples were exposed in thermo bottles that maintained temperatures between 39 and 27.7 °C. After exposure, EDTA-blood samples were transferred into PAXGene tubes to preserve RNA. RNA was isolated in one laboratory and aliquots of four blinded RNA were sent to another five teams for dose estimation based on gene expression changes. Using an X-ray machine, samples for two calibration curves (first: constant dose rate of 8.3 mGy/min and 0.5-8 h varying exposure times; second: varying dose rates of 0.5-8.3 mGy/min and 4 h exposure time) were generated for distribution. Assays were run in each laboratory according to locally established protocols using either a microarray platform (one team) or quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR, five teams). The qRT-PCR measurements were highly reproducible with coefficient of variation below 15% in ≥ 75% of measurements resulting in reported dose estimates ranging between 0 and 0.5 Gy in all samples and in all laboratories. Up to twofold reductions in RNA copy numbers per degree Celsius relative to 37 °C were observed. However, when irradiating independent samples equivalent to the blinded samples but increasing the combined exposure and incubation time to 4 h at 37 °C, expected gene expression changes corresponding to the absorbed doses were observed. Clearly, time and an optimal temperature of 37 °C must be allowed for the biological response to manifest as gene expression changes prior to running the gene expression assay. In conclusion, dose reconstructions based on gene expression measurements are highly reproducible across different techniques, protocols and laboratories. Even a radiation dose of 0.25 Gy protracted over 4 h (1 mGy/min) can be identified. These results demonstrate the importance of the incubation conditions and time span between radiation exposure and measurements of gene expression changes when using this method in a field exercise or real emergency situation.

The 2019-2020 EURADOS WG10 and RENEB Field Test of Retrospective Dosimetry Methods in a Small-Scale Incident Involving Ionizing Radiation.

With the use of ionizing radiation comes the risk of accidents and malevolent misuse. When unplanned exposures occur, there are several methods which can be used to retrospectively reconstruct individual radiation exposures; biological methods include analysis of aberrations and damage of chromosomes and DNA, while physical methods rely on luminescence (TL/OSL) or EPR signals. To ensure the quality and dependability of these methods, they should be evaluated under realistic exposure conditions. In 2019, EURADOS Working Group 10 and RENEB organized a field test with the purpose of evaluating retrospective dosimetry methods as carried out in potential real-life exposure scenarios. A 1.36 TBq 192Ir source was used to irradiate anthropomorphic phantoms in different geometries at doses of several Gy in an outdoor open-air geometry. Materials intended for accident dosimetry (including mobile phones and blood) were placed on the phantoms together with reference dosimeters (LiF, NaCl, glass). The objective was to estimate radiation exposures received by individuals as measured using blood and fortuitous materials, and to evaluate these methods by comparing the estimated doses to reference measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Herein we describe the overall planning, goals, execution and preliminary outcomes of the 2019 field test. Such field tests are essential for the development of new and existing methods. The outputs from this field test include useful experience in terms of planning and execution of future exercises, with respect to time management, radiation protection, and reference dosimetry to be considered to obtain relevant data for analysis.

BIODOSIMETRY AND BIODOSIMETRY NETWORKS FOR MANAGING RADIATION EMERGENCY.

Biological dosimetry enables individual dose reconstruction in the case of unclear or inconsistent radiation exposure situations, especially when a direct measurement of ionizing radiation is not or is no longer possible. To be prepared for large-scale radiological incidents, networking between well-trained laboratories has been identified as a useful approach for provision of the fast and trustworthy dose assessments needed in such circumstances. To this end, various biodosimetry laboratories worldwide have joined forces and set up regional and/or nationwide networks either on a formal or informal basis. Many of these laboratories are also a part of global networks such as those organized by World Health Organization, International Atomic Energy Agency or Global Health Security Initiative. In the present report, biodosimetry networks from different parts of the world are presented, and the partners, activities and cooperation actions are detailed. Moreover, guidance for situational application of tools used for individual dosimetry is given.

Radiosensitivity in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from Shwachman-Diamond syndrome patients.

Shwachman-Diamond syndrome is an autosomal-recessive disorder characterised by bone marrow failure and a cumulative risk of progression to acute myeloid leukaemia. The Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome (SBDS) gene, the only gene known to be causative of the pathology, is involved in ribosomal biogenesis, stress responses and DNA repair, and the lack of SBDS sensitises cells to many stressors and leads to mitotic spindle destabilisation. The effect of ionising radiation on SBDS-deficient cells was investigated using immortalised lymphocytes from SDS patients in comparison with positive and negative controls in order to test whether, in response to ionising radiation exposure, any impairment in the DNA repair machinery could be observed. After irradiating cells with different doses of X-rays or gamma-rays, DNA repair kinetics and the residual damages using the alkaline COMET assay and the γ-H2AX assay were assessed, respectively. In this work, preliminary data about the comparison between ionising radiation effects in different patients-derived cells and healthy control cells are presented.

Realising the European network of biodosimetry: RENEB-status quo.

Creating a sustainable network in biological and retrospective dosimetry that involves a large number of experienced laboratories throughout the European Union (EU) will significantly improve the accident and emergency response capabilities in case of a large-scale radiological emergency. A well-organised cooperative action involving EU laboratories will offer the best chance for fast and trustworthy dose assessments that are urgently needed in an emergency situation. To this end, the EC supports the establishment of a European network in biological dosimetry (RENEB). The RENEB project started in January 2012 involving cooperation of 23 organisations from 16 European countries. The purpose of RENEB is to increase the biodosimetry capacities in case of large-scale radiological emergency scenarios. The progress of the project since its inception is presented, comprising the consolidation process of the network with its operational platform, intercomparison exercises, training activities, proceedings in quality assurance and horizon scanning for new methods and partners. Additionally, the benefit of the network for the radiation research community as a whole is addressed.

The inter-individual variability outperforms the intra-individual variability of differentially expressed proteins prior and post irradiation in lymphoblastoid cell lines.

CONTEXT: Radio-sensitivity in normal tissue is characterized by heterogeneity throughout the population and the absence of pre-diagnostic biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a proteomic approach to search for radiation characteristic protein regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell lines were 10 Gy irradiated and analysed by 2D-DIGE after 24 h. RESULTS were analysed intra- and inter-individually. The principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering was applied to all datasets. RESULTS: Differences in intra-individual spot abundance prior and post irradiation exactly show the separation of sample classes in two groups: sham-irradiated and irradiated. The inter-individual datasets clustered according to the cell line. The intra-individual differences on protein level after gamma-irradiation are very low, compared with the inter-individual differences among cell lines derived from the same tissue. CONCLUSION: The application of 2-D DIGE may offer a realistic chance for a better molecular characterization of radio-sensitivity and for the discovery of candidate biomarkers.

Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays.

Rapid biodosimetry tools are required to assist with triage in the case of a large-scale radiation incident. Here, we aimed to determine the dose-assessment accuracy of the well-established dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) and cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay (CBMN) in comparison to the emerging γ-H2AX foci and gene expression assays for triage mode biodosimetry and radiation injury assessment. Coded blood samples exposed to 10 X-ray doses (240 kVp, 1 Gy/min) of up to 6.4 Gy were sent to participants for dose estimation. Report times were documented for each laboratory and assay. The mean absolute difference (MAD) of estimated doses relative to the true doses was calculated. We also merged doses into binary dose categories of clinical relevance and examined accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the assays. Dose estimates were reported by the first laboratories within 0.3-0.4 days of receipt of samples for the γ-H2AX and gene expression assays compared to 2.4 and 4 days for the DCA and CBMN assays, respectively. Irrespective of the assay we found a 2.5-4-fold variation of interlaboratory accuracy per assay and lowest MAD values for the DCA assay (0.16 Gy) followed by CBMN (0.34 Gy), gene expression (0.34 Gy) and γ-H2AX (0.45 Gy) foci assay. Binary categories of dose estimates could be discriminated with equal efficiency for all assays, but at doses ≥1.5 Gy a 10% decrease in efficiency was observed for the foci assay, which was still comparable to the CBMN assay. In conclusion, the DCA has been confirmed as the gold standard biodosimetry method, but in situations where speed and throughput are more important than ultimate accuracy, the emerging rapid molecular assays have the potential to become useful triage tools.

Laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis assay.

The study design and obtained results represent an intercomparison of various laboratories performing dose assessment using the dicentric chromosome analysis (DCA) as a diagnostic triage tool for individual radiation dose assessment. Homogenously X-irradiated (240 kVp, 1 Gy/min) blood samples for establishing calibration data (0.25-5 Gy) as well as blind samples (0.1-6.4 Gy) were sent to the participants. DCA was performed according to established protocols. The time taken to report dose estimates was documented for each laboratory. Additional information concerning laboratory organization/characteristics as well as assay performance was collected. The mean absolute difference (MAD) was calculated and radiation doses were merged into four triage categories reflecting clinical aspects to calculate accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The earliest report time was 2.4 days after sample arrival. DCA dose estimates were reported with high and comparable accuracy, with MAD values ranging between 0.16-0.5 Gy for both manual and automated scoring. No significant differences were found for dose estimates based either on 20, 30, 40 or 50 cells, suggesting that the scored number of cells can be reduced from 50 to 20 without loss of precision of triage dose estimates, at least for homogenous exposure scenarios. Triage categories of clinical significance could be discriminated efficiently using both scoring procedures.

Laboratory intercomparison of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.

The focus of the study is an intercomparison of laboratories' dose-assessment performances using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay as a diagnostic triage tool for individual radiation dose assessment. Homogenously X-irradiated (240 kVp, 1 Gy/min) blood samples for establishing calibration data (0.25-5 Gy) as well as blind samples (0.1-6.4 Gy) were sent to the participants. The CBMN assay was performed according to protocols individually established and varying among participating laboratories. The time taken to report dose estimates was documented for each laboratory. Additional information concerning laboratory organization/characteristics as well as assay performance was collected. The mean absolute difference (MAD) was calculated and radiation doses were merged into four triage categories reflecting clinical aspects to calculate accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The earliest report time was 4 days after sample arrival. The CBMN dose estimates were reported with high accuracy (MAD values of 0.20-0.50 Gy at doses below 6.4 Gy for both manual and automated scoring procedures), but showed a limitation of the assay at the dose point of 6.4 Gy, which resulted in a clear dose underestimation in all cases. The MAD values (without 6.4 Gy) differed significantly (P = 0.03) between manual (0.25 Gy, SEM = 0.06, n = 4) or automated scoring procedures (0.37 Gy, SEM = 0.08, n = 5), but lowest MAD were equal (0.2 Gy) for both scoring procedures. Likewise, both scoring procedures led to the same allocation of dose estimates to triage categories of clinical significance (about 83% accuracy and up to 100% specificity).

Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB).

In Europe, a network for biological dosimetry has been created to strengthen the emergency preparedness and response capabilities in case of a large-scale nuclear accident or radiological emergency. Through the RENEB (Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry) project, 23 experienced laboratories from 16 European countries will establish a sustainable network for rapid, comprehensive and standardised biodosimetry provision that would be urgently required in an emergency situation on European ground. The foundation of the network is formed by five main pillars: (1) the ad hoc operational basis, (2) a basis of future developments, (3) an effective quality-management system, (4) arrangements to guarantee long-term sustainability and (5) awareness of the existence of RENEB. RENEB will thus provide a mechanism for quick, efficient and reliable support within the European radiation emergency management. The scientific basis of RENEB will concurrently contribute to increased safety in the field of radiation protection.

The WST survival assay: an easy and reliable method to screen radiation-sensitive individuals.

An easy, fast and reliable method was developed to screen hundreds of Epstein-Barr virus-transformed cell lines (lymphoblastoid cell lines, LCLs) for radiation sensitivity that were generated from lymphocytes isolated from young lung cancer patients. The WST-1 test explores the metabolic activity of the mitochondria as an indicator for the vital status of cells. Cell proliferation as well as indirect cell death can be quantified by this method on a large scale in microtiter plates. Cell survival was measured at 24- and 48-h post-irradiation with 10 Gy ((137)Cs source) by the WST-1 assay and Trypan blue staining. To set up the experimental screening conditions and to establish a positive and a negative control, an ATM-mutated cell line from a radiation-sensitive ATM patient and an ATM proficient cell line from a healthy brother were compared. An optimal differentiation between the two cell lines was demonstrated for 10 Gy and 24- and 48-h cell growth after irradiation. Upon screening 120 LCLs of young lung cancer patients under these conditions, 5 of them were found to be radiation sensitive to a high degree of statistical significance. The results have been confirmed by a second laboratory by means of Trypan blue testing. The WST-1 test represents an efficient and reliable method by means of screening for radiation-sensitive cell lines.

Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures.

The current focus on networking and mutual assistance in the management of radiation accidents or incidents has demonstrated the importance of a joined-up approach in physical and biological dosimetry. To this end, the European Radiation Dosimetry Working Group 10 on 'Retrospective Dosimetry' has been set up by individuals from a wide range of disciplines across Europe. Here, established and emerging dosimetry methods are reviewed, which can be used immediately and retrospectively following external ionising radiation exposure. Endpoints and assays include dicentrics, translocations, premature chromosome condensation, micronuclei, somatic mutations, gene expression, electron paramagnetic resonance, thermoluminescence, optically stimulated luminescence, neutron activation, haematology, protein biomarkers and analytical dose reconstruction. Individual characteristics of these techniques, their limitations and potential for further development are reviewed, and their usefulness in specific exposure scenarios is discussed. Whilst no single technique fulfils the criteria of an ideal dosemeter, an integrated approach using multiple techniques tailored to the exposure scenario can cover most requirements.

SKY and FISH analysis of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations: a comparison of whole and partial genome analysis.

For a retrospective dose estimation of human exposure to ionising radiation, a partial genome analysis is routinely used to quantify radiation-induced chromosome aberrations. For this purpose, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with whole chromosome painting probes for selected chromosomes is usually applied covering about 20% of the whole genome. Since genome-wide screening techniques like spectral karyotyping (SKY) and multiplex FISH (mFISH) have been developed the detection of radiation-induced aberrations within the whole genome has now become feasible. To determine the correspondence between partial and whole genome analysis of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations, they were measured comprehensively in this study using in vitro irradiated blood samples from three donors. We were able to demonstrate that comparable results can be detected with both approaches. However, complex aberrations might be misinterpreted by partial genome analysis. We therefore conclude that whole genome analysis by SKY is useful especially in the high dose range to correct aberration data for complex exchange aberrations.

The Application of Photofrin II as a sensitizing agent for ionizing radiation--a new approach in tumor therapy?

Radiosensitizers represent an enticing concept in tumor therapy. As ionizing radiation affects both neoplastic and normal tissues, its effects are generally non-specific. The aim of applying a radiosensitizing agent is to achieve a maximum effect on tumor tissue, while minimizing the damage to normal tissues. A variety of parameters such as the oxygen supply and the state in the cell cycle, need to be taken into account when evaluating a potential radiosensitizer. Most of the previously known radiosensitizers are neither selective nor tumor specific. In this article, we review the properties and radiosensitizing potential of Photofrin II. Photofrin II is well-known as a photosensitizing agent in photodynamic therapy. In recent years, a radiosensitizing potential of the substance has been demonstrated, specifically increasing the sensitivity of solid tumor tissues, especially of radio-resistant, hypoxic tumor cells, to radiation. This radiosensitizing effect has been demonstrated both by in vitro studies and by animal experiments. Several studies with tissue cultures have demonstrated a radiosensitizing effect of Photofrin II in glioblastoma (U-373MG) and bladder cancer cell lines (RT-4). No effect was noted in colon carcinoma cell lines (HT-29). Unpublished data of additional cell lines will be mentioned in the review. Animal experiments with Lewis sarcoma and with bladder cancer have moreover demonstrated an in vivo effect of Photofrin II as a radiosensitizer. The mechanism of this radiosensitizing effect is not completely understood. In vitro data, however, support the hypothesis that the radiosensitizing action involves OH-radicals in addition to a potential impairment of repair mechanisms after sublethal damage of ionizing radiation. Moreover, early results of a phase I trial are available and document the potential feasibility of the application of Phototofrin II as a radiosensitizing agent in clinical practice.

Porphyrins as radiosensitizing agents for solid neoplasms.

The biological effects of radiation affect both neoplastic and normal tissues. The nature and extent of such effects, however, depend on selected biological parameters (e.g., oxygen supply, cell cycle) and can be modified by chemical agents such as radiosensitizers, radioprotectors and chemotherapeutic agents. A precise control of the mode of action of the radiation is important in order to achieve the maximum effect on tumor tissue, while minimizing the effect on normal tissues. Most of the known and routinely used radiosensitizers are neither selective nor tumor specific. This article reviews a new selective and specific modality that increases the sensitivity of solid tumor tissue, especially of radio resistant, hypoxic tumor cells, to radiation. This modality is currently under early clinical evaluation and encompasses the application of Photofrin II, which is already used as a photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy (PDT) at predetermined times prior to irradiation.

Distribution of radiation-induced exchange aberrations in all human chromosomes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the DNA-proportional distribution of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations for all chromosomes of a male and a female human karyotype. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Metaphases were prepared from whole blood cultures obtained from two healthy donors and set up after irradiation with 3 Gy 220 kV X-rays. Single whole-chromosome FISH painting simultaneously with pancentromeric DNA painting were performed separately for each chromosome of the human karyotype. One thousand exclusively first-division metaphases were analysed per chromosome and donor. After statistical analysis, the data obtained were compared with theoretically expected values. RESULTS: All aberration types (translocations, dicentrics) showed deviations from a DNA-proportional distribution. For both donors, chromosomes 2 and 3 exhibited significantly less and chromosome 4 more symmetrical translocations than expected. Chromosomes 15 and 22 showed more symmetrical translocations than predicted for one of the two donors. Less dicentrics than expected became apparent for chromosomes 2, 3 and 18, while more dicentrics were seen for chromosomes 15, 16 and 17. Moreover, chromosomes 4, 14 and 22 showed a significant deviation from the theoretically expected 1:1 ratio of the yields of symmetrical translocations to the yields of dicentrics. CONCLUSION: The results from the whole-chromosome complement in two different donors confirmed published data from the analysis of single chromosomes that some human chromosomes were not involved in radiation-induced dicentrics and symmetrical translocations proportional to their DNA content. This must be taken into account if chromosome subsets for dose reconstruction are selected or if whole genomic frequencies have to be calculated from partial genome analysis.

Technical report: application of the Metafer2 fluorescence scanning system for the analysis of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations measured by FISH-chromosome painting.

The Metafer2 fluorescence scanning system was used for routine analysis of radiation-induced exchange aberrations measured by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) chromosome painting in human peripheral lymphocytes. The system enables a rapid and unbiased fully-automated finding and image acquisition of fluorescently stained metaphase spreads. The chromosome aberration analysis is performed interactively from stored digitised processed gallery images, presented on a screen. Appropriate software image filters are available to further improve these pictures by background correction, noise reduction and fluorescence signal enhancement. Data sets generated by computer-assisted and manual scoring of radiation-induced reciprocal translocations (2B) and total 2B (2B+related 'one-way' types) or complete dicentrics (2A) and total 2A (2A+related 'one-ways') involving painted target chromosomes 2, 3 or 4 were compared and no significant differences were found.A linear-quadratic dose-response curve for total translocations (2B+'one-ways'+complex-derived types) based on computer-assisted analysis of 27,741 metaphases with chromosome 4 painting was compared to a curve obtained earlier for manually scored translocations in a set of target chromosomes 1, 4 and 12. After extrapolation to the whole genome, no significant difference between both curves was found. From our results it can be derived that computer-assisted aberration analysis using the Metafer2 system is a reliable alternative to manual analysis. Since time saving for computer-assisted translocation analysis is about 50% compared to manual scoring, this system is highly promising for a practical application in retrospective biodosimetry of human radiation exposure.

Chromosomal changes during development and progression of prostate adenocarcinomas.

Chromosomal copy number changes were investigated in 16 prostate carcinomas, 12 prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PIN; 4 low-grade and 8 high-grade) adjacent to the invasive tumour areas, and 5 regional lymph node metastases. For this purpose, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed and a copy number karyotype for each histomorphological entity was created. CGH on microdissected cells from non-neoplastic glands was carried out on 3 different cases to demonstrate the reliability of the overall procedure. None of the non-neoplastic tissue samples revealed chromosome copy number changes. In PIN areas, chromosomal imbalances were detected on chromosomes 7, 8q, Xq (gains), and on 4q, 5q, 8p, 13q and 18q (losses). In the primary tumours, recurrent (at least 25% of cases) gains on chromosomes 12q and 15q, and losses on 2q, 4q, 5q, Xq, 13q and 18q became apparent. Losses on 8p and 6q as well as gains on 8q and of chromosome 7 were also detected at lower frequencies than previously reported. The pooled CGH data from the primary carcinomas revealed a novel region of chromosomal loss on 4q which is also frequently affected in other tumour entities like oesophageal adenocarcinomas and is supposed to harbour a new tumour suppressor gene. Gains on chromosome 9q and of chromosome 16 and loss on chromosome 13q were observed as common aberrations in metastases and primary tumours. These CGH results indicate an accumulation of chromosomal imbalances during the PIN-carcinoma-metastasis sequence and an early origin of tumour-specific aberrations in PIN areas.

Follow-up analysis of translocation and dicentric frequencies, measured by FISH-chromosome painting in breast cancer patients after partial-body radiotherapy with little bone marrow exposure.

Follow-up translocation and dicentric measurements in blood lymphocytes of five breast cancer patients were performed by FISH using painting probes for chromosomes 1, 4, and 12 simultaneously with a pancentromeric DNA probe, during 14 months after fractionated photon therapy affecting only small areas of the bone marrow (about 5%). The analysis of individual time-courses for translocations and dicentrics revealed a significant temporal decline of the yields with comparable half-times, both for these stable and unstable aberration types in two patients. In three patients, the aberration yields remained fairly unchanged during the observation period. Regarding retrospective biodosimetry for cases with partial-body exposures or large dose inhomogeneity, it follows that even FISH chromosome painting is limited in assessing initial doses correctly in terms of stable translocations.