Resin Cement/Enamel Interface: A Morphological Evaluation of the Acid-Base Resistant Zone, Enamel Etching Pattern, and Effect of Thermocycling on the Microshear Bond Strength.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of etching mode (self-etch and etch-and-rinse) on acid-base resistant zone (ABRZ) formation at the resin cement/enamel interface and enamel etching pattern, as well as the effects of thermocycling (0, 5000, and 10,000 cycles) on the enamel microshear bond strength (µSBS) mediated by dual-cure resin cements (DCRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two DCRC were used in 4 groups: Panavia V5 in self-etch (V5NE) and etch-and-rinse mode (V5E); and Estecem II in self-etch (ENE) and etch-and-rinse mode (EE). For ABRZ observation, the bonded interface was subjected to a demineralizing solution. The morphological attributes of the interface and etching patterns were observed using FE-SEM. For µ-SBS, cylinders with a 0.79-mm internal diameter and 0.5-mm height were made with DCRC and tested in shear after 0, 5000, and 10,000 thermal cycles (TC) (5°C and 55°C) (n = 10). RESULTS: The formation of an enamel ABRZ was observed in all groups with different morphological features between self-etch and etch-and-rinse groups. A funnel-shaped erosion beneath the interface was present using V5NE and ENE modes where enamel was dissolved, while ABRZ formation was confirmed and no funnel-shaped erosion was noticed using V5E and EE. No significant differences in µSBS were observed between resin cements. However, significantly lower µSBSs were recorded when the self-etching mode was used. Thermocycling resulted in a significant reduction in µSBS for all groups. CONCLUSION: Selective enamel etching should be recommended to improve the interfacial quality when dual-cure resin luting cements are used.

Moist vs over-dried etched dentin: FE-SEM/TEM and bond strength evaluation of resin-dentin interfaces produced by universal adhesives.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the degree of dentin moisture on interfacial ultramorphology and bond strength (µTBS) of universal adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Futurabond U (FBU), Scotchbond Universal (SBU), Adhese Universal (ADU), and Prime&Bond active (PBA) were used. After acid-etching, moist or over-dried dentin surfaces were tested. Teeth were restored for scanning and transmission electron microscopy (n = 3) and µTBS evaluation (n = 5). µTBS results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey. RESULTS: For moist dentin, a well-formed hybrid layer (HL) was observed. However, when applied to over-dried dentin, remarkable differences were observed. Defects, gaps, and reduced HL thickness were observed mainly for ADU and FBU. When applied to wet dentin, µTBS values were similar for all adhesives, except for FBU, which was significantly lower. When applied to over-dried dentin, PBA presented the highest µTBS values, followed by SBU, ADU, and FBU. ADU presented significantly lower µTBS when applied to over-dried dentin. CONCLUSION: PBA, SBU, and FBU µTBS values were not sensitive to the degree of moisture. Even though application to over-dried dentin revealed defects, gaps and reduced HL thickness for SBU, ADU, and FBU, µTBS analysis only revealed a significant reduction for ADU. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Universal adhesives can be applied in either self-etching or etch-and-rinse mode. However, clinicians are not aware which universal adhesives should be strictly applied on a moist dentin for bonding in the etch-and-rinse mode.

Adhesive/silane application effects on bond strength durability to a lithium disilicate ceramic.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effects of different adhesive protocols and silane application on the adhesive durability to a Lithium Disilicate reinforced glass ceramic. METHODS: Forty disks of 13 mm diameter (E.max Press) were used. After etching with 9.5% HF for 20 seconds, disks were randomly assigned into 4 groups according to the adhesive/silane protocol: silane application only (SIL); silane application followed by adhesive (SILXP-XP Bond); silane-containing adhesive (SBU-ScotchBond Universal); silane application followed by silane-containing adhesive (SILSBU). Four resin composite cylinders of 1-mm diameter and 3-mm height were made on each ceramic disk and tested in shear. Specimens were stored in water for 24 hours or 12 months prior to testing. Results were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test. RESULTS: After 24 hours, the highest SBS values were observed for SILXP and SILSBU. However, after 12 months, SILXP and SILSBU presented a significant reduction in SBS, while the highest SBS were observed for SIL. For SBU, no significant reduction in SBS was observed, however, it showed the lowest SBS after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the presence of silane in the composition of SBU, previous silane application is still recommended prior to cementation of Lithium Disilicate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The application of silane as a separate step is recommended prior to cementation of Lithium Disilicate reinforced glass-ceramic, independent of the presence of silane within the universal adhesive solution.