RESUMEN
In this correspondence, we raised our concerns about the methodological issues in the recent network meta-analysis by Yang et al. These issues require close attention because such meta-analysis forms the basis of major guidelines and helps clinicians make informed decisions.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Heel prick is one among the common painful procedures in neonates. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of different interventions for analgesia during heel prick in neonates. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medline, Cochrane, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from inception until February 2023. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials that evaluated different pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for analgesia during heel prick for neonates were included. Data from the included trials were extracted in duplicate. A NMA with a frequentist random-effects model was used for data synthesis. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE. We adhered to the PRISMA-NMA guidelines. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-three trials comparing 51 different analgesic measures were included. Among the 38 interventions, for pain "during" heel prick, non-nutritive suckling (NNS) plus sucrose [SMD -3.15 (-2.62, -3.69)], followed by breastfeeding, glucose, expressed breast milk (EBM), sucrose, NNS and touch massage, had a high certainty of evidence (CoE) to reduce pain scores when compared to no intervention. Among the 23 interventions for pain at 30 seconds after heel-prick, moderate CoE was noted for facilitated tucking plus NNS plus music, glucose, NNS plus sucrose, sucrose plus swaddling, mother holding, EBM, sucrose and NNS. CONCLUSIONS: Oral sucrose 2 minutes before combined with NNS during the procedure, was the best intervention for reducing pain during heel prick. It also effectively reduced pain scores 30 seconds and 1 minute after the procedure. Other interventions with moderate to high CoE for a significant reduction in pain during and at 30 seconds after heel prick are oral sucrose, oral glucose, EBM and NNS. All these are low-cost and feasible interventions for most of the settings.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To generate normative data and validate the recently developed, gender-neutral, External Genitalia Score (EGS) in Indian preterm and term neonates and children up to 2 years of age with normal and atypical genitalia. METHODS: This observational study included 1,040 neonates born between 28 and 42 weeks of gestation and 152 children between 1 and 24 months of age. In addition, 50 children with disorders of sex development (DSD) were also enrolled in the study. The Prader stage/external masculinization score (EMS) (as applicable), anogenital ratio (AGR) and EGS were assessed for all neonates and children with typical and atypical genitalia. RESULTS: Median EGS values in newborn males with typical genitalia were 9.5 at 28-31 weeks, 10.5 at 32-33 weeks, 11 at 34 weeks and 11.5 in males at 35-42 weeks of gestation. For all females with typical genitalia, the EGS was 0. EMS and EGS showed a positive correlation in males with typical genitalia (r=0.421, p=0.000**) and all children with DSD (r=0.857, p=0.000**). Mean AGR in males and females with typical genitalia and those with DSD were 0.52±0.07, 0.31±0.05 and 0.47±0.13, respectively. EGS correlated with AGR in all males with typical genitalia (r=0.107, p=0.008**), and in all children with DSD (r=0.473, p=0.001**). CONCLUSIONS: The EGS enables accurate, gender-neutral and comprehensive assessment of external genitalia in Indian neonates and children with typical and atypical genitalia/DSD. Evaluation for DSD is recommended in any child with EGS greater than 0 and ≤10th percentile for gestation or age (10.5 in a term neonate).
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Twin pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of perinatal morbidity. Besides, if intrauterine death of a single twin occurs, it increases the morbidity of the surviving co-twin perinatally and postnatally. AIM: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of single intrauterine fetal death (SIUFD) in a twin pregnancy and fetal outcome defined in dimensions according to the complications in the surviving co-twin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on twin pregnancies were collected retrospectively for a period of five years (from 2015 to 2019) from the labour room records of the Central Records Department (CRD) at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. Cases with SIUFD were studied individually and neonatal follow-up was taken post delivery for up to three to eight years. Inclusion criteria were SIUFD in twin pregnancies after 14 weeks gestation, chorionicity pre-defined by early trimester ultrasonography. Exclusion criteria were higher-order pregnancy and monoamniotic twins. RESULTS: A total of 1246 (4.273%) twin deliveries were conducted in the study period. Of these, 107 (8.587%) pregnancies had SIUFD with co-twin surviving in utero. Among these, 77 (72%) were dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies and 30 (28%) were monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. The incidence of SIUFD was 8.5%. Preterm birth was the most common complication observed in our study and was found in 53.5% and 58.3% of participants in DCDA and MCDA twins, respectively. Early neonatal death (within 24 hours of life) of the surviving twin was found in 29.2% monochorionic twins with SIUFD. SIUFD at < 28 weeks gestation led to a greater number of early neonatal deaths of surviving twins. The incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders (cerebral palsy, developmental delay, epilepsy) in our population after birth was 7.5% (n=93). CONCLUSION: Twin pregnancies with SIUFD have an increased incidence of preterm labour, increased neonatal death of the surviving twin, and neurodevelopmental disorders (cerebral palsy, developmental delay, epilepsy). Monochorionicity and SIUFD at <28 weeks gestation are associated with increased neonatal deaths in co-twin. The Incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders is not directly associated with chorionicity, but developmental delay is more profoundly seen in the monochorionic group.
RESUMEN
AIM: To synthesize the evidence on the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in adolescents with overweight or obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched five databases and registries until 2 March 2024 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was weight change. We did a pairwise meta-analysis to compare GLP-1RAs and placebo, followed by a drug-wise network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare GLP-1RAs against each other. RESULTS: We screened 770 records to include 12 RCTs with 883 participants. The evidence suggests that GLP-1RAs reduced weight (mean difference -4.21 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.08 to -1.35) and body mass index (BMI; mean difference -2.11 kg/m2, 95% CI -3.60 to -0.62). The evidence on waist circumference, body fat percentage and adverse events (AEs) was very uncertain. The results remained consistent with subgroup analyses for coexisting type 2 diabetes. Longer therapy duration led to a greater reduction in weight and BMI. In the NMA, semaglutide led to the greatest weight reduction, followed by exenatide, liraglutide and lixisenatide. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that GLP-1RAs reduce most weight-related outcomes in adolescents, with semaglutide being the most efficacious. There is uncertain evidence on body fat and serious AEs, probably due to fewer studies and low incidence, respectively. Larger RCTs with head-to-head comparisons, pragmatic design, adiposity-related outcomes, and economic evaluation can further guide the use and choice of GLP-1RAs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of RAM cannula with short binasal prongs (SBPs) as nasal interfaces in preterm infants requiring nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). METHODS: The authors searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) and trial registries from inception until March 15, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the RAM cannula with SBP for delivering nCPAP/NIPPV. They performed a random-effects meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software. The primary outcome was failure of nCPAP/NIPPV. Secondary outcomes included nasal injury, mechanical ventilation, air leaks, and mortality. RESULTS: Five RCTs (825 participants) were included. There was no significant difference in nCPAP/NIPPV failure (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.87) or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.75 to 2.01) between the RAM cannula and SBP groups (low to very low certainty). Compared with infants in the SBP group, those in the RAM cannula group had a significantly lower incidence of moderate to severe nasal injury [(5 RCTs, 825 participants; RR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.66); low certainty] and any nasal injury [(RR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.76; very low certainty)]. There was no significant difference in the other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to SBP, the RAM cannula may have little to no effect on nCPAP/NIPPV failure, but the evidence is very uncertain. Low-certainty evidence suggests that the use of RAM cannula possibly results in reduction in moderate to severe nasal trauma in preterm infants receiving nCPAP/NIPPV.
RESUMEN
Background: Initial randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed that prophylactic azithromycin in pregnant women improved maternal and neonatal outcomes; however, the recent evidence did not show any benefit to neonatal survival. There is conflicting evidence over the role of azithromycin prophylaxis in antenatal and intrapartum periods. We explored whether azithromycin prophylaxis in pregnant women improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis registered on PROSPERO [CRD42023411093], we searched seven databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Web of Science) and clinical trial registries until 04/23/2024, for RCTs evaluating antenatal/intrapartum azithromycin prophylaxis against placebo/routine care in pregnant women. The primary outcome was neonatal mortality. Intrapartum and antenatal administration were assessed separately. We used random-effects meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Findings: Screening 2161 records retrieved 20 RCTs (56,381 participants). Intrapartum azithromycin may make little or no difference to neonatal mortality [5 RCTs, 44,436 participants; Risk Ratio (RR): 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.20, I 2 = 0%, very low certainty], and maternal mortality [3 RCTs, 44,131 participants, RR: 1.26, 0.65-2.42, I 2 = 0%, low certainty]. Similarly, antenatal azithromycin may have little or no effect on neonatal mortality [3 RCTs; 5304 participants; RR: 0.74, 0.35-1.56, I 2 = 43%, very-low certainty] and maternal mortality [3 RCTs; 8167 participants RR: 1.62, 0.67-3.91, I 2 = 0%, low certainty]. There is no data on long-term adverse outcomes and antimicrobial resistance. Interpretation: Low to very low certainty evidence suggests that intrapartum or antenatal azithromycin prophylaxis in pregnant women might not reduce maternal or neonatal mortality. Funding: None.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of pooled synthesized data on the epidemiology of neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI). Our objective with this study is to systematically assess the worldwide incidence of AKI in neonates. METHODS: We searched 3 electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Sciences) from January 2004 to December 2022 without language restrictions. We included cohort and cross-sectional studies that reported the incidence of AKI or associated mortality in neonates. Eligible studies had at least 10 participants and used standard criteria (Acute Kidney Injury Network/Pediatric Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage Renal Disease (pRIFLE)/ Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) to define AKI. Two authors independently retrieved data on demographic characteristics, clinical setting, and outcomes (incidence and AKI-associated mortality) using a semi-structured proforma and assessed the risk of bias. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We included 201 studies (98 228 participants) from 45 countries. The incidence of any stage AKI was 30% (95% confidence interval 28-32), and that of severe AKI was 15% (14-16). Overall, AKI-associated mortality was 30% (27-33). The odds of mortality were higher (odds ratio 3.4; 2.9-4.0) in neonates with AKI compared with those without AKI. We found that perinatal asphyxia, sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, and nephrotoxic medications were significant risk factors for AKI. Significant heterogeneity in the pooled estimates was a limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: AKI was observed in one-third of the neonates and was associated with increased risk of mortality. The incidence of AKI was almost similar in neonates with perinatal asphyxia and sepsis, but mortality was higher in the former group.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Humanos , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Recién Nacido , Incidencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
We discuss an illustrative case of Escherichia coli infected scalp abscess with osteomyelitis following a cephalhaematoma in a 19-day-old neonate. Cephalhaematoma is a common occurrence in neonates after prolonged labour, instrument-assisted, and traumatic deliveries and resolves spontaneously in the majority of cases. Infection may follow haematogenous dissemination or direct inoculation via a skin breach. Complications such as scalp abscess, sepsis, and osteomyelitis of the skull present with local signs, including increasing size, local erythema and tenderness, and fluctuant swelling.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To review the efficacy of nebulised magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) in acute asthma in children. METHODS: The authors searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published until 15 December 2023. RCTs were included if they compared the efficacy and safety of nebulised MgSO4 as a second-line agent in children presenting with acute asthma exacerbation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and the Risk of Bias V.2 tool was used to assess the biases among them. RESULTS: 10 RCTs enrolling 2301 children with acute asthma were included. All trials were placebo controlled and administered nebulised MgSO4/placebo and salbutamol (±ipratropium bromide). There was no significant difference in Composite Asthma Severity Score between the two groups (6 RCTs, 1953 participants; standardised mean difference: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.2 to +0.02, I2=21%). Children in the MgSO4 group have significantly better peak expiratory flow rate (% predicted) than the control group (2 RCTs, 145 participants; mean difference: 19.3; 95% CI: 8.9 to 29.8; I2=0%). There was no difference in the need for hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission or duration of hospital stay. Adverse events were minor, infrequent (7.3%) and similar among the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is low-certainty evidence that nebulised MgSO4 as an add-on second-line therapy for acute asthma in children does not reduce asthma severity or a need for hospitalisation. However, it was associated with slightly better lung functions. The current evidence does not support the routine use of nebulised MgSO4 in paediatric acute asthma management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022373692.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Sulfato de Magnesio , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Humanos , Sulfato de Magnesio/administración & dosificación , Sulfato de Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Sulfato de Magnesio/efectos adversos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración por Inhalación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
We estimated the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and/or periventricular leukomalacia/echogenicity (PVL/E) in Rhesus isoimmunized infants. Seventy-one infants underwent cranial ultrasound within the first 3 days of life or discharge, whichever was earlier. Of these, 27 (38%) infants had IVH/ PVL/E. On multivariate analysis, lower gestational age (P = 0.035), small for gestational age [aOR (95% CI) 10.6 (1.9, 58.9)], and sepsis [aOR (95% CI) 4.5 (1.1, 18.4)] were independently associated with IVH/PVL.
Asunto(s)
Leucomalacia Periventricular , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Leucomalacia Periventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Leucomalacia Periventricular/epidemiología , Eritroblastosis Fetal/epidemiología , Isoinmunización Rh , Ultrasonografía/métodosRESUMEN
Various studies have shown that oropharyngeal colostrum application (OPCA) is beneficial to preterm neonates. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether OPCA reduces the incidence of culture-proven neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates. Randomized controlled trials comparing OPCA with placebo or standard care in preterm neonates were included. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched for studies published up to June 15, 2023. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, version 2, for risk of bias assessment, the random-effects model (RevMan 5.4) for meta-analysis, and Gradepro software for assessing the certainty of evidence. Twenty-one studies involving 2393 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Four studies had a low risk of bias, whereas seven had a high risk. Oropharyngeal colostrum significantly reduced the incidence of culture-proven sepsis (18 studies, 1990 neonates, risk ratio [RR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.65, 0.94), mortality (18 studies, 2117 neonates, RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.90), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (17 studies, 1692 neonates, RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.82), feeding intolerance episodes (four studies, 445 neonates, RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.92), and the time to full enteral feeding (19 studies, 2142 neonates, mean difference: -2 to 21 days, 95% CI: -3.44, -0.99 days). There was no reduction in intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, neurodevelopmental abnormalities, hospital stay duration, time to full oral feeding, weight at discharge, pneumonia, and duration of antibiotic therapy. The certainty of the evidence was high for the outcomes of culture-positive sepsis and mortality, moderate for NEC, low for time to full enteral feeding, and very low for feeding intolerance. OPCA reduces culture-positive sepsis and mortality (high certainty), NEC (moderate certainty), and time to full enteral feeding (low certainty) in preterm neonates. However, scarcity of data from extremely premature infants limits the generalizability of these results to this population.
Asunto(s)
Calostro , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Sepsis Neonatal , Humanos , Calostro/inmunología , Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal/prevención & control , Sepsis Neonatal/terapia , Orofaringe/microbiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Introduction: Disruptions of the gut microbiota of preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during the first 2 weeks of life are of critical importance. These infants are prone to various complications, including necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and sepsis. Studying the gut microbiota will improve outcomes in preterm infants. In the present study, we examined the gut microbiota of preterm infants admitted to the NICU in the first month of life. Methods: Neonates admitted to the NICU were recruited, and stool samples were collected weekly from the seventh day of the infant's life until the 30th day of life. DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Powersoil DNA isolation kit. 16S rRNA gene sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region was performed using the MiSeq platform. Sequenced reads were processed on DADA2 pipeline to obtain an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table. All bioinformatic and statistical analyses were performed using different packages in the R statistical framework. Results: Fourteen preterm infants were recruited, and 48 samples were collected. Alpha diversity metrics, observed ASV count, and Shannon index were found to have no differences in any clinical variables. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) showed discrimination of neonates by gestational age and administration of probiotics. Differential abundance analysis showed a decreased abundance of Bifidobacterium Breve in extremely preterm infants (gestational age <28 weeks) compared to moderate preterm infants (gestational age 29-32 weeks). Supplementation with probiotics decreased Acinetobacter and increased Bifidobacterium in the gut of preterm neonates regardless of gestational age. Conclusion: Gestational age and probiotic supplementation alter the gut microbiota of preterm infants admitted to the NICU.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of pediatrician-performed wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) for diagnosing Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), as compared to binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) as the reference standard. METHODS: Eligible infants undergoing ROP screening were enrolled consecutively. BIO was performed by trained ophthalmologists, followed by WFDRI (using "3nethra neo" camera) by a pediatrician. An expert pediatric ophthalmologist reviewed de-identified images for quality, presence, and severity of ROP. She was masked to the findings of BIO and the pediatrician. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting any ROP, ROP requiring treatment (Type 1), and ROP requiring referral (Type 1 or 2) were calculated for WFDRI, considering BIO as the reference standard. RESULTS: The analysis included 427 eyes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio of WFDRI were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.93), 0.89 (0.85, 0.92), 7.8 (5.7, 10.9), 0.14 (0.09, 0.21), 0.89 (0.85, 0.91), and 58.3 (31, 110) respectively for detection of 'any ROP'. For detecting ROP requiring treatment (Type 1), the sensitivity, specificity, NLR, and diagnostic accuracy were 0.90 (0.75, 0.97), 1.00 (0.99, 1.00), 0.11 (0.04, 0.27), and 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) respectively. For ROP requiring referral, the sensitivity, specificity, NLR, and diagnostic accuracy of pediatrician-performed WFDRI were 0.92 (0.80, 0.98), 1.00 (0.99, 1.00), 0.08 (0.03, 0.21), and 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) respectively. No serious adverse events were noted. The pediatrician and ophthalmologist had a near-perfect (k-1.00) and strong (k-0.88) agreement for ROP requiring treatment and any ROP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatrician-performed WFDRI is feasible, safe, and has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying ROP requiring treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare asthma control between telemedicine and in-person visit in children aged 7 to 17 y. METHODS: A non-inferiority randomized-controlled trial was conducted at a pediatric chest clinic, involving a total of 192 patients, with 96 children in each group of telemedicine and in-person follow-up. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the mean asthma control test (ACT)/ Childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) scores from baseline to three months in both groups, with no significant difference in the change of means between the two groups. The mean difference in ACT/C-ACT score at three months in the telemedicine and in-person visit group was -0.35; 95% CI (-1.30 to +0.10) [p-value 0.09]. There was a significant change in the mean Pediatric Quality of Life index (PQLI) scores from 57.2 ± 10.2 to 66.82 ± 7.99 in the telemedicine group and from 56.1 ± 11.7 to 66.71 ± 4.66 in the in-person visit group, however the mean difference in PQLI score in both the groups was not significant (p = 0.91). There was no significant difference in the number of asthma exacerbations (4 vs. 1) between telemedicine and in-person visit (p = 0.10). The mean telemedicine satisfaction questionnaire score in this study was 3.8 ± 0.7, which indicates that most of the parents were satisfied with the telemedicine follow-up process. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that telemedicine is non-inferior to in-person visit for follow-up of children with asthma and can be used as an alternative to in-person visit for the management of asthma, especially in remote settings and pandemic situations.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To review whether the periodic rotation of nasal mask with binasal prongs is superior to continuous application of either of the interfaces in preterm infants on non-invasive positive pressure respiratory support. METHOD: The authors searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing periodic rotation of the two interfaces (mask or prongs) against the continuous application of either, in preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). They performed a random-effects meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe nasal injury. Other outcomes included any nasal injury, need for invasive ventilation, duration of respiratory support, hospital stay, and mortality. RESULTS: Four RCTs (520 participants) were included. There was no difference in the incidence of moderate to severe nasal injury between periodic rotation vs. continuous nasal mask (3 RCTs, 293 participants; RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.73-4.19), or periodic rotation vs. continuous binasal prongs (3 RCTs, 296 participants; RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.14-1.11). Periodic rotation lowered the incidence of any grade nasal injury compared to continuous binasal prongs (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49-0.75) but not compared to continuous nasal mask (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.92-2.06). Periodic rotation was associated with longer non-invasive respiratory support (compared to prongs) and prolonged hospital stay (compared to masks). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support, periodically rotating a nasal mask with short binasal prongs may not be superior to the continuous application of nasal masks.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To review whether levetiracetam is non-inferior to phenobarbitone as the first-choice antiseizure medication (ASM). METHODS: The authors searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until May 31, 2023. RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and phenobarbitone as first-line ASM in neonatal seizures were included. Random effects meta-analysis was performed, and the Risk of Bias version 2 tool was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs enrolling 821 neonates [mostly term, with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)] were included. There was no significant difference in seizure control between levetiracetam and phenobarbitone (10 RCTs, 786 participants; relative risk RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.54; I2- 88%). Neonates in the levetiracetam group had a significantly lower incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.86), respiratory depression (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.66), and depressed sensorium (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.00). Three studies compared neurodevelopmental outcomes; however two of them were cross-over trials where infants received both drugs. Only one RCT enrolled pure cohorts and showed better neurodevelopment in the levetiracetam group at one month of age. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitation of very-low certainty evidence, the results of this systematic review suggest that levetiracetam may be non-inferior to phenobarbitone for managing neonatal seizures. Considering a better safety profile and marginally better neurodevelopment in the short term, levetiracetam may be considered an initial choice for managing neonatal seizures. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42023438018).
RESUMEN
This study assessed the prevalence of iron overload in infants born to Rh isoimmunized mothers. Infants born to Rh isoimmunized mothers with Indirect Coomb's Test (ICT) titers ≥1:16 were prospectively enrolled and followed until 3 mo. Hemoglobin and serum ferritin were estimated at birth and 3 mo of age. The outcomes were the incidence of iron overload (at birth and 3 mo), anemia, and the need for transfusions in the first 3 mo. Seventy-four infants were enrolled, nearly half receiving intrauterine transfusion (IUT). Sixty (82.2%) had hyperferritinemia at birth. The median (1st, 3rd quartile) ferritin levels were 456 (321, 631) µg/L. Infants who received IUTs had significantly higher serum ferritin levels at birth. Fifty-one (76.1%) infants had hyperferritinemia at 3 mo. Over three months of follow-up, 53 (71.6%) infants had anemia, of which 33 (48.5%) required packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion. These findings suggest that iron overload is common in these infants in the first 3 mo.
RESUMEN
Monkeypox (mpox) is a significant health concern affecting children and adolescents globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesise the available evidence on the proportion of children and adolescents affected by the mpox virus. A comprehensive search was conducted in seven electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, and Cochrane) to identify the original reports on mpox cases in children and adolescents till 15 January 2023. Descriptive reports on probable or laboratory-confirmed mpox in children and adolescents (0-17 years old) were considered eligible. Studies not providing separate data for the above age group and case-control studies were excluded. The primary outcome was pooled proportion of mpox cases among children and adolescents. Proportion meta-analysis and heterogeneity between studies were determined using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator, and a random-effects model was fitted to the data. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted. A drapery plot was also provided as a complementary figure to the forest plot. The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023392475). A total of 440 studies were identified, of which 37 were included in the review and 25 in the meta-analysis (62,701 participants with 3306 children and adolescents). The pooled proportion of children and adolescents was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.30-0.63, I2 :100%). The proportion of children and adolescents was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the ongoing pandemic 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.32) than before 2022 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49-0.74). The meta-regression showed that the higher the study's sample size, the lower the proportion of children among the mpox cases. Both overall and subgroup heterogeneity were high. Adolescents and children below 5 years are commonly affected by the ongoing pandemic. In conclusion, the high proportion of children affected by the mpox virus highlights the need for increased research and targeted interventions to prevent and control the spread of the virus in this population.
Asunto(s)
Mpox , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Estudios de Casos y ControlesRESUMEN
Aims and Objectives To compare the safety and efficacy of dinoprostone pessary with Foley plus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening. Materials and Methods We randomized 115 women to the pessary or Foley plus misoprostol group. Pessary was inserted for 24 hours, and in the Foley plus misoprostol group, intravaginal misoprostol 25 mcg was administered along with trans-cervical Foley insertion and repeated every six hours to a maximum dose of 100 mcg. Singleton pregnancies requiring labor induction at more than 34 weeks with a Bishop score of <6 were included. Study outcomes included induction-delivery interval (IDI), mode of delivery, change in the Bishop score, need for oxytocin augmentation, and patient discomfort as assessed by visual analog score. Results The IDI was similar between the groups (pessary vs Foley plus misoprostol; 21.27 vs 21.10 hours, p = 0.9). The mean change in the Bishop score and need for augmentation with oxytocin was significantly more in the Foley plus misoprostol group compared to pessary (2.72 vs 1.94, p = 0.001; 89.7% vs 57.9%, p = 0.0001). Pessary was better tolerated compared to Foley plus misoprostol (VAS 7.8 vs 6.68, p = 0.0001). Mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes showed no difference. Conclusion There was no significant difference between pessary and Foley plus misoprostol in the IDI and mode of delivery. Pessary was better tolerated, and augmentation with oxytocin was required less often. Foley plus misoprostol caused a faster change in the Bishop score, but oxytocin augmentation was used more often. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar.