Salivary gland tumors: an audit from a tertiary care centre in Northern India.

Salivary gland tumors are relatively rare and can exhibit various clinical behaviors. The study aims to understand the natural history, pathology, diagnostic workup, and treatment strategies for these tumors to improve patient outcomes. The audit included patients with salivary gland tumors detected through radiology or cytology. Patients underwent surgery, with some receiving adjuvant treatment. Demographic information, treatment interventions, and survival outcomes were analyzed using SPSS software. A total 89 as malignant salivart gland tumours were audited Malignant tumors were predominantly found in the parotid gland, with fewer cases in the minor salivary gland and submandibular gland.The median age of presentation was 47 years, and the majority of patients were male. The study examined various pathological and clinical factors, including tumor stage, nodal status, and the presence of facial palsy. Surgical procedures and histological types of tumors were documented. Adverse histological features like positive margins, lymph node positivity, lympho-vascular invasion, extracapsular spread, and perineural invasion were noted. POSTOP RT was administered to high-risk patients. Most malignant salivary gland tumors were found in the parotid gland, while minor salivary gland tumors were underrepresented in the audit. Surgical practices were diverse. Radiotherapy protocols were relatively standardized. The study found that certain histological features, such as lymph node positivity, margin positivity, lympho-vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and extracapsular spread, were associated with adverse effects on DFS and OS. The findings suggest that specific histological features, including LVI and ECE have emerged as independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS.

A dose escalated fiducial marker-based image guided radical radiotherapy in locally advanced prostate cancers: A single institute experience from India.

Purpose: Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is one of the most commonly used treatment in LAPC. Dose escalation >74 Gy has shown to improve the biochemical control and freedom from failure rate in LAPC.We started treating LAPC patients with dose escalated IGRT in our institute since 2008. We did a retrospective analysis to see the biochemical relapse-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and bladder and rectal toxicity. Methods: A total of 50 consecutive prostate cancer patients were treated with dose escalated IGRT between January 2008 to Dec 2013. Out of these, 37 patients of LAPC were analyzed and their medical records were retrieved. All were biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of prostate with D'Amico high risk category (PSA >20 ng/mL or Gleason score (GS) >7 or T2c-T4). Three gold fiducial markers were placed in the prostate. Patients were immobilized in supine position with either ankle or knee rest. Partial bladder filling and rectum emptying protocol was followed. Clinical target volume (CTV) segmentation was done according to EORTC recommendation. Population based PTV expansion from CTV of 10 mm (cranio-caudal), 10 mm (medio-lateral), 10 mm (anterior) and 5 mm (posterior) was given. In patients with radiologically enlarged pelvic lymph node, whole pelvis intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to a dose of 50.4 Gy/28# followed by prostatic boost 26Gy/13# by IMRT using image guidance. Rest of the patients received prostate only RT to a dose of 76Gy/38# by IGRT. Daily On board KV images were taken and 2D-2D fiducial marker matching was done and shifts were applied on machine before treatment. Biochemical relapse was defined as per Phoenix definition (nadir + 2 ng/mL). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity grading system was used to document acute and late toxicity. Results: Median age of patients was 66 years. Median pre-treatment PSA was 22 ng/mL. Thirty patients (81%) had T3/T4 lesions and nodal metastasis was seen in 11 (30%). Median GS was 8. Median radiotherapy dose was 76 Gy. Imaging before radiation delivery was done in 19(51%) patients and 100% in 14 (38%) patients. With a median follow up of 6.5 years, 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 66% and 79% respectively. Mean bRFS and CSS were 71 months and 83 months however Median bRFS and CSS were not reached. Distant metastasis was seen in 8 (22%). RTOG grade III bladder and rectal toxicity was seen in 2 (6%) and 2 (6%) patients respectively. Conclusion: Dose escalated IGRT with fiducial marker positional verification for LAPC is doable in Indian setup provided more emphasis given on daily on-board imaging with rigorous bladder filling and rectal emptying protocol. Long term follow up is needed to assess the effect on distant disease-free survival and CSS.

A comparative study of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus oral capecitabine alone in metastatic gallbladder cancer.

Aims: There is no consensus for palliative chemotherapy regimen in metastatic gallbladder cancer. We did a retrospective study to compare the treatment outcome in patients of metastatic gallbladder cancer treated with either gemcitabine + cisplatin (regimen A) or oral capecitabine (regimen B) alone. Subjects and Methods: A total of 67 patients between January 2015 and September 15 treated with either regimen A or regimen B were retrospectively evaluated. Statistical analysis was done in June 2019. Kaplan-Meir and Log rank test were used to compare survival between two arms. Results: Out of 67 patients, 31/67 (46%) received regimen A, and 36/67 (54%) received regimen B. Male to female ratio was 1:3. About 42% patients in regimen A and 20% in regimen B required palliative stenting. Median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 in both regimen A (range 1->6) and regimen B (range 1->6). Patients receiving 3 cycles and 6 cycles of chemotherapy in regimen A and regimen B was 68% and 31% versus 70% and 63%, respectively (P = 0.86). Response assessment as any response (complete response + partial response + disease was stable) after 3 cycles and 6 cycles was 71% and 57% (P = 0.20), 44% and 39% (P = 0.29), in regimen A and B, respectively. Median survival was 23 weeks (range 2-106 weeks) in regimen A and 15 weeks (range 4-83 weeks) in regimen B (P = 0.40). Conclusions: The present study shows gemcitabine and cisplatin has nonsignificant better survival compared to oral capecitabine. However, oral capecitabine is more convenient and easy to administer. Studies with larger sample size are needed to further establish the standard chemotherapy guidelines.

A Pilot Study of Perioperative Cisplatin-Capecitabine Chemotherapy With Preoperative Chemoradiation for Resectable Gastric Cancers.

OBJECTIVES: The standard of care for resectable gastric cancers (GCs) includes perioperative chemotherapy (CT) or postoperative chemo/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) strategies. Poor treatment compliance postsurgery suggests that intensified surgical adjuvant treatment is more likely deliverable preceding surgery and, therefore, the safety and efficacy of perioperative cisplatin-capecitabine (CX) with preoperative chemoradiation (preopCRT) were ascertained. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2017 and December 2018, 28 potentially resectable locally advanced GC patients were offered neoadjuvant CT-2 cycles of CX at 3-weekly intervals, followed by preopCRT 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks and concurrent capecitabine, followed by surgical resection and 3 adjuvant cycles of CX. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant CT was commenced in 28 patients (100%), preopCRT in 18 patients (64%), and surgery performed in 13 patients (46%). At each treatment step, decreasing patient numbers were due mainly to disease progression (12 [43%]) or other reasons, including (3 [11%]) from treatment-related toxicity. The R0 resection rate was 92% (12/13); a median of 18 nodes was obtained after D2 nodal clearance in 92% (12/13). There were 20%/4%/4% grade 3/4/5 toxicities. The median radiotherapy dose/duration was 45 Gy/5.4 weeks. Adjuvant CT was started in 11 patients (39%) and the third cycle was received by 7 patients (25%). No tumor (ypT0N0) was noted in 23% of the operated patients (3/13), or 11% of the intention-to-treat population (3/28). The median, 1-year, and 2-year survivals were 12 months, 53%, and 32%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intensified preoperative treatment is doable in relatively unselected advanced GC patients in real-world settings of a public-sector hospital from a low-middle-income country. Disease progression during preoperative therapy allows patients destined for early clinical evidence of disease dissemination to avoid futile surgery, as opposed to a surgery-first strategy, without an overt increase in surgical morbidity or mortality, with encouraging R0 resection rates.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: an individual patient data network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown the survival benefit of concomitant chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. We aimed to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other. METHODS: We did a frequentist network meta-analysis based on individual patient data of meta-analyses evaluating the role of chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC]) and of altered fractionation radiotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]). Randomised, controlled trials that enrolled patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016, were included. We used a two-step random-effects approach, and the log-rank test, stratified by trial to compare treatments, with locoregional therapy as the reference. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency and P score to rank treatments (higher scores indicate more effective therapies). FINDINGS: 115 randomised, controlled trials, which enrolled patients between Jan 1, 1980, and April 30, 2012, yielded 154 comparisons (28 978 patients with 19 253 deaths and 20 579 progression events). Treatments were grouped into 16 modalities, for which 35 types of direct comparisons were available. Median follow-up based on all trials was 6·6 years (IQR 5·0-9·4). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (HFCRT) was ranked as the best treatment for overall survival (P score 97%; hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·51-0·77] compared with locoregional therapy). The hazard ratio of HFCRT compared with locoregional therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (CLRTP) was 0·82 (95% CI 0·66-1·01) for overall survival. The superiority of HFCRT was robust to sensitivity analyses. Three other modalities of treatment had a better P score, but not a significantly better HR, for overall survival than CLRTP (P score 78%): induction chemotherapy with taxane, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by locoregional therapy (ICTaxPF-LRT; 89%), accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (82%), and ICTaxPF followed by CLRT (80%). INTERPRETATION: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that further intensifying chemoradiotherapy, using HFCRT or ICTaxPF-CLRT, could improve outcomes over chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. FUNDINGS: French Institut National du Cancer, French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Fondation ARC.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint. RESULTS: For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.

Assessing failure patterns of radical intent radiation strategies in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of failure following definitive CRT (dCRT) are different as compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) with increased locoregional failures documented with dCRT. AIM: To document failure patterns in patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant and definitive intent radiation strategies. METHODS: Subjects were 123 patients treated with two chemoradiotherapy strategies. Group 1 (n = 99) underwent dose escalated definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), Group 2 (n = 24) received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by surgery. Cumulative incidence of locoregional failure (LRF), local failure (LF), regional lymph node failure (RLNF), and distant metastasis (DM) were computed; differences between the groups was evaluated using log rank test. Univariable and multivariable predictors of failure were identified using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Cumulative LRF: 64% in Group 1 vs 35% in Group 2 (P = .050). Cumulative LF: 59% in Group 1 vs 12% in Group 2 (P = .000). Cumulative RLNF: 30% in Group 1 vs 24% in Group 2 (P = .592). Most common RLNF: mediastinum for both groups (6% vs 12.5%, respectively). Distant metastasis: 40.4% Group 1 vs 17% Group 2 (P = .129), predominantly lung (Group 1, 5%), and nonregional nodes (Group 2, 8.3%). Univariate analysis identified age ≤50, absence of concurrent chemotherapy, dose ≤50 Gy, and incomplete radiotherapy to predict higher odds of LRF and DM for Group 1; absence of comorbidities predicted for lower odds of LRF for Group 2. Age ≤50 predicted for higher odds of RNLR for Group 1, while absence of comorbidities predicted for lower odds of RNLR in Group 2. Multivariate analysis identified age ≤50, incomplete radiotherapy, and absence of concurrent chemotherapy to predict higher odds of LRF for Group 1. Age ≤50, absence of concurrent chemotherapy predicted higher odds of DM for Group 1. Absence of comorbidity predicted lower odds of LRF in Group 2. CONCLUSION: LRF is common in both groups, with LF being predominant in dCRT as opposed to RNLF in NACRT. Age ≤50, absence of concurrent chemotherapy is a predictor of LRF and DM in dCRT.

Comparative retrospective analysis of locoregional recurrence in unselected breast cancer patients treated with conventional versus hypofractionated radiotherapy at a tertiary cancer center?

BACKGROUND: Role of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in early breast cancer is established; comparatively, there are limited data for HFRT in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We report the impact of HFRT in unselected breast cancer patients in comparison with historically treated patients with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 463 breast cancer patients treated between January 09 and July 13 with CFRT (50 Gy/25 fr) or HFRT (42.4 Gy in 16 fractions or 40 Gy in 15 fractions) in two sequential periods were retrospectively reviewed. The analysis was done in August 2018. The primary endpoint was to compare the differences in locoregional recurrence rate. RESULTS: Of the 463 patients, 209 received CFRT and 254 received HFRT. The median age was 48 years (interquartile range: 40-56), premenopausal (CFRT: 23% vs. HFRT 39%, P = 0.005). The most common pathology was infiltrating ductal carcinoma (81%) with Grade III tumors (45%), estrogen receptor (+) was seen in 44%, triple-negative breast cancer in 34%, and Her2Neu (3+) were seen in 27%. Two hundred and fifty-four patients (54.5%) had undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 209 patients (45%) modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Nodal radiotherapy was delivered in 76% versus 64% in patients receiving CFRT versus HFRT, respectively (P = 0.005). With a median follow-up of 46 months in CFRT and 57 months in HFRT, 9/209 (4.3%) patients in CFRT and 7/254 (2.7%) in HFRT had locoregional relapse (LRR). The 4 years#39; actuarial local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in CFRT versus HFRT was 95% versus 97% (P = 0.37). The mean estimated LRFS (local relapse-free survival) for CFRT is 113.4 months and for HFRT 94.2 months (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of local recurrence among patients of breast cancer treated with HFRT after BCS or MRM was not worse when compared to CFRT.

ISNO Position Statement on Treatment Guidance in Neuro-oncology During Pandemics.

The entire world including India is currently fighting the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic that threatens to disrupt healthcare systems globally in terms of capacity and resources. This outbreak necessitates an urgent review of existing management guidelines for commonly encountered tumors of the brain and central nervous system (CNS). Such a review should include a reassessment of benefit-risk ratio to align with local, national, and international priorities without compromising on delivery of care in terms of safety, compassion, efficiency, and effectiveness. Towards this end, the Indian Society of Neuro-Oncology (ISNO) constituted an online expert panel with adequate representation from all major treatment modalities (neuro-surgery, radiation oncology, and pediatric/medical oncology) to formulate a "COVID-19 context" position statement to guide the care of neuro-oncology patients during the ongoing crisis. The ISNO position statement suggests graded prioritization (based on clinical presentation, type of tumor, expected prognosis, and relevance of immediate therapy) for efficient utilization of resources and provides a framework through a set of general considerations, treatment modality-based considerations, and disease-specific considerations for the guidance of healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of care and services to patients with CNS tumors. The views expressed herein represent the current consensus of key opinion leaders from within the Indian neuro-oncology community and should not be in any case considered binding medically or legally to individual physicians and/or hospitals who may formulate their guidelines based on local setup and health-environment and update them periodically based on emerging evidence through the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparing Setup Errors Using Portal Imaging in Patients With Gynecologic Cancers by Two Methods of Alignment.

AIMS: Alignment tattoos on a lax abdomen contribute to misalignment of patients undergoing abdomino-pelvic radiotherapy (RT). The present study was undertaken to assess setup reproducibility in gynecologic cancer patients positioned identically but aligned for treatment to machine isocenter by two different ways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study in 35 women treated with radical RT for gynecologic malignancy was undertaken. A RT planning contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan in the supine position using an foot and ankle positioning device was done, and three reference points tattooed on the reference plane, anteriorly at the mons pubis and one on each side laterally at a fixed table top-to-vertical height of 10 cm, whereas a fourth point was tattooed at the xiphoid in the anterior midline. Patients were aligned using either a field center, that is, conventional method (Arm I, n = 18) or by a new setup isocenter (Arm II, n = 17) defined by a cranial offset of 4 cm to the reference plane for daily treatment. Anterior and right lateral digitally reconstructed radiograph setup fields were created at the treatment isocenters and compared with orthogonal megavoltage portal images (PI) taken during initial 3 days of RT and subsequently twice weekly. Setup deviations-rotations and translations were analysed in mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal, and anteroposterior direction. No online and offline corrections were performed. Population systematic error and random error were calculated and planning target volume margins required were estimated using van Herk's formula. RESULTS: Arm I had 209 PI while Arm II had 188 PI. Patients in arm II had a lesser systematic error in the ML direction. Patients with large pelvic girth (>95 cm) were susceptible for greater movements during treatment, more so in Arm I, major shifts (>5 mm) with respect to Arm II in the ML direction (37% vs. 22%, P = .001). A larger planning target volume expansion was required in Arm I (1.6 cm) compared with Arm II (0.9 cm). The margin expansion required from clinical target volume in anteroposterior direction was about 0.6 cm and about a cm in the craniocaudal direction in both the arm. CONCLUSIONS: Alignment of patient with anterior tattoo at the relatively immobile portion of lower abdomen (mons pubis) Arm II (setup) is superior to a more cranial location over the flabby abdomen during radiation treatment.

Objective and subjective assessment of xerostomia in patients of locally advanced head-and-neck cancers treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) effectively reduces xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer (HNC). Changes in the salivary output at 1 year were studied and correlation with quality of life (QOL) changes in patients of locally advanced HNC (LAHNC) was drawn. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2009 and October 2011, 20 patients of LAHNC were treated with IMRT using simultaneous integrated boost technique. High-risk clinical target volume (CTV) was given a dose of 66 Gy/30 fr, intermediate-risk CTV 60 Gy/30 fr, and low-risk CTV 54 Gy/30 fr. The saliva flow rate was estimated for 5 min at rest (unstimulated) and after using lemon drops (stimulated) for the next 5 min, at baseline (pretreatment), and 3, 6, and 12 months following treatment. Evaluation of patients' perception of dry mouth was done using EORTC-QLQ-C30 and HN35 questionnaires at the same time points. RESULTS: Baseline unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were 0.659 ml/min and 1.69 ml/min, respectively. At 3 months, a significant reduction in unstimulated (0.346 ml/min) and stimulated (0.80 ml/min) flow rate was observed. Unstimulated flow rate continued to decrease further till 6 months (0.295 ml/min), but slight improvement was seen in stimulated flow rate (0.91 ml/min). At 12 months, minimal recovery was observed in both unstimulated (0.362 ml/min) and stimulated flow rates (1.09 ml/min). EORTC-QOL questionnaire mean scores for dryness and stickiness of saliva were 10 and 15 at baseline and increased to 36 and 25, respectively, at 3 months. At 6 months, symptom score for dryness further increased to 45 and then decreased to 33 at 12 months. Stickiness score remained static from 3 to 12 months. Salivary flow rate correlated well with dry mouth (P < 0.05) but not with the perception of sticky saliva (P = 0.82) at 6 months and beyond. CONCLUSIONS: Both salivary flow rate and xerostomia-related questions worsened at 3 months even with IMRT and showed a similar pattern of recovery.

Comparative assessment of late toxicity in patients of carcinoma cervix treated by radiotherapy versus chemo-radiotherapy - Minimum 5 years follow up.

BACKGROUND: A randomised trial was carried out comparing chemo-radiation (CTRT) vs. radiotherapy (RT) in patients of carcinoma cervix and showed similar rates of pelvic disease control, disease free survival and overall survival. Late toxicity is presented. METHODS: Between December 2000 and July 2006, 180 patients of carcinoma cervix were randomly assigned to RT + weekly cisplatin (n = 94) or RT alone (n = 86). Late toxicity was prospectively scored using RTOG criteria in 156 evaluable patients, 79 and 77 respectively and is presented as crude incidence for rectum, bladder, small intestine, vagina, skin and bone and also as actuarial incidence for rectum and bladder. RESULTS: The median follow up of surviving patients was 10.4 years (minimum - 6.5 years). Crude incidence, CTRT vs. RT, of late toxicities were: rectal (7.5% vs. 5%, p = 0.22), bladder (15% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.76), small bowel (3% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.51), vagina (25% vs. 35%, p = 0.35) while the actuarial risk of grades 3-5 rectal and bladder toxicities by 5 years were 13% vs. 10% (p = 0.698) and 16% vs. 14.8% (p = 0.783) respectively. Bladder toxicity appeared later then rectal toxicity (median 49.4 vs. 21.4 months). Severe bone toxicity (fractures) were higher in the CTRT arm, 5% vs. 0%, p = 0.018. On multivariate analysis vaginal involvement (p = 0.016) and bulky tumor (p = 0.020) were associated with severe vaginal morbidity while rectal point dose > 80% (p = 0.040) was associated with a higher incidence of rectal toxicity. CONCLUSION: Bone toxicity was significantly increased by addition of CT to RT and patients continued to experience toxicity at longer periods of follow up albeit disease free.

Extranodal histiocytic sarcoma in a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cytomorphological features of a rare entity with brief review of literature.

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is a rare malignant neoplasm showing morphologic and immunophenotypic evidence of histiocytic differentiation. We describe a rare case of synchronous HS in a patient of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A 16-year-old boy diagnosed as ALL also presented with a swelling over the right Achilles tendon. The cytological features of the swelling suggested a histiocytic lesion. Histological and immunohistochemical examination clinched the diagnosis of HS. The available 5-year follow-up showed no recurrence. It was a diagnostic dilemma on fine-needle aspiration. We discuss the cytological features of HS which can help in reaching a diagnosis and emphasize that it should be considered in the differential diagnosis for unexplained swellings in patients of hematological malignancies. Wide local excision of localized HS is associated with a long-term favorable outcome.

Investigating different computed tomography techniques for internal target volume definition.

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the various computed tomography (CT) techniques such as fast CT, slow CT, breath-hold (BH) CT, full-fan cone beam CT (FF-CBCT), half-fan CBCT (HF-CBCT), and average CT for delineation of internal target volume (ITV). In addition, these ITVs were compared against four-dimensional CT (4DCT) ITVs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional target motion was simulated using dynamic thorax phantom with target insert of diameter 3 cm for ten respiration data. CT images were acquired using a commercially available multislice CT scanner, and the CBCT images were acquired using On-Board-Imager. Average CT was generated by averaging 10 phases of 4DCT. ITVs were delineated for each CT by contouring the volume of the target ball; 4DCT ITVs were generated by merging all 10 phases target volumes. Incase of BH-CT, ITV was derived by boolean of CT phases 0%, 50%, and fast CT target volumes. RESULTS: ITVs determined by all CT and CBCT scans were significantly smaller (P < 0.05) than the 4DCT ITV, whereas there was no significant difference between average CT and 4DCT ITVs (P = 0.17). Fast CT had the maximum deviation (-46.1% ± 20.9%) followed by slow CT (-34.3% ± 11.0%) and FF-CBCT scans (-26.3% ± 8.7%). However, HF-CBCT scans (-12.9% ± 4.4%) and BH-CT scans (-11.1% ± 8.5%) resulted in almost similar deviation. On the contrary, average CT had the least deviation (-4.7% ± 9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: When comparing with 4DCT, all the CT techniques underestimated ITV. In the absence of 4DCT, the HF-CBCT target volumes with appropriate margin may be a reasonable approach for defining the ITV.

Magnitude, Impact, and Management of Respiration-induced Target Motion in Radiotherapy Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Tumors in thoracic and upper abdomen regions such as lungs, liver, pancreas, esophagus, and breast move due to respiration. Respiration-induced motion introduces uncertainties in radiotherapy treatments of these sites and is regarded as a significant bottleneck in achieving highly conformal dose distributions. Recent developments in radiation therapy have resulted in (i) motion-encompassing, (ii) respiratory gating, and (iii) tracking methods for adapting the radiation beam aperture to account for the respiration-induced target motion. The purpose of this review is to discuss the magnitude, impact, and management of respiration-induced tumor motion.

Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements.

PURPOSE: With the advent of state-of-the-art treatment technologies, the use of small fields has increased, and dosimetry in small fields is highly challenging. In this study, the potential use of Varian electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for small field measurements was explored for 6 and 15 MV photon beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The output factors and profiles were measured for a range of jaw-collimated square field sizes starting from 0.8 cm × 0.8 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm using EPID. For evaluation purpose, reference data were acquired using Exradin A16 microionization chamber (0.007 cc) for output factors and stereotactic field diode for profile measurements in a radiation field analyzer. RESULTS: The output factors of EPID were in agreement with the reference data for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm and for 2 cm × 2 cm; the difference in output factors was +2.06% for 6 MV and +1.56% for 15 MV. For the lowest field size studied (0.8 cm × 0.8 cm), the differences were maximum; +16% for 6 MV and +23% for 15 MV photon beam. EPID profiles of both energies were closely matching with reference profiles for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm; however, penumbra and measured field size of EPID profiles were slightly lower compared to its counterpart. CONCLUSIONS: EPID is a viable option for profile and output factor measurements for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm in the absence of appropriate small field dosimeters.

Value of Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient on Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Biomarker for Predicting Progression of Disease Following Surgery and Radiotherapy in Glial Tumors from a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that cellularity of glial tumors are inversely correlated to minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The purpose of this prospective exploratory study was to evaluate whether temporal change in "minimum ADC" values during follow-up predict progressive disease in glial tumors post radiotherapy and surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients of glial tumors, subjected to surgery followed by Radiotherapy (RT), were included in the study. Serial conventional magnetic resonance imaging with DWI at the following time points - presurgery, pre-RT, post-RT imaging at 3, 7, and 15 months were done. For "minimum ADC" values, multiple regions of interest (ROI) were identified on ADC maps derived from DWI. A mean of 5 minimum ADC values was chosen as "minimum ADC" value. The correlation was drawn between histology and minimum ADC values and time trends were studied. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in this study. Histologies were low-grade glioma (LGG) - 5, anaplastic oligodendroglioma (ODG) -5, and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) - 4. Minimum ADC values were significantly higher in LGG and GBM than ODG. Presurgery, the values were 0.812, 0.633, and 0.787 × 10-3 mm2/s for LGG, ODG, and GBM, respectively. DWI done at the time of RT planning showed values of 0.786, 0.636, 0.869 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively. During follow-up, the increasing trend of minimum ADC was observed in LGG (P = 0.02). All these patients were clinically and radiologically stable. Anaplastic ODGs, however, showed an initial increase followed by the fall of minimum ADC in all the 5 cases (P = 0.00). Four of the five cases developed progressive disease subsequently. In all the 4 GBM cases, a consistent fall of minimum ADC values was observed (P = 0.00), and they all progressed in spite of RT. CONCLUSIONS: The DWI-derived minimum ADC values are an important yet simple quantitative tool to assess the treatment response and disease progression before they are evident on conventional imaging during the follow-up of glial tumors.

Initial Experience of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated in an Oncologist Led Palliative Cancer Care Clinic at a Tertiary Cancer Care Center in Uttar Pradesh: Is the Initiative of a Full-fledged Palliative Care for Cancer Patients Justified.

INTRODUCTION: Poor socioeconomic status and illiteracy attribute to the advanced presentation of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in India and are candidates for palliation in our setup. We set up a palliative cancer care clinic (PCCC), and an audit of initial 153 HNC patients is presented. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of palliative cancer care services. METHODOLOGY: Data of advanced HNC patients suited for palliation were collected to document demography, symptomatology, cancer treatment, and supportive care. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-three patients were seen during January 2013 to March 2015 in the PCCC. Seventy-two (47%) referral cases were due to disease progression and 81 (53%) due to de novo advanced cases. Median follow-up for this group was 5.3 months. Ninety (59%) cases needed some degree of assistance for their normal activities. Sixty-seven (44%) patients belonged to poor socioeconomic status and 65 (43%) were educated up to equivalent of high school. One hundred and thirty-five (88%) patients had an adequate family support. Pain was the most common presenting symptom in 134 (87%) cases with adequate relief in 112 (84%) patients with another 13 (09%) could not be assessed. Overall median duration of symptoms was 6 months. Cancer-directed therapy was used in 143 (93%) patients. Near the end of life in 47 (73%) out of 63 documented cases, caregivers were psychologically prepared for the inevitable. CONCLUSION: The role of palliative care team in alleviating physical, psychosocial, and emotional issues of patient and family members was significant. PCCC seems to be a feasible working model in our setup.

Long term results of comparison of concurrent low-dose daily cisplatin versus the standard weekly cisplatin with six fractions per week radiotherapy in locally advanced head neck cancer.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: Weekly administration of cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum [CDDP]) appears more feasible and substantially more popular than the 3 weekly schedules due to better compliance. Different concurrent cisplatin schedules have been attempted including a daily schedule. We did a comparison of two consecutive single arm studies, i.e., use of weekly cisplatin versus daily cisplatin when used with concurrently with a moderately accelerated radiotherapy (RT) schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two prospective feasibility, safety and efficacy studies were carried out consecutively within the department. The weekly CDDP study was done from August 2003 to August 2005 and daily CDDP study was conducted from November 2005 to June 2007. Both studies included locally advanced stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region with RT dose of 70 Gy. Concurrent single-agent cisplatin was administered weekly (35 mg/m(2)) in the first and daily (6 mg/m(2)) in the second study. RESULTS: Weekly cisplatin study had 68 and daily CDDP study had 52 patients. The median follow-up in the two studies was 93 and 63 months, respectively. Compliance in the two studies was comparable. Acute Grade III/IV mucositis and dysphagia were significantly higher in weekly cisplatin study. Late Grade II/III toxicities such as xerostomia, dysphagia, ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity were similar. The 5 years locoregional control was 18% and 25% and 5 years overall survival rate was 32% and 31% in weekly and daily cisplatin studies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modest acceleration along with either weekly or daily cisplatin, whichever is possible in one's setup, is do-able, provided due attention is paid to patient selection and supportive care.