Positional relationship between ball and fingers for accurate baseball pitching.

Accurately throwing an object to a target position repeatedly is one of the specific human motor skills. The final arrival position of a thrown ball can be determined by its physical state at release. In baseball pitching, reducing the variability of the velocity angle of the ball at release (release angle) is important for reducing the variability of the pitch location. Although previous studies have suggested that hand and finger movements are important for accurate throwing, their relationship with the release angle has not yet been investigated in detail. This study focused on the positional relationship between the ball and fingers, which is considered to be closely related to ball movement as an action point of the force, and examined its relationship with the variability of release angle. To obtain accurate finger positions relative to the ball without impeding movement or sensation, an automatic image recognition technology based on deep learning was employed. This approach revealed a noteworthy correlation between the lower middle finger positions prior to acceleration peaks and the reduced variability in release angle, emphasizing the importance of consistent finger positioning during the pre-release phase. This finger positioning of the pitchers with low variability in the release angle is suggested to be robust against the spatial variability of ball movement.

The ability to appropriately distinguish throws for different target positions.

Repeated and accurate throwing of an object to a target position is a special human motor skill. It is particularly important to understand accuracy, which has received less attention than speed due to difficulties in measurement. Accuracy has been studied in terms of reducing errors against a single target, but also in terms of distinguishing appropriate throws for targets in different positions. In this study, this ability was investigated by evaluating the two-dimensional distributions of the pitch locations of 15 pitches to three target positions in university students with and without baseball experience. The center, major and minor axis length, major and minor axis ratio, slope, area, and percentage of overlapping area of the 95% confidence ellipse were compared between target positions and participants using a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The center and area of the ellipse indicate the mean and variability of the error, respectively. The lengths of the major axes correspond to the variability of the release timing, and the minor axes correspond to the variability of the release point in space. Therefore, the ratio of the major and minor axes indicates how the variability of the pitching motion is controlled. The slope of the ellipse corresponds to the throwing arm's trajectory, and the percentage of overlap area means the ability to distinguish throws at different target positions. The result showed a main effect of participants on all indices except the center of the ellipse. This indicates that participants can generally distinguish throws by target positions regardless of their baseball experience, although participants with baseball experience may naturally reduce variability. Furthermore, participants with baseball experience demonstrated a decrease variability in release timing, which is a primary contributor to the pitch location variability, relative to the spatial variability of the pitching movements. This reduction in timing variability may be attributed to advanced motor control mechanisms.

Changes in error-correction behavior according to visuomotor maps in goal-directed projection tasks.

Humans can move objects to target positions out of their reach with certain accuracy by throwing or hitting them with tools. However, the outcome-the final object position-after the same movement varies due to various internal and external factors. Therefore, to improve outcome accuracy, humans correct their movements in the following trial as necessary by estimating the relationship between movement and visual outcome (visuomotor map). In the present study, we compared participants' error-correction behaviors to visual errors under three conditions, wherein the relationship between joystick movement direction and cursor projection direction on the monitor covertly differed. This allowed us to examine whether the error-correction behavior changed depending on the visuomotor map. Moreover, to determine whether participants maintain the visuomotor map regardless of the visual error size (cursor projection) and proprioceptive errors (joystick movement), we for the first time focused on whether temporary visual errors deviating from the conventional relationship between joystick movement direction and cursor projection direction (i.e., visual perturbation) are ignored. The visual information was occasionally perturbed in two ways to create a situation wherein the visual error was larger or smaller than the proprioceptive error. We found that participants changed their error-correction behaviors according to the conditions and could ignore visual perturbations. This suggests that humans can be implicitly aware of differences in visuomotor maps and adapt accordingly to visual errors.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that participants changed their error-correction behaviors according to the conditions and could ignore visual perturbations. This suggests that humans can be implicitly aware of differences in visuomotor maps and adapt accordingly to visual errors. These findings provide suggestions for how to notice and adapt our movements to the environment and our own dynamically changing conditions, to perform accurate movements consistently.

Control of Accuracy during Movements of High Speed: Implications from Baseball Pitching.

Despite the well-known tradeoff between speed and accuracy, skilled people often demonstrate the ability to maintain high accuracy during fast movements. We focused on two strategies to improve accuracy, thereby increasing the reproducibility of individual parameters (certain parameters are maintained in low variability) and coordinating covariation among parameters (different parameters compensate each other's variability). The objective of this study was to determine whether coordinated covariation among release parameters is used for high accuracy by skilled baseball pitchers. A model was employed to simulate pitch location after eliminating the coordinated covariation by randomly reshuffling the release parameters, and the variability of simulated and measured pitch locations were compared. The results showed that there was no significant coordinated covariation for any of the release parameters for either the vertical or horizontal pitch location supports strategy of increasing the reproducibility of individual parameter. In addition, for the vertical pitch location, because there was coordinated covariation between the release angle and speed in slow pitching, it was suggested that, the higher speed the task requires, the more important the reproducibility of individual parameter becomes.

Influence of Release Parameters on Pitch Location in Skilled Baseball Pitching.

This study explored the mechanical factors that determine accuracy of a baseball pitching. In particular, we focused on the mechanical parameters at ball release, referred to as release parameters. The aim was to understand which parameter has the most deterministic influence on pitch location by measuring the release parameters during actual pitching and developing a simulation that predicts the pitch location from given release parameters. By comparing the fluctuation of the simulated pitch location when varying each release parameter, it was found that the elevation pitching angle and speed significantly influenced the vertical pitch location, and the azimuth pitching angle significantly influenced the horizontal pitch location. Moreover, a regression model was obtained to predict the pitch location, and it became clear that the significant predictors for the vertical pitch location were the elevation pitching angle, the speed, and spin axis, and those for the horizontal pitch location were the azimuth pitching angle, the spin axis, and horizontal release point. Therefore, it was suggested that the parameter most affecting pitch location weas pitching angle. On the other hand, multiple regression analyses revealed that the relation between release parameters varied between pitchers. The result is expected to contribute to an understanding of the mechanisms underlying accurate ball control skill in baseball pitching.