A bosentan pharmacokinetic study to investigate dosing regimens in paediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: FUTURE-3.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether increasing the bosentan dosing frequency from 2 mg kg-1 twice daily (b.i.d.) to 2 mg kg-1 three times daily (t.i.d.) in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (from ≥3 months to <12 years of age) would increase exposure. METHODS: An open-label, prospective, randomized, multicentre, multiple-dose, phase III study was conducted. Patients (n = 64) were randomized 1:1 to receive oral doses of bosentan of 2 mg kg-1 b.i.d. or t.i.d. The main pharmacokinetic endpoint was the daily exposure to bosentan over 24 h corrected to the 2 mg kg-1 dose (AUC0-24C ). The maximum plasma concentration corrected to the 2 mg kg-1 dose (CmaxC ), the time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (tmax ) and safety endpoints were also assessed. RESULTS: The geometric mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] for AUC0-24C was 8535 h.ng ml-1 (6936, 10 504) and 7275 h.ng ml-1 (5468, 9679) for 2 mg kg-1 b.i.d. and t.i.d., respectively [geometric mean ratio (95% CI) 0.85 (0.61, 1.20)]. The geometric mean (95% CI) for CmaxC was 743 ng ml-1 (573, 963) and 528 ng ml-1 (386, 722) for 2 mg kg-1 b.i.d. and t.i.d., respectively [geometric mean ratio (95% CI) 0.71 (0.48, 1.05)]. The median (range) for tmax was 3.0 h (0.0-7.5) and 3.0 h (1.0-8.0) for 2 mg kg-1 b.i.d. and t.i.d., respectively. The proportions of patients who experienced ≥1 adverse event were similar in the b.i.d. (66.7%) and t.i.d. (67.7%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: There appeared to be no clinically relevant difference in exposure to bosentan, or in safety, when increasing the frequency of bosentan dosing from b.i.d. to t.i.d. Therefore, the present study provides no indication that the dosing recommendation should be changed, and 2 mg kg-1 b.i.d. remains the recommended dosing regimen for bosentan in paediatric PAH patients.

Pediatric Development of Bosentan Facilitated by Modeling and Simulation.

BACKGROUND: Bosentan is approved for use in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The primary aim of the pharmacokinetic modeling was the provision of a systematic guidance for study design and enhanced understanding of pharmacokinetics across the entire pediatric age range. METHODS: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed for the pediatric population; starting from an adult model, the effects of body weight, age, and maturation of relevant metabolizing enzymes were incorporated to extrapolate the pharmacokinetics to children. A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model was developed to identify relevant covariates. RESULTS: Based on model predictions, a dose of 0.5 mg/kg led to an exposure distinguishable from a dose of 2 mg/kg, and an additional blood sampling time point at 2 h (the predicted time of maximum concentration) allowed more precise estimation of bosentan exposure in children. The lower exposure observed in children compared with adults could be explained by maturation-related changes in clearance. Clinical data confirmed the model predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Maturational changes in drug clearance and developmental changes in body weight were identified as key elements of bosentan pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients. Estimating bosentan exposure using physiologically based and population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation supported dose selection in pediatric patients. Model-based exposure estimates helped in reducing the number of the youngest pediatric patients to be studied. Pharmacokinetic models can provide a systematic guidance for study design and enhanced understanding of pharmacokinetics across the entire pediatric age range.

Bosentan as Adjunctive Therapy for Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: Results of the Randomized Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Exploratory Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan as adjunctive therapy for neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). STUDY DESIGN: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled exploratory trial (FUTURE-4). Eligible patients were >34 weeks gestation, <7 days old, receiving inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) treatment (≥4 hours), and had persistent respiratory failure (oxygenation index [OI] ≥12). After 2:1 randomization, bosentan 2 mg/kg or placebo was given by nasogastric tube twice daily for ≥48 hours and up to 1 day after iNO weaning. RESULTS: Twenty-one neonates received a study drug (13 bosentan, 8 placebo). Compared with the placebo group, the group treated with bosentan had a higher median baseline OI and greater need for vasoactive agents. One treatment failure (need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) occurred in the group treated with bosentan. The time to weaning from iNO or mechanical ventilation was not different between the groups. Bosentan was well tolerated and did not adversely affect systemic blood pressure or hepatic transaminase levels. Anemia and edema were more frequent in patients receiving bosentan. Blood concentrations of bosentan were low and variable on day 1, and achieved steady state on day 5. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive bosentan was well tolerated, but did not improve oxygenation or other outcomes in our patients with PPHN. This effect may be related to delayed absorption of bosentan on treatment initiation in critically ill neonates or to more severe illness of the neonates who received bosentan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01389856.

FUTURE-2: Results from an open-label, long-term safety and tolerability extension study using the pediatric FormUlation of bosenTan in pUlmonary arterial hypeRtEnsion.

BACKGROUND: A novel formulation of bosentan was evaluated in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in FUTURE-1, which characterized its pharmacokinetic and clinical profile. The subsequent phase III, open-label, long-term extension study, FUTURE-2, aimed to provide long-term tolerability, safety and exploratory efficacy data. METHODS: Children (≥2 and <12 years) with idiopathic or heritable PAH, who completed 12-week treatment in FUTURE-1 and for whom bosentan was considered beneficial were enrolled, and continued to receive bosentan 4 mg/kg twice-daily, which could be down-titrated to 2mg/kg if not tolerated. Safety and tolerability were evaluated via treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, growth, and laboratory measurements. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included time to PAH worsening and long-term survival. All analyses were conducted on pooled data of both studies. RESULTS: 36 patients were enrolled in FUTURE-1 and 33 continued in FUTURE-2. The overall median duration of exposure to bosentan was 27.7 (range 1.9-59.6) months. Treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 32 (88.9%) patients; AEs considered treatment-related in 15 (41.7%) patients. Of 51 serious AEs, three were considered treatment-related: two incidences of reported PAH worsening and one of autoimmune hepatitis. Six deaths occurred; none were considered treatment-related. Kaplan-Meier event-free estimates of PAH worsening were 78.9% and 73.6% at 2 and 4 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric bosentan formulation was generally well tolerated, its safety profile comparable to that of the adult formulation when used in children. The results are in line with the efficacy profile of bosentan in previous pediatric and adult PAH studies of shorter duration.

Long-term results from the EARLY study of bosentan in WHO functional class II pulmonary arterial hypertension patients.

BACKGROUND: The double-blind phase of the EARLY study of bosentan remains the only randomized controlled trial of a PAH-targeted therapy in World Health Organization functional class (FC) II patients. We report on the efficacy, safety, disease worsening, survival and prognostic factors in mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients treated with bosentan in the open-label extension phase of the EARLY study. METHODS: Exploratory efficacy outcomes included 6-minute walk distance (6 MWD) and WHO FC. Adverse events were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to first PAH worsening event (death, initiation of intravenous or subcutaneous prostanoids, atrial septostomy or lung transplantation) and survival. Cox regression analysis determined factors prognostic of survival. RESULTS: Median exposure to bosentan (n=173) was 51 months. At the end of the bosentan-treatment assessment period, 77.8% of patients were in WHO FC I/II. Adverse events led to discontinuation of bosentan in 20.2% of patients. Aminotransferase elevations>3× upper limit of normal occurred in 16.8%. Four-year PAH-event-free survival and survival were 79.5% (95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 73.4, 85.6) and 84.8% [95% CI 79.4, 90.2], respectively. Low 6 MWD, low mixed venous oxygenation, high N-terminal pro hormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels and PAH associated with connective tissue disease were associated with a higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients exposed to long-term bosentan maintained or improved their functional class. Approximately 20% of the patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, which were most commonly PAH worsening and elevated liver enzymes.

Hemodynamics and pharmacokinetics of tezosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of tezosentan, a parenteral dual ET receptor antagonist, on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis. In addition, the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tezosentan were evaluated. METHODS: The population consisted of patients with cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension. This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. The patients were randomized 3:1 to tezosentan (3 mg/h for 2-3 h) or placebo. HVPG, hepatic blood flow (HBF, ICG method), and systemic arterial pressures were measured before and after tezosentan administration. Plasma concentrations of tezosentan and ET-1 were determined peripherally and in the hepatic vein. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received tezosentan and six placebo. Baseline clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic characteristics were balanced between the two groups. There was no significant treatment effect on HVPG. The extraction ratio (0.31), the plasma clearance of ICG (280 ml/min), and the HBF (1,430 ml/min) did not show any relevant changes during the infusion of tezosentan, and there were no differences between placebo- and tezosentan-treated patients. A linear relationship was observed between the maximum-fold increase in ET-1 concentration and the steady-state tezosentan plasma concentration (r = 0.82). There was a strong correlation (r = 0.88) between plasma clearance of ICG and that of tezosentan (10.2 l/h). Arterial pressure and heart rate did not significantly change in either group. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis, a 2- to 3-h tezosentan infusion was safe and well tolerated but did not change the HVPG. Tezosentan infusion had no influence on the extraction ratio and plasma clearance of ICG and did not change HBF.

Pharmacokinetic and clinical profile of a novel formulation of bosentan in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension: the FUTURE-1 study.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Exposure to bosentan was lower in paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients treated with the marketed adult formulation at a dose of about 2 mg kg(-1) when compared with adult PAH patients. * In healthy adult subjects, bosentan pharmacokinetics are less than dose-proportional at doses of >or=500 mg. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * The pharmacokinetics of a new paediatric bosentan formulation were characterized in paediatric PAH patients. * The level of exposure to bosentan as observed in adult PAH patients cannot be reached in paediatric patients with b.i.d. dosing. * In paediatric PAH patients, nondose-proportional pharmacokinetics of bosentan occur at lower doses when compared with healthy adult subjects. AIM: To show equivalent bosentan exposure in paediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) when compared with a cohort of historical controls of adult PAH patients using a newly developed paediatric formulation. METHODS: Thirty-six paediatric PAH patients were enrolled in this multicentre, prospective, open-label, noncontrolled study and treated for 4 weeks with bosentan 2 mg kg(-1) b.i.d. and then for 8 weeks with 4 mg kg(-1) b.i.d. Blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic purposes. Exploratory efficacy measurements included World Health Organization (WHO) functional class and parent's and clinician's Global Clinical Impression scales. RESULTS: Comparing children with a historical group of adults, the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 0.54 (0.37, 0.78), i.e. children had lower exposure to bosentan than adults. Bosentan concentrations following doses of 2 and 4 mg kg(-1) were similar. Improvements in WHO functional class and the Global Clinical Impression scales occurred mainly in bosentan-naive patients, whereas the rare worsenings occurred in patients already on bosentan prior to study initiation. The paediatric formulation was well accepted and bosentan well tolerated in this study. No cases of elevated liver enzymes or anaemia were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to bosentan, as shown comparing the results from this study with those from a study in adults, was different in paediatric and adult PAH patients. Since FUTURE-1 and past studies suggest a favourable benefit-risk profile for bosentan at 2 mg kg(-1) b.i.d., this dose is recommended for children with PAH. The new paediatric formulation was well tolerated.