Depressive symptoms in epilepsy: prevalence, impact, aetiology, biological correlates and effect of treatment with antiepileptic drugs.

Occurring in up to 80% of patients with epilepsy, depression in epilepsy may manifest as (i) major depressive disorder, meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria; (ii) atypical depression or dysthymia; or (iii) a dysthymic-like disorder with intermittent symptoms that can be milder than those of major depression. Depressive symptoms impair patients' health-related quality of life and may affect the clinical course of epilepsy. Depressive symptoms in epilepsy have been attributed to several causes, including endocrine and/or metabolic effects of seizures; the psychological response to epilepsy and its associated mental, physical and social challenges; common pathogenic mechanisms between depression and epilepsy; and the adverse effects of certain antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), particularly GABAergic agents, such as vigabatrin, tiagabine, topiramate and phenobarbital. Whereas some AEDs impair mood, others appear to improve aspects of mood or are mood neutral. Demonstrable antidepressant efficacy of AEDs used to manage seizures could have a significant impact on the care of patients with epilepsy. The AED lamotrigine has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy. In randomized, double-blind, clinical trials in patients with epilepsy, depressive symptoms improved more with lamotrigine monotherapy than valproate monotherapy and more with lamotrigine adjunctive therapy than placebo. Results of open-label studies of lamotrigine monotherapy and adjunctive therapy are consistent with the results of double-blind clinical trials. Lamotrigine-associated improvement in depressive symptoms is independent of its anticonvulsant efficacy. In prospective assessments, gabapentin, levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine each exhibited potentially beneficial effects on depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy. However, evidence for the efficacy of gabapentin, levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine in the treatment of depressive symptoms in epilepsy is inconclusive at present because the effects of each agent have only been reported in single studies of an open-label design and with small sample sizes.

Relative influences of adjunctive topiramate and adjunctive lamotrigine on scanning and the effective field of view.

A subsample of 67 adult patients with partial seizures participating in a randomized, double-blind study comparing the cognitive effects of adjunctive lamotrigine (LTG) and adjunctive topiramate (TPM) was administered Performance On-Line (POL) in addition to a battery of neuropsychological tests at baseline, week 8 and week 16 of treatment. The POL is a self-administered computer task that measures scanning, divided-attention, and the effective field of view. Although the POL does not measure driving performance, POL scores are correlated with driving performance. The results show that adjunctive TPM, but not adjunctive LTG, negatively impacted cognition. Both simple target identification and divided-attention performance on POL were compromised in the TPM group but not in the LTG group. The relative POL impairment associated with chronic TPM treatment was similar to that observed with the acute effects of alcohol with a breath level of .045% or a low dose of alprazolam (0.5mg). Thus, driving-related visual and cognitive skills were compromised by adjunctive TPM treatment. Therapeutic doses of adjunctive TPM pose a potential risk of impaired scanning and divided-attention skills.

Conversion to lamotrigine monotherapy from valproate monotherapy in older adolescent patients with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic interactions can make necessary anti-epileptic medication (AED) changes hazardous for children with epilepsy. We report the utility of a dosing algorithm designed to maintain stable trough lamotrigine (LTG) concentrations during conversion from valproate (VPA) to LTG monotherapy in adolescents aged 16-20 years. METHODS: Patients were enrolled into the study if they required a change in their AED regimen due to lack of efficacy or intolerable side effects. Conversion to LTG monotherapy took place in a four part treatment algorithm. Lamotrigine was escalated according to a target dose of 200 mg/day over 8-weeks. Valproate was withdrawn over a period of 2-6 weeks, depending on the initial dose. Lamotrigine dose was further escalated to 500 mg/day and continued for four weeks as mono therapy. Trough serum concentrations of LTG were measured during each phase of the trial. RESULTS: Twelve of 16 patients completed the study. After the LTG escalation to 200 mg/day, mean trough serum concentrations of 8.0 microg/mL did not differ significantly from the 9.5 microg/mL after VPA withdrawal or the 9.2 microg/mL after 4 weeks of monotherapy at 500 mg/day. Adverse events led to premature discontinuation for one subject. Two subjects withdrew due to worsening seizures during LTG monotherapy possibly due to non-compliance. Limitations of the trial include the open label design and small sample size of the sub-analysis. CONCLUSION: In adolescent patients, this algorithm produces stable LTG serum concentrations with favorable tolerability during a transition from VPA to LTG mono therapy.

Assessment of tolerability in elderly patients: changing to lamotrigine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Of all age groups, adults older than 75 years have the highest risk of seizures, especially partial seizures. In the past, physicians commonly used phenytoin, carbamazepine, and valproic acid as antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the elderly. However, these AEDs have potential adverse effects and drug interactions that may make them less desirable than newer AEDs for this age group. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effects of changing the AED regimen to lamotrigine (LTG) in elderly patients (aged >or=60 years) who were initially unsatisfied with their drug regimen because of adverse effects or continuing seizures. These patients comprised a subgroup from a multicenter, open-label trial of partial-seizure patients who switched to LTG. Other objectives included assessing the change in quality of life in patients taking LTG as adjunctive therapy and as monotherapy, and evaluating the efficacy of LTG for seizures when used as adjunctive treatment and as monotherapy. METHODS: The study involved 2 phases: LTG was first added to the regimen, and then patients could change to LTG monotherapy. Tolerability, the primary end point, was assessed using the Liverpool Adverse Experience Profile (AEP). Secondary end points included quality of life, as measured with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 inventory, investigator global assessment, patient's self-rated satisfaction with treatment, and Profile of Mood States. The proportion of patients who completed each phase with at least a 50% reduction in seizures from baseline and the proportion of patients remaining seizure free throughout each phase were also determined. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients aged >or=60 years (mean [SD]age, 71.3 [7.6] years; 31 men, 31 women) were enrolled. After adding LTG, older patients reported fewer adverse effects, improved mood, better quality of life, and fewer seizures. Changing to LTG as monotherapy produced further improvement in all measurements. For the primary end point, mean improvement in AEP scores from baseline was 2.3 at the end of the adjunctive therapy phase (P = 0.027) and 5.7 by the end of the monotherapy phase (P < 0.005). In addition, there was a mean improvement of 2.0 in the AEP score from the adjunctive therapy to the monotherapy phase. CONCLUSIONS: For older patients with seizures who were unhappy with their AED regimen because of adverse effects, continuing seizures, or both, adding LTG to the drug regimen was associated with improved tolerability and effectiveness, and switching to LTG monotherapy was associated with further improvement.

Effect of lamotrigine on depressive symptoms in adult patients with epilepsy.

In this investigation, the effects of lamotrigine versus placebo on depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy were prospectively assessed. This investigation was a secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in which adult patients received adjunctive lamotrigine (n=32) or placebo (n=38) for a 7-week dose escalation phase, followed by a 12-week maintenance phase, for primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures. Mood symptoms were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory, second edition (BDI-II), the Profile of Mood States (POMS), and the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale-Self-Report (CDRS). Mean (SD) BDI-II scores at screening reflected mild depressive symptoms and were similar between groups (lamotrigine 18.3 (12.1), placebo 16.8 (12.0)). At the end of the maintenance phase, mean (SD) improvement from baseline was greater with lamotrigine than placebo with respect to BDI-II score (lamotrigine 8.9 (7.6), placebo 1.7 (8.5), P=0.01) and POMS total score (lamotrigine 32.0 (30.4), placebo 6.5 (32.3), P=0.03) and numerically greater with lamotrigine than placebo for CDRS score (lamotrigine 7.3 (7.8), placebo 4.1 (13.9), P=0.50). Among the subset of patients with at least mild depression (BDI-II score10), mean improvement from baseline was numerically, but not statistically significantly, greater with lamotrigine (11.5, n=13) than placebo (3.1, n=18) (P=0.054). Median percentage reductions in seizure frequency were significantly greater with lamotrigine than placebo during the escalation phase, the maintenance phase, and the escalation and maintenance phases combined for PGTC seizures and all generalized seizures. However, improvement in seizure frequency was not correlated with improvement in mood (r=0.1, P=ns). Compared with placebo, lamotrigine improved mood symptoms independently of seizure reduction in patients with generalized seizures. Lamotrigine may be useful in treating patients with epilepsy and comorbid depressive symptoms.

Lamotrigine therapy in patients requiring a change in antiepileptic drug regimen.

INTRODUCTION: The tolerability of lamotrigine as adjunctive and monotherapy in patients requiring a change in antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy was assessed in this multicenter, open-label study. Open-label studies conducted in the clinic setting may provide additional drug tolerability and effectiveness information that may not be evident in pre-approval clinical trials. METHODS: Adult patients with partial seizures received adjunctive lamotrigine for 16 weeks. Patients taking a single enzyme-inducing AED could convert to lamotrigine monotherapy for an additional 12 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline, end of adjunctive therapy, and end of monotherapy using the Liverpool Adverse Experience Profile (AEP), Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31, a patient satisfaction rating, and a subjective investigator global assessment. RESULTS: Of the 547 patients enrolled (mean age 42.7 years, 58% female), 421 (77%) completed adjunctive therapy. Upon completion of the adjunctive phase, mean improvement from baseline was 4.3 points on the AEP, and investigators rated 71% of patients as improved in global status. Overall score on the QOLIE 31 improved by 10 points from baseline. One hundred and seventy-eight patients entered and 143 (80%) patients completed the monotherapy phase. In patients completing lamotrigine monotherapy, mean improvement from baseline was 5.9 points on the AEP, and investigators rated 92% as improved in global status. Overall score on the QOLIE 31 score improved by 15 points from baseline. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine as adjunctive treatment and monotherapy may improve side effect burden and quality of life in patients requiring a change in AED therapy.

Effects of lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: An open-label study.

BACKGROUND: It is important that drug therapy for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy(JME), a lifelong disorder requiring long-term therapy, is effective and well tolerated with long-term use. Lamotrigine as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing the frequency of partial and generalized seizures in short- and long-term studies in children, adolescents, adults, and elderly patients with epilepsy, including those with JME. With its tolerability profile and spectrum of efficacy, lamotrigine might be an appropriate option for newly diagnosed patients with JME, a possibility that has not been empirically assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed JME. METHODS: This open-label study was conducted at 18 clinical sites across the United States. Patients aged ≥12 years with newly diagnosed JME and who had experienced at least 1 generalized motor seizure since diagnosis but were antiepileptic treatment-naive or had received inappropriate treatment due to misdiagnosis were enrolled. During the first 8 weeks of the study, lamotrigine (25-mg or 100-mg tablets) was introduced (to a maximum dosage of 100-500 mg/d, based on instructions in the package insert and clinical response). This dose escalation was followed by a 24-week treatment phase during which lamotrigine dose could be adjusted as needed to achieve optimal clinical benefit. Efficacy end points included the rates of patients with a decrease from baseline of at least 50% in the frequency of myoclonic, tonic-clonic, and absence seizures; and the rate of patients with mild, moderate, or marked improvement from baseline in global clinical status as perceived by the investigators. Adverse events were recorded in patient diaries, and diary information was reviewed by study personnel at clinic visits. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (17 females, 12 males; mean [SD] age, 24.0 [11.3] years [range, 12-50 years]) were included in the efficacy analysis. During the lamotrigine monotherapy treatment period, 58% of patients experienced a reduction from baseline of at least 50% in days with myoclonic seizures, and 56% and 38% of patients experienced a reduction of at least 50% in the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures and absence seizures, respectively. At week 24 of the monotherapy phase, investigators perceived that 72% of patients had shown mild, moderate, or marked improvement in global clinical status relative to the start of the study. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, lamotrigine monotherapy given to patients with newly diagnosed JME was associated with a reduction in the frequency of seizures and improvement in global clinical status as rated by the investigators. Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated.

Improved mood states with lamotrigine in patients with epilepsy.

Lamotrigine (LTG) was added to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in a study of adjunctive therapy. In addition to seizure control and adverse effects, patients were evaluated for changes in mood states and quality of life. The Profile of Mood States (POMS) and 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31) instruments were administered at baseline (N=196), after addition of LTG as adjunctive treatment (N=155), and after withdrawal of other drugs to LTG monotherapy (N=51). POMS scores correlated highly with the QOLIE-31 Emotional Well-Being subscale, a known measure of mood. All POMS subscales were significantly improved (all P<0.0001) at the end of the adjunctive therapy phase. POMS scores remained significantly better than baseline among patients completing the conversion to monotherapy (all P<0.003). Minimal clinically important changes were determined for POMS scores. These data indicate that LTG improves mood states to a clinically important degree, even in the presence of other AEDs. The improvement likely was not a synergy but attributable only to LTG because it remained stable after withdrawal of the other AEDs.

Lamotrigine for patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy following prior treatment with valproate: results of an open-label study.

This open-label study was designed to evaluate lamotrigine monotherapy as a possible alternative in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy who previously failed treatment with valproate. Patients (n=63) were transitioned from valproate to lamotrigine during an 8-week escalation phase followed by 24 weeks of lamotrigine monotherapy. On Week 24 of the treatment phase, investigators judged that 50 and 67% of patients completing the study had shown mild, moderate, or marked improvement in adverse events and global clinical status, respectively, and 76% of patients rated lamotrigine as somewhat better (13%) or much better (63%) than valproate. The majority of patients completing the study experienced no deterioration of seizure control when switching from valproate to lamotrigine. These results support additional research on lamotrigine in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Quality of life improvement with conversion to lamotrigine monotherapy.

This report describes the effect on patient-reported quality of life (QOL) after reduction from two drugs to monotherapy with lamotrigine. Patients taking lamotrigine (LTG) with an enzyme-inducing drug were converted to LTG monotherapy for a 12-week follow-up. Changes in QOLIE-31 between baseline and follow-up were compared with physicians' global change ratings and patient-reported health status. Total QOLIE-31 scores increased 10.7 points for patients rated by physicians as having mild improvement, and 17 points for those reported as having moderate to marked improvement. Subscale scores also increased by minimum important change (MIC) amounts (> or = 11.76), with the largest change in Cognition, Energy, Medication Effects, and Seizure Worry subscales. The data also support > or = 11 MIC as a clinically important change in total score for the QOLIE-31. Exploratory analyses also provide information about MIC for individual subscales (8-18 for physician rated global change, 10-26 for patient-rated global health status change). This study demonstrates the value of reduction to monotherapy from the patients' and physicians' perspectives.