Emergency Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Did Not Increase the Incidence of Postprocedural Pancreatitis Compared With Elective Cases: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of and risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) after emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter observational study of 3914 patients who underwent ERCP. We compared the incidence of PEP after emergency and elective ERCP. RESULTS: A total of 3410 patients were enrolled in this study. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 44 of 800 patients (5.5%) and in 190 of 2418 patients (7.9%) in the emergency and elective groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted between the groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.03; P = 0.07). Multivariate analysis showed that the following factors increased the risk for PEP after emergency ERCP: contrast medium injection into the pancreatic duct (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.30-5.03; P = 0.005), >4 cannulation attempts (OR, 5.72; 95% CI, 2.61-12.50; P < 0.001), and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (OR, 9.24; 95% CI, 2.13-40.10; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was noted in the incidence of PEP in patients after emergency and elective ERCP. We may prevent PEP even after emergency ERCP by avoiding contrast injection into the pancreatic duct, multiple cannulation attempts, and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation.

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis assessed using criteria for acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: International consensus on the definition and classification of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) has been reached. However, the diagnosis and severity of PEP are often assessed according to the diagnostic criteria and classification for acute pancreatitis (AP). This study determined the incidence, severity, and risk factors of PEP diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria and classification for AP in a large cohort. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study conducted at five high-volume centers included 1932 patients who underwent ERCP-related procedures. The incidence, severity, and risk factors for PEP were evaluated. RESULTS: PEP occurred in 142 patients (7.3%); it was mild in 117 patients (6.0%) and severe in 25 patients (1.3%). According to the Cotton criteria, PEP occurred in 87 patients (4.5%); it was mild in 54 patients (2.8%), moderate in 20 patients (1.0%), and severe in 13 patients (0.7%). In the multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.239; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.546-3.243), naïve papilla (OR 3.047; 95% CI 1.803-5.150), surgically-altered gastrointestinal anatomy (OR 2.538; 95% CI 1.342-4.802), procedure time after reaching the papilla (OR 1.009; 95% CI 1.001-1.017), pancreatic duct injection (OR 2.396; 95% CI 1.565-3.669), and intraductal ultrasonography (OR 1.641; 95% CI 1.024-2.629) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: According to the diagnostic criteria and classification for AP, the incidence of PEP was higher than that according to the Cotton criteria and the severity of PEP tended to be severe.

[A case of concomitant pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in which preoperative diagnosis was difficult].

A 75-year-old male patient has been followed-up for mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in the tail of the pancreas for about 20 years. Upon close examination, he was diagnosed of high-risk stigmata due to a nodule having a contrast effect of 5mm or more in the tumor. Based on this, a distal pancreatectomy was performed. Histopathological analysis revealed concomitant IPMN (low-grade) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PNEN) (G1). This prompted us to report a very rare case of coexisting PNEN and IPMN with an interesting pathological finding that might suggest its pathogenic mechanism.

[Prediction of pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if the difference in serum amylase levels prior to, and two hours following, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), or the ratio of the two-hour post-ERCP amylase level to the pre-ERCP amylase level was a better predictor of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of consecutive patients, who underwent ERCP between April 2015 and August 2018. Serum amylase was measured before and two hours following ERCP. We compared the difference and the ratio of the two levels in predicting PEP using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1029 patients underwent ERCP, with PEP occurring in 118 (11.5%). Multivariate analysis revealed that an elevated two-hour post-ERCP serum amylase level was a significant predictor of PEP. ROC analysis of the difference and the ratio of the two levels found good performance for both parameters, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.823-0.900) and 0.847 (95% CI, 0.809-0.886), respectively. The difference between the values was a significantly more effective predictor of PEP, based on the AUC analysis (P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The difference between pre and two-hour post-ERCP amylase levels is a better predictor of PEP than the ratio of the two.

Diagnostic Value of Serum Amylase Levels Indicating Computed Tomography-Defined Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis involves persistent serum amylase levels of 3 times or more the standard upper limit. However, these criteria were mostly based on retrospective studies and not necessarily supported by diagnostic imaging. Our prospective study aimed to investigate cutoff serum amylase levels suggesting post-ERCP pancreatitis using computed tomography as the criterion standard. METHODS: We prospectively followed 2078 cases. Computed tomography was performed in patients whose serum amylase levels exceeded the institutional upper limit 12 to 24 hours after ERCP. Two expert radiologists blindly assessed the images and judged the presence or absence of pancreatitis. Correlations between serum amylase levels with pancreatitis were investigated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Amylase levels increased in 416 (23.2%) of 1789 cases included, and 350 cases were analyzed using computed tomography. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis was diagnosed in 12.0% (214/1789). The cutoff amylase levels for judging pancreatitis after 12 to 24 hours was 2.75 times higher than the institutional upper limit, with an area under the curve of 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate cutoff serum amylase level for judging post-ERCP pancreatitis at 12 to 24 hours after ERCP was 2.75 times higher than the institutional upper limit. These results may clarify the definition of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

[Successful biliary drainage by percutaneous transhepatic puncture common bile duct and rendezvous technique for a case of recurrent biliary pancreatitis with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction and without extension of the bile duct].

A 92-year-old woman was hospitalized with upper abdominal pain. She had a history of acute biliary pancreatitis and chronic heart failure and had undergone gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. She was admitted with recurrent pancreatitis and an exacerbation of heart failure. Biliary drainage could not successfully be achieved endoscopically or with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and EUS-guided biliary drainage because of the Roux-en-Y reconstruction and non-dilation of bile duct. We successfully accomplished biliary drainage in one session with percutaneous transhepatic puncture of the common bile duct with ultrasound guidance and the rendezvous technique. We report this case because it is rare.

[A case of relapsed hemosuccus pancreaticus successfully treated with interventional radiology].

A 67-year-old male with chronic pancreatitis presented with upper abdominal pain and melena. Abdominal dynamic computed tomography revealed a splenic artery aneurysm in the main pancreatic duct. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed active bleeding from Vater's papilla. The patient was diagnosed with hemosuccus pancreaticus (HP) due to rupture of the aneurysm and treated with interventional radiology (IVR). The patient's poor lung function did not allow for a radical operation and a follow-up examination was recommended. The HP relapsed 7 months later and was successfully retreated with IVR. Although IVR is associated with a high recurrence rate, it is less invasive and therefore effective for treating relapsing HP in patients with a poor general condition.

[A patient with sepsis and a gas-forming liver abscess caused by Clostridium perfringens treated with continuous perfusion drainage].

A 64-year-old man presented with diarrhea, fever, and disturbance of consciousness; he was subsequently diagnosed with acute renal and hepatic disorder. Abdominal computed tomography identified a gas-forming liver abscess, and the patient underwent emergency drainage. However, his condition did not improve, and Clostridium perfringens was observed in his blood culture. Continuous perfusion drainage was performed by placing an additional drainage tube, which resulted in abscess shrinkage and improved the patient's general condition. Despite the low survival rate in patients with gas-forming liver abscesses caused by C. perfringens, therapy was successful in this patient.

[Two cases of colonic diverticular bleeding in which the combination of a planned marking clip and dynamic computed tomography was useful for identification of the bleeding site].

We experienced two cases of shock secondary to colonic diverticular bleeding. Both patients showed signs of shock after each episode of melena; however, the bleeding site could not be initially identified because multiple diverticula were present and the bleeding spontaneously ceased during each examination. Therefore, we subsequently performed planned clipping and dynamic computed tomography scanning of the area surrounding the potential bleeding sites to look for signs of vascular leakage and to determine the clip location. The use of this method enabled us to successfully identify the bleeding site in both cases. Thus, this method can be useful in identifying the site of colonic diverticular bleeding that may cause shock.