Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of COMT-Inhibitors as Adjuvant Treatments to Levodopa in Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease.

PURPOSE: We aimed to elicit scientific evidence on the cost-effectiveness of two catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (COMT-i) versus no COMT-i in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. METHODS: A mixed model of the decision tree and a Markov model with three health states by OFF-time level (<25%, ≥25%, and death) was constructed to compare opicapone (OPC), entacapone (ENT), and no COMT-i over a lifetime. A hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients was created and simulated based on the characteristics of the BIPARK trial subjects. FINDINGS: Two COMT-i (OPC and ENT) were identified as a cost-effective option compared to no COMT-i. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that over 90% of the simulations proved the robust cost-effectiveness of COMT-i. When the time horizon as the most influential factor decreases to a 5- and 10-year period, COMT-i can be a cost-saving option. Although ENT may be the preferred option over OPC economically because of its lower price, OPC can be acceptable if the drug price is reduced by 17%. IMPLICATIONS: Add-on treatment with COMT-i in patients with PD receiving levodopa/carbidopa appears to be cost-saving compared with not using COMT-i. In the future, it is necessary to evaluate the economic evaluation of COMT-i based on long-term real-world evidence.

Association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use and developing irritable bowel syndrome through retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Serotonin affects the balance and integrity of the gut microbiome; however, studies have confirmed the influence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We evaluated the association between SSRI use and subsequent IBS occurrence in a real-world setting. METHODS: A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was adopted, and the National Health Insurance Service cohort claims database between 2010 and 2019 was used. Non-SSRI users were selected using the propensity score matching method. Subgroup analyses were performed using the point of use, cumulative dose, and duration of SSRI use. Additional analysis was performed using a control group without psychiatric medications. RESULTS: We included 2901 SSRI users and 2727 non-SSRI users. After adjusting covariates, the risk of developing IBS in SSRI users was 1.54 times that in non-SSRI users (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.33). The hazard ratio (HR) of the recent, heavy, and short-term user groups were 3.19 (95% CI: 2.03-4.99), 2.22 (95% CI: 1.50-3.29), and 4.83 (95% CI: 3.02-7.73), respectively, compared with that of non-users. In patients without a history of psychiatric medications, the risk of IBS incidence after SSRI use increased significantly (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.06-2.42), whereas HR was insignificant in patients with a history of psychiatric medications (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.98-1.60). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of subsequent IBS occurrence following SSRI use was high in patients who initially took a heavy SSRI dose and those who did not have a history of psychiatric drug use.

Efficacy and Safety of Opicapone for Motor Fluctuations as an Adjuvant to Levodopa Therapy in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term levodopa administration for treating Parkinson's disease (PD) may shorten the duration of effect and cause dyskinesias, inducing the need for catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors as adjuvant therapy. OBJECTIVE: We provide pooled scientific evidence highlighting the efficacy and safety of opicapone, a newly approved COMT inhibitor, as an adjuvant to levodopa. METHODS: We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant reports. Efficacy and safety were evaluated as off-time reduction and risk ratio (RR) of dyskinesia, respectively. Data were independently extracted using predefined criteria. Selected placebo-controlled trials were divided into double-blind and open-label periods. Using a random-effects model, the mean difference (MD) of the off-time reduction (efficacy), RR for the occurrence of dyskinesia, and on-time without/with troublesome dyskinesia (TD; safety assessment) were compared between opicapone and placebo groups. RESULTS: Five studies from three randomized controlled trials were included, and a meta-analysis was performed with 407 patients receiving opicapone 50 mg and 402 patients receiving placebo. Compared with the placebo, opicapone (50 mg) reduced off-time by 49.91 min during the double-blind period (95% confidence intervals [CIs] = -71.39, -28.43; I2 = 0%). The RR of dyskinesia was 3.43 times greater in the opicapone 50 mg group than in the placebo group (95% CI = 2.14, 5.51; I = 0%). Compared with the placebo, opicapone increased the on-time without TD by 44.62 min (95% CI = 22.60, 66.64; I2 = 0%); the on-time increase with TD did not differ between treatments. CONCLUSION: Opicapone can play a positive role as an adjuvant to levodopa in patients with PD by reducing off-time and prolonging on-time without PD.