Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Adv ; 1(1): 100008, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939083

RESUMEN

Background: The incidence of pregnancy in women with cardiovascular disease (CVD) has increased, yet little is known about placental pathology in these women. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe placental pathology in pregnancies complicated by maternal CVD and to compare findings among categories of maternal CVD. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted. Pathology reports for 264 placentas from pregnancies complicated by maternal CVD were reviewed for prespecified pathologic findings which were then compared against maternal characteristics. Results: Placentas were from pregnancies associated with maternal congenital heart disease (n = 171), arrhythmia (n = 43), cardiomyopathy (n = 20), connective tissue disease (n = 20), and valvular heart disease (n = 10). Median maternal age at delivery was 32 years (range: 19-49). Median gestational age at delivery was 39 weeks (range: 25-41). Placental pathology was identified in 75% (199/264) of placentas. Anatomic pathology, primarily small placenta by weight, was present in 45% (119/264) of placentas. Vascular pathology, primarily maternal vascular malperfusion or fetal vascular malperfusion, was seen in 41% (107/264) of placentas. Acute chorioamnionitis and villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) were seen in 23% (61/264) and 11% (28/264) of placentas, respectively. Prevalence of VUE differed across CVD categories (P = 0.008) and was most common in maternal congenital heart disease; there were no differences in anatomic, infectious, and vascular pathologies across CVD categories. Conclusions: Pregnancies among women with CVD commonly demonstrate abnormal placental findings, especially anatomic and vascular pathology. Prevalence of VUE differed across CVD categories. Otherwise, the incidence of specific pathology findings did not differ based on maternal characteristics.

2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(18): e021345, 2021 09 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482709

RESUMEN

Background American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology consensus guidelines introduce an adult congenital heart disease anatomic and physiological (AP) classification system. We assessed the association between AP classification and clinical outcomes. Methods and Results Data were collected for 1000 outpatients with ACHD prospectively enrolled between 2012 and 2019. AP classification was assigned based on consensus definitions. Primary outcomes were (1) all-cause mortality and (2) a composite of all-cause mortality or nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization. Cox regression models were developed for AP classification, each component variable, and additional clinical models. Discrimination was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. Over a median follow-up of 2.5 years (1.4-3.9 years), the composite outcome occurred in 185 participants, including 49 deaths. Moderately or severely complex anatomic class (class II/III) and severe physiological stage (stage D) had increased risk of the composite outcome (AP class IID and IIID hazard ratio, 4.46 and 3.73, respectively, versus IIC). AP classification discriminated moderately between patients who did and did not suffer the composite outcome (C statistic, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.71]), similar to New York Heart Association functional class and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide); it was more strongly associated with mortality (C statistic, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.78-0.84]), as were NT-proBNP and functional class. A model with AP class and NT-proBNP provided the strongest discrimination for the composite outcome (C statistic, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.71-0.75]) and mortality (C statistic, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.88]). Conclusions The addition of physiological stage modestly improves the discriminative ability of a purely anatomic classification, but simpler approaches offer equivalent prognostic information. The AP system may be improved by addition of key variables, such as circulating biomarkers, and by avoiding categorization of continuous variables.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Adulto , American Heart Association , Cardiopatías Congénitas/clasificación , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Mortalidad , Estados Unidos
3.
Am Heart J ; 229: 92-99, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32947058

RESUMEN

The Anatomic and Physiological (AP) classification system proposed in the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) guidelines assigns 2 dimensions to each patient: anatomic class (AnatC) and physiological stage (PhyS). This approach has not been tested in practice; we assessed interrater reliability and identified sources of disagreement. METHODS: Consensus definitions for AP categories were developed with input from 4 experts. Research assistants (RAs) assigned AnatC/PhyS for patients in the Boston ACHD Biobank, a prospectively enrolled cohort of ambulatory ACHD patients ≥18 years old seen between 2012 and 2019. Two (of 4) expert reviewers then independently assigned AnatC/PhyS for 41 patients. Interrater reliability was assessed with linearly weighted kappa (κω) for agreement between (1) experts and (2) an RA and an expert. Experts examined disagreements and identified sources of variability and areas requiring clarification. RESULTS: Interexpert agreement for AnatC was excellent, with agreement on 38/41 (92.7%) cases and κω 0.88 [0.75, 1.01]. Agreement for PhyS was less robust, with consensus on 24/41 cases (59.5%), κω 0.57 [0.39, 0.75]. Expert-RA agreement was lower for AnatC (κω 0.77 [0.60, 0.95]), whereas PhyS was similar to interexpert agreement (κω 0.53 [0.34, 0.72]). There was ambiguity in the definitions of (1) arrhythmia status, (2) cyanotic CHD, and (3) valve disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although AnatC can be assessed reliably, that is not true for the PhyS part of the AP classification proposed in the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Reliability of PhyS would be strengthened by more precise definitions readily interpretable in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Clasificación/métodos , Consenso , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Adulto , American Heart Association , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Femenino , Corazón/anatomía & histología , Corazón/fisiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/clasificación , Cardiopatías Congénitas/patología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...