RESUMEN
Confronted with criticisms focused on the nature of Responsible Gambling (RG), this article suggests that Positive Play (PP) is a conceptual subset of Responsible Gambling and not a fully developed and independent harm prevention or reduction framework. To advance public health initiatives and focus public policy. This article reviews and clarifies some of the confusing and subtle difference between Responsible Gambling and Positive Play. The discussion defines the notion of responsibility, Responsible Gambling, and Positive Play. We recognize that well-developed RG activities permit and encourage the underpinnings of PP. However, when viewed as a dependent measure, PP does not intend to reduce the prevalence of gambling-related harms or prevent the incidence of gambling-related harms. These objectives are the two basic and fundamental requirements to classify any activity as a RG program.
Asunto(s)
Juego de Azar , Humanos , Juego de Azar/psicología , Salud Pública , Política Pública , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
As people around the world experience a devastating pandemic, it is critical that policy-makers consider the methodological and measurement issues that might be associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health indicators. This commentary uses four primary variables to illustrate measurement and methodological issues that can complicate comparisons between jurisdictions. Jurisdiction refers to a variety of geographic areas, such as a country, a state, or a province/territory. These variables play a critical role in determining how we understand the trajectory of disease spread. These variables also contribute to our understanding of prevention strategies and their associated efficacy, reflecting the impact of COVID-19 on hospitals. It is critical for public health stakeholders and the public to recognize that these four simple variables can vary substantially across jurisdictions.
RESUMEN
In this comment, we suggest there has been a crusade among some gambling stakeholders to move the field away from personal responsibility influences and toward social setting effects. This perspective disproportionally attributes gambling-related negative consequences to the social setting rather than the gambler. We argue that personal responsibility is a pivotal issue during the emotional maturation of healthy adults and remains essential to understanding intemperate gambling. This comment explores this movement away from personal responsibility and briefly discusses some of the iatrogenic consequences that this position might create in a clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Juego de Azar , Adulto , Juego de Azar/psicología , Humanos , Conducta SocialRESUMEN
A challenge when repairing imperforate anus is positioning the neo-rectum into the center of the sphincter muscle complex (SMC) with limited muscle injury and scarring. Unfortunately, the path through the components of the SMC are often non-linear. We have used MRI to delineate the complex and guide the needle through the center using standard MRI-guidance (Raschbaum GR et al. J Pediatr Surg 45:220-223, 2010; Thomas TT et al. J Pediatr Surg 35:927-930, 2000). However, asynchronous scanning requires multiple, time-consuming scans to advance the needle in stepwise fashion. Asynchronous scanning also prevents visualizing the needle as it is advanced. We recently integrated software into the MRI operative suite that allows placement of the needle with real-time MRI. We report the feasibility and utility of real-time MRI-assisted laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty (RT MRI-LAARP). Needle guidance was performed with Siemens Espree 1.5 T MRI with T1 Flash RT Sequence. After needle placement, laparoscopic mobilization, fistula takedown and pull-through was performed using the needle to guide dilation to create a tract to pull-through the neo-rectum. Charts of patients who underwent RT MRI-LAARP were reviewed. Demographics, anatomy, number of needle passes, OR duration and complications are reported. There were five children that underwent RT MRI-LAARP; one was a redo secondary to a retracted rectovestibular fistula. Operative time ranged from 187-505 min. Average hospital stay was 4.0 ± 1.0 days. There were no intraoperative complications although one patient had temporary urinary retention post-op. Muscle sparring laparoscopic anorectoplasty using real-time MRI is feasible and facilitates needle placement through the SMC.
Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/cirugía , Ano Imperforado/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Canal Anal/diagnóstico por imagen , Ano Imperforado/diagnóstico , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This paper discusses the relationship between investigative credibility and the sources of funding associated with gambling research. Some researchers argue against accepting funding from gambling industry sources; similarly, they decline to participate in activities directly or indirectly sponsored by gambling industry sources. In contrast, these anti-industry investigators evidence less resistance toward accepting funds from sources other than industry, for example, governments, because they believe that they have greater independence, reliability, and validity, and less undue influence and/or interference. We organize this article, around six primary issues: (1) researchers making a priori judgments that restrict positions towards industry associated research; (2) the potential negative impacts of holding such a position; (3) a description of the different sources of funding available to support gambling-related research; (4) an examination of the extant empirical support associated with the sources of funding and whether such support evidences bias; (5) a description of six cases illustrating how refusing to participate in any project funded by the industry can adversely influence the advancement of science and, at times, be itself unethical; and finally, (6) we suggest some remedies to advance solutions to this problem by stimulating the participation of reluctant researchers to work towards a greater harmony, keeping in mind that the pivotal goal of our work is to increase our knowledge in different area of science and to harness it to public goods.
Asunto(s)
Organización de la Financiación/economía , Juego de Azar/economía , Industrias/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Sesgo , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/economía , Conflicto de Intereses , Juego de Azar/psicología , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
Unfortunately, the original publication contains errors. The authors would like to correct the errors.
RESUMEN
A recent systematic review of the responsible gambling research suggests that there are no significant differences between gambling industry and non-industry funded research with regard to research design and outcomes. This study empirically synthesizes the outcomes of a larger sample of the scientific gambling literature to determine the generalizability of these original results. Our goal was to determine the extent to which funding sources might differentially influence characteristics of research design and outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive review of 18 research databases and examined studies published between January 2008 and August 2018. For four gambling-related journals, we reviewed all of the available studies. For 14 addiction-related journals, we examined only studies that examined gambling-related outcomes. To be included in this study, publications had to be quantitative and include a clear gambling-related hypothesis. After retrieving 1731 gambling studies, we applied the inclusion criteria and retained 720 studies for our final analytic sample. We used hypothesis confirmation and funding source information to determine the presence or absence of funding bias. Gambling industry funded studies were no more likely than studies not funded by the gambling industry to report either confirmed, partially confirmed, or rejected hypotheses. Nonetheless, studies funded by the gambling industry were more likely than other types of funding sources to include a conflict of interest statement. Studies with disclosed funding sources were more likely than those with undisclosed funding sources to include a conflict of interest statement. These findings highlight the importance of transparency and disclosure during research dissemination.
Asunto(s)
Organización de la Financiación/economía , Juego de Azar/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Sesgo , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/economía , Juego de Azar/psicología , Humanos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
This brief report examines whether there are differences in aspects of different characteristics, including design/methodologies of responsible gambling (RG), between studies funded by industry as compared to other sources. To investigate this, the authors used those studies included in a recent meta-analysis focusing on the empirical basis of RG initiatives (Ladouceur et al. in Addict Res Theory 25:225-235, 2017). We examined eight associations between funding sources, and different design/methodological characteristics of these studies; type of strategy, inclusion of comparison groups, measurement scales and repeated measures, publication source, number of inclusion criteria met, secondary sources of funding, publication year. The results revealed no statistically significant difference between the funding source, and the index study characteristics. These results do not support claims that funding exerts influence on the design or methodologies of RG studies. However, the absence of statistically significant findings should not be used to assert the absence of a funding effect because there are many reasons for failing to find differences, or interpretation of findings. Unexpectedly, a third of the papers included in this study failed to disclose their funding sources. This finding highlights the need for more open and transparent disclosures.
Asunto(s)
Organización de la Financiación , Juego de Azar , Sesgo de Publicación , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/normas , Juego de Azar/psicología , Humanos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
Available evidence suggests that self-help treatments may reduce problem gambling severity but inconsistencies of results across clinical trials leave the extent of their benefits unclear. Moreover, no self-help treatment has yet been validated within a French Canadian setting. The current study therefore assesses the efficacy of a French language self-help treatment including three motivational telephone interviews spread over an 11-week period and a cognitive-behavioral self-help workbook. At-risk and pathological gamblers were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 31) or the waiting list (n = 31). Relative to the waiting list, the treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of DSM-5 gambling disorder criteria met, gambling habits, and gambling consequences at Week 11. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction also significantly improved after 11 weeks for the treatment group, but not for the waiting list group. At Week 11, 13% of participants had dropped out of the study. All significant changes reported for the treatment group were maintained throughout 1, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. Results support the efficacy of the self-help treatment to reduce problem gambling severity, gambling behaviour and to improve overall functioning among a sample of French Canadian problem gamblers over short, medium and long term. Findings from this study lend support to the appropriateness of self-help treatments for problem gamblers and help clarify inconsistencies found in the literature. The low dropout rate is discussed with respect to the advantages of the self-help format. Clinical and methodological implications of the results are put forth.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Adictiva/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Juego de Azar/terapia , Autocuidado , Adulto , Conducta Adictiva/psicología , Canadá , Femenino , Juego de Azar/psicología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Entrevista Motivacional , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The RENO Model, first published during 2004, described a science-based framework of responsible gambling principles for a range of industry operators, health service providers, community and consumer groups, and governments. These strategic principles serve as a guide for the adoption and implementation of responsible gambling and harm-minimization initiatives. This article extends the RENO Model core principles by describing how to apply these strategies to clinical practice. This discussion examines the central tenets of the model and includes a review of (a) the ethical principles that should guide the development, implementation, and practice of RENO Model responsible gambling activities; (b) a brief consideration of the various perspectives that influence the treatment of gambling-related problems; and (c) a discussion of key applied elements of responsible gambling programs. This article advances the argument that, to maximize positive outcomes and to avoid unintended harms, clinicians should apply science-based principles to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and impact of their clinical practice activities. (PsycINFO Database Record
Asunto(s)
Conducta Adictiva/psicología , Juego de Azar/psicología , Principios Morales , Conducta Adictiva/prevención & control , Reducción del Daño , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Psicológicos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: MRI-guided laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty (MRI-LAARP), a new approach for surgical correction of high imperforate anus, does not bisect the sphincter complex as in the PSARP and is able to pull the neorectum through the entire sphincter complex unlike the LAARP. There is no available MRI-compatible device to position and transport patients during this procedure. We report on the design of such a device here. METHODS AND DEVICE: The device was constructed from 1.0â³ polyvinylchloride tubing and poly-methyl methacrylate (Plexiglass(®)) platform. The device has a stable, rigid base on which platform is secure. An adjustable and removable superstructure is secured to this base to suspend legs for lithotomy position. RESULTS: MRI-LAARP has been performed on 6 patients. The device has performed well and meets requirements set forth in development including construction with MRI-compatible materials, size fitting in the MRI bore, ability to hold patient in lithotomy position, ability to position and support MRI flex coils, and providing stability while transporting to a separate OR with needle in position. CONCLUSIONS: This device provides a stable structure to position and transport a patient with a needle in a tenuous position without dislodgement allowing this procedure, and potentially other procedures, to be done in hospitals without MROR capability.
Asunto(s)
Ano Imperforado/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/instrumentación , Posicionamiento del Paciente/instrumentación , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Canal Anal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Lactante , Laparoscopía/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Quirófanos , Polimetil Metacrilato , Polivinilos , Recto/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have highlighted the implications of impulsivity and novelty seeking for both the maintenance and the process of recovery from bulimia nervosa (BN). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the treatment of choice for BN, but for some cases, this treatment alone might not be sufficient for reducing the high levels of impulsivity. The paper presents a case report of a patient with BN, examining the effectiveness of using a videogame (VG; Playmancer) as an additional intervention designed to address impulsivity. DESIGN: Psychometric and neuropsychological measures were collected at baseline. After this assessment, Playmancer was applied prior to CBT, following an "A-B-A-C-A" single case experimental design. Impulsivity levels were assessed with the Conner's Continuous Performance Test II (CPT-II). After the Playmancer treatment, the patient started CBT, and the levels of impulsivity were recorded again. Finally, psychometric and neuropsychological measures were collected after treatment. Weekly frequency of binges and vomiting were also recorded during the entire procedure. RESULTS: After the VG intervention, psychometric measures such as anxiety levels, impulsivity and novelty seeking decreased. Regarding the neuropsychological measures, impulsivity levels (measured with the CPT-II) progressively decreased throughout the intervention, and an improvement in decision making capacities was observed. Furthermore, the frequency of binges also decreased during and after the VG intervention. DISCUSSION: This case report suggests that using the Playmancer VG to reduce impulsivity prior to CBT may enhance the final results of the treatment for BN.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Problem gambling-specific cognitive therapy (CT) and behavioural (exposure-based) therapy (ET) are two core cognitive-behavioural techniques to treating the disorder, but no studies have directly compared them using a randomised trial. AIMS: To evaluate differential efficacy of CT and ET for adult problem gamblers at a South Australian gambling therapy service. METHODS: Two-group randomised, parallel design. Primary outcome was rated by participants using the Victorian Gambling Screen (VGS) at baseline, treatment-end, 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up. FINDINGS: Of eighty-seven participants who were randomised and started intervention (CT = 44; ET = 43), 51 (59%) completed intervention (CT = 30; ET = 21). Both groups experienced comparable reductions (improvement) in VGS scores at 12 weeks (mean difference -0.18, 95% CI: -4.48-4.11) and 6 month follow-up (mean difference 1.47, 95% CI: -4.46-7.39). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive and exposure therapies are both viable and effective treatments for problem gambling. Large-scale trials are needed to compare them individually and combined to enhance retention rates and reduce drop-out.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Juego de Azar/terapia , Terapia Implosiva/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Juego de Azar/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Problem gambling is a serious public health concern at an international level where population prevalence rates average 2% or more and occurs more frequently in younger populations. The most empirically established treatments until now are combinations of cognitive and behavioural techniques labelled cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). However, there is a paucity of high quality evidence for the comparative efficacy of core CBT interventions in treating problem gamblers. This study aims to isolate and compare cognitive and behavioural (exposure-based) techniques to determine their relative efficacy. METHODS: A sample of 130 treatment-seeking problem gamblers will be allocated to either cognitive or exposure therapy in a two-group randomised, parallel design. Repeated measures will be conducted at baseline, mid and end of treatment (12 sessions intervention period), and at 3, 6 and 12 months (maintenance effects). The primary outcome measure is improvement in problem gambling severity symptoms using the Victorian Gambling Screen (VGS) harm to self-subscale. VGS measures gambling severity on an extensive continuum, thereby enhancing sensitivity to change within and between individuals over time. DISCUSSION: This article describes the research methods, treatments and outcome measures used to evaluate gambling behaviours, problems caused by gambling and mechanisms of change. This study will be the first randomised, parallel trial to compare cognitive and exposure therapies in this population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Southern Adelaide Health Service/Flinders University Human Research Ethics Committee. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN 12610000828022.
RESUMEN
From September 2007 to May 2011 a total of 471 participants (325 males and 146 females) signed up for an 8-week Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy offered for gamblers in Finland. Sixty-four percent of the participants were pathological gamblers (PGs) (NODS 5> points), 14% were problem gamblers (NODS 3-4 points) and 10% were at risk of gambling problems (NODS 1-2 points). Two hundred and twenty four participants completed the treatment and after the treatment period significant changes were found in the following variables: gambling related problems (NODS), gambling urge, impaired control of gambling, alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C), social consequences, gambling-related cognitive erroneous thoughts and depression (MARD-S). In this sample co-morbid alcohol consumption was stronger among males. The main finding of this study was that the onset age of gambling was associated with a greater amount of gambling-related cognitive erroneous thoughts.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Juego de Azar/terapia , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/psicología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Finlandia , Juego de Azar/epidemiología , Juego de Azar/psicología , Humanos , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Prevención Secundaria , Factores Sexuales , Telemedicina/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: OBJECTIF : Estimer la prévalence des habitudes aux jeux de hasard et d'argent (JHA), du jeu à risque (JAR) et du jeu pathologique probable (JPP) dans la région de la Gaspésie et des Îles-de-la-Madeleine (GIM) (Québec). MÉTHODE : Un sondage téléphonique portant sur les habitudes de jeu a été réalisé auprès de 1014 adultes résidents de la région de la GIM. Les participants ont été sélectionnés aléatoirement. L'échelle Problem Gambling Severity Index de l'Indice canadien du jeu excessif a servi à l'évaluation du jeu pathologique. RÉSULTATS : Quatre-vingt-cinq pour cent des répondants rapportent avoir joué à un JHA au cours de l'année précédente. Les activités les plus populaires sont l'achat de billets de loterie, la participation à des tirages et collectes de fonds, le bingo, les cartes ou jeux de société en famille ou avec des amis pour de l'argent, la loterie vidéo et les jeux de casino. Les taux de prévalence du JAR et du JPP s'élèvent à 1,5 % et 0,8 % respectivement. La loterie vidéo s'avère le jeu le plus souvent identifié comme étant problématique, suivi des loteries instantanées et ordinaires (par exemple, Lotto 6/49). CONCLUSION: Les habitudes de jeu des Gaspésiens et des Madelinots sont similaires à celles observées chez l'ensemble des Québécois. La discussion soulève entre autres la question de la validité de l'évaluation de la présence d'un problème de jeu parmi les membres de l'entourage, et certaines perceptions à risque, dont celle qu'il est impossible de développer un problème aux loteries instantanées et au bingo.
Asunto(s)
Juego de Azar/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Juego de Azar/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Quebec/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Many international jurisdictions have introduced responsible gambling programs. These programs intend to minimize negative consequences of excessive gambling, but vary considerably in their aims, focus, and content. Many responsible gambling programs lack a conceptual framework and, in the absence of empirical data, their components are based only on general considerations and impressions. This paper outlines the consensus viewpoint of an international group of researchers suggesting fundamental responsible gambling principles, roles of key stakeholders, and minimal requirements that stakeholders can use to frame and inform responsible gambling programs across jurisdictions. Such a framework does not purport to offer value statements regarding the legal status of gambling or its expansion. Rather, it proposes gambling-related initiatives aimed at government, industry, and individuals to promote responsible gambling and consumer protection. This paper argues that there is a set of basic principles and minimal requirements that should form the basis for every responsible gambling program.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Adictiva/prevención & control , Juego de Azar/prevención & control , Reducción del Daño , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Conducta Adictiva/epidemiología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Juego de Azar/epidemiología , Humanos , Control Interno-Externo , Cooperación Internacional , Modelos Psicológicos , Técnicas de Planificación , Salud Pública , Recompensa , Asunción de RiesgosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Inuit are commonly portrayed to be somehow protected from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) through their traditional lifestyle and diet. However, actual sociocultural transition and related major, modifiable risk factors have scarcely been quantified in the Inuit population. Such knowledge is extremely valuable in terms of public health intervention. METHODS: A total of 887 Inuit residents from Nunavik, Quebec, participated in a cohort study. The estimates presented were derived from anthropometric and biological measurements gathered at the time of recruitment and enhanced by information collected in the medical file of each participant. All estimates were corrected for a complex sampling strategy and bootstrapped to ensure the representativeness of the general Nunavik population. RESULTS: Overall, 19% of Inuit had a disease of the circulatory system according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision. Among all disorders, peripheral circulatory system disease was the most prevalent (9%). Prevalences of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease were of similar magnitude (2.5%). No significant difference in disease prevalence was noted between sexes. The major modifiable CVD risk factors were smoking (84%), obesity (49%) [corrected] (body mass index of greater than 30 kgm2) and elevated blood pressure (13085 mmHg or greater) (18%). Prevalences were globally higher among women. CONCLUSION: The current belief that the Inuit are protected from CVD is seriously questioned by the results of the present study. Considering the extremely high prevalence of CVD risk factors, a population-based intervention reinforced for women is urgently needed to reduce their risk.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Transición de la Salud , Inuk , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Dieta , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/etnología , Prevalencia , Quebec/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/etnologíaRESUMEN
This randomized clinical trial compared cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), applied relaxation (AR), and wait-list control (WL) in a sample of 65 adults with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The CBT condition was based on the intolerance of uncertainty model of GAD, whereas the AR condition was based on general theories of anxiety. Both manualized treatments were administered over 12 weekly 1-hour sessions. Standardized clinician ratings and self-report questionnaires were used to assess GAD and related symptoms at pretest, posttest, and at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. At posttest, CBT was clearly superior to WL, AR was marginally superior to WL, and CBT was marginally superior to AR. Over follow-up, CBT and AR were equivalent, but only CBT led to continued improvement. Thus, direct comparisons of CBT and AR indicated that the treatments were comparable; however, comparisons of each treatment with another point of reference (either waiting list or no change over follow-up) provided greater support for the efficacy of CBT than AR.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia por Relajación/métodos , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Psicológicos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
At the beginning of 2000, some educational initiatives in the field of responsible gambling resulted in the implementation of Onsite Casino Information Centres (OCICs). However, no study has yet empirically evaluated the impact of visiting an OCIC. This paper includes two studies evaluating the OCIC Au Centre du Hasard, located in Montreal, Quebec. The goal of the first study was to identify the profile of the visitors and to assess their appreciation. After a visit, 336 patrons accepted to complete a pen and paper questionnaire. The goal of the second study was to evaluate the impact of a visit on the perceptions about randomness and the gambling behaviours of the visitors. For this study, 67 visitors were evaluated before, after, and 3 months following a visit and their results were compared to a control group. Data showed that most visitors were seniors, occasional slot machine gamblers, and in control of their gambling activities. The majority of guests greatly appreciated their visit. A visit to Au Centre du Hasard seemed to modify the misconceptions towards the notion of randomness but not the gambling behaviours. These gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Results with respect to other prevention programs are discussed, and future research avenues are suggested.