RESUMEN
High-flow nasal oxygen can be administered at induction of anaesthesia for the purposes of pre-oxygenation and apnoeic oxygenation. This intervention is claimed to enhance carbon dioxide elimination during apnoea, but the extent to which this occurs remains poorly quantified. The optimal nasal oxygen flow rate for gas exchange is also unknown. In this study, 114 patients received pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen at 50 l.min-1. At the onset of apnoea, patients were allocated randomly to receive one of three nasal oxygen flow rates: 0 l.min-1; 70 l.min-1; or 120 l.min-1. After 4 minutes of apnoea, all oxygen delivery was ceased, tracheal intubation was performed, and oxygen delivery was recommenced when SpO2 was 92%. Mean (SD) PaCO2 rise during the first minute of apnoea was 1.39 (0.39) kPa, 1.41 (0.29) kPa, and 1.26 (0.38) kPa in the 0 l.min-1, 70 l.min-1 and 120 l.min-1 groups, respectively; p = 0.16. During the second, third and fourth minutes of apnoea, mean (SD) rates of rise in PaCO2 were 0.34 (0.08) kPa.min-1, 0.36 (0.06) kPa.min-1 and 0.37 (0.07) kPa.min-1 in the 0 l.min-1, 70 l.min-1 and 120 l.min-1 groups, respectively; p = 0.17. After 4 minutes of apnoea, median (IQR [range]) arterial oxygen partial pressures in the 0 l.min-1, 70 l.min-1 and 120 l.min-1 groups were 24.5 (18.6-31.4 [12.3-48.3]) kPa; 36.6 (28.1-43.8 [9.8-56.9]) kPa; and 37.6 (26.5-45.4 [11.0-56.6]) kPa, respectively; p < 0.001. Median (IQR [range]) times to desaturate to 92% after the onset of apnoea in the 0 l.min-1, 70 l.min-1 and 120 l.min-1 groups, were 412 (347-509 [190-796]) s; 533 (467-641 [192-958]) s; and 531 (462-681 [326-1007]) s, respectively; p < 0.001. In conclusion, the rate of carbon dioxide accumulation in arterial blood did not differ significantly between apnoeic patients who received high-flow nasal oxygen and those who did not.
Asunto(s)
Apnea , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Oxígeno , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Humanos , Apnea/terapia , Apnea/fisiopatología , Apnea/metabolismo , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar/fisiología , Oxígeno/sangre , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Dióxido de Carbono/sangre , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Administración IntranasalRESUMEN
High-flow nasal oxygen used before and during apnoea prolongs time to desaturation at induction of anaesthesia. It is unclear how much oxygenation before apnoea prolongs this time. We randomly allocated 84 participants to 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation by one of three methods: 15 l.min-1 by facemask; 50 l.min-1 by high-flow nasal cannulae only; or 50 l.min-1 by high-flow nasal cannulae plus 15 l.min-1 by mouthpiece. We then anaesthetised and intubated the trachea of 79 participants and waited for oxygen saturation to fall to 92%. Median (IQR [range]) times to desaturate to 92% after pre-oxygenation with facemask oxygen, high-flow nasal oxygen only and high-flow nasal oxygen with mouthpiece, were: 309 (208-417 [107-544]) s; 344 (250-393 [194-585]) s; and 386 (328-498 [182-852]) s, respectively, p = 0.014. Time to desaturation after facemask pre-oxygenation was shorter than after combined nasal and mouthpiece pre-oxygenation, p = 0.006. We could not statistically distinguish high-flow nasal oxygen without mouthpiece from the other two groups for this outcome. Median (IQR [range]) arterial oxygen partial pressure after 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation by facemask, nasal cannulae and nasal cannulae plus mouthpiece, was: 49 (36-61 [24-66]) kPa; 57 (48-62 [30-69]) kPa; and 61 (55-64 [36-72]) kPa, respectively, p = 0.003. Oxygen partial pressure after 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with nasal and mouthpiece combination was greater than after facemask pre-oxygenation, p = 0.002, and after high-flow nasal oxygen alone, p = 0.016. We did not reject the null hypothesis for the pairwise comparison of facemask pre-oxygenation and high-flow nasal pre-oxygenation, p = 0.14.
Asunto(s)
Apnea/terapia , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Saturación de Oxígeno/fisiología , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia General , Dióxido de Carbono/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Oxígeno/sangre , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/instrumentación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Severe viral pneumonia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality globally, whether due to outbreaks of endemic viruses, periodic viral epidemics, or the rarer but devastating global viral pandemics. While limited anti-viral therapies exist, there is a paucity of direct therapies to directly attenuate viral pneumonia-induced lung injury, and management therefore remains largely supportive. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are receiving considerable attention as a cytotherapeutic for viral pneumonia. Several properties of MSCs position them as a promising therapeutic strategy for viral pneumonia-induced lung injury as demonstrated in pre-clinical studies in relevant models. More recently, early phase clinical studies have demonstrated a reassuring safety profile of these cells. These investigations have taken on an added importance and urgency during the COVID-19 pandemic, with multiple trials in progress across the globe. In parallel with clinical translation, strategies are being investigated to enhance the therapeutic potential of these cells in vivo, with different MSC tissue sources, specific cellular products including cell-free options, and strategies to 'licence' or 'pre-activate' these cells, all being explored. This review will assess the therapeutic potential of MSC-based therapies for severe viral pneumonia. It will describe the aetiology and epidemiology of severe viral pneumonia, describe current therapeutic approaches, and examine the data suggesting therapeutic potential of MSCs for severe viral pneumonia in pre-clinical and clinical studies. The challenges and opportunities for MSC-based therapies will then be considered.
RESUMEN
Bacterial infection remains the main cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome and is a leading cause of death and disability in critically ill patients. Here we report on the use of purified ß-glucan (lentinan) extracts from Lentinus edodes (Shiitake) mushroom that can reduce infection by a multidrug-resistant clinical isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae in a rodent pneumonia model, likely through immunomodulation. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to intra-tracheal administration of K. pneumoniae to induce pulmonary sepsis and randomized to three groups; vehicle control (Vehicle, n = 12), commercial lentinan (CL, n = 8) or in-house extracted lentinan (IHL, n = 8) were administered intravenously 1 h postinfection. Physiological parameters and blood gas analysis were measured, bacterial counts from bronchoalveolar-lavage (BAL) were determined, along with differential staining of white cells and measurement of protein concentration in BAL 48 h after pneumonia induction. Use of IHL extract significantly decreased BAL CFU counts. Both CL and IHL extractions reduced protein concentration in BAL. Use of IHL resulted in an improvement in physiological parameters compared to controls and CL. In conclusion, administration of lentinan to treat sepsis-induced lung injury appears safe and effective and may exert its effects in an immunomodulatory manner.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Lentinano/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Hongos Shiitake/química , beta-Glucanos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antibacterianos/química , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/fisiología , Lentinano/química , Lentinano/farmacología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/microbiología , Masculino , Extractos Vegetales/química , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Sepsis/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common comorbidity in bronchiectasis, and is often associated with poorer outcomes. The cause and effect relationship between GORD and bronchiectasis has not yet been fully elucidated and a greater understanding of the pathophysiology of the interaction and potential therapies is required. This review explores the underlying pathophysiology of GORD, its clinical presentation, risk factors, commonly applied diagnostic tools, and a detailed synthesis of original articles evaluating the prevalence of GORD, its influence on disease severity and current management strategies within the context of bronchiectasis. The prevalence of GORD in bronchiectasis ranges from 26% to 75%. Patients with co-existing bronchiectasis and GORD were found to have an increased mortality and increased bronchiectasis severity, manifest by increased symptoms, exacerbations, hospitalisations, radiological extent and chronic infection, with reduced pulmonary function and quality of life. The pathogenic role of Helicobacter pylori infection in bronchiectasis, perhaps via aspiration of gastric contents, also warrants further investigation. Our index of suspicion for GORD should remain high across the spectrum of disease severity in bronchiectasis. Identifying GORD in bronchiectasis patients may have important therapeutic and prognostic implications, although clinical trial evidence that treatment targeted at GORD can improve outcomes in bronchiectasis is currently lacking.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiectasia/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Bronquiectasia/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/epidemiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Helicobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Major shoulder surgery is associated with moderate-to-severe pain, but consensus on the optimal analgesic approach is lacking. Continuous catheter-based interscalene block (CISB) prolongs the analgesic benefits of its single-injection counterpart (SISB), but concerns over CISB complications and difficulties in interpreting comparative evidence examining major and minor shoulder procedures simultaneously, despite their differences in postoperative pain, have limited CISB popularity. This meta-analysis evaluates the CISB analgesic role and complications compared with SISB for major shoulder surgery. METHODS: We retrieved randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of CISB to SISB on analgesic outcomes and side-effects after major shoulder surgery. Postoperative opioid consumption at 24 h was designated as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included 24-48 h opioid consumption, postoperative rest and dynamic pain scores up to 72 h, time-to-first analgesic, recovery room and hospital stay durations, patient satisfaction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory function, and block-related complications. RESULTS: Data from 15 RCTs were pooled using random-effects modelling. Compared with SISB, CISB reduced 24- and 48-h oral morphine consumption by a weighted mean difference [95% confidence interval] of 50.9 mg [-81.6, -20.2], (P=0.001) and 44.7 mg [-80.9, -8.7], (P<0.0001), respectively. Additionally, CISB provided superior rest and dynamic pain control beyond 48 h, prolonged time-to-first analgesic, enhanced satisfaction, and reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting without complications. CISB caused an 11.0-11.7% decrease in respiratory indices. Result heterogeneity was successfully explained. CONCLUSIONS: High-level evidence indicates that CISB provides superior analgesia up to 48 h after major shoulder surgery, without increasing side-effects, compared with SISB. The importance of CISB-related changes in respiratory indices is questionable.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Hombro/cirugía , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Esquema de MedicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Simvastatin therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been shown to be safe and associated with minimal adverse effects, but it does not improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this research was to report on mortality and cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in patients with ARDS at 12 months. METHODS: This was a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial carried out in the UK and Ireland. Five hundred and forty intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-daily simvastatin (at a dose of 80 mg) or identical placebo tablets enterally for up to 28 days. RESULTS: Mortality was lower in the simvastatin group (31.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.1-37.5) compared to the placebo group (37.3%, 95% CI 31.6-43.0) at 12 months, although this was not significant. Simvastatin was associated with statistically significant quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain (incremental QALYs 0.064, 95% CI 0.002-0.127) compared to placebo. Simvastatin was also less costly (incremental total costs -£3601, 95% CI -8061 to 859). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY, the probability of simvastatin being cost-effective was 99%. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were robust to changes in methodological assumptions with the probability of cost-effectiveness never dropping below 90%. CONCLUSION: Simvastatin was found to be cost-effective for the treatment of ARDS, being associated with both a significant QALY gain and a cost saving. There was no significant reduction in mortality at 12 months, TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, 88244364. Registered 26 November 2010.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Simvastatina/efectos adversos , Tiempo , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/economía , Simvastatina/economía , Simvastatina/uso terapéutico , Medicina Estatal/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery in obese patients. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment maneuvers may improve intraoperative respiratory function, but they can also compromise hemodynamics, and the effects on PPCs are uncertain. We hypothesized that intraoperative mechanical ventilation using high PEEP with periodic recruitment maneuvers, as compared with low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers, prevents PPCs in obese patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The PRotective Ventilation with Higher versus Lower PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery in OBESE Patients (PROBESE) study is a multicenter, two-arm, international randomized controlled trial. In total, 2013 obese patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 scheduled for at least 2 h of surgery under general anesthesia and at intermediate to high risk for PPCs will be included. Patients are ventilated intraoperatively with a low tidal volume of 7 ml/kg (predicted body weight) and randomly assigned to PEEP of 12 cmH2O with lung recruitment maneuvers (high PEEP) or PEEP of 4 cmH2O without recruitment maneuvers (low PEEP). The occurrence of PPCs will be recorded as collapsed composite of single adverse pulmonary events and represents the primary endpoint. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, the PROBESE trial is the first multicenter, international randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two different levels of intraoperative PEEP during protective low tidal volume ventilation on PPCs in obese patients. The results of the PROBESE trial will support anesthesiologists in their decision to choose a certain PEEP level during general anesthesia for surgery in obese patients in an attempt to prevent PPCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02148692. Registered on 23 May 2014; last updated 7 June 2016.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/prevención & control , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Respiración con Presión Positiva/efectos adversos , Factores Protectores , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bronchiectasis is a multidimensional disease associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Two disease-specific clinical prediction tools have been developed, the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) and the FACED score, both of which stratify patients into severity risk categories to predict the probability of mortality. METHODS: We aimed to compare the predictive utility of BSI and FACED in assessing clinically relevant disease outcomes across seven European cohorts independent of their original validation studies. RESULTS: The combined cohorts totalled 1612. Pooled analysis showed that both scores had a good discriminatory predictive value for mortality (pooled area under the curve (AUC) 0.76, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.78 for both scores) with the BSI demonstrating a higher sensitivity (65% vs 28%) but lower specificity (70% vs 93%) compared with the FACED score. Calibration analysis suggested that the BSI performed consistently well across all cohorts, while FACED consistently overestimated mortality in 'severe' patients (pooled OR 0.33 (0.23 to 0.48), p<0.0001). The BSI accurately predicted hospitalisations (pooled AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.84), exacerbations, quality of life (QoL) and respiratory symptoms across all risk categories. FACED had poor discrimination for hospital admissions (pooled AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.67) with low sensitivity at 16% and did not consistently predict future risk of exacerbations, QoL or respiratory symptoms. No association was observed with FACED and 6â min walk distance (6MWD) or lung function decline. CONCLUSION: The BSI accurately predicts mortality, hospital admissions, exacerbations, QoL, respiratory symptoms, 6MWD and lung function decline in bronchiectasis, providing a clinically relevant evaluation of disease severity.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiectasia/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano , Bronquiectasia/mortalidad , Bronquiectasia/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo/métodosRESUMEN
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) offer considerable promise as a novel therapeutic strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). MSCs may be able to "reprogramme" the immune response to reduce destructive inflammatory elements while preserving the host response to pathogens. In addition, MSCs may be able to enhance the repair and resolution of lung injury. Resolution of ARDS is impeded by destruction of the integrity of the epithelial barrier, which inhibits alveolar fluid clearance and depletes surfactant. MSCs appear to restore epithelial and endothelial function, via both paracrine and cell contact dependent effects. ARDS is frequently a component of a generalized process resulting in dysfunction and failure of multiple organs. MSCs have been demonstrated to decrease injury and/or restore function in other organs, including the kidney, liver and heart. MSCs may directly attenuate bacterial sepsis, the commonest and most severe cause of ALI/ARDS. The fact that MSCs are in clinical studies for a wide range of disease processes is a clear advantage for translating MSCs to clinical testing in patients with ARDS. However, some important knowledge gaps exist that may impede clinical translation. The ultimate success of MSCs as a therapy for patients with ARDS will likely be dependent on a greater knowledge of their mechanisms of action and the determination of the optimal strategies for their use in the clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/métodos , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/terapia , Humanos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway is central to the pathogenesis of lung injury and inflammation. We determined whether targeted overexpression of inhibitor-κBα (IκBα) in the lung could decrease the severity of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). METHODS: Anaesthetized adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated to undergo intratracheal instillation of: (i) vehicle alone (surfactant, n=10); (ii) 1×10(10) adeno-associated virus encoding IκBα (AAV-IκBα, n=10); (iii) 5×10(10) AAV-IκBα (n=10); and (iv) 1×10(10) AAV-Null (n=5). This was followed by 4 h of injurious mechanical ventilation. Subsequent experiments examined the effect of IκBα overexpression in animals undergoing 'protective' mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: IκBα overexpression increased survival duration at both the lower [3.8 h (0.4)] and higher [3.6 h (0.7)] doses compared with vehicle [2.7 h (1.0)] or the null transgene [2.2 h (0.8)]. IκBα overexpression reduced the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (kPa) at both the lower [53 (21)] and higher [52 (19)] doses compared with vehicle [75 (8.5)] or the null transgene [70 (15)], decreased alveolar neutrophil infiltration, and reduced alveolar concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-10. The lower IκBα dose was as effective as the higher dose. IκBα overexpression had no effect in the setting of protective lung ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of pulmonary NF-κB activity by IκBα overexpression reduced the severity of VILI in a rat model.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Genética/métodos , Proteínas I-kappa B/biosíntesis , Pulmón/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/prevención & control , Animales , Dependovirus/genética , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Expresión Génica , Vectores Genéticos , Proteínas I-kappa B/genética , Masculino , Inhibidor NF-kappaB alfa , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Oxígeno/sangre , Neumonía/metabolismo , Neumonía/prevención & control , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Transgenes , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/patologíaRESUMEN
The lack of suitable donors for all solid-organ transplant programs is exacerbated in lung transplantation by the low utilization of potential donor lungs, due primarily to donor lung injury and dysfunction, including pulmonary edema. The current studies were designed to determine if intravenous clinical-grade human mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (hMSCs) would be effective in restoring alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) in the human ex vivo lung perfusion model, using lungs that had been deemed unsuitable for transplantation and had been subjected to prolonged ischemic time. The human lungs were perfused with 5% albumin in a balanced electrolyte solution and oxygenated with continuous positive airway pressure. Baseline AFC was measured in the control lobe and if AFC was impaired (defined as <10%/h), the lungs received either hMSC (5 × 10(6) cells) added to the perfusate or perfusion only as a control. AFC was measured in a different lung lobe at 4 h. Intravenous hMSC restored AFC in the injured lungs to a normal level. In contrast, perfusion only did not increase AFC. This positive effect on AFC was reduced by intrabronchial administration of a neutralizing antibody to keratinocyte growth factor (KGF). Thus, intravenous allogeneic hMSCs are effective in restoring the capacity of the alveolar epithelium to remove alveolar fluid at a normal rate, suggesting that this therapy may be effective in enhancing the resolution of pulmonary edema in human lungs deemed clinically unsuitable for transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/terapia , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/inmunología , Alveolos Pulmonares/metabolismo , Edema Pulmonar/terapia , Adulto , Células Cultivadas , Femenino , Factor 7 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Alveolos Pulmonares/patología , Edema Pulmonar/etiología , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
We compared the Baska(®) mask with the single-use classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) in 150 females at low risk for difficult tracheal intubation in a randomised, controlled clinical trial. We found that median (IQR [range]) seal pressure was significantly higher with the Baska mask compared with the cLMA (40 (34-40 [16-40]) vs 22 (18-25 [14-40]) cmH2O, respectively, p < 0.001), indicating a better seal. In contrast, the first time success rate for insertion of the Baska mask was lower than that seen with the cLMA (52/71 (73%) vs 77/99 (98%), respectively, p < 0.001). There were no differences in overall device insertion success rates (78/79 (99%) vs 68/71 (96%), respectively, p = 0.54). The Baska mask proved more difficult to insert, requiring more insertion attempts, taking longer to insert and had higher median (IQR [range]) insertion difficulty scores (1.6 (0.8-2.2 [0.1-5.6]) vs 0.5 (0.3-1.4 [0.1-4.0]), respectively, p < 0.001). There was also an increased rate of minor blood staining of the Baska mask after removal, but there were no differences in other complication rates, such as laryngospasm, or in the severity of throat discomfort. In conclusion, in clinical situations where the seal with the glottic aperture takes priority over ease of insertion, the Baska mask may provide a useful alternative to the cLMA.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Anestesia por Inhalación , Equipos Desechables , Máscaras Laríngeas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Presión del Aire , Anestesia General , Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Respiración Artificial , Tamaño de la Muestra , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block techniques provide effective early (0-12 h) postoperative analgesia after transverse incision surgery. However, whether either technique produces prolonged analgesia lasting beyond 12 h remains controversial. This meta-analysis examines the duration of analgesia associated with posterior and lateral TAP blocks in the first 48 h after lower abdominal transverse incision surgery. METHODS: We retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the analgesic effects of TAP block compared with control in patients undergoing lower abdominal transverse incision surgery. Outcomes sought included interval postoperative i.v. morphine consumption and also rest and dynamic pain scores at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Opioid-related side-effects and patient satisfaction at 24 and 48 h were also assessed. The 12-24 h interval morphine consumption was designated as a primary outcome. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs including 641 patients were analysed. Four trials examined the posterior technique and eight assessed the lateral technique. Compared with control, the posterior TAP block reduced postoperative morphine consumption during the 12-24 h and 24-48 h intervals by 9.1 mg (95% CI: -16.83, -1.45; P=0.02) and 5 mg (95% CI: -9.54, -0.52; P=0.03), respectively. It also reduced rest pain scores at 24, 36, and 48 h, and also dynamic pain scores at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Differences were not significant with the lateral TAP block. CONCLUSION: Based on the comparisons with control, the posterior TAP block appears to produce more prolonged analgesia than the lateral TAP block. Future RCTs comparing these two techniques are required to confirm our findings.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Adulto , Analgesia , Analgesia Obstétrica , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anestesia General , Anestesia Raquidea , Cesárea , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Humanos , Histerectomía , Laparotomía , Morfina/efectos adversos , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Descanso , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Baska mask is a novel supraglottic airway device. We conducted an initial observational study to assess this device in 30 low-risk female patients. All Baska masks were inserted by a single investigator. The overall success rate for device insertion was 96.7% (95% CI 82.8-99.9%), while the success rate for the first insertion attempt was 76.7% (95% CI 57.7-90.1%). The device was easy to insert, with a mean (SD) difficulty score of 0.9 (1.6) on a 10-cm scale. The mean (SD) airway leak pressure was 35.7 (13.3) cmH(2) O. The incidence of throat pain, dysphonia and dysphagia was low. We conclude that the Baska mask demonstrates a level of utility as an alternative supraglottic airway that is worthy of further clinical study.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/instrumentación , Máscaras Laríngeas , Adulto , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/efectos adversos , Anestesia General , Índice de Masa Corporal , Trastornos de Deglución/epidemiología , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Equipos Desechables , Disfonía/epidemiología , Disfonía/etiología , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Máscaras Laríngeas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/sangre , Faringitis/epidemiología , Faringitis/etiología , Respiración con Presión Positiva/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Intubation Difficulty Scale is meaningful when used with indirect laryngoscopes. Data were analysed from previously published clinical trials from our group that compared the indirect laryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope. For each laryngoscope type, the Intubation Difficulty Scale score obtained for each tracheal intubation was correlated with data for duration of the intubation attempt and with the user rated difficulty of the intubation attempt. The strengths of the correlations between these indices were then compared for tracheas intubated with the Macintosh vs the indirect laryngoscopes. The Intubation Difficulty Scale performed well when compared with data for duration and user rated difficulty of the intubation attempts for the both direct and indirect laryngoscopy. However, the correlation between the Intubation Difficulty Scale score and both user rated difficulty (p = 0.001) and the duration of tracheal intubation (p = 0.003) were significantly stronger for the Macintosh laryngoscope compared with the indirect laryngoscopes. In contrast, the correlation between user rated difficulty scores and the data for duration of tracheal intubation was not different between the device types. The Intubation Difficulty Scale performs less well with indirect laryngoscopes than with the Macintosh laryngoscope. These findings suggest the need for caution with the use of this score with indirect laryngoscopes.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Laringoscopios , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The extent of analgesia provided by transversus abdominis plane blocks depends upon the site of injection and pattern of spread within the plane. There are currently a number of ultrasound-guided approaches in use, including an anterior oblique-subcostal approach, a mid-axillary approach and a more recently proposed posterior approach. We wished to determine whether the site of injection of local anaesthetic into the transversus abdominis plane affects the spread of the local anaesthetic within that plane, by studying the spread of a local anaesthetic and contrast solution in four groups of volunteers. The first group underwent the classical landmark-based transversus abdominis plane block whereby two different volumes of injectate were studied: 0.3 ml.kg(-1) vs 0.6 ml.kg(-1). The second group underwent transversus abdominis plane block using the anterior subcostal approach. The third group underwent transversus abdominis plane block using the mid-axillary approach. The fourth group underwent transversus abdominis plane block using the posterior approach, in which local anaesthetic was deposited close to the antero-lateral border of the quadratus lumborum. All volunteers subsequently underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 1, 2 and 4 h following each block to determine the spread of local anaesthetic over time. The studies demonstrated that the anterior subcostal and mid-axillary ultrasound approaches resulted in a predominantly anterior spread of the contrast solution within the transversus abdominis plane and relatively little posterior spread. There was no spread to the paravertebral space with the anterior subcostal approach. The mid-axillary transversus abdominis plane block gave faint contrast enhancement in the paravertebral space at T12-L2. In contrast, the posterior approaches, using both landmark and ultrasound identifications, resulted in predominantly posterior spread of contrast around the quadratus lumborum to the paravertebral space from T5 to L1 vertebral levels. We concluded that the pattern of spread of local anaesthetic differs depending on the site of injection into the transversus abdominis plane. This may have important implications for the extent of analgesia produced with each approach.
Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/inervación , Anestésicos Locales/farmacocinética , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
We report the successful use of a stellate ganglion block as part of a multi-modal postoperative analgesic regimen. Four patients scheduled for orthopaedic surgery following upper limb trauma underwent blockade of the stellate ganglion pre-operatively under ultrasound guidance. Patients reported excellent postoperative analgesia, with postoperative VAS pain scores between 0 and 2, and consumption of morphine in the first 24 h ranging from 0 to 14 mg. While these are preliminary findings, and must be confirmed in a clinical trial, they highlight the potential for stellate ganglion blockade to provide analgesia following major upper limb surgery.