Comparison of same-day sequential anterior and posterior spinal fusion with delayed two-stage anterior and posterior spinal fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. Short-term outcomes were compared based on two different surgical techniques. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of two different surgical techniques of anterior and posterior spinal fusion for pediatric patients with spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Brown et al, Floman et al, and Bradford et al have reported on combined anterior and posterior spine fusions with a 1-2-week recovery period between stages. However, advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques combined with the prohibitive cost of prolonged hospitalization and theoretical advantages in pulmonary function and nutrition have led to increasing use of combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion under one anesthetic. METHODS: The authors reviewed records and radiographs of patients with pediatric spinal deformities who underwent anterior spine fusion/posterior spine fusion and instrumentation performed by the senior author (HAK) at one institution. RESULTS: Same-day sequential anterior spine fusion/posterior spine fusion resulted in less blood loss (575 +/- 275 ml; P < or = 0.0045), shorter hospital stay (8.00 +/- 2.68 days; P < or = 0.0001), and reduced hospital costs ($18,762 +/- $4,925; P < or = 0.0001). Operative time and complication rate were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with pediatric spinal deformity, experienced spinal surgeons can reduce blood loss, hospital stay, and costs by performing anterior and posterior spinal fusions sequentially under one anesthetic.

Derotational analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis.

Ten patients with idiopathic scoliosis were treated with posterior spinal fusion and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Computed tomographic scans and intraoperative photographs were used to evaluate the derotational effect of the Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. The frontal deformity was corrected from an average of 51 degrees to 15 degrees and the kyphosis from 9.5 degrees to 18 degrees. The amount of preoperative vertebral rotation was variable, however, and insignificant postoperative changes were documented in the majority of cases.

The Keller resection arthroplasty: a 13-year experience.

The clinical results following Keller resection arthroplasty were reviewed in 54 feet with a 2- to 10-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated by radiographs, physical examination, and questionnaire. The primary indication for surgery was painful hallux valgus with associated degenerative changes of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Additionally, rheumatoid arthritis was the underlying diagnosis in four feet. Seventy-five percent of all patients had complete relief of their symptoms. There was significant (P less than .01) improvement in both the metatarsophalangeal and intermetatarsal angles, but a decreased range of motion in the first metatarsophalangeal joint, with a complete lack of plantarflexion in 67%. Application of the Bonney and MacNab2 grading system yielded a 72% rate of good and excellent results. The subjective patient satisfaction rate was 87.5%. Patient satisfaction was most strongly associated with the use of a K-wire for postoperative fixation (P = .03), and a limited resection of the proximal phalanx (P = .03). We conclude that the Keller resection arthroplasty is a reasonable alternative for the treatment of hallux valgus in the presence of degenerative changes in the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

Treatment of symptomatic flatback after spinal fusion.

Fifty-five patients who had loss of lumbar lordosis after spinal fusion and subsequently had corrective osteotomies were studied. When they were first seen, fifty-two patients (95 per cent) were unable to stand erect and forty-nine (89 per cent) had back pain. The previous use of distraction instrumentation with a hook placed at the level of the lower lumbar spine or the sacrum was the factor that was most frequently identified as leading to the development of the flatback syndrome. Sixty-six extension osteotomies were performed in these fifty-five patients. Nineteen patients (35 per cent) had an associated anterior spinal fusion. Thirty-three patients (60 per cent) had one or more complications, including pseudarthrosis, a dural tear, failure of hardware, neurapraxia, and urinary tract infection. The results of the operation were evaluated at follow-up by review of clinical records, radiographs, and questionnaires. At an average follow-up of six years (range, two to fourteen years), most patients felt that they had benefited from the corrective osteotomies. However, twenty-six patients (47 per cent) continued to lean forward and twenty patients (36 per cent) continued to have moderate or severe back pain. The failure to restore sagittal plane balance led to a higher rate of pseudarthrosis, which was associated with recurrent deformity. Anterior spinal fusion combined with posterior osteotomy resulted in greater maintenance of correction. The prevention of flatback syndrome is important, since its treatment is difficult. When a spinal fusion must be extended to the level of the lower lumbar spine or the sacrum, the use of distraction instrumentation should be avoided in order to prevent this deformity.