RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses chronic gastrointestinal disorders characterized by recurrent inflammation. Achieving mucosal healing and preventing disease progression are primary treatment goals. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare disease characteristics, medication utilization, procedures performed, and hospitalizations between IBD patients treated in hospital and community settings using the Leumit Health Service database. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Leumit Health Service, comprising 3020 patients diagnosed with IBD from January 2010 to December 2019. METHODS: Patients were divided based on primary care setting: hospital-based or community-based. Data included demographic characteristics, disease type, medication usage, procedures, and outcomes. Statistical analyses assessed differences between groups. RESULTS: Hospital-treated patients were significantly younger (49.4±18.4 vs. 40.4±18.7, P<0.001 ), had higher rates of Crohn's disease (45.9% vs. 71.4%, P<0.001), exhibited higher inflammatory markers (calprotectin 768±2182 vs. 1305±2526, P<0.001), lower albumin (4.23±0.27 vs. 4.12±0.32, P<0.001), hemoglobin levels (13.4±1.6 vs. 12.9±1.6, P<0.001), and lower BMI (26.2±5.3 vs. 24.6±5.6, P<0.001) compared with community-treated patients. Hospital-treated patients had more endoscopic procedures, higher medication utilization rates, shorter treatment durations, and increased hospitalization occurrence (12.1% vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), length (0.67±3.34 vs. 1.45±5.88, P<0.001), and colectomies (4.73% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist in IBD management between hospital and community settings, influenced by disease severity and treatment approaches. Hospital-based care is associated with more aggressive disease and intensive interventions, while community-based care may reflect milder disease and conservative management. Integrating specialized care models and personalized approaches across settings can optimize patient outcomes and health care delivery for IBD management. Further research is needed to understand these disparities' underlying mechanisms and develop comprehensive care strategies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is known to be a sensitive biomarker of colonic inflammation but to a lesser degree of small bowel (SB) inflammation. Moreover, data on FC's diagnostic levels in different SB segments are scarce. We aimed to examine FC's diagnostic levels along the SB-axis in CD. METHODS: This was a post-hoc aggregated analysis of five prospective studies of adult CD patients, who underwent FC testing and SB video capsule endoscopy (VCE). Lewis score (LS) inflammation in different SB segments was tested for correlation with FC level after exclusion of colonic disease. The diagnostic levels of FC for SB inflammatory topographical-gradient were assessed using a receiver operating characteristic. RESULTS: 214 patients were included (age:30 [24-43] year-old, males-57%). For a similar SB inflammatory-activity (LS≥135), FC levels incrementally increased from proximal to distal SB segments (63 [30-121] versus 190 [78-549], p=0.005) and from distal SB segment to the colon (190 [78-549] versus 542 [185-1000], p=0.010). The best FC cutoffs to identify isolated mild proximal/distal SB-inflammation (LS≥135) were 77µgg and 123µgg, respectively. A cutoff of 234µgg was best to detect more significant proximal inflammation (LS≥350) when only mild distal SB-inflammation was present. In sensitivity analyses, this proximal-to-distal FC gradient was maintained when LS≥350 and LS≥790 were used as the inflammatory reference-values. Unlike FC, the magnitude of CRP elevation was unrelated to the topography of inflammation along the SB-axis. CONCLUSIONS: FC may serve as a topographical biomarker of CD-activity, with its sensitivity to identify mucosal inflammation increases from proximal to distal SB segments.
RESUMEN
Background: Celiac disease, a gluten-triggered autoimmune disorder, is known for its systemic inflammatory effects. Its genetic associations with type 2 inflammatory diseases like asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis remain unclear, prompting this study to explore their potential genetic interplay. Methods: Utilizing two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR), we examined the genetic associations using 15 genetic instruments from GWAS datasets. Our analysis focused on celiac disease and its relation to asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and IgE-mediated food allergies. A power analysis was conducted to determine the study's detection capabilities, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using various MR methods. Results: Our Mendelian randomization analysis identified statistically significant genetic associations between celiac disease and several type 2 inflammatory diseases, although these were practically insignificant. Specifically, celiac disease was associated with a slight increase in the risk of atopic dermatitis (OR = 1.037) and a minor protective effect against asthma (OR = 0.97). The link with allergic rhinitis was statistically detectable (OR = 1.002) but practically negligible. Despite robust statistical confirmation through various sensitivity analyses, all observed effects remained within the range of practical equivalence (ROPE). Conclusions: Our study identifies potential genetic associations between celiac disease and certain type 2 inflammatory diseases. However, these associations, predominantly within the ROPE range, suggest only limited clinical implications. These findings highlight the need for cautious interpretation and indicate that further exploration for clinical applications may not be warranted at this stage.
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Colonoscopy is a critical diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in gastroenterology. However, it carries risks, including hypoxemia, which can impact patient safety. Understanding the factors that contribute to the incidence of severe hypoxemia, specifically the role of procedure duration, is essential for improving patient outcomes. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between the length of colonoscopy procedures and the occurrence of severe hypoxemia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Sheba Medical Center, Israel, including 21,524 adult patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2020 to January 2024. The study focused on the incidence of severe hypoxemia, defined as a drop in oxygen saturation below 90%. Sedation protocols, involving a combination of Fentanyl, Midazolam, and Propofol were personalized based on the endoscopist's discretion. Data were collected from electronic health records, covering patient demographics, clinical scores, sedation and procedure details, and outcomes. Statistical analyses, including logistic regression, were used to examine the association between procedure duration and hypoxemia, adjusting for various patient and procedural factors. Results: We initially collected records of 26,569 patients who underwent colonoscopy, excluding 5045 due to incomplete data, resulting in a final cohort of 21,524 patients. Procedures under 20 min comprised 48.9% of the total, while those lasting 20-40 min made up 50.7%. Only 8.5% lasted 40-60 min, and 2.9% exceeded 60 min. Longer procedures correlated with higher hypoxemia risk: 17.3% for <20 min, 24.2% for 20-40 min, 32.4% for 40-60 min, and 36.1% for ≥60 min. Patients aged 60-80 and ≥80 had increased hypoxemia odds (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2 and aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.4, respectively). Procedure durations of 20-40 min, 40-60 min, and over 60 min had aORs of 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.6), 2.1 (95% CI 1.9-2.4), and 2.4 (95% CI 2.0-3.0), respectively. Conclusions: The duration of colonoscopy procedures significantly impacts the risk of severe hypoxemia, with longer durations associated with higher risks. This study underscores the importance of optimizing procedural efficiency and tailoring sedation protocols to individual patient risk profiles to enhance the safety of colonoscopy. Further research is needed to develop strategies that minimize procedure duration without compromising the quality of care, thereby reducing the risk of hypoxemia and improving patient safety.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sedation increases colonoscopy risks and prolongs recovery time. We examined whether virtual reality (VR) can substitute for sedation. The primary outcome was the overall satisfaction of patients who underwent colonoscopy with VR headset compared with patients who underwent standard sedation. Pain during the procedure, polyp detection rate (PDR), colonoscopy duration, post-colonoscopy adverse events, post-colonoscopy recovery, time-to-return to daily functions, and turnaround time at the endoscopy unit were secondary outcomes. METHODS: The study was approved by Sheba Medical Center's ethics committee IRB number 21-8177-SMC. Sixty patients were sequentially enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to either standard sedated colonoscopy or VR-unsedated procedure, and all patients signed a written informed consent. 28/30 patients successfully completed the colonoscopy using VR headset. Overall satisfaction score was comparable between the groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between VR and controls in colonoscopy duration, or PDR. VR patients had numerically lower rate of post-colonoscopy adverse events than controls. The proportion of VR patients who reported resuming daily activities on the day of the procedure was significantly higher than in the control group. The VR group patients spent significantly less time in the hospital compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: VR technology can provide adequate substitution for sedation for most patients undergoing colonoscopy and offers comparable patient satisfaction and faster return to daily activities.
Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía , Sedación Consciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Colonoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence, particularly chatbot systems, is becoming an instrumental tool in health care, aiding clinical decision-making and patient engagement. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 in addressing complex clinical and ethical dilemmas, and to illustrate their potential role in health care decision-making while comparing seniors' and residents' ratings, and specific question types. METHODS: A total of 4 specialized physicians formulated 176 real-world clinical questions. A total of 8 senior physicians and residents assessed responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a 1-5 scale across 5 categories: accuracy, relevance, clarity, utility, and comprehensiveness. Evaluations were conducted within internal medicine, emergency medicine, and ethics. Comparisons were made globally, between seniors and residents, and across classifications. RESULTS: Both GPT models received high mean scores (4.4, SD 0.8 for GPT-4 and 4.1, SD 1.0 for GPT-3.5). GPT-4 outperformed GPT-3.5 across all rating dimensions, with seniors consistently rating responses higher than residents for both models. Specifically, seniors rated GPT-4 as more beneficial and complete (mean 4.6 vs 4.0 and 4.6 vs 4.1, respectively; P<.001), and GPT-3.5 similarly (mean 4.1 vs 3.7 and 3.9 vs 3.5, respectively; P<.001). Ethical queries received the highest ratings for both models, with mean scores reflecting consistency across accuracy and completeness criteria. Distinctions among question types were significant, particularly for the GPT-4 mean scores in completeness across emergency, internal, and ethical questions (4.2, SD 1.0; 4.3, SD 0.8; and 4.5, SD 0.7, respectively; P<.001), and for GPT-3.5's accuracy, beneficial, and completeness dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT's potential to assist physicians with medical issues is promising, with prospects to enhance diagnostics, treatments, and ethics. While integration into clinical workflows may be valuable, it must complement, not replace, human expertise. Continued research is essential to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical environments.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos , Inteligencia ArtificialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The ORAL Surveillance trial, a postmarketing safety clinical trial, found an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients treated with Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. However, additional studies yielded mixed results and data on other JAK inhibitors are limited. METHODS: A retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) to assess reporting of adverse cardiovascular events following treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients between January 2015 and June 2023. To identify disproportionately increased reporting, an adjusted reporting odds ratio (adj.ROR) was calculated with a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: We identified safety reports of 75,407 RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, n = 52,181; upadacitinib, n = 21,006; baricitinib, n = 2,220) and 303,278 patients treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and tocilizumab). The mean age was 61.2(±12) and 59.0(±13), respectively; 82 % and 81 % were women. Compared to bDMARDs, JAK inhibitors were associated with an increased reporting of VTE [n = 1,393, adj.ROR=2.11 (1.97-2.25)], stroke [n = 973, adj.ROR=1.25 (1.16-1.34)], ischemic heart disease [IHD, n = 999, adj.ROR=1.23 (1.13-1.33)], peripheral edema [n = 2699, adj.ROR=1.22 (1.17-1.28)], and tachyarrhythmias [n = 370, adj.ROR=1.15 (1.00-1.33)]. Most of the events occurred in the first year after treatment initiation. When different JAK inhibitors were compared, VTE, stroke, and IHD were more frequently reported with upadacitinib and baricitinib than tofacitinib. When stratified by age category, all safety signals were statistically significant in patients aged≤65 years. CONCLUSION: In this global postmarketing study, JAK inhibitors are associated with increased reporting of VTE, stroke, IHD, and tachyarrhythmias. These adverse events were reported following all JAK inhibitors that were studied, suggesting a class effect.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Azetidinas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Farmacovigilancia , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Azetidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Purinas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pan-enteric capsule endoscopy (PillCam Crohn's capsule [PCC]) is a useful tool in diagnosing and monitoring Crohn's disease [CD]. Eliakim score [ES] reliability and its strong correlation to Lewis score [LS] and to inflammatory biomarkers have been previously demonstrated using PCC in quiescent CD. We aimed to examine ES performance in active CD and its responsiveness to clinical/biochemical change over time. METHODS: Patients with CD who have started biologics were included, and were prospectively followed based on clinical visits, biomarkers, and PCC at baseline, after 14 and 52 weeks. Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI], C-reactive protein [CRP], and faecal calprotectin [FC] levels were determined, and LS and ES were calculated [independently reviewed by two experienced readers]. Inter-class classification [ICC], Spearman's baseline correlation, and repeated-measures correlation [RMC] analyses were performed. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included (age: 30.5 [range 23.3-45.0] years old, male 50%). In total, 142 PCCs were read [baseline, 62; week 14, 58; week 52, 22]. Inter-rater agreement was high for both LS and ES (ICC: 0.872 [pâ <â 0.001] and 0.925 [<0.001], respectively). Baseline correlations between FC&ES [râ =â 0.509 [pâ <â 0.001]) and FC&LS (râ =â 0.467 [pâ <â 0.001]) were comparable [pâ =â 0.56]. RMCs between the inflammatory biomarkers and ES were higher than between the former and LS (Reader 1: CRP râ =â 0.306 vs râ =â 0.138 [pâ =â 0.057], FC râ =â 0.479 vs râ =â 0.297 [pâ =â 0.034]; Reader 2 CRP râ =â 0.376 vs râ =â 0.204 [pâ =â 0.035], FC râ =â 0.549 vs râ =â 0.412 [pâ =â 0.075]). Moreover, ES was better correlated to CDAI than LS [pâ =â 0.036]. CONCLUSIONS: ES is a reliable scoring system in assessing pan-enteric mucosal inflammation in active CD, and might have a better responsiveness to clinical/biochemical change over time compared to LS.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva , Endoscopía Capsular , Enfermedad de Crohn , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Endoscopía Capsular/métodos , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/análisis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Heces/química , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC), an SC formulation of the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 IV, creates a unique exposure profile. The LIBERTY studies aimed to demonstrate superiority of CT-P13 SC vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were conducted in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC and inadequate response or intolerance to corticosteroids and immunomodulators. All patients received open-label CT-P13 IV 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6. At week 10, clinical responders were randomized (2:1) to CT-P13 SC 120 mg or placebo every 2 weeks until week 54 (maintenance phase) using prefilled syringes. (Co-) primary end points were clinical remission and endoscopic response (CD) and clinical remission (UC) at week 54 (all-randomized population). RESULTS: Overall, 396 patients with CD and 548 patients with UC received induction treatment. At week 54 in the CD study, statistically significant higher proportions of CT-P13 SC-treated patients vs placebo-treated patients achieved clinical remission (62.3% vs 32.1%; P < .0001) and endoscopic response (51.1% vs 17.9%; P < .0001). In the UC study, clinical remission rates at week 54 were statistically significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo (43.2% vs 20.8%; P < .0001). Achievement of key secondary end points was significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo across both studies. CT-P13 SC was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. CONCLUSIONS: CT-P13 SC was more effective than placebo as maintenance therapy and was well tolerated in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC who responded to CT-P13 IV induction. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Numbers: NCT03945019 (CD) and NCT04205643 (UC).
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Fármacos Gastrointestinales , Infliximab , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Inducción de Remisión , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Adulto , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Método Doble Ciego , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Factores de Tiempo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic conditions with overlapping pathogenic mechanisms. The genetic predisposition and inflammatory pathways common to both diseases suggest a syndemic relationship. While some evidence points to a connection between the two conditions, other reports do not support this link. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between AS and the subsequent incidence of IBD. To identify potential risk factors and effect modifiers that contribute to this relationship. METHODS: Utilizing the Chronic Disease Registry of Clalit Health Services, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of individuals diagnosed with AS between January 2002 and December 2018. We compared these patients with age- and sex-matched controls, excluding those with a prior diagnosis of IBD. Statistical analyses included chi-square and t-tests for demographic comparisons, and Cox proportional hazards models for evaluating the risk of IBD development, with adjustments for various co-morbidities and demographic factors. RESULTS: The study included 5825 AS patients and 28,356 controls. AS patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of IBD with hazard ratios of 6.09 for Crohn's disease and 2.31 for ulcerative colitis, after multivariate adjustment. The overall incidence of IBD in the AS cohort was significantly higher compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: AS patients exhibit a markedly increased risk of developing IBD. These findings advocate for heightened clinical vigilance for IBD symptoms in AS patients and suggest the need for a multidisciplinary approach to patient care. Further research into the shared pathogenic pathways is needed to develop personalized treatment strategies and improve patient management.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal practices, especially endoscopy, have a substantial environmental impact, marked by notable greenhouse gas emissions and waste generation. As the world struggles with climate change, there emerges a pressing need to re-evaluate and reform the environmental footprint within gastrointestinal medicine. The challenge lies in finding a harmonious balance between ensuring clinical effectiveness and upholding environmental responsibility. This task involves recognising that the most significant reduction in the carbon footprint of endoscopy is achieved by avoiding unnecessary procedures; addressing the use of single-use endoscopes and accessories; and extending beyond the procedural suites to include clinics, virtual care, and conferences, among other aspects of gastrointestinal practice. The emerging digital realm in health care is crucial, given the potential environmental advantages of virtual gastroenterological care. Through an in-depth analysis, this review presents a path towards sustainable gastrointestinal practices, emphasising integrated strategies that prioritise both patient care and environmental stewardship.
Asunto(s)
Huella de Carbono , Cambio Climático , Humanos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , GastroenterologíaRESUMEN
Background: The skin-gut axis, characterized by bidirectional communication between the skin and gut, plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Objectives: We aimed to explore the association between psoriasis and IBD and identify predictors associated with IBD development among patients with psoriasis. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: A retrospective study which utilized an electronic database from the Meuhedet Health Maintenance Organization (MHMO) in Israel. Psoriasis was categorized as severe if any systemic agent or phototherapy was administered. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify specific predictors for IBD, with adjustments made for potential confounders. The study received approval from the Ethical Committee of the MHMO. Results: In total, 61,003 adult patients who were diagnosed with psoriasis between 2000 and 2022 were included. Among them, 1495/61,003 patients (2.4%) were diagnosed with IBD, as compared to 3834/244,012 patients (1.6%) in the non-psoriasis group [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-1.56; p < 0.001]. Increased age (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02; p < 0.001), male gender (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.03-1.45; p = 0.024), and Jewish ethnicity (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-4.1; p < 0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for IBD. Spondyloarthropathies, including psoriatic arthritis (OR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.86-2.77; p < 0.001) and ankylosing spondylitis (OR: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.5-5.32; p < 0.05), were associated with a higher prevalence of IBD. Furthermore, severe psoriasis was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of IBD, compared to mild psoriasis (OR: 16.03; 95% CI: 11.02-23.34; p < 0.001). Conclusion: A significant association between psoriasis and IBD was demonstrated, including its subtypes: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Moreover, such association may depend on psoriasis severity as determined by the treatment used. This association warrants further investigation and implies a potential need for closer monitoring of patients with severe psoriasis.
Association between psoriatic disease severity and risk of inflammatory bowel diseases 1- Gut and skin barrier play an integral role in psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) development. 2- Shared genetic and environmental factors could explain the association between both diseases. 3- We report increased association between psoriasis and IBD, a relationship that is more pronounced in patients with severe psoriasis. 4- Patients with spondyloarthritis related diseases have a stronger association with IBD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated the efficacy of herbal combination of curcumin-QingDai (CurQD) in active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Part I was an open-label trial of CurQD in patients with active UC, defined by a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score of 5 or higher and a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 or higher. Part II was a placebo-controlled trial conducted in Israel and Greece, randomizing active UC patients at a 2:1 ratio to enteric-coated CurQD 3 g/d or placebo for 8 weeks. The co-primary outcome was clinical response (reduction in the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index of ≥3 points) and an objective response (Mayo endoscopic subscore improvement of ≥1 or a 50% fecal calprotectin reduction). Responding patients continued either maintenance curcumin or placebo alone for an additional 8 weeks. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor activation was assessed by cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) mucosal expression. RESULTS: In part I, 7 of 10 patients responded and 3 of 10 achieved clinical remission. Of 42 patients in part II, the week 8 co-primary outcome was achieved in 43% and 8% of CurQD and placebo patients, respectively (P = .033). Clinical response was observed in 85.7% vs 30.7% (P < .001), clinical remission in 14 of 28 (50%) vs 1 of 13 (8%; P = .01), a 50% calprotectin reduction in 46.4% vs 15.4% (P = .08), and endoscopic improvement in 75% vs 20% (P = .036) in the CurQD and placebo groups, respectively. Adverse events were comparable between groups. By week 16, curcumin-maintained clinical response, clinical remission, and clinical biomarker response rates were 93%, 80%, and 40%, respectively. CurQD uniquely up-regulated mucosal CYP1A1 expression, which was not observed among patients receiving placebo, mesalamine, or biologics. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial, CurQD was effective for inducing response and remission in active UC patients. The aryl-hydrocarbon receptor pathway may merit further study as a potential UC treatment target. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT03720002.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Colitis , Curcumina , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Curcumina/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A1/uso terapéutico , Colitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coeliac disease affects approximately 1% of the global population with the diagnosis often relying on invasive and time-demanding methods. Deep learning, a powerful tool in medical science, shows potential for non-invasive, accurate coeliac disease diagnosis, though challenges remain. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current state of deep-learning applications in coeliac disease diagnosis and identify potential areas for future research that could enhance diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. PRISMA guidelines were applied. Two independent reviewers identified research articles using deep learning for coeliac disease diagnosis and severity assessment. Only original research articles with performance metrics data were included. The quality of the diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, categorizing studies based on risk of bias and concerns about applicability. Due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted to describe the applications and efficacy of the deep-learning techniques (DLT) in coeliac disease diagnosis. RESULTS: The initial search across four databases yielded 417 studies with 195 being removed due to duplicity. Finally, eight studies were found to be suitable for inclusion after rigorous evaluation. They were all published between 2017 and 2023 and focused on using DLT for coeliac disease diagnosis or assessing disease severity. Different deep-learning architectures were applied. Accuracy levels ranged from 84% to 95.94% with the GoogLeNet model achieving 100% sensitivity and specificity for video capsule endoscopy images. CONCLUSIONS: DLT hold substantial potential in coeliac disease diagnosis. They offer improved accuracy and the prospect of mitigating clinician bias. However, key challenges persist, notably the requirement for more extensive and diverse datasets, especially to detect milder forms of coeliac disease. These methods are in their nascent stages, underscoring the need of integrating multiple data sources to achieve comprehensive coeliac disease diagnosis.
RESUMEN
Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has opened new avenues for enhancing patient care and clinical research. In gastroenterology, the potential of AI tools, specifically large language models like ChatGPT, is being explored to understand their utility and effectiveness. Objectives: The primary goal of this systematic review is to assess the various applications, ascertain the benefits, and identify the limitations of utilizing ChatGPT within the realm of gastroenterology. Design: Through a systematic approach, this review aggregates findings from multiple studies to evaluate the impact of ChatGPT on the field. Data sources and methods: The review was based on a detailed literature search of the PubMed database, targeting research that delves into the use of ChatGPT for gastroenterological purposes. It incorporated six selected studies, which were meticulously evaluated for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal instruments. The data were then synthesized narratively to encapsulate the roles, advantages, and drawbacks of ChatGPT in gastroenterology. Results: The investigation unearthed various roles of ChatGPT, including its use in patient education, diagnostic self-assessment, disease management, and the formulation of research queries. Notable benefits were its capability to provide pertinent recommendations, enhance communication between patients and physicians, and prompt valuable research inquiries. Nonetheless, it encountered obstacles in decoding intricate medical questions, yielded inconsistent responses at times, and exhibited limitations in generating novel content. The review also considered ethical implications. Conclusion: ChatGPT has demonstrated significant potential in the field of gastroenterology, especially in facilitating patient-physician interactions and managing diseases. Despite these advancements, the review underscores the necessity for ongoing refinement, customization, and ethical regulation of AI tools. These findings serve to enrich the dialog concerning AI's role in healthcare, with a specific focus on ChatGPT's application in gastroenterology.
Checking how ChatGPT works in gastroenterology: a detailed look at its uses, advantages, and challenges Goal We looked at how ChatGPT, a computer program, is used in the study Gastroenterology. We wanted to understand what's good about it, what's challenging, and how it can help doctors and patients. How We Did It We searched for articles about ChatGPT in Gastroenterology on PubMed. We found six suitable articles and checked their quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Then, we put all the information together to get a clear picture. What We Found Doctors and researchers use ChatGPT in many ways. Some use it to teach patients about their health, while others use it to help patients check their symptoms or manage their conditions. It can even help come up with research questions. The good things about ChatGPT are that it gives helpful advice, makes talking between doctors and patients easier, and helps come up with research topics. But, sometimes it doesn't understand hard medical questions, gives different answers for the same question, or lacks new ideas. There are also concerns about using it the right way. What This Means ChatGPT can be a helpful tool in Gastroenterology, especially when talking with patients and managing their health. But, there are challenges that need to be fixed. Our review helps people understand how ChatGPT can be used in health care, especially in the field of Gastroenterology.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC), a significant health burden worldwide, is typically diagnosed in the advanced stages due to its non-specific symptoms and complex morphological features. Deep learning (DL) has shown potential for improving and standardizing early GC detection. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current status of DL in pre-malignant, early-stage, and gastric neoplasia analysis. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE for original studies implementing DL algorithms for gastric neoplasia detection using endoscopic images. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The focus was on studies providing quantitative diagnostic performance measures and those comparing AI performance with human endoscopists. RESULTS: Our review encompasses 42 studies that utilize a variety of DL techniques. The findings demonstrate the utility of DL in GC classification, detection, tumor invasion depth assessment, cancer margin delineation, lesion segmentation, and detection of early-stage and pre-malignant lesions. Notably, DL models frequently matched or outperformed human endoscopists in diagnostic accuracy. However, heterogeneity in DL algorithms, imaging techniques, and study designs precluded a definitive conclusion about the best algorithmic approach. CONCLUSIONS: The promise of artificial intelligence in improving and standardizing gastric neoplasia detection, diagnosis, and segmentation is significant. This review is limited by predominantly single-center studies and undisclosed datasets used in AI training, impacting generalizability and demographic representation. Further, retrospective algorithm training may not reflect actual clinical performance, and a lack of model details hinders replication efforts. More research is needed to substantiate these findings, including larger-scale multi-center studies, prospective clinical trials, and comprehensive technical reporting of DL algorithms and datasets, particularly regarding the heterogeneity in DL algorithms and study designs.
RESUMEN
Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, a type I carcinogen, affects approximately 50% of the global population, correlating with various gastric pathologies. Notably, diagnostic sensitivities of non-invasive methods, such as the stool antigen test (HpSA), Serology, and Urea Breath Test (UBT), have been suggested to be less effective in older age groups. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the diagnostic accuracy of these tests within the elderly population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science, up to July 2023. Data were pooled and analyzed using random-effects models. Sensitivity, specificity, and Diagnostic Odds Ratios (DOR) were computed for the tests. Heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed. Results: Eight studies involving diverse geographic locations and totaling between 46 and 1,441 participants per study were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for HpSA were 72.5 and 94.7%, for Serology 83.7 and 73.3%, and for UBT 96.4 and 88.3%, respectively. DOR for UBT, HpSA, and Serology were 94.5, 47.9, and 14.2, respectively. High levels of heterogeneity were observed across the studies. Conclusion: UBT and HpSA proved effective for diagnosing H. pylori in those over 60, while serology showed lower specificity. Despite methodological variations in available studies, these non-invasive tests offer reliable alternatives, especially for older patients who recently undergone endoscopy or without an indication for it, warranting consideration by healthcare practitioners.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The link between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is well-established, with concurrent prevalence estimates ranging from 5-10%. However, there are still significant gaps in our understanding, and a comprehensive treatment guideline for these co-diagnosed patients has yet to be established. Our objective was to explore patterns of treatment alterations following the diagnosis of AS in patients previously diagnosed with IBD, and vice versa. Additionally, we sought to determine how these modifications influence clinical outcomes in both conditions. METHODS: This retrospective data-based cohort study included patients with coexisting IBD and AS that were diagnosed between the years 2009-2022 and were followed by the gastroenterology and the rheumatology units of the Sheba Medical Center, Israel. The data were extracted from the electronic health record and included demographic information, medication history, treatment modification at the time of second diagnosis, and the characteristics and activity of both IBD and AS at the index time and at the 3-month mark. RESULTS: The study included a total of 68 patients, with a male predominance (40 patients, 59%). The median age was 43 years (IQR 31-55) and 78% had Crohn's disease (CD). The median duration between the diagnosis of the first disease to the second one was 4 years (IQR 1-9.5). A significant proportion of patients (85%) underwent treatment modification at their second diagnosis. Out of the total cohort, 28% initiated biological therapy, 17.6% switched their biologic regimen, and 16.2% discontinued NSAIDS. Patients who underwent biologic modifications at time of the second diagnosis (the initiation/switch/augmentation of a concurrent regimen) experienced significantly higher rates of clinical improvement in either IBD or AS at the 90-day follow-up compared to patients who did not (68% vs. 32%, p = 0.004), and biologic modification was found to be an independent predictor for clinical improvement (OR 3.69, CI 1.08-12.58, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that biologic therapy modification at the time of the second diagnosis was associated with a higher rate of improvement in AS/IBD at the 90-day follow-up.
RESUMEN
Background: Due to its apparent efficacy and safety, dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks Interleukin 4 (IL-4) and Interleukin 13 (IL-13), has been approved for treating T-helper 2 (Th2) disorders. However, adverse effects like local injection site reactions, conjunctivitis, headaches, and nasopharyngitis have been reported. Sex differences are known to influence both adaptive and innate immune responses and, thus, may have a bearing on the occurrence of these adverse effects. Nevertheless, the literature lacks a comprehensive exploration of this influence, a gap this study aims to bridge. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive data mining of VigiBase, the World Health Organization (WHO) global pharmacovigilance database which contains case safety reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was performed to test for sex -specific safety response to dual IL4/IL13 blockade by dupilumab. The information component (IC), a measure of the disproportionality of ADR occurrence, was evaluated and compared between males and females to identify potential sexual dimorphism. Results: Of the 94,065 ADRs recorded in the WHO global pharmacovigilance database, 2,001 (57.4%) were reported among female dupilumab users, and 1,768 (50.7%) were among males. Immune/autoimmune T-helper 1 (Th1)-, innate- and T-helper 17 (Th17)-driven diseases and degenerative ones were consistently reported with a stronger association with Dupilumab in males than females. Some adverse events were more robustly associated with Dupilumab in females. Conclusion: Dupilumab has an excellent safety profile, even though some ADRs may occur. The risk is higher among male patients, further studies, including ad hoc studies, are needed to establish causality.
RESUMEN
Celiac disease (CD) presents a complex interplay of both innate and adaptive immune responses that drive a variety of pathological manifestations. Recent studies highlight the role of immune-mediated pathogenesis, pinpointing the involvement of antibodies against tissue transglutaminases (TG2, TG3, TG6), specific HLA molecules (DQ2/8), and the regulatory role of interleukin-15, among other cellular and molecular pathways. These aspects illuminate the systemic nature of CD, reflecting its wide-reaching impact that extends beyond gastrointestinal symptoms to affect other physiological systems and giving rise to a range of pathological landscapes, including refractory CD (RCD) and, in severe cases, enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma. The existing primary therapeutic strategy, a gluten-free diet (GFD), poses significant challenges, such as low adherence rates, necessitating alternative treatments. Emerging therapies target various stages of the disease pathology, from preventing immunogenic gluten peptide absorption to enhancing intestinal epithelial integrity and modulating the immune response, heralding potential breakthroughs in CD management. As the understanding of CD deepens, novel therapeutic avenues are emerging, paving the way for more effective and sophisticated treatment strategies with the aim of enhancing the quality of life of CD patients. This review aims to delineate the immunopathology of CD and exploring its implications on other systems, its complications and the development of novel treatments.