Comparative analysis of short- and long-term outcomes in laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: Although minimally invasive colorectal surgery has been proven to have a shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications than open surgery, the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis have not been validated. This study compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic approaches in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2020, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 78 hemodialysis patients who underwent curative-intent, elective colorectal surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method: open and laparoscopic. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity (p = 0.480) and mortality (p = 0.598) rates and length of hospital stay (28.8 vs. 27.5 days, p = 0.830) were similar between the groups. However, laparoscopic surgery patients had a shorter return to clear liquid, full liquid, or soft food time than open surgery patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, and p = 0.002, respectively). Disease-free survival and long-term cancer-specific survival rates were also similar between the two groups (p = 0.353 and p = 0.201, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that intraoperative blood transfusion was a risk factor for severe complications and mortality (OR 6.055; p = 0.046), and the odds ratio (OR) of laparoscopic surgery was not significantly greater than that of open surgery (OR = 0.537, p = 0.337). CONCLUSION: Although laparoscopic surgery did not result in hemodialysis patients having a shorter postoperative hospital stay, our results suggest that the laparoscopic approach is as safe as open surgery for hemodialysis patients and may be beneficial for shortening the return time to food intake.

Impact of preoperative frailty on the surgical and survival outcomes in older patients with solid cancer after elective abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is common in older patients with cancer; however, its clinical impact on the survival outcomes has seldom been examined in these patients. This study aimed to investigate the association of frailty with the survival outcomes and surgical complications in older patients with cancer after elective abdominal surgery in Taiwan. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 345 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed cancer who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2018. They were allocated into the fit, pre-frail, and frail groups according to comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) findings. RESULTS: The fit, pre-frail, and frail groups comprised 62 (18.0%), 181 (52.5%), and 102 (29.5%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 (interquartile range, 40-53) months, the mortality rates were 12.9%, 31.5%, and 43.1%, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-3.39; p = 0.25) and 2.87 (95% CI, 1.10-5.35; p = 0.028) when the pre-frail and frail groups were compared with the fit group, respectively. The frail group had a significantly increased risk for a prolonged hospital stay (adjusted odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.05-4.69; p = 0.022) compared with the fit group. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment frailty was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes and more surgical complications, with prolonged hospital stay, in the older patients with cancer after elective abdominal surgery. Preoperative frailty assessment can assist physicians in identifying patients at a high risk for surgical complications and predicting the survival outcomes of older patients with cancer.

Event-related brain potentials reveal enhancing and compensatory mechanisms during dual neurocognitive and cycling tasks.

BACKGROUND: Various neurocognitive tests have shown that cycling enhances cognitive performance compared to resting. Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by an oddball or flanker task have clarified the impact of dual-task cycling on perception and attention. In this study, we investigate the effect of cycling on cognitive recruitment during tasks that involve not only stimulus identification but also semantic processing and memory retention. METHODS: We recruited 24 healthy young adults (12 males, 12 females; mean age = 22.71, SD = 1.97 years) to perform three neurocognitive tasks (namely color-word matching, arithmetic calculation, and spatial working memory) at rest and while cycling, employing a within-subject design with rest/cycling counterbalancing. RESULTS: The reaction time on the spatial working memory task was faster while cycling than at rest at a level approaching statistical significance. The commission error percentage on the color-word matching task was significantly lower at rest than while cycling. Dual-task cycling while responding to neurocognitive tests elicited the following results: (a) a greater ERP P1 amplitude, delayed P3a latency, less negative N4, and less positivity in the late slow wave (LSW) during color-word matching; (b) a greater P1 amplitude during memory encoding and smaller posterior negativity during memory retention on the spatial working memory task; and (c) a smaller P3 amplitude, followed by a more negative N4 and less LSW positivity during arithmetic calculation. CONCLUSION: The encoding of color-word and spatial information while cycling may have resulted in compensatory visual processing and attention allocation to cope with the additional cycling task load. The dual-task cycling and cognitive performance reduced the demands of semantic processing for color-word matching and the cognitive load associated with temporarily suspending spatial information. While dual-tasking may have required enhanced semantic processing to initiate mental arithmetic, a compensatory decrement was noted during arithmetic calculation. These significant neurocognitive findings demonstrate the effect of cycling on semantic-demand and memory retention-demand tasks.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of stoma reversal during versus after chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The optimal timing of stoma closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the influence of clinical and oncological outcomes depending on the timing of stoma closure. METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2015, we enrolled 244 consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent curative-intent sphincter-preserving surgery with diverting transverse colostomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with stoma closure during (During group) adjuvant chemotherapy were compared to those who had stoma closure after adjuvant chemotherapy (After group). RESULTS: Parastomal hernia occurred more frequently in the after group than in the during group. (10% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.028). Overall, no significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups (p = 0.911 for OS, p = 0.505 for DFS). However, an inferior OS occurred if reopen surgery was performed within 30 days of stoma closure in the during group, as compared with the after group (p = 0.004). In addition, a marginally poor DFS was observed in the group of patients who received further operations due to 30-day stoma closure complications compared to the other patients (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: For rectal cancer patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery, attention should be given to avoid 30-day major complications after stoma reversal because patients who require reoperation during adjuvant chemotherapy may have poor long-term survival.

Three-Dimensional Simulation Training for Oncology Nurses to Address Pitfalls in Current Irrigation Strategy for Intravenous Ports: Repeated Measurements Study.

OBJECTIVE: We designed an interactive visual training course and three-dimensional (3-D) simulator for participants and used verified questionnaires as tool to evaluate the efficacy of the education course. DATA SOURCES: From August 2020 to December 2021, 159 nursing staff who received the interactive visual training course and completed validated questionnaires before and after the course were included. The efficacy of the course was evaluated by comparing the pre- and post-course questionnaires. CONCLUSION: The interactive visual training course, including maintenance lectures and practice with a 3-D simulator, improved consensus among the nursing staff and increased the willingness of oncology nurses to perform the proposed port irrigation procedure. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: An implanted intravenous port cannot be directly seen by nursing staff and can only be identified through manual palpation. This lack of visibility may result in individual variations in port identification during daily practice, potentially leading to malpractice. To minimize these individual variations, we have designed an interactive visual training course. We used validated questionnaires before and after the course to analyze its efficacy in practical education.

Extracellular Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase as a Surrogate Marker of Prominent Malignant Potential in Colonic Polyps: A 2-Year Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The implications of extracellular nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (eNAMPT), a cancer metabokine, in colonic polyps remain uncertain. METHODS: A 2-year prospective cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy was conducted. Biochemical parameters and serum eNAMPT levels were analyzed at baseline and every 24 weeks postpolypectomy. NAMPT-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including rs61330082, rs2302559, rs10953502, and rs23058539, were assayed. RESULTS: Of 532 patients, 80 (15%) had prominent malignant potential (PMP) in colonic polyps, including villous adenomas (n = 18, 3.3%), adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (n = 33, 6.2%), and adenocarcinomas (n = 29, 5.5%). Baseline associations were as follows: colonic polyp pathology (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p = 0.019), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.023) with eNAMPT levels; and age (p < 0.001), polyp size (p < 0.001), and eNAMPT levels (p < 0.001) with polyp pathology. Higher baseline eNAMPT levels were noted in patients harboring polyps with PMP than in patients without PMP (p < 0.001), and baseline eNAMPT levels significantly predicted PMP (cutoff: >4.238 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Proportions of eNAMPT-positive glandular and stromal cells were higher in polyps with PMP than in polyps without PMP (64.55 ± 11.94 vs. 14.82 ± 11.45%, p = 0.025). eNAMPT levels decreased within 48 weeks postpolypectomy (p = 0.01) and remained stable afterward regardless of PMP until 96 weeks postpolypectomy. However, those with PMP had a higher degree of eNAMPT decline within 24 weeks (p = 0.046). All investigated SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium with each other but were not associated with eNAMPT levels. CONCLUSION: With a link to inflammation and lipid metabolism, along with its decreasing trend after polypectomy, serum eNAMPT may serve as a surrogate marker of PMP in colonic polyps. In situ probing of the NAMPT-associated pathway holds promise in attenuating PMP, as much of the eNAMPT likely originates from colonic polyps.

Risk factors and effect of postoperative delirium on adverse surgical outcomes in older adults after elective abdominal cancer surgery in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in older adults, with unknown epidemiology and effects on surgical outcomes in Asian geriatric cancer patients. This study evaluated incidence, risk factors, and association between adverse surgical outcomes and POD after intra-abdominal cancer surgery in Taiwan. METHODS: Overall, 345 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective abdominal cancer surgery at a medical center in Taiwan were prospectively enrolled. Delirium was assessed daily using the Confusion Assessment Method. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses investigated risk factors for POD occurrence and estimated the association with adverse surgical outcomes. RESULTS: POD occurred in 19 (5.5%) of the 345 patients. Age ≥73 years, Charlson comorbidity index ≥3, and operative time >428 min were independent predictors for POD occurrence. Patients presenting with one, two, and three risk factors had 4.1-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-35.8, p = 0.20), 17.4-fold (95% CI, 2.2-138, p = 0.007), and 30.8-fold likelihood (95% CI, 2.9-321, p = 0.004) for POD occurrence, respectively. Patients with POD had a higher probability of prolonged hospital stay (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.8; 95% CI, 1.0-8.1; p = 0.037), intensive care stay (adjusted OR: 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5-10.5; p = 0.008), 30-day readmission (adjusted OR 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-9.7; p = 0.039), and 90-day postoperative death (adjusted OR: 4.2; 95% CI, 1.0-17.7; p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: POD occurrence was significantly associated with adverse surgical outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing elective abdominal cancer surgery, highlighting the importance of early POD identification in geriatric patients to improve postoperative care quality.

Association of preoperative frailty and postoperative delirium in older cancer patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: A prospective observational study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common surgical complication in elderly patients. As frailty is a relatively novel concept, its clinical significance for POD has seldom been examined. This study aimed to investigate the association between frailty and POD in aged cancer patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery in Taiwan. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 345 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed cancer who underwent elective abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2018. Frailty assessment was performed using the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). POD was assessed daily using the Confusion Assessment Method from postoperative day 1 until discharge. Patients were allocated into fit and frail groups. RESULTS: POD occurred in 19 (5.5%) of 345 patients. POD incidence was 1.6%, 3.1%, 4.8%, 11.5%, and 10.0% in patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4+ frail conditions, respectively, which presented a positive linear correlation among patients with an increased number of frail conditions and POD incidence. Based on CGA, 159 (46.1%) and 186 (53.9%) patients were allocated to fit and frail groups, respectively. POD incidence was 2.5% and 8.1% for the fit and frail groups, respectively. Frailty status was an independent risk factor for POD occurrence in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study identified frailty as an independent risk factor for POD in aged Taiwanese cancer patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Given the high prevalence of frailty among older cancer patients, preoperative assessment is important to identify high risk of POD and to improve the quality of postoperative care.

External validation of a risk model for survival prediction in older patients with cancer undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

We previously developed a Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) model to predict the 1-year postoperative mortality risk in patients with solid cancer undergoing cancer surgery. This study aimed to externally validate the CGMH score for survival outcome and surgical complication prediction in a prospective patient cohort. A total of 345 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective abdominal surgery for cancer treatment were prospectively enrolled. Patients were categorized into the low, intermediate, high, and very high-risk groups according to the CGMH score for comparison. The postoperative 1-year mortality rate was 12.5% in the entire cohort. The postoperative 1-year mortality rates were 0%, 2.2%, 14.0%, and 31.6% among patients in the low, intermediate, high, and very-high risk groups, respectively. The c-statistic of the CGMH model was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.88) for predicting the 1-year mortality risk. Hazard ratios for overall survival were 3.73 (95% CI, 2.11-6.57; P<0.001) and 10.1 (95% CI, 5.84-17.6; P<0.001) when comparing the high and very-high risk groups with the low/intermediate risk groups, respectively. Patients in the higher CGMH risk groups had higher risks of adverse surgical outcomes in terms of longer length of hospital stay, major surgical complications, postoperative intensive care unit stay, and in-hospital death. The CGMH model accurately predicted thesurvival probabilityand risk of adverse surgical outcomes in older patients with cancer undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Our study justifies the prospective use of the CGMH model for survival outcome and safety profile predictionfor cancer surgery in older patients.

Clinical Significance of Frailty on Treatment Outcome in Nongeriatric Patients With Head and Neck Cancer and Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Curative-Intent Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Whether the prevalence of frailty and its clinical significance are relevant to treatment outcomes in younger (aged < 65 years) cancer patients remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on treatment outcomes in younger cancer patients with head and neck and esophageal malignancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective study recruited 502 patients with locally advanced head and neck and esophageal cancer during 2016-2017 in Taiwan, aged 20-64 years who received curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as first-line antitumor treatment. Baseline frailty assessment using geriatric assessment (GA) was performed for each patient within 7 days before CCRT initiation. RESULTS: Frailty was observed in 169 (33.7%) of 502 middle-aged patients. Frail patients had significantly higher incidences of chemotherapy incompletion (16.6% versus 3.3%, P < .001) and radiotherapy incompletion (16.6% versus 3.6%, P < .001) than fit patients. During CCRT, frail patients had a significantly higher percentage of hospitalizations (42.0% versus 24.6%, P < .001) and a trend toward a higher percentage of emergency room visits (37.9% versus 30.0%, P = .08) than fit patients. Frail patients more likely had a significantly higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events than fit patients during CCRT. The 1-year survival rate was 68.7% and 85.2% (hazard ratio 2.56, 95% confidence interval 1.80-3.63, P < .001) for frail and fit patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the significance of pretreatment frailty on treatment tolerance, treatment-related toxicity, and survival outcome in younger patients with head and neck and esophageal cancer undergoing CCRT. While GA is commonly targeted toward the older population, frailty assessment by GA may also be utilized in younger patients for decision-making guidance and prognosis prediction.

A Noninvasive Risk Stratification Tool Build Using an Artificial Intelligence Approach for Colorectal Polyps Based on Annual Checkup Data.

Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and early detection has proven to be an effective method for reducing mortality. The machine learning method can be implemented to build a noninvasive stratifying tool that helps identify patients with potential colorectal precancerous lesions (polyps). This study aimed to develop a noninvasive risk-stratified tool for colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, healthy participants. A total of 20,129 consecutive asymptomatic patients who underwent a health checkup between January 2005 and August 2007 were recruited. Positive relationships between noninvasive risk factors, such as age, Helicobacter pylori infection, hypertension, gallbladder polyps/stone, and BMI and colorectal polyps were observed (p < 0.0001), regardless of sex, whereas significant findings were noted in men with tooth disease (p = 0.0053). A risk stratification tool was developed, for colorectal polyps, that considers annual checkup results from noninvasive examinations. For the noninvasive stratified tool, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of obese females (males) aged <50 years was 91% (83%). In elderly patients (>50 years old), the AUCs of the stratifying tools were >85%. Our results indicate that the risk stratification tool can be built by using random forest and serve as an efficient noninvasive tool to identify patients requiring colonoscopy.

Smoking cessation for less than 10 years remains a risk factor of anastomotic leakage in mid-to-low rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery.

PURPOSE: Although cigarette smoking is a well-known risk factor for anastomotic leakage during rectal surgery, the proper duration of smoking cessation that can decrease anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the optimal duration of smoking cessation that can reduce this complication. METHODS: Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, we enrolled 1246 consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent sphincter-preserving surgery without preventive stoma at the Division of Colorectal Surgery of a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. Questionnaires were used to record their pre-surgical smoking status. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off duration of smoking cessation. Multivariate analysis was used to verify the effect of cigarette cessation on anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: The ROC curve showed a cut-off value of 10.5 years of cessation duration. Therefore, the former-smoker group was further divided using a cessation duration of 10 years. The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5.29%. However, the anastomotic leakage rate in current smokers (9.3%) and in those who quit for < 10 years (12.9%) was significantly higher than that in non-smokers (3.3%) and those who quit for ≥ 10 years (4.5%). On multivariate analysis, current smokers (p = 0.022), former smokers with < 10 years of smoking cessation (OR 2.725; p = 0.029), male sex (p = 0.015), and low rectal cancer (p < 0.001) were all independently related to the development of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Smoking cessation for < 10 years remains a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery.

Impact of Frailty on Treatment Outcome in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical significance of frailty status on treatment outcome in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) has been seldom explored. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pretreatment frailty on treatment-related toxicity and survival outcome in patients with EC undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥20 years and with newly diagnosed locally advanced EC receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with weekly administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel for 5 weeks were prospectively enrolled. A pretreatment frailty assessment was performed within 7 days before CCRT initiation. The primary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity and complications of CCRT while the secondary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were enrolled, 41 (47%) and 46 (53%) of whom were allocated in the frail and fit group, respectively. Frail patients had a significantly higher incidence of having at least one severe hematological adverse event (63.4% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001), higher risk of emergent room visiting [relative risk 3.72; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.39-9.91; p=0.009] and hospitalization (relative risk 3.85; 95% CI=1.03-11.2; p=0.013) during the course of CCRT, when compared to fit patients. Overall survival showed significant worsening in the frail group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=2.12; 95% CI=1.01-4.42; p=0.046]. CONCLUSION: Frailty is associated with increase of treatment-related toxicities and poor survival outcome in EC patients undergoing CCRT. Our study suggested that pretreatment frailty assessment is imperative to serve as a predictor and prognostic factor for all adult patients with EC undergoing CCRT.

A Prediction Model for Metachronous Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Patients with Stage T4 Colon Cancer after Curative Resection.

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for assessing individual mPC risk in patients with pT4 colon cancer. Methods: A total of 2003 patients with pT4 colon cancer undergoing R0 resection were categorized into the training or testing set. Based on the training set, 2044 Cox prediction models were developed. Next, models with the maximal C-index and minimal prediction error were selected. The final model was then validated based on the testing set using a time-dependent area under the curve and Brier score, and a scoring system was developed. Patients were stratified into the high- or low-risk group by their risk score, with the cut-off points determined by a classification and regression tree (CART). (2) Results: The five candidate predictors were tumor location, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen value, histologic type, T stage and nodal stage. Based on the CART, patients were categorized into the low-risk or high-risk groups. The model has high predictive accuracy (prediction error ≤5%) and good discrimination ability (area under the curve >0.7). (3) Conclusions: The prediction model quantifies individual risk and is feasible for selecting patients with pT4 colon cancer who are at high risk of developing mPC.

Prognostic value of regional lymph node involvement in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: palliative versus curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer are initially diagnosed with stage IV disease. This study aims to examine the role of regional lymph node (LN) status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with respect to clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes. METHODS: We investigated 1147 patients diagnosed with mCRC and had undergone surgical resection of the primary CRC. A total of 167 patients were placed in the LN-negative (LN-) group and another 980 in the LN-positive (LN+) group. RESULTS: LN+ patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of T4 tumors (p = 0.008), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), and perineural invasion (p < 0.001) than those in the LN- group. LN- patients had a significantly higher rate of lung metastasis (p < 0.001), whereas the rate of peritoneal seeding (p < 0.001) and systemic node metastasis (p < 0.001) was both significantly higher in the LN+ group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the LN+ group was significantly poorer than that in the LN- group (LN- vs. LN+ 23.2% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.040). In patients with curative resection, the 5-year OS rate has no significant difference between the two groups (LN- vs. LN+ 19.5% vs. 24.3%; p = 0.890). CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic CRC patients with LN+ who underwent primary tumor resection may present with more high-risk pathological features, more peritoneal seeding, and systemic node metastasis, but less lung metastasis than LN- patients. LN+ patients had poorer long-term outcomes compared with that in LN- patients. Nevertheless, with curative resection, LN+ patients could have similar survival outcomes as LN- patients.

A comparison of the MNA-SF, MUST, and NRS-2002 nutritional tools in predicting treatment incompletion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) treatment incompletion is a known negative prognosticator for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Malnutrition is a common phenomenon which leads to treatment interruption in patients with HNC. We aimed to compare the performance of three nutritional tools in predicting treatment incompletion in patients with HNC undergoing definitive CCRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three nutritional assessment tools, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutritional Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), were prospectively assessed prior to CCRT for HNC patients. Patients were stratified into either normal nutrition or malnourished groups using different nutrition tools. Treatment incompletion and treatment-related toxicities associated with CCRT were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were included in the study; malnourished rates ranged from 31.0 to 51.0%. The CCRT incompletion rates were 4.9-6.3% and 14.5-18.2% for normal nutrition patients and malnourished patients, respectively. The tools had significant correlations with each other (Pearson correlation 0.801-0.837, p<0.001 for all) and accurately predicted the incompletion of CCRT. MNA-SF had the highest performance in predicting treatment-related toxicity, including emergency room visits, need for hospitalization, any grade III or higher hematological adverse events, and critical body weight loss, compared to the other tools. CONCLUSIONS: MNA-SF, MUST, and NRS2002 were all shown to be competent tools for prediction of treatment incompletion and treatment-related toxicity in HNC patients undergoing CCRT. We suggest implementing nutritional assessment prior to treatment to improve the rate of treatment completion and to reduce treatment-related toxicity in HNC patients.

Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis.

Routine postoperative surveillance is recommended for the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to clarify the conditions indicate initial suspicion of CRC recurrence in different preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level groups, including positive physical signs/symptoms, elevated CEA level, positive radiologic studies results, and other elevated tumor markers.A total of 2268 patients with recurrence after curative surgery for CRC were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to preoperative serum CEA level (low, <2 ng/mL; intermediate, ≥2 and <5 ng/mL; and high, ≥5 ng/mL).Up to 63.6% of recurrence was suspected based on elevated CEA level in the high preoperative serum CEA level group. Patients in the low preoperative serum CEA level group had a higher rate of initial suspicion of recurrence based on positive physical signs or symptoms (36.7% vs 26.9% vs 20.4%, P < .001) and positive radiologic findings (51.4% vs 40.7% vs 29.5%, P < .001) than those in the intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups.Conditions indicate initial suspicion of recurrence varied in the different preoperative serum CEA level groups. In patients with low preoperative serum CEA level, the detection of recurrence depend on abnormal CEA level is less sensitive than intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups. We suggest that the strategy for CRC surveillance should not depend on serum CEA level alone. The signs or symptoms of patients, changes in postoperative serial CEA level, and ongoing radiologic or imaging findings must be cautiously monitored.

Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of metachronous rectal cancer in patients with a history of cervical cancer with and without remote radiotherapy: Reports of 45 cases.

The purpose of this study was to report the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of 45 rectal cancer patients who have a history of cervical cancer with or without remote radiotherapy. Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) with a history of cervical cancer treated with pelvic radiotherapy were classified as group A, 16 (35.6%) patients with a history of cervical cancer not treated with radiotherapy were classified as group B. The median duration between radiotherapy for cervical cancer and rectal adenocarcinoma diagnosis was 18 years. At the time of rectal cancer diagnosis, 5 (17.2%) patients presented stage I disease, 15 (51.7%) had stage II, 1 (3.4%) had stage III, and 8 (27.6%) had stage IV. The patients in group A had older age, higher rates of gross ulcerative lesions, low hemoglobin levels, and a lower rate of lymph node metastases. The patients with secondary rectal cancer developed after radiotherapy for cervical cancer usually presented with abnormal abdominal symptoms, such as proctitis, cystitis, or rectal fistula. Higher colostomy rate was found in this group of patients due to severe pelvic fibrosis or proctitis.

Survival analysis of local excision vs total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer in pT1/pT2 stage and intermediate pathological risk.

BACKGROUND: Local excision (LE) is a feasible treatment approach for rectal cancers in stage pT1 and presents low pathological risk, whereas total mesorectal excision (TME) is a reasonable treatment for more advanced cancers. On the basis of the pathology findings, surgeons may suggest TME for patients receiving LE. This study compared the survival outcomes between LE with/without chemoradiation and TME in mid and low rectal cancer patients in stage pT1/pT2, with highly selective intermediate pathological risk. METHODS: This retrospective study included 134 patients who received TME and 39 patients who underwent LE for the treatment of intermediate risk (pT1 with poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, relatively large tumor, or small-sized pT2 tumor) rectal cancer between 1998 and 2016. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative recurrence rate (CRR) were similar between the LE (3-year DFS 92%) and TME (3-year DFS 91%) groups. Following subgrouping into an LE with adjuvant therapy group and a TME without adjuvant therapy group, the compared survival outcomes (OS, DFS, and CRR) were found not to be statistically different. The temporary and permanent ostomy rates were higher in the TME group than in the LE group (p < 0.001). Rates of early and late morbidity following surgery were higher in the TME group (p = 0.005), and LE had similar survival compared with TME. CONCLUSION: For patients who had mid and low rectal cancer in stage pT1/pT2 and intermediate pathological risk, LE with chemoradiation presents an alternative treatment option for selected patients.

The impact of kidney function on colorectal cancer patients with localized and regional diseases: An observational study from Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Impaired kidney function is associated with different diseases. However, its impact on colorectal cancer has not been clarified. In order to understand the effect of preoperative kidney function on the outcome of patients with cancer, we analyzed colorectal cancer patients with localized or regional diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 3731 stage I to III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were analyzed in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula was used for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for kidney function cut-off value; Chi-square method, independent t test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) method for clinicopathological factors; Kaplan-Meier method for disease-free survival (DFS); Cox proportional hazard model for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among colon cancer patients, low eGFR (MDRD <70) was associated with more male patients, T2 stage, patients without adjuvant chemotherapy, and patients with elevated creatinine level. Low eGFR is a significant risk factor only for stage III colon cancer (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI: 1.28-2.26; P < 0.001). Furthermore, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly increase 5-year DFS for both high and low eGFR groups in stage II patients (5 yrs DFS, 94.8% vs. 84.1%, P = 0.098 for high eGFR subgroup; and 75.0% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.379 for low eGFR subgroup). However, significant improvement of 5-yrs DFS after chemotherapy was found in low eGFR stage III colon cancer patients (64.7% vs. 39.4%, P < 0.001 for low eGFR subgroup). In contrast, no significant DFS difference was caused by chemotherapy for high eGFR stage III subgroup (70.5% vs. 63.9%, P = 0.110). CONCLUSIONS: Although low eGFR is an independent risk factor for stage III colon cancer. However, the adjuvant chemotherapy impacts on stage III colon cancer patients differently according to eGFR status.