Viability of Human Arterial Grafts Monitored by Comet Assay.

An analytical method for studying DNA degradation by electrophoresis after cell lysis and visualization of DNA fragments with fluorescent dye, comet assay, was used to evaluate the viability of the endothelial layer of human arterial grafts with the aim of identifying the procedure that will least damage the tissue before cryopreservation. Four groups of samples were studied: cryopreserved arterial grafts that were thawed in two different ways, slowly lasting 2 hours or rapidly for approx. 7 minutes. Arterial grafts that were collected as part of multiorgan procurement with minimal warm ischemia time. Cadaveric grafts were taken as part of the autopsy, so they have a more extended period of warm ischemia. The HeadDNA (%) parameter and others commonly used parameters like TailDNA (%). TailMoment, TailLength, OliveMoment, TailMoment to characterize the comet were used to assess viability in this study. The ratio of non-decayed to decayed nuclei was determined from the values found. This ratio for cadaveric grafts was 0.63, for slowly thawed cryopreserved grafts 2.9, for rapidly thawed cryopreserved grafts 1.9, and for multi-organ procurement grafts 0.68. The results of the study confirmed the assumption that the allografts obtained from cadaveric donors are the least suitable. On the other hand, grafts obtained from multiorgan donors are better in terms of viability monitored by comet assay. Keywords: Arterial grafts, Cryopreservation, Cadaveric, Multiorgan procurement, Viability, Comet assay.

Partial resection of native and prosthetic arteriovenous fistula as a treatment of late infections complications - series of case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Infection of arteriovenous fistula (AV) used for hemodialysis (HD) is associated with massive bleeding, sepsis development, formation of metastatic infectious foci, and a high risk of AV loss. Urgent management of an infected AV is crucial for successful treatment and AV salvage. CASE REPORTS: We present the use of partial resection as a successful method of dealing with late AV infection in two cases. In case 1, the resection was performed due to an infection of the native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) with two defects above the drainage vein aneurysms. In case 2, partial resection and replacement of the prosthetic arteriovenous fistula (AVG) were done due to an infection of HD puncture site. The AVs remained patent in both cases, with no further signs of infection postoperatively and, most importantly, without the need to use a temporary HD catheter. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a new AV is limited by the quality of the venous and arterial systems. All surgical, interventional and non-surgical means should be used to safely maintain the created AV patent. Provided that the requirements of an early indication are met, partial resection of the AV is the method of choice for AV infections and allows us to avoid using a permanent dialysis catheter in our patients.