Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Complicated by Sinistral Portal Hypertension.

Pancreatic cancer is known for vague symptoms that lead to a delay in diagnosis, and hence most cases are found at an advanced stage. Many complications can happen secondary to pancreatic cancer including diabetes, malabsorption, and deep venous thrombosis. Sinistral (segmental or left-sided) portal hypertension (SPH) refers to portal hypertension confined to the left-sided segment of the portal venous system namely the splenic side, and the most common etiology is splenic vein thrombosis (SVT). We present here a case of a 66-year-old male with advanced pancreatic cancer who died due to bleeding secondary to SVT. We advise physicians caring for these patients to be aware of this complication, which may also be the manifestation of an undiagnosed pancreatic cancer.

First-in-human phase II trial of the botanical formulation PHY906 with capecitabine as second-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies showed a Chinese botanical formula, PHY906, has synergistic anti-tumor activity with capecitabine. Our phase I study determined maximal tolerated dose of capecitabine 1,500 mg/m(2) BID day 1-7 and PHY906 800 mg BID day 1-4 every 2 weeks. We conducted this phase II study to explore the efficacy of capecitabine and PHY906 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were previously treated with gemcitabine-based regimens. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 received PHY906 and capecitabine. Toxicity was assessed per NCI-CTCAE v3.0 and response per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors q 6 weeks. Correlative studies of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors were tested using a cytometric bead array. Quality of life was assessed by utilizing Edmonton symptom assessment system. The primary objective was overall survival. RESULTS: The study enrolled 25 patients. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 10.1 weeks (range 0.4-54.1) and median overall survival (mOS) was 21.6 weeks (range 0.4-84.1). Eighteen patients received at least 2 cycles, and achieved mPFS of 12.3 weeks and mOS of 28 weeks. Six-month survival rate was 44 % (11/25). Unsupervised clustering of patients grouped those with shortened survival together by their cytokine profile showed that only IL-6 had a significant difference (p < .001) between short- and long-term survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine plus PHY906 provides a safe and feasible salvage therapy after gemcitabine failure for APC. Role of IL-6 in tumor progression and tumor cachexia needs to be investigated with respect to its relation to pathophysiology of pancreatic cancer and development of anti-IL-6 therapeutics.

Bone Metastasis as the Only Metastatic Site in a Patient with Pancreatic Cancer following Distal Pancreatectomy.

Pancreatic cancer remains a challenge both diagnostically and therapeutically. The typical sites of metastases in pancreatic cancer include the liver and peritoneum. Other less common sites are the lung, brain, kidney, and bone. Skeletal metastases are less prevalent in occurrence but contribute to significant morbidity associated with pancreatic cancer. The prevalence of osseous metastases remains unknown but has been estimated to be between 5% and 20%. The most common osseous lesions are osteolytic in nature, but the osteoblastic ones are extremely rare. Here, we report an interesting case of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with exclusive bone metastases and discuss briefly the possible pathogenesis.

Management of skin toxicities of anti-EGFR agents in patients with pancreatic cancer and other GI tumors by using electronic communication: effective and convenient.

Erlotinib has been FDA approved to be used in combination with gemcitabine as the first line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Skin rash has been documented as one of the commonest adverse reactions in patients receiving erlotinib and other EGFR inhibitors. Draw back to this reaction leads to: 1) drug discontinuation or dose reduction; 2) impairs quality of life; and 3) Puts patients at risk of superinfection. Monitoring patients closely and initiating immediate skin care is recommended. However, patients forget how the rash started and when. No standard treatments exist secondary to the diversity of symptoms, variability and intermittent occurrence in relation to the cancer therapy. In addition, there is slow improvement with medical treatment. Also, patients need to make extra visits to doctor's office for skin management when in needed in addition to chemotherapy appointments. Late presentation for medical attention leading to complications, such as sepsis. We here experience a novel way of assessing and managing the skin rash using the electronic media. We suggest that electronic communication is of crucial importance to detect early, diagnose and treat anti-EGFR related skin rash in order to continue the benefit of anti-EGFR.

Brain and leptomeningeal metastases from cutaneous melanoma: survival outcomes based on clinical features.

Brain metastases (BM) are among the most devastating and debilitating complications of melanoma. This retrospective study was conducted to gain a better understanding of patient and disease characteristics that have the greatest impact on overall survival in melanoma patients with BM; therapeutic interventions were also assessed. The records of all patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma and BM who were seen at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1991 and 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. A variety of factors, including age at diagnosis of stage IV disease, gender, race, disease stage at diagnosis, presence of BM at diagnosis of stage IV disease, neurologic symptoms, radiographic findings, number of BM, status and site(s) of extracranial metastasis, and treatment modalities, were analyzed for correlation with overall survival using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. The records of 355 patients with BM were included in the analysis. On univariate analysis, seven patient and disease characteristics were significantly associated with poorer survival: age > 65 years, extracranial metastases, BM at stage IV diagnosis, neurologic symptoms, four or more BM, hydrocephalus, and leptomeningeal metastases. Of these, age, extracranial metastasis, neurologic symptoms, and number of BM were significantly associated with poorer survival in a multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis of treatment modalities suggested that patients who had surgery, radiosurgery, or chemotherapy with temozolomide had improved survival outcomes, although this analysis has limitations. The prognostic factors identified in this retrospective study should be considered when making treatment decisions for patients with BM and used as stratification factors in future clinical trials.

Phase II study of temozolomide plus pegylated interferon-alpha-2b for metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN-alpha-2b) are both active in melanoma. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in combination with pegylated IFN-alpha-2b in patients with metastatic melanoma without brain metastases was investigated. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable, American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV melanoma were enrolled in an open-label, Phase II study. The primary endpoints were tumor response and safety. Patients received temozolomide (75 mg/m2/dayx6 weeks with a 2-week break between cycles) plus concomitant subcutaneous pegylated IFN-alpha-2b (0.5 microg/kg/wk, continuously). Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (median age, 55 years) with Stage IV melanoma and a median of 3 metastatic sites were enrolled and received a median of 1 cycle (i.e., 8 weeks) of therapy (range, 0-6 cycles). Eleven patients (31%) (95% confidence interval, 16% to 47%) had an objective tumor response, including 3 with clinical complete response durations of 6 months, 20 months, and 32+ months and 8 with partial responses. Three patients with a partial or mixed response were subsequently rendered free of clinically detectable disease with surgery. The median survival was 12 months with a median follow-up among survivors of 16 months. No patient developed brain metastases while receiving study treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Hematologic toxicity consisted mainly of lymphopenia and leukopenia (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grades 1-3); no Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of temozolomide plus pegylated IFN-alpha-2b had antitumor activity and was well tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma. Therefore, further study is warranted.

Temozolomide plus thalidomide in patients with brain metastases from melanoma: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide plus thalidomide is a promising oral combination regimen for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The current Phase II study examined the efficacy and safety of this combination in chemotherapy-naive patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma and measurable brain metastases received temozolomide (75 mg/m2 per day for 6 weeks with a 2-week break between cycles) plus concomitant thalidomide (200 mg/day escalating to 400 mg/day for patients < 70 years or 100 mg/day escalating to 250 mg/day for patients > or = 70 years). The primary end point was tumor response in the brain assessed every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with a median age of 60 years were treated. All patients had progressive brain metastases: 16 were symptomatic and 25 had extensive extracranial metastases. Eight patients had received whole-brain radiotherapy, 4 had received stereotactic radiotherapy, and 8 had received craniotomy with resection of hemorrhagic lesions. Fifteen patients completed > or = 1 cycle (median, 1 cycle; range, 0-4 cycles), and 11 discontinued treatment before completing 1 cycle (7 for intracranial hemorrhage, 2 for pulmonary embolism, 1 for deep vein thrombosis, and 1 for Grade 3 rash). Of 15 patients assessable for response, 3 had a complete or partial response (12% intent to treat) and 7 had minor response or stable disease in the brain. However, 5 of these 10 patients had disease progression at extracranial sites. The median survival period was 5 months for all 26 patients and 6 months for the 15 assessable patients. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide plus thalidomide was an active oral regimen for patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma.

Phase II study of temozolomide plus thalidomide for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: To further investigate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide plus thalidomide in patients with metastatic melanoma without brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed advanced-stage metastatic melanoma were enrolled in an open-label, phase II study. The primary end point was response rate. Patients received temozolomide (75 mg/m2/d x 6 weeks with a 2-week rest between cycles) plus concomitant thalidomide (200 mg/d with dose escalation to 400 mg/d for patients < 70 years old, or 100 mg/d with dose escalation to 250 mg/d for patients >/= 70 years old). Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (median age, 62 years) with stage IV (three patients with M1a, eight with M1b, and 26 with M1c) or stage IIIc (one patient) melanoma and a median of four metastatic sites were enrolled, and received a median of two cycles of therapy. Twelve patients (32%) had an objective tumor response, including one with an ongoing complete response of 25+ months' duration and 11 with partial responses. Five patients achieving partial response with a more than 90% reduction of disease were converted to a complete response with surgery. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Median survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.05 to 19.38 months), with a median follow-up among survivors of 24.3 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of temozolomide plus thalidomide seems to be a promising and well-tolerated oral regimen for metastatic melanoma that merits further study.

Diagnosis and management of stage I/II melanoma.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical features and histologic subtypes of cutaneous melanoma; to review the diagnosis, clinical, and pathologic staging of melanoma and the associated prognostic factors; and to review the treatment and management of AJCC stage I and II melanoma. DATA SOURCES: Scientific and review articles, textbooks, and clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Management of melanoma depends on accurate diagnosis, staging, and interpretation of prognostic factors. The treatment of choice for stage I and II melanoma is surgery, ranging from simple excision to lymph node dissection. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Familiarity with the clinical features of melanoma assists nurses in the screening and early detection of melanoma. Knowledge of AJCC staging guides education regarding treatment and lifelong surveillance.