DDB2 expression lights the way for precision radiotherapy response in PDAC cells, with or without olaparib.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers. Therapeutic options for PDAC are primarily restricted to surgery in the early stages of the disease or chemotherapy in advanced disease. Only a subset of patients with germline defects in BRCA1/2 genes can potentially benefit from personalized therapy, with the PARP inhibitor olaparib serving as a maintenance treatment for metastatic disease. Although the role of radiotherapy in PDAC remains controversial, the use of radiosensitizers offers hope for improving cancer management. Previously, we have shown that damage-specific DNA binding protein 2 (DDB2) is a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response in PDAC. In this study, we investigated the function of DDB2 in radiotherapy response, with and without radiosensitization by olaparib in PDAC cells. Our findings demonstrated DDB2 resistance to radiation effects, thereby improving cell survival and enhancing the repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. We observed that DDB2 expression enhances the cell cycle arrest in the G2 phase by phosphorylating Chk1 and Chk2 cell cycle checkpoints. Additionally, we identified a novel link between DDB2 and PARP1 in the context of radiotherapy, which enhances the expression and activity of PARP1. Our findings highlight the potential of low-DDB2 expression to potentiate the radiosensitization effect of olaparib in PDAC cells. Collectively, this study provides novel insights into the impacts of DDB2 in the radiotherapy response in PDAC, enabling its employment as a potential biomarker to predict resistance to radiation. Furthermore, DDB2 represents a significant step forward in precision radiotherapy by widening the scope of patients who can be benefiting from olaparib as a radiosensitizer. Hence, this research has the potential to enrich the limited use of radiotherapy in the care of patients with PDAC.

Impact of Positive Resection Margins on Recurrence and Survival Following Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6 Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the correlation between positive resection margins and outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy according to the pivotal trial PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6. BACKGROUND: The primary focus is on elucidating the prognostic significance of specific resection margins, including those associated with the superior-mesenteric vein (SMV), medial, and posterior pancreas. METHODS: The analysis involved 400 patients across multiple centers in France and Canada. Surgical resection and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy were core interventions. This study assessed the prognostic impact of resection margins, highlighting the significance of standardized pathology assessments. Additionally, the influence of chemotherapy regimen choice, comparing gemcitabine to mFOLFIRINOX, on the implications of positive resection margins was examined. RESULTS: Only three margins, SMV (HR=1.48 95% CI [1.11;1.96], P<.001), medial (HR=1.92 95% CI [1.36;2.73], P<.001) and posterior (HR=1.65 95% CI [1.21;2.24], P=.002), had a significant prognostic impact on disease-free survival and were sufficient compared with the seven recommended margins (Kappa=0.90 95% CI [0.87; 0.94]). R1 status was significant independent prognostic factor for poorer survival in gemcitabine-treasted patients (HR=1.97 95% CI [1.23;3.16], P=.005) but lost its significance with mFOLFIRINOX (HR=1.46 95% CI [0.91;2.35], P=.114). CONCLUSIONS: All efforts should be made to evaluate the three margins of the highest prognostic value, with the others being secondary. A key finding of this study is the likely effect of mFOLFIRINOX on local invasion in operated patients, which seems to correct the impairment related to margin involvement, probably explaining the improvements in DFS and OS.

Role of molecular biology in the management of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents significant challenges in patient management due to a dismal prognosis, increasing incidence, and limited treatment options. In this regard, precision medicine, which personalizes treatments based on tumour molecular characteristics, has gained great interest. However, its widespread implementation is not fully endorsed in current recommendations. This review explores key molecular alterations in PDAC, while emphasizing differences between KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild-type tumours. It assesses the practical application of precision medicine in clinical settings and outlines potential future directions with respect to PDAC. Actionable molecular targets are examined with the aim of enhancing our understanding of PDAC molecular biology. Insights from this analysis may contribute to a more refined and personalized approach to pancreatic cancer treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Factors Associated with Myocardial Uptake on Oncologic Somatostatin PET Investigations and Differentiation from Myocardial Uptake of Acute Myocarditis.

Myocardial somatostatin PET uptake is observed not only in most patients with acute myocarditis (AM) but also in some oncology patients referred for routine somatostatin PET. This raises concerns about the specificity of somatostatin PET for detecting myocarditis. The current study aims to identify factors associated with the detection of myocardial uptake on somatostatin PET scans recorded for oncology indications and differential PET criteria that characterize myocardial uptake in AM patients. Methods: We analyzed factors associated with the detection of myocardial [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC uptake in 508 [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET scans from 178 patients, performed for confirmed or suspected oncologic disease (Onc-PET) and PET criteria that could differentiate myocardial [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC uptake in 31 patients with MRI-ascertained AM (AM-PET) from that in the Onc-PET group. Results: Significant myocardial uptake was detected in 137 (26.9%) Onc-PET scans and was independently associated with somatostatin analog treatment (exp(ß), 0.805; 95% CI, 0.728-0.890; P < 0.001) and age (exp(ß), 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001-1.009; P = 0.012). A comparable model was selected for predicting the myocardial-to-blood SUVmax ratio using somatostatin analog treatment (P < 0.001) and history of coronary artery disease (P = 0.022). Myocardial uptake was detected in 12.9% (25/193) of Onc-PET scans from patients treated with somatostatin analogs but in 43.4% (59/136) of untreated patients over the median age of 64 y. Myocardial uptake was apparent in all 31 AM-PET scans, with volume and intensity of uptake dramatically higher than in the 137 Onc-PET scans showing myocardial uptake. A myocardial-to-blood SUVmax ratio threshold of 2.20 provided a sensitivity of 87% (27/31) and a specificity of 88% (44/50) for differentiating myocardial uptake between the AM-PET group and an Onc-PET group restricted to patients with clinical characteristics comparable to those of patients in the AM-PET group (≤64 y of age, no coronary artery disease history, and no somatostatin agonists). A myocardial uptake volume threshold of 18 cm3 provided comparable diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 84% [26/31]; specificity, 94% [47/50]). Conclusion: Myocardial uptake was detected in 26.9% of somatostatin PET scans recorded for oncology indications. This rate was decreased by somatostatin analog treatments and increased in older individuals. However, somatostatin PET scans, analyzed with the quantitative criterion of uptake intensity or volume, are able to identify AM and to differentiate it from myocardial uptake of other origins.

Combining CD40 agonist mitazalimab with mFOLFIRINOX in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (OPTIMIZE-1): a single-arm, multicentre phase 1b/2 study.

BACKGROUND: Current systemic therapies for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are associated with poor outcomes with a 5-year overall survival rate under 5%. We aimed to assess the safety and antitumour activity of mitazalimab, a human CD40 agonistic IgG1 antibody, with modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX; fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan), in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: OPTIMIZE-1 was a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1b/2 study which enrolled adults with histologically-confirmed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 in 14 university hospitals in Belgium, France, and Spain. The primary endpoint of phase 1b was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of intravenous mitazalimab (450 µg/kg or 900 µg/kg) when combined with intravenous mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2). In the first 21-day treatment cycle, mitazalimab was administered on days 1 and 10, and mFOLFIRINOX on day 8. In subsequent 14-day cycles mitazalimab was administered 2 days after mFOLFIRINOX. The phase 2 primary endpoint was objective response rate. Activity and safety analyses were conducted on the full analysis set (all patients who received the combination of mitazalimab at the recommended phase 2 dose and mFOLFIRINOX for at least two treatment cycles) and safety set (all patients who received any study treatment), respectively. Enrolment is complete, and data represents a primary analysis of the ongoing trial. The trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04888312). FINDINGS: Between Sept 29, 2021, and March 28, 2023, 88 patients were screened and 70 patients were enrolled (40 [57%] were female and 30 [43%] were male). In phase 1b, 900 µg/kg mitazalimab was determined as the recommended phase 2 dose. Overall, five patients received 450 µg/kg mitazalimab; 65 received 900 µg/kg mitazalimab. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 450 µg/kg, and one dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 900 µg/kg. 57 patients were evaluated for activity, and all 70 patients were included in the safety set. At data cutoff on Nov 14, 2023, median follow-up was 12·7 months (95% CI 11·1-15·7). Of the 57 patients, 29 (51%) remained on study and 18 (32%) remained on treatment. The primary endpoint (objective response rate >30%) was met (objective response rates in 23 [40%]; one-sided 90% CI ≥32 of 57 patients). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (18 [26%] of 70 patients), hypokalaemia (11 patients [16%]), and anaemia and thrombocytopenia (eight patients [11%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 29 (41%) of 70 patients, the most common being vomiting (five [7%] of 70 patients), decreased appetite (four [6%]), and diarrhoea and cholangitis (three [4%] of 70 patients for each), none considered related to mitazalimab. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Mitazalimab with mFOLFIRINOX demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging activity, warranting continued development in a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. The results from OPTIMIZE-1 pave the way for further exploration and confirmation of a novel immunotherapy treatment regimen for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which is a complex and aggressive cancer with very low survival rates and restricted treatment options. FUNDING: Alligator Bioscience.

[Development of an artificial intelligence system to improve cancer clinical trial eligibility screening]. / Développement d'une solution d'intelligence artificielle pour améliorer le screening en recherche clinique.

INTRODUCTION: The recruitment step of all clinical trials is time consuming, harsh and generate extra costs. Artificial intelligence tools could improve recruitment in order to shorten inclusion phase. The objective was to assess the performance of an artificial intelligence driven tool (text mining, machine learning, classification…) for the screening and detection of patients, potentially eligible for recruitment in one of the clinical trials open at the "Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine". METHODS: Computerized clinical data during the first medical consultation among patients managed in an anticancer center over the 2019-2023 period were used to study the performances of an artificial intelligence tool (SAS® Viya). Recall, precision and F1-score were used to determine the artificial intelligence algorithm effectiveness. Time saved on screening was determined by the difference between the time taken using the artificial intelligence-assisted method and that taken using the standard method in clinical trial participant screening. RESULTS: Out of 9876 patients included in the study, the artificial intelligence algorithm obtained the following scores: precision of 96 %, recall of 94 % and a 0.95 F1-score to detect patients with breast cancer (n=2039) and potentially eligible for inclusion in a clinical trial. The screening of 258 potentially eligible patient's files took 20s per file vs. 5min and 6s with standard method. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that artificial intelligence could yield sizable improvements over standard practices in several aspects of the patient screening process, as well as in approaches to feasibility, site selection, and trial selection.

Association between baseline hemodynamic indices, cardiotoxicity risk, and survival in women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of breast cancer (BrCa) women monitored by low-dose equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) remains challenging to predict. AIM: This study aims to determine whether heart rate (HR)/blood pressure (BP) ratio-based indexes, previously confirmed to predict outcomes of various diseases, also predict BrCa-therapy-related cardiotoxicity and survival. METHODS: Predictors of cardiotoxicity and survival were determined among pre-therapy variables, including shock index ([SI HR/systolic BP) and age-adjusted SI (ASI), in a female BrCa cohort with normal baseline ERNA-left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RESULTS: We included 274 women with a median age of 54.8 (interquartile range: 45.5-65.4) years, 271 treated with anthracyclines and 96 with trastuzumab. During a median follow-up of 25.9 (18.6-33.5) months, 31 women developed cardiotoxicity (LVEF: <50% and ≥10% drop from baseline), and 25 died. Baseline ASI was a multivariate predictor (p < 0.001) of (i) cardiotoxicity, in association with trastuzumab treatment (p = 0.010), and LV end-diastolic volume (p = 0.001) and (ii) survival, in association with metastasis (p < 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.008). Cardiotoxicity poorly impacted survival (p = 0.064). The 36-month cardiotoxicity and mortality rates were markedly higher for patients in the upper half of baseline ASI values (ASI: >30 years min-1.mmHg-1, 16.5% and 20.7%, respectively) than in the lower half (7.6% and 4.5%, respectively, both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In BrCa women with normal baseline ERNA-LVEF, HR/BP ratio-based indexes unmask hemodynamic profiles associated with increased cardiotoxicity risk and decreased survival, highlighting the need for a comprehensive assessment of cardiac- and vascular-related risks in BrCa women monitored by ERNA. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: In a cohort of 274 women BrCa women who were monitored by ERNA for potentially cardiotoxic drugs (anthracyclines or trastuzumab) and who had no history of cardiac disease and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction before treatment, baseline indexes based on HR/BP ratios unmask hemodynamic profiles strongly associated with an increased risk of cardiotoxicity and subsequently decreased survival. Although further validations in other cohorts are needed, these findings highlight the need for a more comprehensive assessment of the cardiac- and vascular-related risk in BrCa women monitored by ERNA.

Prediction of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using the GemPred RNA Signature: An Ancillary Study of the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: GemPred, a transcriptomic signature predictive of the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM), was developed from cell lines and organoids and validated retrospectively. The phase III PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial has demonstrated the superiority of modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) over GEM as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at the expense of higher toxicity. We evaluated the potential predictive value of GemPred in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens of 350 patients were retrieved for RNA sequencing and GemPred prediction (167 in the GEM arm and 183 in the mFOLFIRINOX [mFFX] arm). Survival analyses were stratified by resection margins, lymph node status, and cancer antigen 19-9 level. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients' tumors (25.5%) were GemPred+ and were thus predicted to be gemcitabine-sensitive. In the GEM arm, GemPred+ patients (n = 50, 30%) had a significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) than GemPred- patients (n = 117, 70%; median 27.3 v 10.2 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.65]; P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; median 68.4 v 28.6 months, HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66]; P < .001). GemPred had no prognostic value in the mFFX arm. DFS and CSS were similar in GemPred+ patients who received adjuvant GEM and mFFX (median 27.3 v 24.0 months, and 68.4 v 51.4 months, respectively). The statistical interaction between GEM and GemPred+ status was significant for DFS (P = .008) and CSS (P = .004). GemPred+ patients had significantly more adverse events of grade ≥3 in the mFFX arm (76%) compared with those in the GEM arm (40%; P = .001). CONCLUSION: This ancillary study of a phase III randomized trial demonstrates that among the quarter of patients with a GemPred-positive transcriptomic signature, survival was comparable with that of mFOLFIRINOX, whereas those receiving adjuvant gemcitabine had fewer adverse events.

Diagnostic Value of an Additional Sequence (Large-Field Coronal Stir) in a Routine Lumbar Spine MR Imaging Protocol to Investigate Lumbar Radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar radiculopathy mainly originates in the spine (lumbar disc herniation or spine osteoarthritis) but can sometimes be explained by extra-spinal nerve compression or confused with referred pain mimicking radiculopathy. Our main objective was to demonstrate the clinical benefit of the large-field coronal STIR (coroSTIR) sequence in the etiological assessment of lumbar radiculopathy with a duration of more than six weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred consecutive lumbar MRI scans performed using the same protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently assessed the coroSTIR sequence for the presence of extra-spinal anomalies (ESA) that could explain or contribute to the lumbar radiculopathy. The presence of an ESA was then correlated with sex, age, topography and lateralization of radiculopathy, history of vertebral surgery, as well as the presence of a spinal cause explaining the symptoms. Extra-spinal incidentalomas (ESI) with potential clinical impact visible only on the coroSTIR sequence were also systematically reported. RESULTS: An extra-spinal cause was detected on the coroSTIR sequence in 68 cases (11.3%), mainly gluteal tendinobursitis (30.9%), congestive hip osteoarthritis (25%), degenerative sacroiliac arthropathy (14.7%), or inflammatory sacroilitis (7.3%). Their prevalence was significantly correlated in multivariate regression with age (58 years vs. 53 years, p = 0.01), but not with the type of radiating pain (sciatica or cruralgia). The presence of ESI was also frequent (70 cases, 11.7%), including some potentially severe diagnoses (38% of tumor or pseudo-tumor mass requiring further assessment or monitoring). CONCLUSIONS: Considering its acceptable acquisition time, the detection of a significant number of potentially symptom-related extra-spinal anomalies, and the discovery of a non-negligible number of extra-spinal incidentalomas with potential clinical impact, the coronal STIR should be performed systematically in routine MRI for lumbar radiculopathy.

COVID-19 Infection despite Previous Vaccination in Cancer Patients and Healthcare Workers: Results from a French Prospective Multicenter Cohort (PAPESCO-19).

In a multicenter prospective cohort of cancer patients (CP; n = 840) and healthcare workers (HCWs; n = 935) vaccinated against COVID-19, we noticed the following: i/after vaccination, 4.4% of HCWs and 5.8% of CP were infected; ii/no characteristic was associated with post-vaccine COVID-19 infections among HCWs; iii/CP who developed infections were younger, more frequently women (NS), more frequently had gastrointestinal, gynecological, or breast cancer and a localized cancer stage; iv/CP vaccinated while receiving chemotherapy or targeted therapy had (NS) more breakthrough infections after vaccination than those vaccinated after these treatments; the opposite was noted with radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or hormonotherapy; v/most COVID-19 infections occurred either during the Alpha wave (11/41 HCW, 20/49 CP), early after the first vaccination campaign started, or during the Omicron wave (21/41 HCW, 20/49 CP), more than 3 months after the second dose; vi/risk of infection was not associated with values of antibody titers; vii/the outcome of these COVID-19 infections after vaccination was not severe in all cases. To conclude, around 5% of our CPs or HCWs developed a COVID-19 infection despite previous vaccination. The outcome of these infections was not severe.