Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(1): 29-56, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37802689

RESUMEN

This article reviews research highlights in the field of thoracic anesthesia. The highlights of this year included new developments in the preoperative assessment and prehabilitation of patients requiring thoracic surgery, updates on the use of devices for one-lung ventilation (OLV) in adults and children, updates on the anesthetic and postoperative management of these patients, including protective OLV ventilation, the use of opioid-sparing techniques and regional anesthesia, and outcomes using enhanced recovery after surgery, as well as the use of expanding indications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, specialized anesthetic techniques for airway surgery, and nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia de Conducción , Anestesiología , Anestésicos , Ventilación Unipulmonar , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Ventilación Unipulmonar/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos
2.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol ; 33(1): 65-72, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31403978

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to improve patient care, a perioperative complex spine surgery management protocol was developed through collaboration between spine surgeons and neuroanesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to investigate whether implementation of the protocol in 2015 decreased total hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and complication rates after elective complex spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by review of the medical charts of patients who underwent elective complex spine surgery at an academic medical center between 2012 and 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the date of their spine surgery in relation to implementation of the spine surgery protocol; before-protocol (January 2012 to March 2015) and protocol (April 2015 to March 2017) groups. Outcomes in the 2 groups were compared, focusing on hospital and ICU LOS, and complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included in the study; 107 and 94 in the before-protocol and protocol groups, respectively. Mean (SD) hospital LOS was 14.8±10.8 days in the before-protocol group compared with 10±10.7 days in the protocol group (P<0.001). The spine surgery protocol was the primary factor decreasing hospital LOS; incidence rate ratio 0.78 (P<0.001). Similarly, mean ICU LOS was lower in the protocol compared with before-protocol group (4.2±6.3 vs. 6.3±7.3 d, respectively; P=0.011). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P=0.231). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a spine protocol reduced ICU and total hospital LOS stay in high-risk spine surgery patients.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...