Lysine-specific demethylase LSD1 regulates autophagy in neuroblastoma through SESN2-dependent pathway.

Autophagy is a physiological process, important for recycling of macromolecules and maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Defective autophagy is associated with tumorigenesis and has a causative role in chemotherapy resistance in leukemia and in solid cancers. Here, we report that autophagy is regulated by the lysine-specific demethylase LSD1/KDM1A, an epigenetic marker whose overexpression is a feature of malignant neoplasia with an instrumental role in cancer development. In the present study, we determine that two different LSD1 inhibitors (TCP and SP2509) as well as selective ablation of LSD1 expression promote autophagy in neuroblastoma cells. At a mechanistic level, we show that LSD1 binds to the promoter region of Sestrin2 (SESN2), a critical regulator of mTORC1 activity. Pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 triggers SESN2 expression that hampers mTORC1 activity, leading to enhanced autophagy. SESN2 overexpression suffices to promote autophagy in neuroblastoma cells, while loss of SESN2 expression reduces autophagy induced by LSD1 inhibition. Our findings elucidate a mechanism whereby LSD1 controls autophagy in neuroblastoma cells through SESN2 transcription regulation, and we suggest that pharmacological targeting of LSD1 may have effective therapeutic relevance in the control of autophagy in neuroblastoma.

LSD1-mediated demethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 triggers Myc-induced transcription.

Myc is a transcription factor that significantly contributes to cancer progression by modulating the expression of important genes through binding to a DNA sequence, CACGTG, called E-box. We find that on Myc binding to chromatin, the lysine-demethylating enzyme, LSD1, triggers a transient demethylation of lysine 4 in the histone H3. In addition, we demonstrate that Myc binds and recruits LSD1 to the E-box chromatin and the formation of this complex is stimulated by cAMP-PKA. Demethylation by LSD1 produces H(2)O(2), which locally oxidizes guanine and induces the recruitment of 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) and of the nuclease Ape1 on the E-box chromatin. Inhibition of oxidation or silencing of LSD1, OGG1 or Ape1 significantly reduce transcription and inhibit mRNA accumulation of Myc-target genes. Collectively, these data highlight the role of transient LSD1-mediated demethylation of H3K4 leading to local DNA oxidation as driving force in the assembly of the Myc-induced transcription initiation complex.

Transcription activation by targeted recruitment of the RNA polymerase II CTD phosphatase FCP1.

Human FCP1 in association with RNAP II reconstitutes a highly specific CTD phosphatase activity and is required for recycling RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) in vitro. Here we demonstrate that targeted recruitment of FCP1 to promoter templates, through fusion to a DNA-binding domain, stimulates transcription. We demonstrate that a short region at the C-terminus of the FCP1 protein is required and sufficient for activation, indicating that neither the N-terminal phosphatase domain nor the BRCT domains are required for transcription activity of DNA-bound FCP1. In addition, we demonstrate that the C-terminus region of FCP1 suffices for efficient binding in vivo to the RAP74 subunit of TFIIF and is also required for the exclusive nuclear localization of the protein. These findings suggest a role for FCP1 as a positive regulator of RNAP II transcription.

Distinct regions of cyclinT1 are required for binding to CDK9 and for recruitment to the HIV-1 Tat/TAR complex.

Tat-mediated activation of the HIV-1 promoter activity requires Tat-dependent recruitment of the cyclinT1/CDK9 complex (P-TEFb) to the transacting element (TAR) RNA. Tat interaction with the cyclinT1, the regulatory partner of CDK9, results in a specific recruitment of the heterodimer CycT1/CDK9 complex to TAR, whereby it promotes transcription elongation of the HIV-1 LTR-mediated transcription. Using the yeast two-hybrid protein interaction assay we analyzed the binding between cyclinT1 and CDK9. Moreover, using a modified three-hybrid yeast interaction system, we analyzed the recruitment of CycT1 to the Tat/TAR complex. The data presented here demonstrated that distinct domains of cyclinT1 interact with CDK9 and Tat/TAR in vivo. These findings will be instrumental for the designing of proper dominant-negative P-TEFb components capable to interfere with Tat function. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 36: 247-253, 2001.

Inhibition of Tat transactivation by the RNA polymerase II CTD-phosphatase FCP1.

OBJECTIVES: To asses the role of the RNAPII carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) phosphatase FCP1 on HIV-1 Tat-mediated transactivation. DESIGN: Construction of expression vectors encoding FCP1 phosphatase and analysis of their functions on Tat activity. METHODS: Basal and Tat-mediated transactivation of HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR)-driven transcription was compared, by transient transfections, in the presence of FCP1 phosphatase. Protein interactions were analysed by in vitro binding assays. RESULTS: FCP1 specifically and effectively represses Tat transactivation but not HIV-1 LTR-basal transcription. Protein interaction assays demonstrated that FCP1 specifically and directly binds Tat in vitro. CONCLUSION: The specific and efficient inhibitory function of FCP1 highlights the important role of this CTD-phosphatase in Tat-mediated transactivation, and it suggests that FCP1 might represent a specific target for modulation of Tat activity in infected cells.

Transcriptional activity of positive transcription elongation factor b kinase in vivo requires the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.

Phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is an important step in transcription and the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) has been proposed to facilitate elongation at many genes. The P-TEFb contains a catalytic subunit (Cdk9) that, in association with a cyclin subunit (cyclinT1), has the ability to phosphorylate the CTD substrate in vitro. Here, we demonstrate that cyclinT1/Cdk9-mediated transcription requires CTD-containing RNAPII, suggesting that the CTD is the major target of the cyclinT1/Cdk9 complex in vivo. Unlike Cdk7 and Cdk8, two other cyclin-dependent kinases that are capable of phosphorylating the CTD in vitro, we found that only the Cdk9 activates gene expression in a catalysis-dependent manner. Finally, unlike cyclinT1 and T2, we found that the targeted recruitment to promoter DNA of cyclinK (a recently described alternative partner of Cdk9) does not stimulate transcription in vivo. Collectively, our data strongly indicate that the P-TEFb kinase subunits cyclinT/Cdk9 are specifically involved in transcription and the CTD domain of RNAPII is the major functional target of this complex in vivo.

Class A helix-loop-helix proteins are positive regulators of several cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors' promoter activity and negatively affect cell growth.

The class A of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins are ubiquitously expressed transcription factors playing a pivotal role in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation. We determined that enforced expression of all four different mammalian members of this family, E12, E47, E2-2, and HEB, suppresses the cell colony-forming efficiency of several cell lines. To gain insights into the mechanisms by which class A bHLH factors affect cell growth, we have investigated their role in the transcriptional regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. We found that p21CIP1/ WAF1, p15INK4B, and p16INK4B promoter sequences contain E-boxes that render these genes competent for class A bHLH-mediated transcriptional activation and Id-mediated repression. The mechanism underlying the class A bHLH-mediated inhibition of cell growth does not involve an arrest of G1 progression in 293T cells. In fact, contrary to what has been found in 3T3 NIH fibroblasts, we found that enhanced expression of class A bHLH proteins led to a decreased proliferation rate by promoting cell death associated with the induction of apoptosis. These findings highlight the role of the class A bHLH proteins as general negative regulators of cell proliferation through a mechanism(s) that involves both enhancement of several cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor genes expression and promotion of cell death.

A novel member of the BTB/POZ family, PATZ, associates with the RNF4 RING finger protein and acts as a transcriptional repressor.

We have identified a novel human gene encoding a 59-kDa POZ-AT hook-zinc finger protein (PATZ) that interacts with RNF4, a mediator of androgen receptor activity, and acts as a transcriptional repressor. PATZ cDNA was isolated through a two-hybrid interaction screening using the RING finger protein RNF4 as a bait. In vitro and in vivo interaction between RNF4 and PATZ was demonstrated by protein-protein affinity chromatography and coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Such interaction occurred through a small region of PATZ containing an AT-hook DNA binding domain. Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy showed that PATZ localizes in distinct punctate nuclear regions and colocalizes with RNF4. Functional analysis was performed by cotransfection assays: PATZ acted as a transcriptional repressor, whereas its partner RNF4 behaved as a transcriptional activator. When both proteins were overexpressed a strong repression of the basal transcription was observed, indicating that the association of PATZ with RNF4 switches activation to repression. In addition, RNF4 was also found to associate with HMGI(Y), a chromatin-modeling factor containing AT-hook domains.

Differential role for Sp1/Sp3 transcription factors in the regulation of the promoter activity of multiple cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor genes.

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors play a significant role in cell cycle progression and in cellular differentiation and their expression is regulated in different cellular settings. GC-rich regions in the promoter sequences of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor genes p15INK4B and p21CIP1/WAF1 mediate the transcriptional response of these genes to extracellular stimuli. Similar GC-rich sequences in the promoter of the p15INK4A and p16INK4B gene can be targeted for transcriptional inactivation by methylation of cytosine residues. GC-rich regions represent putative target sites for binding of the ubiquitously expressed Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors. Using a combination of functional and biochemical studies, we analyzed the potential role of the Sp1 and Sp3 factors in the regulation of CDKI p15, p16, and p21 promoter activities. Using transient reporter gene assays, we determined that Sp1 is a strong activator of these promoters, whereas Sp3 functions as a weak transactivator. We have identified multiple protein-binding sites in the proximal promoter sequences of these genes by footprinting analysis. Some of these sites are bound by Sp1 and Sp3, as demonstrated by gel-shift experiments using Sp1/Sp3-specific antibodies, permitting the demonstration that a differential role exists for Sp1 and Sp3 in the regulation of the activity of these promoters.

Transcriptional regulation by targeted recruitment of cyclin-dependent CDK9 kinase in vivo.

The CDK9 kinase in association with Cyclin T is a component of the transcription positive-acting complex pTEFb which facilitates the transition from abortive to productive transcription elongation by phosphorylating the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. The Cyclin T1/CDK9 complex is implicated in Tat transactivation, and it has been suggested that Tat functions by recruiting this complex to RNAPII through cooperative binding to RNA. Here, we demonstrate that targeted recruitment of Cyclin T1/CDK9 kinase complex to specific promoters, through fusion to a DNA-binding domain of either Cyclin T1 or CDK9 kinase, stimulates transcription in vivo. Transcriptional enhancement was dependent on active CDK9, as a catalytically inactive form had no transcriptional effect. We determined that, unlike conventional activators, DNA-bound CDK9 does not activate enhancerless TATA-promoters unless TBP is overexpressed, suggesting that CDK9 acts in vivo at a step subsequent to TFIID recruitment DNA-bound. Finally, we determined that CDK9-mediated transcriptional activation is mediated by preferentially stimulating productive transcription elongation.

The CDK9-associated cyclins T1 and T2 exert opposite effects on HIV-1 Tat activity.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the functional interaction between HIV-1 Tat protein and the cyclin T1 and T2 proteins which, in association with cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)9, are the regulatory subunits of the TAK/P-TEFb cellular complex strictly required for Tat transactivation. DESIGN: HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) reporter plasmid was co-transfected into human and rodent cells with expression vectors encoding Tat and vectors encoding the cyclins T1, T2a and T2b, respectively. METHODS: Tat-mediated transactivation of HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription was compared in the presence or absence of different cyclins T (T1, T2a and T2b), upon co-transfections into human and rodent cell lines. Protein interactions were analysed by in vitro binding assays. RESULTS: It was found that Tat function in rodent cells is enhanced by co-expression of cyclin T1 but not cyclin T2. The N-terminal region (amino acids 1-290) of cyclin T1 is sufficient for this function and for binding to Tat and CDK9. Cyclin T2 binds to CDK9 but not to Tat. Moreover, enforced expression of cyclin T2 inhibits cyclin T1-mediated enhancement of Tat in rodent cells and it represses Tat activity in human cells. CONCLUSION: Efficient Tat transactivation in rodent cells occurs in the presence of human cyclin T1 but not in the presence of cyclin T2; overexpression of cyclin T2 inhibits Tat function in both rodent and human cells.

Transiently transfected and stably integrated HIV-1 LTR responds differentially to the silencing activity of the Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) transcriptional repressor domain.

It has been demonstrated previously that the transcriptional repressor domain called the Krüppel-associated box (KRAB), conserved in a large number of Krüppel-type zinc finger proteins, fused to Tat transdominant negative mutants, is able to silence HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR)-driven gene expression in transient transfection assays. In the present study chimeric Tat mutant-KRAB retroviral expression vectors were used to control HIV-1 replication in acutely infected cells. It was found that while transient and stable expression of Tat mutant-KRAB chimeric proteins represses HIV-1 LTR-driven gene transcription in transient assays, stable expression of Tat mutant-KRAB chimeric molecules does not confer resistance to HIV-1 infection in Jurkat T lymphocytic cell lines. The results provide further evidence that transient transfection may underestimate the role of chromosomal structure in transcriptional regulation and highlight the caveat of direct extrapolation of transient results for designing gene therapy strategies for efficient control of HIV-1 infection.

Transcriptional control by cell-cycle regulators: a review.

In eukaryotes, progression of the cell cycle is associated with periodic transcription activation/repression of growth-regulatory genes. We summarize here current knowledge and views on the role of critical cell-cycle regulators such as the retinoblastoma pocket family members and cyclin-dependent kinases in the regulation of gene transcription. In particular, we discuss here the role of specific cyclin-dependent kinase complexes in the regulation of basal transcription. Although the functional connections between transcription and cell-cycle regulators is far from being understood, recent progress has been made in connecting cell-cycle progression to dedicated components of the RNA polymerase II transcription apparatus complex.

Recruitment of the TATA-binding protein to the HIV-1 promoter is a limiting step for Tat transactivation.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the functional interaction between HIV-1 Tat protein and the TATA-binding protein (TBP). DESIGN: HIV long terminal repeat reporter plasmids were cotransfected into mammalian and Drosophila insect cells with expression vectors encoding Tat and vectors encoding TBP either alone or linked to an heterologous DNA-binding domain. METHODS: The activity of the different reporters was compared in the presence or absence of Tat or TBP, or both, upon cotransfections into human and Drosophila insect cell lines. RESULTS: Tat protein is unable to transactivate enhancerless HIV-1 minimal promoter bearing only the TATA box and TAR. Artificial recruitment of human TBP (hTBP) to the enhancerless HIV minimal promoter was found to trigger gene expression and coexpression of Tat resulted in a marked synergy. Tat protein cooperated with DNA-bound hTBP by inducing high levels of processive viral transcripts. Synergy between Tat and hTBP was also observed when both factors were targeted to a promoter DNA template. The functional cooperation between TBP and Tat was further demonstrated using the Drosophila Schneider SL2 cells. In these cells Tat protein alone was ineffective; however, coexpression of Drosophila TBP and Tat resulted in a trans-activating response region-dependent synergistic transactivation of basal transcription. CONCLUSION: The strong synergy between TBP and Tat in the absence of any DNA-bound activator suggests that Tat stimulates transcription in an activator-independent manner most likely by a functional interaction with general transcription factors that occurs after TBP recruitment. Thus, efficient recruitment of TBP represents a limiting step for Tat transactivation.

Retinoblastoma protein tethered to promoter DNA represses TBP-mediated transcription.

The retinoblastoma (RB) tumour suppressor protein negatively regulates cell proliferation by modulating transcription of growth-regulatory genes. Recruitment of Rb to promoters, by association with E2F complex or by fusion with heterologous DNA-binding domains, demonstrated that Rb represses directly transcription. Recent studies also suggest that the RB protein is able to repress gene transcription mediated by the RNA polymerase I and III. Since the TATA-binding protein (TBP) is an important component for transcription mediated by all three RNA polymerases, we have analysed the functional interaction between Rb and TBP in vivo in the context of RNA pol II-driven transcription. We demonstrated that in mammalian cells Rb tethered to promoter represses TBP-mediated activation in vivo, and Rb-mediated repression is reversed in the presence of the inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by trichostatin A (TSA).

Recruitment of human TBP selectively activates RNA polymerase II TATA-dependent promoters.

An increasing body of evidence suggests that eukaryotic activators stimulate polymerase II transcription by facilitating the assembly of the functional basal machinery at the promoter. Here we describe experiments that provide added support for the idea that recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP) is a rate-limiting step for transcription activation in mammalian cells. We found that, in human cell lines, recruitment of TBP to a promoter, as a GAL4-TBP fusion protein, can provide a substantial activation of transcription. Activation mediated by the hTBP, tethered to promoter DNA, is strictly dependent upon the presence of a functional TATA element, and it directs faithful transcription initiation. Interestingly, GAL4-hTBP activation was not observed from initiator (Inr) -dependent TATA-less promoters. These results suggest that TBP binding to DNA is not a rate-limiting step for the initial stages of TFIID recruitment to initiator-dependent TATA-less promoters. Finally, we provide evidence that synergy between GAL4-hTBP and defined transcription domains is restricted to activators, such as VP16 and Tat, which are likely to function at steps subsequent to the TFIID recruitment. These findings strengthen the idea that recruitment of TBP represents an important mechanism of activation of TATA-dependent promoters, and on the other hand, they suggest that TBP-DNA interactions are largely dispensable for specific transcription of initiator dependent TATA-less promoters.

A role for Sp and helix-loop-helix transcription factors in the regulation of the human Id4 gene promoter activity.

Id family helix-loop-helix (HLH) proteins are involved in the regulation of proliferation and differentiation of several cell types. To identify cis- and trans-acting factors that regulate Id4 gene expression, we have analyzed the promoter regulatory sequences of the human Id4 gene in transient transfections and gel mobility shift assays. We have identified two functional elements, both located downstream from the TATA motif, that control Id4 promoter activity. One element contains a consensus E-box, and we demonstrated that the protein complex binding to the E-box contains the bHLH-zip upstream stimulatory factor (USF) transcription factor. Enforced expression of USF1 leads to E-box-mediated stimulation of promoter activity. The E-box also mediated stimulatory effects of several bHLH transcription factors, and co-expression of Id4 blocked the stimulatory effect mediated by the bHLH factors. A second element is a GA motif, located downstream from the transcriptional start sites, mutation of which resulted in a 20-fold increase in transcriptional activity. Gel-shift analysis and transfections into Drosophila Schneider SL2 cells showed that the repressor element is recognized by both Sp1 and Sp3 factors. These data suggest that Id4 transcription control is highly complex, involving both negative and positive regulatory elements, including a novel inhibitory function exerted by Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors.

Sp3 is a bifunctional transcription regulator with modular independent activation and repression domains.

Sp3 is a member of the Sp family of transcription factors and binds to DNA with affinity and specificity comparable to that of Sp1. We demonstrate that Sp3 is a bifunctional transcription factor that can both activate and repress transcription. Gene fusion experiments in mammalian cells demonstrate that the Sp3 activation potential is distributed over an extensive glutamine-rich N-terminal region, whereas the repressor activity has been mapped in a 72-amino acid region located at the 5' of the zinc finger DNA-binding domain. We demonstrated that the repression activity is strictly dependent on the context of the DNA-binding sites bound by Sp3. We found that Sp3 represses transcription of promoters bearing multiple GAL4 DNA-binding sites, whereas it activates isogenic reporters containing a single GAL4-binding site. Transfection experiments in Drosophila cells that lack endogenous Sp activity demonstrated that Sp3 does not possess an active repression domain that can function in insect cells, rather it is a weak transcriptional activator of the c-myc promoter. Our results strongly suggest that Sp3 is a dual-function regulator whose activity is dependent upon both the promoter and the cellular context.

Negative and positive transcriptional control during cell proliferation (Review).

A significant amount of experimental evidence has demonstrated that progression of the cell cycle in mammalian cells is associated with periodic transcriptional activation/ repression of growth-regulatory genes. We summarize our current knowledge and views on the role of the critical cell cycle regulators such as the retinoblastoma proteins in transcription repression and their functional connections with various different transcription factors. In addition, we discuss the role of oncogenes such as TIF1 alpha, PML and RFL which belong to a characteristic subgroup of RING finger proteins that contain the RING finger (C3HC4 zinc finger) the B-boxes and a putative coiled-coil (RBCC configuration) as mediators of transcription repression.

Transcriptional regulation by the Sp family proteins.

Sp1 is one of the very first cellular transcription factors to be identified and cloned in virtue of its binding to a G-rich motif in the SV40 early promoter. Sp1 protein binds to the G-rich sequences present in a variety of cellular and viral promoters and stimulates their transcriptional activity. Recently, a number of other GC and/or GT box-binding factors homologous to Sp1 have been isolated, namely Sp2, Sp3 and Sp4, and the two more distantly related factors, BTEB and BTEB2. The discovery of this family highlights a previously unknown level of complexity of transcriptional regulation of promoters containing GC and/or GT box motifs. This review focuses primarily on strategies aimed to elucidate the transcription properties of the Sp1-like factors and discusses the experimental problems inherent in the attempt to define their respective functions.