Association Between Non-spinal Comorbid Medical Conditions and Neuropathic Low Back Pain. - A Further Unravelling of Pain Complexities in the Context of Back Pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Understanding the complex nature of low back pain (LBP) is crucial for effective management. The PainDETECT questionnaire is a tool that distinguishes between neuropathic (NeP) and nociceptive (NoP) low back pain. Traditionally NeP and NoP have been primarily attributed to patho-anatomical abnormalities within the lumbar spine. However, increasing evidence points to multifaceted involvement, encompassing a range of physical, biomechanical, chemical, and psychosocial factors. The study aimed to determine the independent relationship between NeP as assessed by the PainDETECT questionnaire and non-spinal comorbid medical conditions. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 400 patients suffering from chronic LBP (>6months), aged >18 years, who complete the PainDETECT questionnaire and provided responses regarding the presence of any comorbid conditions. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyse the confounding status of comorbid medical conditions and pain severity measured by NRS to determine independent relationships between specific conditions and neuropathic pain. RESULTS: The study included 143 and 257 patients suffering from NeP and NoP, respectively. The NeP group had a 38% higher mean numerical rating scale score compared to the NoP group (8.10 ± 1.55 vs 5.86± 2.26, P < 0.001). The odds of developing NeP were 2.9 Exp(B) = 2.844, 95%C.I. [1.426-5.670], P < 0.01), 2.7 (Exp(B) = 2.726, 95%C.I. [1.183-6.283], P < 0.05) and 2.8 (Exp(B) = 2.847, 95%C.I. [1.473-5.503], P < 0.05) times higher in patients suffering from gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression, respectively. CONCLUSION: NeP as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, is associated with gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression. This pioneering study has shed light on the potential involvement of the gut microbiome as a common factor connecting non-spinal comorbidities and NeP. These findings underscore the importance of formulating personalized management plans tailored to individual pain and medical profiles, rather than relying on a blanket approach to pain management.

Low back pain classifications and their associations with disability, quality-of-life, and sociodemographic factors: a comprehensive examination using the PainDETECT questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a debilitating phenomenon that significantly impacts quality-of-life (QoL). The PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) is a screening tool aimed at distinguishing nociceptive pain (NoP) and neuropathic pain (NeP) classifications. Associations between these classifications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and sociodemographic parameters are yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the relationship between NeP as assessed by the PD-Q and pain, disability, QoL, and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of an ongoing prospectively collected database was conducted involving 512 patients aged >18 years who presented to a tertiary spine clinic for LBP having completed the PainDETECT questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol Five-Dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire, or answered questions regarding sociodemographic status. RESULTS: The NeP group had a higher mean numerical rating scale (NRS) score (7.96±1.54 vs. 5.76±2.27, p <.001) and lower age (55±15.6 vs. 59±17.8, p <.05) compared to the NoP group. When confounded for NRS, analysis of covariance demonstrated an 89.5% higher total ODI score (p <.001) and 50.5% lower EQ-5D utility score (p <.001) in the NeP compared to NoP group. Smokers and individuals with a no partner marital status were 2.373 (OR = 2.373, 95% CI = 1.319-4.266, p <.01) and 2.384 times (OR = 2.384, 95% CI = 1.390-4.092, p <.01) more likely to have NeP compared to NoP, respectively. Patients with NeP were also of lower income class compared to patients with NoP (Z = -2.45, p <.05). CONCLUSION: NeP was associated with higher levels of disability and lower QoL. Smokers, individuals with a no partner marital status, and individuals with a lower income class were more likely to suffer NeP rather than NoP. These findings have illuminated a crucial notion: in patients with elevated NRS, the detrimental impact of NeP on patient wellbeing underscores the fundamental need to represent pain on a nociceptive-neuropathic continuum, permitting more accurate differentiation of pain components.

The voice of the second-level regulated nursing role: a qualitative approach.

BACKGROUND: With an international nursing shortage, there is a need to navigate towards an improved nursing workforce structure where each nursing role is valued and recognised for the work they contribute. The second-level regulated nursing role is seen as integral; however, there is role confusion, especially with the registered nurse, and high attrition. To implement strategies to retain an integral nursing workforce, there is a need to better understand the role from the experiences and expectations of the second-level regulated nursing role. AIM: To gain a better understanding of the second-level regulated nursing role in the Australian nursing workforce. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study from a larger mixed methods study. METHOD: Five focus groups in 2018. The findings were analysed through the lens of organisational behaviour. RESULTS: The findings identified that enrolled nurses' intrinsic and extrinsic motivators influenced levels of job satisfaction and sense of feeling valued. The findings also identified key determinants that influence job satisfaction and occupational stress: enrolled nurses' understanding of their role and scope of practice; the registered nurses' understanding of the enrolled nurses' role and their role when working with the enrolled nurse; and the organisation's understanding and recognition of their role. When these determinants align, there is job satisfaction, less occupational stress and enrolled nurses feel valued. At a professional level, the title does not reflect the role, and there are no career pathways. CONCLUSION: This study explained why recurrent challenges impact the role and what contributes to those in the role feeling valued. Challenges that affect job satisfaction and occupational stress for the second-level (enrolled) nurse are related to the working environment and with whom the nurse works. From a professional level, there are limited career opportunities that recognise and retain the enrolled nurse in their role.

Nociceptive pain assessed by the PainDETECT questionnaire may predict response to opioid treatment for chronic low back pain.

Introduction: The pharmacological management of chronic low back pain (LBP) is complex. The World Health Organisation recommends a laddered approach to pain medication usage. The PainDETECT questionnaire distinguishes between neuropathic pain (NeP), nociceptive pain (NoP), and ambiguous pain. By elucidating the difference in medication efficacy between these groups, clinicians can provide a tailored treatment plan to manage patient's pain. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pharmacological treatments, pain categorizations, and medication efficacy as reported by patients. Methods: A secondary retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was conducted involving 318 consecutively recruited patients, aged 18 years and above, who completed PainDETECT, medication history and patient reported medication efficacy questionnaires. Medication history was categorized into four lines of treatment: first line (paracetamol ± non-prescribed anti-inflammatories), second line (prescribed anti-inflammatories), third line (anticonvulsants/neuromodulators) and fourth line (opioids). Medication efficacy was measured using a three-point Likert scale: effective (+2), somewhat effective (+1), no effect (0). Findings: The study included 120, 50, 54 and 94 patients on first line, second line, third line and fourth line treatment, respectively. The NeP group had higher mean numerical rating scale (NRS) compared to NoP group in all four lines of treatment (8.10 ± 1.59 vs. 5.47± 2.27, p < 0.001, 8.64± 1.43 vs. 5.52± 1.86, p < 0.001, 8.00± 1.07 vs. 6.37± 2.39, p < 0.01, and 8.05± 1.73 vs. 7.2± 1.29, p < 0.05). When confounding for severity of LBP as measured by NRS, the distribution of medication efficacy significantly differed amongst the NeP, ambiguous and NoP groups in patients undergoing fourth line pharmacological treatment (r2 = 8.623, p < 0.05). The NoP group exhibited significantly higher medication efficacy compared to the NeP group (U = 14.038, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in medication efficacy across the pain classifications for first, second- and third-line treatment. Interpretation: Opioids was the only line of treatment more effective in targeting NoP, as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, compared to NeP. This pioneering study illustrates the complex nature of pharmacological management for chronic LBP. It underscores the importance of tailoring pharmacological treatment plans to fit individual pain profiles and expectations instead of adopting a blanket approach to pain management.

In subjects with chronic low back pain, does neuropathia exclusively correlated to neuronal compression? A correlation study of PainDETECT questionnaire and corresponding MRI and X-ray findings.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the complex nature of low back pain (LBP) is crucial for effective management. The PainDETECT questionnaire is a tool that distinguishes between neuropathic (NeP), nociceptive (NoP), and ambiguous pain. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pain classification and lumbar intervertebral degenerative parameters obtained from imaging. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted involving 279 patients, aged 18 years and above, who completed PainDETECT questionnaires and underwent lumbar MRI and/or X-ray scans. RESULTS: The study included 102 patients with NoP, 78 with ambiguous pain, and 99 with NeP. The NeP group had lower mean age (58.21 vs. 53.63, p < 0.05) and higher mean numerical rating scale score (7.9 vs. 5.9, p < 0.001) compared to the NoP group. A negative correlation was found between PainDETECT scores and pelvic incidence (τ = - 0.177, p = 0.043). The NeP group exhibited significantly higher severity of foraminal stenosis (U = 18.962, p = 0.002), spinal stenosis (U = 14.481, p = 0.005), and Pfirrmann grade (U = 14.221, p = 0.028) compared to the NoP group. A higher proportion of NeP patients had intervertebral disk bulge (96% vs. 78% vs. 78%, p = 0.002) and high-intensity zones (51% vs. 41% vs. 19%, p < 0.001) compared to those with NoP and ambiguous pain. CONCLUSION: NeP, as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, is associated with more severe neural compression, increased presence of discogenic disease and inflammatory disk severity, and decreased pelvic incidence. This pioneering study establishes a connection between pathological findings and pain categorization, providing clinicians with valuable guidance for formulating tailored management plans and reducing the need for unnecessary pharmacotherapy, imaging, and non-targeted surgical interventions.

A confirmatory factor analysis of an electronic format painDETECT questionnaire for patients with low back pain.

BACKGROUND: The substantial burden of low back pain on patients and healthcare systems is exacerbated by unclear pathology and ineffective diagnostic methods, hindering effective management. The painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) has been used to facilitate the evaluation and categorization of low back pain. While preliminary validation and translations of the paper-based format of PD-Q into languages such as Spanish and Dutch have been accomplished, the underlying factor model inherent to the electronic format of the PD-Q remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to utilise confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to investigate the factor structure of an electronic format PD-Q among patients with neuropathic low back pain. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a Spinal Clinic in Sydney between November 2020 and October 2022. Eligible participants were adults over 18 with low back pain and no history of lumbar surgery or systemic co-morbidities. Participants completed the electronic format of the PD-Q, and CFA was employed to assess the validity of the suggested two-factor, nine-item structure. Recommended cut-offs for goodness-of-fit indices were used to evaluate the model fit. RESULTS: Of the 236 patients that visited the clinic during the data collection period, 142 (71, 50% female, mean age 51.26 ± 15.28 years) participated in the study. Median pain severity was 9/10 over 4 weeks. CFA indicated strong model fit, with goodness-of-fit and comparative fit indices over 0.9, and overall internal consistency was 0.77. Construct validity analysis demonstrated the PD-Q's effectiveness in distinguishing neuropathic, mixed, and nociceptive LBP, aiding neuropathic pain evaluation in low back pain patients. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the reliability and two-factor structure of the electronic PD-Q for neuropathic pain assessment in low back pain patients. To enhance comprehension of the clinical applicability of the electronic format PD-Q, future research should conduct clinimetric evaluations.

Registered Nurses' beliefs about end-of-life care: A mixed method study.

AIMS: To examine registered nurses' (RNs) behavioural, normative and control beliefs about end-of-life care for patients who are diagnosed with advanced and life-limiting illnesses; and to identify the barriers and facilitators they experience when providing end-of-life care. DESIGN: A sequential explanatory mixed methods study. METHOD: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Care for Terminally Ill Patient tool among 1293 RNs working across five hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Online individual semi-structured interviews with a subgroup of survey respondents were then undertaken. Data were collected between October 2020 to February 2021. RESULTS: A total of 415 RNs completed the online survey, with 16 of them participating in individual interviews. Over half of the participants expressed the belief that end-of-life care is most efficiently delivered through multidisciplinary team collaboration. The majority of participants also believed that discussing end-of-life care with patients or families leads to feelings of hopelessness. Paradoxically, the study revealed that more than half of the participants held the negative belief that patients at the end of life should optimally receive a combination of both curative and palliative care services. The results showed that nurses' beliefs were significantly associated with their age, religion, ward type, level of education and frequency of providing end-of-life care. Data from the qualitative interviews identified four themes that explored RNs' beliefs and its related factors. The four themes were 'holistic care', 'diversity of beliefs', 'dynamics of truth-telling' and 'experiences of providing end-of-life care.' IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Wherever possible, patients at the end-of-life should be cared for in specialist settings by multidisciplinary teams to ensure effective, high-quality care. Where this is not possible, organisations should ensure that teams of multidisciplinary staff, including nurses, receive education and resources to support end-of-life care in non-specialist settings. Hospitals that employ foreign-trained nurses should consider providing targeted education to enhance their cultural competence and reduce the impact of different beliefs on end-of-life care.

The impact of safety culture, quality of care, missed care and nurse staffing on patient falls: A multisource association study.

AIMS: To examine the association between nursing unit safety culture, quality of care, missed care and nurse staffing levels, and inpatient falls using two data sources: incidence of falls and nurses' perceptions of fall frequency in their units. The study explores the association between the two sources of patient falls and identifies if nurses' perceptions of patient fall frequency reflect the actual patient falls recorded in the incident management system. BACKGROUND: Inpatient falls are associated with severe complications that result in extended hospitalisation and increased financial consequences for patients and healthcare services. DESIGN: A multi-source cross-sectional study guided by the STROBE guidelines. METHODS: A purposive sample of 33 nursing units (619 nurses) from five hospitals completed an online survey from August to November 2021. The survey measured safety culture, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing levels and nurses' perceptions of patient fall frequency. In addition, secondary data on falls from participating units between 2018 and 2021 were also collected. Generalised linear models were fitted to examine the association between study variables. RESULTS: Nursing units with strong safety climate and working conditions and lower missed care were associated with lower rates of falls using both data sources. Nurses' perceptions of the frequency of falls in their units were reflective of the actual incidence rate of falls, but the association was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Nursing units with a strong safety climate and better collaborations between nurses and other professionals, including physicians and pharmacists, were associated with lower incidents of patient falls. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provided evidence for healthcare services and hospital managers to minimise patient falls. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients who had experienced a fall, which was reported in the incident management system, from the included units in the five hospitals were part of this study.

Healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care units: A multisource study examining nurses' safety attitudes, quality of care, missed care, and nurse staffing.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between safety attitudes, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing levels, and the rate of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) in adult intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in five hospitals. Nurses completed a validated survey on safety attitudes, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing levels, and the frequency of HAIs. Secondary data were collected on the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in participating units. Descriptive analysis and generalized linear models were performed. RESULTS: A total of 314 nurses from eight ICUs participated in this study. The mean safety culture score was 60.85 (SD = 3.53). ICUs with strong job satisfaction had lower incidence and nurse-reported frequency of CLABSI, CAUTI, and VAP. Missed care was common, with 73.11% of nurses reporting missing at least one required care activity on their last shift. The mean patient-to-nurse ratio was 1.95. Increased missed care and higher workload were associated with higher HAIs. Nurses' perceptions of CLABSI and VAP frequency were positively associated with the actual occurrence of CLABSI and VAP in participating units. CONCLUSION: Positive safety culture and better nurse staffing levels can lower the rates of HAIs in ICUs. Improvements to nurse staffing will reduce nursing workloads, which may reduce missed care, increase job satisfaction, and, ultimately, reduce HAIs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Higher levels of job satisfaction among ICU nurses, lower proportions of missed nursing care and higher nurse staffing are associated with lower rates of HAIs. Nurse-reported HAI frequency was positively associated with the incidence of HAIs; therefore, nurses provide reliable data on infection control outcomes in ICU settings.

Registered Nurses' attitudes towards end-of-life care: A sequential explanatory mixed method study.

AIMS: To examine registered nurses' attitudes about end-of-life care and explore the barriers and facilitators that influence the provision of high-quality end-of-life care. DESIGN: A sequential explanatory mixed methods research design was used. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to 1293 registered nurses working in five different hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Frommelt Attitudes Towards Care of the Dying Scale was used to assess nurses' attitudes towards end-of-life care. Following the survey, a subset of registered nurses were interviewed using individual semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-one registered nurses completed the online survey, and 16 of them participated in individual interviews. Although nurses reported positive attitudes towards caring for dying patients and their families in most items, they identified negative attitudes towards talking with patients about death, their relationship with patients' families and controlling their emotions. The individual interview data identified the barriers and facilitators that registered nurses experience when providing end-of-life care. Barriers included a lack of communication skills and family and cultural and religious resistance to end-of-life care. The facilitators included gaining support from colleagues and patients' families. CONCLUSION: This study has identified that while registered nurses hold generally favourable attitudes towards end-of-life care, they have negative attitudes towards talking with patients and families about death and managing their emotional feelings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Education providers and leaders in healthcare settings should consider developing programmes for undergraduate nurses and nurses in clinical practice to raise awareness about the concept of death in a cross-section of cultures. Nurses' attitudes towards dying patients will be enhanced with culture-specific knowledge which will also enhance communication and coping methods. REPORTING METHOD: This study used the Mixed Methods Article Reporting Standards (MMARS).

Predicting behavioural intentions towards medication safety among student and new graduate nurses across four countries.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify final-year undergraduate students and new graduate nurses' behavioural intentions towards medication safety across four countries. BACKGROUND: Medication errors are a common and avoidable occurrence, being costly for not only patients but also for health systems and society. DESIGN: A multi-site cross-sectional study. METHODS: A self-administered survey was distributed to students and new graduate nurses in South Africa, India, Turkey and Australia. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all survey items. Multiple linear regressions were performed to predict behavioural intentions using the three Theory of Planned Behaviour constructs: attitudes, behavioural control and subjective norms. This study adheres to the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 432 students and 576 new graduate nurses. Across all countries, new graduate nurses reported significantly higher scores on all the TPB variables compared with student nurses. Attitudes towards medication management were found significantly and positively related to intention to practice safe medication management for both student and new graduate nurses. Total perceived behavioural control was significantly and negatively related to intention to practice safe medication management for students. CONCLUSION: Student and new graduate nurses showed favourable attitude, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control and intention in practising medication safety. However, differences in countries require further exploration on the factors influencing attitudes towards medication safety among student nurses and new nurse graduates. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Understanding student and new graduate nurses' medication administration practices is important to inform strategies aimed at improving patient safety. The findings of this study highlight the need for an internationally coordinated approach to ensure safe medication administration by student and new graduate nurses.

Job satisfaction among small rural hospital nurses: A cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To explore the relationships between job satisfaction, community satisfaction, practice environment, burnout, and intention to leave of nurses working in Australian small rural hospitals. DESIGN: A national cross-sectional survey of 383 nurses from Australian rural public hospitals of less than 99 beds during 2018. METHODS: Job satisfaction was measured on a four-point Likert scale. Factors associated with community satisfaction, practice environment, burnout and intention to leave were analyzed using multiple linear regression to explore the predictors of job satisfaction. FINDINGS: Overall job satisfaction was positive, with most nurses moderately (n = 146, 38.1%) or very satisfied (n = 107, 27.9%) with their current job. Emotional exhaustion, nurse manager ability, leadership and support of nurses were the most significant predictors of job satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study provides new insight into the factors impacting the job satisfaction of nurses working in rural hospitals. The knowledge gained is important to inform strategies to retain nurses in rural areas and, in turn, ensure rural communities have access to quality health care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The impact of nurses' job satisfaction on burnout, patient safety, and intention to leave is well recognized; however, there is limited understanding of job satisfaction in a rural hospital context. This study provides an understanding of the factors that impact job satisfaction of nurses working in small rural hospitals and highlights the importance of improving the practice environment to reduce the high attrition rates of this workforce.

Safety culture, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing and their impact on pressure injuries: A cross-sectional multi-source study.

Background: Safety culture is known to influence patient outcomes, but the relationship between nursing units' safety cultures and the development of pressure injuries in acute care hospitals is unclear. Pressure injuries are a nursing-sensitive patient outcome and are widely considered preventable. Objective: To examine the impact of unit safety culture, nursing unit characteristics, and missed care on pressure injury rates in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Design: A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted between August and November 2021 and compared to secondary data on the incidence of pressure injuries. Settings/Participants: A total of 653 nurses from 35 units in five Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia participated in this study. Methods: The survey included validated scales of safety culture, nurse staffing, and nurses' perceptions of quality of care, missed care, and the frequency of pressure injury. Secondary data on pressure injuries were collected from the Ministry of Health administrative database between 2018 and 2021. Descriptive analysis and Generalized Linear Models were performed. Results: Higher safety culture scores were associated with fewer pressure injuries (ß = -2.000, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -3.107, -0.893) and lower nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries in their unit (ß = -1.224, 95% CI -2.255, -0.192). High scores on the sub-scales of hospital management (ß = -2.105, 95% CI -2.835, -1.375) and safety climate (ß = -1.402, 95% CI -2.383, -0.421) were the most statistically significant predictor for pressure injury prevention. Higher frequency of missed nursing care was positively associated with higher rates of pressure injuries (ß = 1.606, 95% CI 0.187, 3.024) and higher nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries (ß = 1.243, 95% CI 0.211, 2.363). There was a positive relationship between higher nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injury and higher incidence rate of pressure injury as reported in the incident management system (ß = 1.183, 95% CI 0.065, 2.301). Conclusion: Nursing units with stronger safety climate and safety behavior scores, higher ratings of hospital and unit quality of care, and lower levels of missed nursing care were associated with lower incidence of pressure injury and nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injury in their units. Nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries are concordant with the incidence of pressure injuries and can be a valid measure to capture patient outcomes within a specific time. Tweetable abstract: High safety culture and lower missed care are linked to fewer pressure injuries in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Nurses' perceptions of pressure injury frequency aligned with reported incidence rates, indicating a valid measure of patient outcomes.

Developing a self-administered questionnaire: methods and considerations.

BACKGROUND: Using a structured process to develop a self-administered questionnaire provides a robust tool for collecting data that enhances the credibility of the results. Describing this process mitigates any complexity and confusion for the nurse researcher which can be generated by many sources of information that either lack detail or have complex statistical approaches. AIM: To discuss the development of a self-administered questionnaire with a focus on face, content, construct validity and reliability testing. DISCUSSION: Adopting a well-established, sequential, five-step approach ensures that important concepts of questionnaire development are addressed: assessing existing tools and qualitative data, if available; drafting of the questionnaire with consideration for question styles, comprehension, acquiescent bias and face validity; expert panel review to establish content validity and inter-rater reliability; pilot testing to assess construct validity; and exploratory factor analysis to establish reliability testing. This approach results in a robust and credible tool for collecting data. CONCLUSION: This article provides nurse researchers with a structured process for developing self-administered questionnaires. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Investing time and effort to assess a newly developed questionnaire for validity and reliability and consider question styles, comprehension and acquiescent bias results in an improved and strengthened tool for collecting data. This in turn enhances the quality and credibility of a study's findings.

Exploring the role of the second-level regulated nurse in the Australian nursing workforce: an integrative review.

BACKGROUND: The enrolled nurse is the second-level regulated nursing role in Australia and internationally. Reports and research indicate that the nursing profession requires greater understanding of the role, so it can be utilised to its potential. AIM: To explore issues that may impact the EN role in the Australian nursing workforce. DESIGN: An integrative review. METHODS: A seven-step framework was used to review scholarly papers, government documents, and grey literature. RESULTS: Three themes from 24 documents were identified: understanding the EN's scope of practice, standardised practice, and career development. DISCUSSION: A lack of understanding of their scope of practice creates role confusion and a lack of standardised practice, with an expected progression to become a registered nurse. These factors contribute to ENs' not feeling valued. CONCLUSION: The nursing profession do not understand the enrolled nurse role, and further work is required to value its place in the Australian nursing workforce.

Registered nurses' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about end-of-life care in non-specialist palliative care settings: A mixed studies review.

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe, evaluate and synthesise the literature on registered nurses' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care in adult non-specialist palliative care settings. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of Registered Nurses working in non-specialist palliative care settings about end-of-life care. DESIGN: A mixed-methods systematic review and narrative synthesis was conducted (PROSPERO Registration No: CRD4202148114). Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science) were searched from inception to August 2020. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Registered nurses in non-specialist palliative care settings demonstrated good knowledge of pain symptoms and management and positive attitudes towards caring for dying patients and their families. Knowledge deficits were identified in the psychosocial and spiritual aspects of end-of-life care and registered nurses reported negative attitudes towards communication about death. Only five of the included studies explored registered nurses' beliefs towards end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to enhance palliative care education in clinical practice settings and in undergraduate programs to improve registered nurses' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about end-of-life care. Future studies that use reliable and validated methods to measure registered nurses' beliefs about end-of-life care should be conducted. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: RNs in non-specialist palliative care settings want more education on pain management & greater knowledge on communicating about death/dying.

Systematic review: Nurses' safety attitudes and their impact on patient outcomes in acute-care hospitals.

AIMS: The aim of this review was to synthesize the best available evidence on the impact of nurses' safety attitudes on patient outcomes in acute-care hospitals. DESIGN: Systematic review with a narrative synthesis of the available data. DATA SOURCES: Data sources included MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies published up to March 2021 were included. REVIEW METHODS: This review was conducted using guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute for Systematic Reviews and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 3,452 studies were identified, and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Nurses with positive safety attitudes reported fewer patient falls, medication errors, pressure injuries, healthcare-associated infections, mortality, physical restraints, vascular access device reactions and higher patient satisfaction. Effective teamwork led to a reduction in adverse patient outcomes. Most included studies (N = 6) used variants of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture to assess nurses' safety attitudes. Patient outcomes data were collected from four sources: coded medical records data, incident management systems, nurse perceptions of adverse events and patient perceptions of safety. CONCLUSION: A positive safety culture in nursing units and across hospitals resulted in fewer reported adverse patient outcomes. Nurse managers can improve nurses' safety attitudes by promoting a non-punitive response to error reporting and promoting effective teamwork and good communication.

Strength of Improvement Recommendations From Injurious Fall Investigations: A Retrospective Multi-Incident Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the strength of improvement recommendations proposed after investigation of fall incidents in health care facilities that result in major injuries. METHODS: This study was conducted using a retrospective multi-incident analysis design. The study setting was 4 tertiary teaching hospitals, 1 subacute rehabilitation facility, and a residential aged care facility in a metropolitan health district in New South Wales, Australia. Ninety-eight injurious fall incidents during a 2-year period (2015-2016) were investigated. Recommendations were grouped into 3 categories: strong (including environmental modifications, equipment, workflow or process redesign), medium (including changes in communication or documentation processes, staffing numbers and/or skill mix, education to address identified knowledge deficits), and weak (including alerts/warning/labels or expected practice without any associated policy or procedure). RESULTS: The majority of the incidents (34.7%; n = 34) occurred between 1300 and 1859 hours, 65.3% (n = 64) occurred in the patient's room, and 79.4% (n = 81) of the injuries were fractures. There were 224 recommendations made for 79 incidents, and 19 incidents did not have any recommendations. The average number of improvement recommendations proposed per incident investigation was 2.3 (SD, 2.1; range, 0-9). Nineteen (8.5%), 80 (35.7%), and 125 (55.8%) recommendations were classified as strong, medium, and weak, respectively. Half of the investigative teams included representatives from more than one professional group. There were a significantly greater number of medium recommendations made by multi-disciplinary teams compared with single-disciplinary teams (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.21). There was no significant difference in the number of strong and weak recommendations made between the 2 teams. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that only 8.5% of recommendations were classified as strong. This suggests that a major challenge lies in formulating robust recommendations; hence, efforts should focus on enhancing the strength of improvement recommendations.

Nursing Students' Intention to Report Medication Errors: Application of Theory of Planned Behavior.

BACKGROUND: Reporting, investigating, and full disclosure of medication errors (MEs) is a fundamental component of patient safety. Therefore, determining nursing students' intention to report MEs is important. PURPOSE: This study examined the factors related to nursing students' intention to report MEs and the use of the Turkish version of the Theory of Planned Behavior Medication Safety Questionnaire (TPB-MSQ-T). METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used with a sample of 227 undergraduate nursing students in Istanbul, Turkey. Students' intentions to report MEs were measured using an online TPB-MSQ-T. Quantitative analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Attitudes and perceived behavioral control (PBC) were significant predictors of intention to report MEs (P = .05 and P = .01, respectively), but subjective norms did not predict it (P = .11). The Cronbach's α of the questionnaire was 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: Attitude and PBC are important determinants of nursing students' intention to report MEs. The TPB-MSQ-T can be used for identifying the main determinants of intention to report MEs.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of multidimensional pain assessment tools used in postoperative adult patients: a systematic review of measurement properties.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the best available evidence relating to the measurement properties of the multidimensional pain assessment tools used to assess postoperative pain in adults. INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common and poorly managed occurrence in patients during the postoperative period. Currently, postoperative pain is usually evaluated with assessment tools that measure one dimension of pain, namely pain intensity, resulting in inadequate management of postoperative pain. It is important to understand the complex nature of pain by considering all dimensions for optimal postoperative pain management. Systematic, robust evidence is lacking regarding the most psychometrically reliable and valid multidimensional pain assessment tool for adult postoperative patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This systematic review considered all study types for inclusion. Studies were considered if they assessed the measurement properties of a multidimensional pain assessment tool in adult postoperative patients within two weeks post-surgery. The outcomes included measurement of at least one of the psychometric properties, including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. METHODS: A three-step search strategy was undertaken, including a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and CINAHL databases performed in October 2019. We also searched Dissertation Abstracts International, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished studies. The title and abstracts of the studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the potential studies was assessed independently by three reviewers using the COSMIN checklist. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving five multidimensional postoperative pain assessment tools were included in the review: American Pain Society Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-Revised; Brief Pain Inventory; Houston Pain Outcome Instrument; McGill Pain Questionnaire; and the Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management Postoperative Pain Questionnaire. The two most commonly used tools were the Brief Pain Inventory and the American Pain Society Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-Revised, which were assessed in six studies each. The included studies mainly reported internal consistency reliability, with four of the five identified tools demonstrating high Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.72 to 0.92. However, the Houston Pain Outcome Instrument demonstrated mixed findings, with eight of the nine subscales having moderate to high reliability while the expectations about pain subscale had poor reliability (α=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This review provides much needed information about the current tools used in many clinical, educational, and research settings. Of the five tools included in this review, the Brief Pain Inventory demonstrated strong evidence of psychometric validity and is recommended for use in assessing postoperative pain. Further psychometric validation of multidimensional postoperative pain assessment tools with emphasis on responsiveness and measurement error is required in order to accurately assess the minimal clinically important difference in postoperative pain outcomes.