RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current standard of local treatment for patients with localized breast cancer (BC) includes whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Ultrahypofractionated WBI schemes (1-week treatment) were shown not to be inferior to the standard WBI. Tumor bed boost using photon intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is safe and feasible in combination with standard WBI. The aim of the present study is to assess, for the first time, the feasibility and safety of combining photon IORT with ultrahypofractionated WBI. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with low-risk early BC candidates for BCS were included in this prospective study. IORT was administered at a dose of 20 Gy to the surface's applicator, and WBI was administered 3-5 weeks after surgery at a total dose of 26 Gy in five consecutive days. RESULTS: From July 2020 to December 2022, seventy-two patients diagnosed with low-risk early BC and treated in our institution were included in this prospective study. All patients completed the proposed treatment, and no severe acute or late grade 3 toxicity was observed 3 and 12 months after WBI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm for the first time that the combination of ultrafractionation WBI and photon-IORT after BCS is a feasible and safe option in patients with early BC.
RESUMEN
Patients with an early carcinoma of the breast are commonly treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiotherapy. Partial-breast irradiation has gained acceptance in the last few years. Between December 2008 and December 2017, 182 low-risk breast cancer patients treated by BCS in the four university hospitals of the province of Las Palmas and treated with APBI using interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy were included in this study. After a mean follow-up for survivors of 10 years, the treatment was shown to be safe, as no severe acute/late toxicity (grade ≥ 3) was observed. The 10-year IBTR was 1.7% (95%CI: 0.7-2.7%), and the cause-specific survival was 94.9% (95%CI: 93.2-96.6%). We suggest that multicatheter brachytherapy after BCS is safe and effective in early breast cancer patients.
RESUMEN
The European population is strongly affected by cancer. Radiotherapy is roughly used in 50% of cancer patients in European countries. The increased cancer burden demands a new generation of radiation/clinical oncologist (RO/CO) that, besides a strong evidence-based oncological knowledge, will be ready for leadership in cancer care. The mutual recognition of professional qualifications of Radiation/Clinical Oncology in the EU needs training harmonization. The European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Union for Medical Specialties (UEMS) made important efforts toward a European Common Curriculum for RO/CO leadership in cancer care. If qualifications are mutually recognized, the training supporting these qualifications should be also harmonized. Since 1991, ESTRO produced several editions of the Core Curriculum in Radiation Oncology (1991, 2004, 2012, 2019). These Core Curricula were endorsed as European Training Requirements by the UEMS in 2004, 2013, and 2019. A core curriculum for clinical oncology was also produced to provide this harmonization tool to countries where radiation oncology is practiced inside the broader specialty of clinical oncology. New initiatives are in place to continuously adapt the training programs to the rapidly evolving cancer care organization.
RESUMEN
Background: Intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is usually treated by a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and a short course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT is associated with multiple side effects, including weight gain, loss of libido, and hot flashes. In contrast, anti-androgen monotherapy is generally better tolerated in spite of higher rates of gynecomastia. Objective: This study assessed the effectiveness of enzalutamide monotherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT (Hypo-EBRT) for treating intermediate risk prostate cancer. Method: This trial was a multicenter, open-label phase II study of 6 months of enzalutamide monotherapy combined with Hypo-EBRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Hypo-EBRT was initiated 8-12 weeks after initiating enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was PSA decline >80% measured at the 25th week of enzalutamide administration. Secondary end-points included assessment of toxicity, changes in anthropomorphic body measurements, sexual hormones, and metabolic changes. Results: Sixty-two patients were included in the study from January 2018 to February 2020. A PSA decline of >80% was observed in all evaluable patients at the end of enzalutamide treatment and 92% achieved PSA values under 0.1 ngr/ml. All patients remain in PSA response (<80% reduction of the initial values) 6 months after the end of enzalutamide treatment. The most frequent adverse events were hypertension, asthenia, and gynecomastia. There were no significant changes in bone density, body mass index (BMI), or patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Conclusion: Enzalutamide monotherapy is very effective along with hEBRT in reducing PSA levels for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the potential use of this combination in future randomized trials.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The percentage of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma who benefit from anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) is low owing to resistance mechanisms. SABR has a role in oligoprogressive disease and can improve responses to anti-PD-1. This multicenter prospective observational study aimed to determine whether concomitant anti-PD-1 and SABR to oligoprogressive sites enhance tumor response in metastatic NSCLC and melanoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with metastatic NSCLC or melanoma in progression to anti-PD-1 but continuing the same line owing to clinical benefit were referred for palliative SABR. All patients received concomitant pembrolizumab or nivolumab and SABR to 1 to 5 lesions, maintaining anti-PD-1 until further progression, unacceptable toxicity, or medical/patient decision. Objective response rate-complete responses and partial responses-was evaluated during all follow-up according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. The abscopal response was evaluated 8 weeks after SABR as a ≥30% reduction in 1 to 2 predefined nonirradiated lesions. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients enrolled, 50 could be analyzed. With a median follow-up of 32.8 months, objective response rate was 42% (30% complete responses and 12% partial responses). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval, 6.9-29 months). Median overall survival since SABR was 37.4 months (95% confidence interval, 22.9 months-not reached). Abscopal response was 65%, evaluated in 40 patients who fulfilled the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Combined anti-PD-1 and SABR in oligoprogressive metastatic NSCLC or melanoma can achieve high rates of response and extend the clinical benefit of immunotherapy by delaying further progression and a new systemic therapy. This approach should be assessed in larger randomized trials.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Melanoma , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/patología , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Novel mechanistic insights are discussed herein that link a single, nontoxic, low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) treatment (0.5-1.0 Gy) to (1) beneficial subcellular effects mediated by the activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related transcription factor (Nrf2) and to (2) favorable clinical outcomes for COVID-19 pneumonia patients displaying symptoms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We posit that the favorable clinical outcomes following LDRT result from potent Nrf2-mediated antioxidant responses that rebalance the oxidatively skewed redox states of immunological cells, driving them toward anti-inflammatory phenotypes. Activation of Nrf2 by ionizing radiation is highly dose dependent and conforms to the features of a biphasic (hormetic) dose-response. At the cellular and subcellular levels, hormetic doses of <1.0 Gy induce polarization shifts in the predominant population of lung macrophages, from an M1 pro-inflammatory to an M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype. Together, the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant responses and the subsequent shifts to anti-inflammatory phenotypes have the capacity to suppress cytokine storms, resolve inflammation, promote tissue repair, and prevent COVID-19-related mortality. Given these mechanistic considerations-and the historical clinical success of LDRT early in the 20th century-we opine that LDRT should be regarded as safe and effective for use at almost any stage of COVID-19 infection. In theory, however, optimal life-saving potential is thought to occur when LDRT is applied prior to the cytokine storms and before the patients are placed on mechanical oxygen ventilators. The administration of LDRT either as an intervention of last resort or too early in the disease progression may be far less effective in saving the lives of ARDS patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Humanos , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2 , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
We have reviewed a considerable amount of recent scientific papers relating inflammation caused by air pollution with chronic and severe medical conditions. Furthermore, there are evidences relating organ inflammation caused by not only outdoor long-term but also short-term inhaled radioisotopes contained in high polluted air or in household natural radioactive background aerosols, in addition to SARS-COV-2 attached to bioaerosols, which are related with a worst evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome patients. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production induced by the interaction with environmental ionizing radiation contained in pollution is pointed out as a critical mechanism that predispose mainly to elder population, but not excluding young subjects, presenting previous chronic conditions of lung inflammation or neuroinflammation, which can lead to the most serious consequences.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación Radiactiva del Aire/efectos adversos , COVID-19/etiología , Cambio Climático , Inflamación/etiología , Proteína con Dominio Pirina 3 de la Familia NLR/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Aerosoles , Microbiología del Aire , COVID-19/mortalidad , Causalidad , Humanos , Inflamasomas/metabolismo , Inflamasomas/efectos de la radiación , Modelos Biológicos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Pandemias , Tamaño de la Partícula , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Neumonía/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Clinical oncologists are physicians with the competencies to manage cancer patients through the entire disease pathway combining the competencies of radiation and medical oncologists. The 4th edition of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Core Curriculum for Radiation Oncology/Radiotherapy (ESTRO curriculum) has received wide support by the clinical oncology community. The aim was to develop a clinical oncology module that could be combined with the ESTRO curriculum to enable clinical oncology trainees to follow a single curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A range of stakeholders including National Society representatives, an oncologist from a low- middle-income country, and a recently appointed specialist, developed and commented on iterations of the curriculum. Further modifications were made by the ESTRO Education Council. RESULTS: The module is based on the CanMEDS 2015 framework and identifies 20 enabling competencies in the Medical Expert role that are required in addition to the ESTRO curriculum for the training of clinical oncologists. Recommendations are made for the levels of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) to be attained by the end of training. CONCLUSIONS: The Clinical Oncology module, when combined with the ESTRO curriculum, covers the entire cancer pathway rather than being modality specific. It is hoped it will aid in the development of comparable standards of training in clinical oncology across Europe and may also have utility in low- and middle-income countries as well as providing a single curriculum for trainees.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Oncología por Radiación , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Oncología por Radiación/educaciónRESUMEN
Age is one of the most important prognostic factors associated to lethality in SARS-CoV-2 infection. In multivariate analysis, advanced age was an independent risk factor for death. Recent studies suggest a role for the nucleotide-binding domain and leucine rich repeat containing family, pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation in lung inflammation and fibrosis in SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infections. Increased NLRP3/ apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (ASC) mRNA expression and increased caspase-1 activity, have been observed in aged lung, provoking increased and heightened expression levels of mature Interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-18 in aged individuals. Aged individuals have a basal predisposition to over-react to infection, displaying an increased hyper-inflammatory cascade, that seems not to be fully physiologically controlled. NLRP3 inflammasome is over-activated in aged individuals, through deficient mitochondrial functioning, increased mitochondrial Reactive Oxigen Species (mtROS) and/or mitochondrial (mt)DNA, leading to a hyper-response of classically activated macrophages and subsequent increases in IL-1 ß. This NLRP3 over-activated status in elderly individuals, is also observed in telomere dysfunctional mice models. In our opinion, the NLRP3 inflammasome plays a central role in the increased lethality observed in elderly patients infected by COVID-19. Strategies blocking inflammasome would deserve to be studied.
RESUMEN
A cytokine storm induced by SARS-Cov2 may produce pneumonitis which may be fatal for older patients with underlying lung disease. Hyper-elevation of Interleukin1 (IL-1), Tumor necrosis factor-1alfa (TNF-1 alfa), and Interleukin 6 (IL-6) produced by inflammatory macrophage M1 may damage the lung alveoli leading to severe pneumonitis, decreased oxygenation, and potential death despite artificial ventilation. Older patients may not be suitable candidates for pharmaceutical intervention targeting IL-1/6 blockade or artificial ventilation. Low dose total lung (LDTL) irradiation at a single dose of 50 cGy may stop this cytokine cascade, thus preventing, and/or reversing normal organs damage. This therapy has been proven in the past to be effective against pneumonitis of diverse etiology and could be used to prevent death of older infected patients. Thus, LDRT radiotherapy may be a cost-effective treatment for this frail patient population whom radiation -induced malignancy is not a concern because of their advanced age. This hypothesis should be tested in future prospective trials.
RESUMEN
Patients with low-risk invasive ductal carcinoma treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were included in a multicatheter brachytherapy APBI protocol. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast recurrence. Between December 2008-December 2017, 186 low-risk breast cancer patients were treated with APBI using interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy and followed prospectively. At 5-years of follow-up, cumulative local recurrence (LR) and cause-specific survival was 1.1% (95% CI 0.3-1.9) and 98.3% (95% CI 97.3-99.3%) respectively. No grade 3 adverse effects were observed. Postoperative APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy after BCS in early breast cancer patients have excellent rates of local control and survival, without significant toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemia is affecting people worldwide. Most of the patients suffered of a respiratory disease that will progress to an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia severely ill patients, develop a systemic inflammatory response with a Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), that is characterized by a sudden increase in several pro-inflammatory cytokines, mainly IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alfa by activated macrophages (M1 phenotype). Blocking IL-6 with tocilizumab and using respirator equipment seems to be a very important issue in this (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia, but not all patients are referred to such treatments. Low dose radiotherapy (0,5 Gy), is an evidence-based anti-inflammatory treatment, that could modify the immune landscape in the lung affected of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, through macrophages polarization to alternatively activated Macrophages (M2 phenotype). Radiation-induced cancer risk could be assumed due to the very low dose used, the advanced age of the patients and the life-threatening condition of SARS-Cov2 pneumonia. LDRT is a cost-effective non-toxic treatment already available in most general hospitals. This fact allows that it would be used for the large number of patients that will suffer this disease, and that would not receive specific anti-IL-6 treatments in ICUs in low and middle income countries.
RESUMEN
Breast cancer (BC) is the principal cause of cancer-related death in women. Metastatic patients are usually treated with a systemic therapy, but clinical results are limited. Oligometastatic subjects can benefit from high-precision radiotherapy techniques to potentially achieve a complete response. Currently, there is limited evidence of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatments in elderly oligometastatic cancer patients. A review of the medical literature was performed in PubMed database to assess the current role of SABR in the treatment of breast oligometastases in elderly patients. SABR represents a feasible and safe therapeutic approach in oligometastatic elderly BC patients. Further studies are required to establish the optimum patient selection and treatment scheme.
RESUMEN
Breast cancer is the most common cancer pathology in women in the Western world. The median age at diagnosis is 60 years and in the coming decades it is estimated that the number of elderly women affected reaches an important percentage. This aging of the cancer population, associated with its inherent comorbidities and aggravated by the lack of consensus about the most appropriate treatment, make it difficult to administer an effective postoperative treatment in elderly women with a low-risk profile. An exhaustive geriatric evaluation is a sine qua non condition to opt for a specific type of treatment. To date, several options are available such as endocrine therapy (ET) alone, moderate/high hypofractionation and various accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques. In this article, we provide information about each of them.
RESUMEN
Aim: It remains unclear what the best therapeutic option for recurrent glioma patients after Stupp treatment is. Bevacizumab (BVZ) is commonly administered in progression, but it appears that only some patients benefit. It would be useful to find biomarkers that determine beforehand who these patients are. Methods: The protocol included 31 high-risk progressing glioma patients after Stupp treatment who received BVZ 5-10 mg/kg every 14 days and temozolomide (3-19 cycles, 150-200 mg five days each 28-day cycle) during a mean of eight cycles of BVZ or until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. We analyzed the clinical outcome values of inflammatory indices measured before BVZ administration. Results: Lymphocyte level before BVZ administration was the best independent predictor of overall survival (HR = 0.34; 95%CI: 0.145-0.81; P = 0.015). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.823, with 1.645 being the optimal cut-off value, and 0.80 and 0.85 the sensitivity and specificity values, respectively. Responder and non-responder survival curves were also significantly different, considering the first and second tertiles as cut-off points. The number of BVZ cycles was not related to lymphopenia. Pretreatment neutrophil, platelet levels, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) did not have independent predictive value. Inflammatory variables were not correlated with each other. However, patients with high NLR and PLR simultaneously (double positive PLR-NLR) showed a worse clinical outcome than the rest (P = 0.043). Conclusion: Pretreatment lymphocyte levels and double positive PLR-NLR could be used as non-invasive hematological prognostic markers for recurrent gliomas treated with bevacizumab. A close relationship emerged between inflammation and angiogenesis.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In 2017 it was decided to revise the European Core Curriculum for Radiation Oncology/Radiotherapy to produce a 4th edition. The aims of the ESTRO curriculum are to develop comparable standards for training across Europe and to facilitate free movement of specialists across borders. It is also hoped that it will improve the level of training across Europe and will make the non-medical expert roles more explicit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A wide range of stakeholders including National Society representatives, trainees, recently appointed specialists, members of the European Union Medical Specialists Radiotherapy section, an RTT, a radiobiologist, a physicist and lay members from ESTRO staff developed and commented on iterations of the curriculum. RESULTS: The 4th edition is based on the CanMEDS 2015 framework and identifies 14 Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) and the competencies required to perform these. The manager role is replaced by competencies related to leadership. The levels of proficiency required for tumour sites is defined as levels of EPAs. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that the inclusive method of developing the 4th edition has resulted in a document that will have utility in the wide range of environments in which radiation oncology is practised in Europe.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Unión Europea , Humanos , Oncología por Radiación/normasRESUMEN
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have represented a revolution in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To improve these results, combined approaches are being tested. The addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to ICI seems promising. A systematic review was performed in order to assess the safety and efficacy of SABR-ICI combination. Material and Methods: MEDLINE databases from 2009 to March 3, 2019 were reviewed to obtain English language studies reporting clinical outcomes of the combination of ICI-SABR in NSCLC. 18 out of the 429 initial results fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. Results: Eighteen articles, including six prospective studies, describing 1736 patients treated with an ICI-SABR combination fulfilled the selection criteria. The reported mean rates for local control and distant/abscopal response rates were 71% and 41%, respectively. Eleven studies reported progression-free survival and overall survival, with a mean of 4.6 and 12.4 months, respectively. Toxicity rates were consistent with the ones attributable to ICI treatment alone. Conclusions: The ICI-SABR combination has a good safety profile and achieves high rates of local control and greater chances of obtaining abscopal responses than SABR alone, with a relevant impact on PFS. More studies are needed to improve patient selection for an optimal benefit from this approach.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/radioterapia , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/inmunología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/patología , Radiocirugia/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of liver X receptor (LXR) nuclear receptors on irradiation-induced cell death and polarization of macrophages and the potential implications in the context of radiation therapy treatment of cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Primary and immortalized murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from wild type or LXR double knock-out mice were exposed to gamma irradiation. Subsequently, analysis of LXR signaling on cell proliferation and cytotoxicity induced by ionizing radiation was determined by time-lapse photomicroscopy. Genotoxic cell damage was evaluated by Western blot of γ-H2AX and p53. Pyroptosis was analyzed through cell viability assay, lactate dehydrogenase release assay, and Western blot of caspase-1 active protein. Expression of inflammatory markers was measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Genetic and pharmacologic inactivation of LXR induced radiosensitivity of macrophages. LXR deficiency decreased cell proliferation and enhanced cytotoxicity induced by ionizing radiation in both immortalized and primary BMDMs. Protein levels of γ-H2AX and p53, both involved in response to cell damage, were exacerbated in LXR-deficient macrophages exposed to irradiation. Cell membrane damage was augmented and cell viability was decreased in LXR-deficient macrophages compared with LXR wild type macrophages in response to irradiation. In addition, LXR deficiency enhanced both caspase-1 activation and lactate dehydrogenase release in BMDM exposed inflammasome activators. LXR inactivation or deficiency markedly increased the expression of proinflammatory markers IL-1ß, IL-6, and inducible nitric oxide synthase in irradiated macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: The present work identifies LXR transcription factors as potential therapeutic targets to enhance the suppressive effects of radiation therapy on tumor growth through induction of macrophage cell death and activation of the inflammatory cascade.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia Celular , Receptores X del Hígado/metabolismo , Macrófagos/efectos de la radiación , Tolerancia a Radiación , Animales , Muerte Celular , Polaridad Celular , Proliferación Celular , Roturas del ADN de Doble Cadena , Rayos gamma , Expresión Génica , Histonas/metabolismo , Inflamación , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , L-Lactato Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Receptores X del Hígado/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores X del Hígado/genética , Macrófagos/efectos de los fármacos , Macrófagos/fisiología , Ratones , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/metabolismo , Piroptosis , Radiación Ionizante , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismoRESUMEN
Over the last decade, immunotherapy has emerged as a hopeful alternative in cancer therapy. Different drugs are used to stimulate the immune system and block negative immune regulatory pathways, known as "immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)". Although clinical studies have reported efficacy and safety with the use of ICI, only a small group of patients have obtained a clinical benefit. Because of this, immunomodulation based on immunogenic cell death produced by radiotherapy (RT) has been well positioned as an alternative to increase the clinical effect on the primary neoplasm, but also in distant tumours, a phenomenon known as the "abscopal effect". Early clinical outcomes with RT-ICI combination are promising, but the rate of abscopal responses remains low. These developments have opened a path to evaluate the use of nanotechnology as antigen-capturing nanoparticles (AC-NPs) for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic disease treated with RT-ICI. In this review, we aim to highlight the basic characteristics of nanoparticles and its application in oncology, focusing on their potential to enhance abscopal responses.
RESUMEN
The original version of this article, published on 15 October 2018, unfortunately contained a mistake. The following correction has therefore been made in the original: The name of Mariano Amo-Salas and the affiliation of Ismael Herruzo were presented incorrectly.