Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Nurs ; 22(3-4): 347-55, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22931456

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based guidelines for adult patients in order to prevent urinary retention and to minimise bladder damage and urinary tract infection. BACKGROUND: Urinary retention causing bladder damage is a well known complication in patients during hospital care. The most common treatment for urinary retention is an indwelling urinary catheter, which causes 80% of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections. Appropriate use of bladder ultrasonography can reduce the rate of bladder damage as well as the need to use an indwelling urinary catheter. It can also lead to a decrease in the rate of urinary tract infections, a lower risk of spread of multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria, and lower hospital costs. DESIGN: An expert group was established, and a literature review was performed. METHODS: On the basis of literature findings and consensus in the expert group, guidelines for clinical situations were constructed. RESULTS: The main points of the guidelines are the following: identification of risk factors for urinary retention, managing patients at risk of urinary retention, strategies for patients with urinary retention and patient documentation and information. CONCLUSION: Using literature review and consensus technique based on a multiprofessional group of experts, evidence-based guidelines have been developed. Although consensus was reached, there are parts of the guidelines where the knowledge is weak. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These guidelines are designed to be easy to use in clinical work and could be an important step towards minimising bladder damage and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections and their serious consequences, such as bacteraemia and the spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria in hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Vejiga Urinaria/lesiones , Retención Urinaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Cateterismo Urinario
2.
Eur Urol ; 55(4): 773-80, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19153001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To decrease recurrences in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend immediate, intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection (TUR) for all patients with Ta/T1 tumours. OBJECTIVE: To study the benefits of a single, early, intravesical instillation of epirubicin after TUR in patients with low- to intermediate-risk NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this prospective randomised multicentre trial, 305 patients with primary as well as recurrent low- to intermediate-risk (Ta/T1, G1/G2) tumours were enrolled between 1997 and 2004. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 80 mg of epirubicin in 50 ml of saline intravesically within 24 h of TUR or no further treatment after TUR. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was time to first recurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 219 patients remained for analysis after exclusions. The median follow-up time was 3.9 yr. During the study period, 62% (63 of 102) of the patients in the epirubicin group and 77% (90 of 117) in the control group experienced recurrence (p=0.016). In a multivariate model, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 0.56 (p=0.002) for early instillation of epirubicin versus no treatment. In a subgroup analysis, the treatment had a profound recurrence-reducing effect on patients with primary, solitary tumours, whereas it provided no benefits in patients with recurrent or multiple tumours. Furthermore, patients with a modified European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk score of 0-2 with and without single instillation had recurrence rates of 41% and 69%, respectively (p=0.003), whereas the corresponding rates for those with a risk score of > or = 3 were 81% and 85%, respectively (p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: A single, early instillation of epirubicin after TUR for NMIBC reduces the likelihood of tumour recurrence; however, the benefit seems to be minimal in patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence. Future trials will determine the value of early instillation in addition to serial instillations in NMIBC.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Epirrubicina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Administración Intravesical , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...