Relationship between ABO Blood Group Distribution and COVID-19 Infection in Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Multicenter Observational Spanish Study.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, a relationship between the ABO blood group type and the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent of COVID-19, has been reported, noting that individuals with the O blood group are the least likely to be infected. Spain is one of the most badly affected countries worldwide, with high rates of patients diagnosed, hospitalized, and deceased due to COVID-19 infection. The present study aimed to analyze the possible relationship of ABO in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in different Spanish centers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, for which the ABO group was available. Physicians from the transfusion services of different Spanish hospitals, who have developed a multicenter retrospective observational study, were invited to participate voluntarily in the research and 12,115 patients with COVID-19 infection were admitted to the nine participating hospitals. The blood group was known in 1399 cases (11.5%), of which 365 (26.1%) were admitted to the ICU. Regarding the distribution of ABO blood groups, a significant increase in the non-O blood groups and reduction for the O blood group was observed in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19, compared to the reference general population. Among the patients admitted to the ICU, after multivariate analysis, adjusted for the rest of the confounding variables, patients with the O blood group presented a significantly lower risk for admission to the ICU. We conclude that an association was observed between patients with the O blood group and their lower susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, both for those admitted to the hospitalization ward and for those who required admission to the ICU.

Single dose of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose infusion versus multiple fractionated doses of intravenous iron sucrose in the treatment of postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) often present with associated anaemia which is usually present at the time of diagnosis and is aggravated during the postoperative period due to blood loss during the surgery process. Several guidelines advocate for the treatment of postoperative anaemia in these patients in order to prevent complications and allogeneic blood transfusions. However, there are no publications to shed light on the effectiveness of intravenous iron (IVI) administration after CRC surgery and the optimal dose and regimen. We have started a clinical trial with the objective of comparing the effectiveness of 1000 mg of ferric carboxymaltose with fractionated iron sucrose 200 g/48 h for the treatment of postoperative anaemia, by measuring the change of haemoglobin (Hb) levels from postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 30. METHODS: We designed an open label randomised controlled trial to compare two postoperative IVI treatment regimens. Patients aged > 18 years undergoing CRC surgery, with Hb < 11 g/dL on POD 1 are randomly assigned to receive either 1000 mg of ferric carboxymaltose (single dose) or 200 g/48 h of iron sucrose. The main study endpoint will be the change from POD 1 to POD 30 in Hb levels and the key secondary endpoint the percentage of patients with Hb levels ≥ 13 g/dL at POD 30. Other secondary endpoints include: changes in iron metabolism parameters (Fe, ferritin, transferrin, % saturated trasferrin) at POD 30; total doses of iron received; number of postoperative transfusions; compliance with oral iron treatment; number of medical and surgical complications; adverse reactions reported by the patient; use of health resources after surgery; and changes in quality of life (QoL). It has been estimated that a sample of 48 patients per group will allow detecting a difference of 0.75 g/dL in Hb in the change in Hb levels from POD 1 to POD 30. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will confirm if the single dose of 1000 mg ferric carboxymaltose should be preferred in front of the fractionated doses and in which type of patients this regimen should be used preferably. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2015-001005-13 . Registered on 6 January 2015.

Intravenous iron administration for post-operative anaemia management after colorectal cancer surgery in clinical practice: a single-centre, retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the role of intravenous iron (IVI) supplementation after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery is rather scant. This study was aimed at assessing the benefit of post-operative IVI administration after elective CRC surgery at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective observational study including all patients who underwent CRC surgery during 2014. Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin (Hb) <13 g/dL, regardless of gender. Anaemic patients received 200 mg IVI up to three times a week to cover iron deficiency (IVI group). Those who did not receive IVI were placed on standard care (NIVI group). The primary outcome was the proportion of anaemic patients on post-operative day (POD)1 and POD30. Secondary outcomes included Hb changes from POD1 to POD30, transfusion requirements and complication rates. RESULTS: Of the 159 patients studied, 139 (87%) presented with anaemia: 47 (34%) of these received post-operative IVI and 92 (66%) did not. Patients in the IVI group had lower POD1 Hb levels compared to those in the NIVI group (p=0.001). On POD30, only 103 had their Hb measured (34 IVI, 69 NIVI). Anaemia was more prevalent and more severe among the patients in the IVI group (p=0.027), despite their greater increment in Hb (2.0±1.5 g/dL vs 1.1±1.2 g/dL; p=0.001). Eleven patients needed post-operative transfusions (7 IVI, 4 NIVI; p=0.044). There were no differences in post-operative complication rates between the groups. No IVI-related adverse events were recorded DISCUSSION: Compared with standard care, post-operative IVI administration to anaemic patients improved the recovery of Hb levels at POD30, without increasing post-operative complications.

[The multidisciplinary approach is useful for optimising preoperative haemoglobin in colorectal cancer surgery]. / El abordaje multidisciplinar es útil para la optimización de la hemoglobina preoperatoria en cirugía neoplásica colorrectal.

INTRODUCTION: Optimising haemoglobin (Hb) levels less than 13 g/dl in the preoperative period can reduce the transfusion rate. With this aim, we developed a multidisciplinary protocol in our hospital for the treatment of patients proposed for colorectal cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A study was conducted on 437 patients who had surgery performed for colorectal cancer in the period 2005-2009. The data recorded were: demographic data, Hb and iron metabolism (Fe) at the time of diagnosis, Hb on the day of the surgery and on discharge, tumour location, preoperative adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), tumour stage (TNM), iron treatment, transfusion rate, and complications at 30 days. Patients were classified into Group A; Hb < 13 g/dl and/or abnormal Fe metabolism, and Group B; Hb > 13 g/dl and/or normal Fe metabolism. RESULTS: Of the total, 53.3% were in Group B and were treated with Fe; 73.6% intravenous (IV), and the rest oral. The mean dose of IV Fe was 867 mg. The mean intraindividual difference between the Hb on the day of surgery and at the initial value, increased by 0.6g/dl in Group A, while it decreased by 0.8 g/dl in Group B. The mean intraindividual difference between the Hb at discharge and the diagnosis decreased by 0.4 g/dl in Group A compared to 2.5 g/dl in Group B. The overall transfusion rate was 8.6%. No statistically significant differences were observed in complications. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary and early treatment of colorectal cancer enables patients with a low haemoglobin (Group A) to be optimised, as well as achieving a lower transfusion rate.