Cardiac resynchronization in Poland - comparable procedural routines? Insights from CRT Survey II.

INTRODUCTION: CRT Survey II was initiated by the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, to explore everyday implantation practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices in a broad spectrum of hospitals in European Society of Cardiology (ESC) member countries. AIM: To compare Polish and European procedural practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Procedural details of Polish patients collected in 37 Polish centres (n = 1241 - Poland group) were compared to the patients enrolled throughout Europe (n = 9847 - CRT II Survey group). RESULTS: There were significant differences in: successful implantation (96.1% vs. 97.4%), type of device implanted (for CRT-D: 87% vs. 67.6%), implanting physician subspecialty (for electrophysiologist: 69.2% vs. 79.8%), type of location of procedure (for operating room: 19.4% vs. 8.9%), duration of procedure (117.8 ±44 vs. 97.5 ±46.1 min), left ventricle lead type (for multipolar lead: 50% vs. 57.9%), coronary sinus venogram with occlusion rate (41.4% vs. 47.9%) and peri-procedural complication rate (7.5% vs. 5.3%) between Poland and CRT II Survey groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important information describing current differences in Polish procedural routines in relation to ESC member countries. Heterogeneous CRT implantation practices across European countries still exist. However, it may be related to different clinical profile of patients qualified for CRT implantation in Poland as well as organization of care.

Do we differ in terms of indications and demographics in cardiac resynchronisation recipients in Poland? Insights from the European CRT Survey II Registry.

BACKGROUND: Multiple randomised clinical trials have proven that cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients with congestive heart failure and is recommended for such patients as per the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. AIM: In this paper we compare the indications and demographics in cardiac resynchronisation recipients in Poland and other European countries. METHODS: In 2015 and 2016, physicians from 42 European countries participated in the second edition of the European Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Survey. For 14 months, 288 implanting centres gathered data regarding demography, indications, implanting methods, and guidance compatibility from 11,088 patients receiving CRT. RESULTS: The survey revealed that a vast group of patients were eligible for CRT implantation (although some of them with rela-tively weak guidance recommendations) and showed essential variety in clinical practice when national data were benchmarked. CONCLUSIONS: The population of CRT recipients in Poland and other European countries did not differ in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. In most cases, indications for CRT were in accordance with the guidelines; however some devices were implanted in patients beyond the guideline recommendations. For these procedures, the decision regarding CRT im-plantation relies mainly on the physicians' experience.

Ventricular fibrillation induced by radiofrequency energy delivery for premature ventricular contractions arising from the right ventricular outflow tract: is implantablecardioverterdefibrillator indicated?

INTRODUCTION    Inadvertently induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) by radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery for premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is a rare phenomenon; nevertheless, it is crucial to assess long­term risk of sudden cardiac death in these patients. OBJECTIVES    The aim of our study was to define the long­term prognosis in patients with normal ejection fraction (EF), in whom VF was inadvertently induced by RF energy application during ablation of symptomatic idiopathic PVCs originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). PATIENTS AND METHODS    Among over 20 000 RF catheter ablations performed at 5 tertiary centers (2008-2016), 6 patients (5 men) had VF induced by RF application to the RVOT. The mean (SD) age of patients was 35.2 (16.8) years. All patients had normal EF (≥60%). We analyzed the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and assessed heart function during follow­up. RESULTS    After ablation, baseline contrast­enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 4 of the 6 patients; no area of late gadolinium enhancement was observed. One patient received an implantable cardioverter­defibrillator (ICD). Exercise tests revealed only rare PVCs. All patients completedthe follow­up (mean [SD] duration of follow­up, 64.0 [34.9] months). All patients were alive, with no cases of syncope, documented ventricular tachycardia, or VF. The patient with an ICD received 2 inappropriate high­voltage therapies. CONCLUSIONS    Patients with inadvertently induced VF via RF energy application during ablation of PVCs from the RVOT, who have normal left ventricular function and no electrocardiography abnormalities have good prognosis and low VF risk during long­term follow­up. Therefore, ICD placement seems to be not indicated for these patients.

Risk factors of atrial fibrillation recurrence despite successful radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathway: At 11 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports on patients with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of accessory pathway (AP) and atrial fibrillation (AF) include only short follow-up periods. The aim of this study was to analyze predictors of recurrence of AF in patients after successful RFCA of APs over long term follow-up periods. METHODS: Of the 1,007 patients who underwent non-pharmacological treatment of APs (between the years 1993-2008), data of 100 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed (75 men, mean age 43.6 ± 14.7), with the longest period of follow-up (mean 11.3 ± 3.5 years) after successful RFCA of AP. In Group 1, there were 72 patients (54 men, mean age 40.66 ± 13.85 years) without documented episodes of AF after RFCA of AP. Group 2 consisted of 28 patients (21 men, mean age 50.79 ± 14.49 years) with AF episodes despite successful elimination of AP. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, patients from Group 1 were significantly younger at the time of abla-tion than patients from Group 2 (40.66 ± 13.85 vs. 50.79 ± 14.49 years; p = 0.002), had shorter his¬tory of AF episodes (4.11 ± 4.07 vs. 8.25 ± 7.50 years; p = 0.024) and had less frequently documented atrial tachycardia (AT) prior to ablation (3.39 vs. 20.00% years; p = 0.022). In multivariate analysis, the history of AF in years (p = 0.043), was an independent risk factor for AF recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Older patient age, longer history of AF and AT prior to RFCA of APs identified a sub-group of patients who required additional treatment. In the multivariate analysis, the history of AF in years (p = 0.043) was a risk factor for AF recurrence.