RESUMEN
The authors describe and evaluate an annual competitive "mini-grant" program, funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Generalist Physician Initiative established at the University of Massachusetts Medical School as a strategy to stimulate greater faculty involvement in the development of innovative, generalist-oriented projects. The mini-grant program stimulated proposals from across the academic community. The average award was small (mean = $7,039) but at times the awards led to results exceeding the scope of the original funding. In several cases, mini-grant support provided seed funding for faculty to undertake pilot projects to test new initiatives that would otherwise not have been developed. Some projects led to further ideas or to collaborations between generalists and basic scientists or specialists. More than half of funded projects were eventually institutionalized, and nearly 20% led to formal presentations at national meetings. Two problems are identified: (1) there were fewer proposals generated by specialist faculty and fewer collaborative proposals from generalists and specialists than anticipated, and (2) no funded proposals were generated by community-based faculty who were predominantly clinicians, such as preceptors. Despite these problems, and in light of available solutions, the authors conclude that an institutional mini-grant program can provide an ongoing, flexible mechanism to support a shift in institutional culture toward an enhanced status for generalism.
