Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Chim Acta ; 546: 117414, 2023 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37263535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is based exclusively on glucose measurements, which are highly influenced by pre-analytical and analytical factors. Therefore, poor agreement across laboratories may affect the prevalence of GDM. We aimed to determine the inter-laboratory bias of glucose measurements and the impact on GDM prevalence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study of women (n = 110) referred for second-trimester GDM diagnostics using a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Maternal glucose was assessed from venous plasma at fasting, 1 h and 2 h. Venous blood were collected in Fluoride Citrate tubes and frozen. Samples were analyzed at five central laboratories using four different automated glucose Hexokinase methods and GDM prevalence was evaluated according to WHO2013 diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: Maximum inter-laboratory bias was 0.19, 0.30 and 0.27 mmol/L in fasting, 1 h and 2 h samples, respectively. GDM prevalence ranged 30.0-41.1% across laboratories. CONCLUSION: Inter-laboratory bias for mean venous glucose was low and within desirable limits. Nonetheless, the impact on GDM prevalence was considerable, which may inappropriately affect clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Glucemia , Glucosa , Estudios Prospectivos , Laboratorios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...