Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
5.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 31(1): E12-24, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20075104

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of this article is to provide consensus recommendations for reporting standards, terminology, and written definitions when reporting on the radiological evaluation and endovascular treatment of intracranial, cerebral aneurysms. These criteria can be used to design clinical trials, to provide uniformity of definitions for appropriate selection and stratification of patients, and to allow analysis and meta-analysis of reported data. METHODS: This article was written under the auspices of the Joint Writing Group of the Technology Assessment Committee, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society of Interventional Radiology; Joint Section on Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons; and Section of Stroke and Interventional Neurology of the American Academy of Neurology. A computerized search of the National Library of Medicine database of literature (PubMed) from January 1991 to December 2007 was conducted with the goal to identify published endovascular cerebrovascular interventional data about the assessment and endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms useful as benchmarks for quality assessment. We sought to identify those risk adjustment variables that affect the likelihood of success and complications. This article offers the rationale for different clinical and technical considerations that may be important during the design of clinical trials for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Included in this guidance article are suggestions for uniform reporting standards for such trials. These definitions and standards are primarily intended for research purposes; however, they should also be helpful in clinical practice and applicable to all publications. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation and treatment of brain aneurysms often involve multiple medical specialties. Recent reviews by the American Heart Association have surveyed the medical literature to develop guidelines for the clinical management of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Despite efforts to synthesize existing knowledge on cerebral aneurysm evaluation and treatment, significant inconsistencies remain in nomenclature and definition for research and reporting purposes. These operational definitions were selected by consensus of a multidisciplinary writing group to provide consistency for reporting on imaging in clinical trials and observational studies involving cerebral aneurysms. These definitions should help different groups to publish results that are directly comparable.

6.
Brain Inj ; 19(7): 505-10, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16134738

RESUMEN

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study examined the differences between gang and non-gang-related incidents of penetrative missile injuries in terms of demographics, motivation, intra-cranial pathology, transit time, injury time and clinical outcome. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective chart review. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Between 1985-1992, 349 patients with penetrating missile injuries to the brain presenting to LAC-USC were studied. EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTIONS: Inclusion criteria were implemented to keep the cohort as homogenous as possible. Patients excluded were those with multiple gunshot wounds, non-penetrating gunshot wounds to the head, systemic injuries and cases in which the motivation for the incident was unknown. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Gang-related shooting slightly out-numbered non-gang-related incidents. Demographic analysis showed both a male and Hispanic predominance for both gang- and non-gang-related victims and significant differences in gender, race and age. Occipital entrance sites were more common in the gang-related vs temporal entrance sites in the non-gang-related. Mean transit time to the emergency department for gang-related shootings was less than non-gang-related shootings (24.4 vs 27.8 minutes). Most shooting incidents took place between 6pm and 3am. No difference between survival and outcome was noted between gang and non-gang victims. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found between gang- and non-gang-related shooting victims in terms of demographics, entrance site and transit time. No difference was found between injury time, survival and outcome between gang and non-gang populations.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/etiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/patología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/cirugía , Víctimas de Crimen , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Grupo Paritario , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Transporte de Pacientes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Violencia/etnología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/patología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía
7.
Neurosurgery ; 48(5): 1109-15; discussion 1115-7, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11334278

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A major impetus of the "brain attack" campaign is the early recognition and treatment of acute stroke. Critical to this goal is the education of physicians during their residency training. METHODS: Resident physicians in Los Angeles who were in family practice (18%), internal medicine (51%), emergency medicine (20%), and neurology (11%) and had already completed their first year of training responded to a questionnaire on stroke and the treatment of carotid stenosis. RESULTS: Of the 266 respondents, 76% had heard of the "brain attack" campaign, 22% did not identify dysarthria as a symptom of stroke, and 21% did not identify obtundation as a presentation of stroke. Twenty-eight percent chose not to use tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke, and 60% recognized the need to begin treatment within 3 hours. More than 90% of respondents were able to identify correct screening tests for patients with suspected carotid stenosis. However, 56% responded that they would not advocate operating on patients with asymptomatic severe stenosis (>70%) until stenosis reached a critical value (85%). Conversely, 45% would recommend operative treatment for symptomatic patients who had less than 60% stenosis. Sixty-eight percent would refer patients to vascular surgeons, 14% to neurosurgeons, and 17% to both for carotid endarterectomy. CONCLUSION: Recognition of stroke as a medical emergency is improving. However, significant progress can still be made in the recognition of stroke symptoms. Primary care and neurology residents remain skeptical about carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic patients, whereas there is enthusiasm for treating stroke survivors. Education by members of the surgical community could promote the aggressive treatment of asymptomatic patients to prevent stroke.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Endarterectomía , Internado y Residencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Recolección de Datos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Derivación y Consulta , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico
8.
Neurosurgery ; 49(5): 1105-14; discussion 1114-5, 2001 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11846904

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcome of percutaneous transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty (PTPV) for the treatment of spinal compression fractures causing refractory pain. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive group of patients undergoing PTPV at our institution between April 1998 and January 2001. Outcome measures included analgesic requirements, ambulatory status, sleep comfort, and overall quality of life 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients (73 women and 24 men) underwent 258 PTPV procedures during 133 treatment sessions. The mean age was 76 years (range, 42-99 yr). The mean duration of follow-up was 14.7 months (range, 2-35 mo). Most of the patients had osteoporotic compression fractures, although some had osteolytic malignancies. Complete follow-up was obtained in 81 patients (84%). Narcotic and analgesic usage decreased in 63% of patients, increased in 7%, and remained the same in 30%. Ambulation and mobility were improved in 51%, worse in 1% and the same in 48%. One-half of the patients were able to sleep more comfortably after the procedure, whereas the other half remained the same. Most patients who reported no change in sleep or ambulation had experienced no impairment of these activities before PTPV. Overall, 74% of patients believed that PTPV significantly enhanced their quality of life and 26% reported no change. No patient was worse after PTPV. One patient with preexisting pneumonia died of respiratory failure after the procedure; another died of an acute stroke weeks later. One patient developed symptomatic pulmonary embolism of cement, and another developed transient quadriceps weakness from radiculopathy. Other complications were minor and infrequent. There were no infections. CONCLUSION: PTPV provided significant relief in a high percentage of patients with refractory pain. PTPV is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with spinal compression fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Espontáneas/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Polimetil Metacrilato/administración & dosificación , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fracturas Espontáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Examen Neurológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 75(10): 1087-90, 2000 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11040858

RESUMEN

The recent proliferation of endovascular treatment of carotid atherosclerotic disease will increase the number of patients who require treatment for recurrent carotid stenosis after angioplasty and stent placement. The optimal management of these patients has not yet been defined. We describe a 66-year-old woman who required 2 surgical procedures for recurrent in-stent carotid stenosis. She experienced numerous transient ischemic attacks 5 months after left extracranial internal carotid artery angioplasty and stenting for asymptomatic stenosis. Angiography showed high-grade in-stent restenosis, left intracranial carotid artery stenosis, and poor collateral flow to the left middle cerebral artery circulation. The patient underwent a superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass, and the transient ischemic attacks resolved. Five months later, angiography showed progressive stenosis of the external carotid artery at the site of the stent. The patient underwent successful external carotid reconstruction with an on-lay patch. Extracranial-intracranial bypass grafting may be used successfully in the treatment of recurrent extracranial carotid artery stenosis after angioplasty and stent placement. Also, external carotid artery reconstruction at the site of an internal carotid artery stent can be performed safely.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Arteria Carótida Externa/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Arteria Cerebral Media/cirugía , Stents , Arterias Temporales/cirugía , Anciano , Angiografía , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Circulación Colateral/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Recurrencia , Reoperación
10.
Neurosurgery ; 46(4): 918-21; discussion 922-3, 2000 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10764265

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We describe a method of protecting the distal cerebral circulation during carotid angioplasty and report results using the technique in 17 procedures. METHODS: Eleven men and five women with carotid stenoses ranging in severity from 70 to 95% underwent the procedure. The technique was used bilaterally in one patient. A compliant silicone balloon was used to occlude the distal internal carotid artery during the angioplasty phase, when the largest number of emboli are generated. After angioplasty, debris was then flushed into the external circulation while the occlusion balloon remained inflated. The subsequent passage of an exchange guidewire through the angioplasty catheter, with the occlusion balloon deflated, allowed continuous guidewire access across the area of stenosis and facilitated the subsequent placement of a stent. RESULTS: The technique was successful in 16 (94%) of 17 procedures. In the one patient in whom the occlusion balloon could not be advanced across the stenosis, the patient experienced a transient ischemic attack after subsequent angioplasty that was performed without protection. Otherwise, no complications occurred among the 15 patients undergoing successful, balloon-protected angioplasty. Inflation times for the occlusion balloon did not exceed 5 minutes in any patient. CONCLUSION: This method of cerebral protection prevents the intracranial embolization of thrombus and atherosclerotic debris, while allowing continuous guidewire access across the site of stenosis. The success of this technique and a similar method used by Theron et al. supports the use of balloon protection as a means of reducing the risk of stroke associated with carotid angioplasty.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Cateterismo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Carótida Interna , Angiografía Cerebral , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Neurosurgery ; 46(4): 1013-7, 2000 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10764283

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Despite recent advances in technology, parent vessel coil herniation occasionally complicates successful Guglielmi detachable coil embolization, particularly in wide-necked aneurysms. We report endovascular stent deployment performed in two patients specifically to treat this complication. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Two patients underwent Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cavernous segment aneurysms. Both developed coil herniation into the internal carotid artery. In one patient, the herniation occurred during the initial procedure; in the other, it was discovered in a delayed fashion during a follow-up examination for ocular symptoms. INTERVENTION: In both patients, endovascular stent deployment was performed to isolate the herniated portion of the coil from the internal carotid lumen. Follow-up angiography at 6 months demonstrated no aneurysm recanalization and no stenosis of the parent internal carotid artery in the stented region in either patient. CONCLUSION: The use of intraluminal stents has been reported to be a helpful technical adjunct to the conventional endovascular treatment of aneurysms and balloon angioplasty. One additional indication for the use of this technology is sequestering herniated coils from the lumen of the parent artery to reduce potential embolic or occlusive sequelae.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Aneurisma Intracraneal/terapia , Stents , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Retratamiento
12.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 9(2): 64-9, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17895198

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carotid stenosis is an important, treatable cause of stroke. Several population-based studies have shown ethnic differences in the prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis. This study was performed at a large multiethnic hospital to clarify these differences. METHODS: One thousand six carotid artery ultrasounds performed by the Department of Radiology at Los Angeles County General Hospital over a 4-year period were reviewed. Patients were classified as Caucasian (n=151), Hispanic (n=515), Black (n=173), or Asian (n=167) by self-declaration and birthplace. Carotid stenosis was defined as mild (1% to 39%), moderate (40% to 59%), severe (60% to 79%), critical (80% to 99%), or total (100%). RESULTS: Twenty and one-half percent of Caucasian patients had greater than 59% stenosis compared with 10.1% of Hispanics, 8.7% of Blacks, and 10.7% of Asians (P<0.001). Nine and two-tenths percent of Caucasians had greater than 79% stenosis compared with 4.3% of Hispanics, 2.9% of Blacks, and 2.8% of Asians (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in age or gender representations between ethnic groups, and the indications for ordering carotid duplex sonography also did not vary by race. Caucasians and Blacks had a higher prevalence of cardiac disease, smoking, and heavy alcohol abuse. Hispanics had higher rates of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that significant differences in the degree of carotid stenosis exist among ethnic groups. Caucasian patients in our series showed a statistically higher likelihood of having a severe or critical level of stenosis. These findings may have implications for the allocation of health care resources as ethnic minorities compose a greater proportion of the population.

13.
Neurosurgery ; 44(1): 59-64; discussion 64-6, 1999 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9894964

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although the mainstays for treatment of metastatic brain disease have been surgery and/or external beam radiation therapy, an increasing number of patients are being referred for stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary intervention for their intracranial pathological abnormalities. The lack of efficacy and cognitive and behavioral consequences of whole brain irradiation have prompted clinicians to select patients for alternative therapies. This study analyzes the effectiveness of Leksell gamma unit therapy for metastatic melanoma to the brain. METHODS: We present our experience with 59 Leksell gamma unit treatment sessions in 45 consecutive patients who presented with metastatic melanoma to the brain. Five of these procedures were performed as salvage therapy for patients who needed second radiosurgical treatment for new lesions that were remote from the previous targets and were not included in the overall analyses. RESULTS: The population included 78% male patients. The mean patient age was 53 years (age range, 24-80 yr). The mean time from diagnosis of primary melanoma to discovery of brain metastasis was 43 months (median, 27.5 mo; range, 1-180 mo). At the time of diagnosis of brain disease, 35.5% of the patients (16 of 45 patients) had neurological symptoms, 77.7% (35 of 45 patients) had known visceral metastases, and 11.1% (5 of 45 patients) had seizure disorders. Eighty-six percent of the lesions (80 of 93 lesions) were cortical, 12% (11 of 93 lesions) were cerebellar, 1% (1 of 93 lesions) were pontine, and 1% (1 of 93 lesions) were thalamic. Fifty-seven percent of the sessions (31 of 54 sessions) were performed for a single lesion, 24.1% (13 of 54 sessions) for two lesions, 9.2% (5 of 54 sessions) for three lesions, 7.4% (4 of 54 sessions) for four lesions, and 1.8% (1 of 54 sessions) for five lesions. The mean treatment volume was 5.6 cc, with a mean prescription of 21.6 Gy to the 56.0% mean isodose line. The median survival time of the patients in our population, using Kaplan-Meier curves, was 43 months from the time of diagnosis of primary melanoma (range, 3-180 mo) and 8 months (range, 1-20 mo) from the time of gamma knife treatment. Complications included seizures within 24 hours of the procedure in four patients, with transient nausea and vomiting in three patients, transient worsening of preprocedure paresis responsive to steroids in three patients, and increased confusion in one patient. All 45 patients were located for follow-up (mean follow-up duration, 1 yr). After gamma knife treatment, 78% of the patients (35 of 45 patients) experienced either improved or stable neurological symptomatology before death or at the time of the latest follow-up examination. There were 26 deaths (58%). The cause of death was determined to be neurological in only 2 of 45 patients (7.7%). Follow-up magnetic resonance images revealed a 97% local tumor control rate of gamma knife-treated lesions, with 28% radiographic disappearance (9 of 32 cases). Six patients developed new lesions remote from radiosurgical targets and underwent second procedures. CONCLUSION: Although metastatic melanoma to the brain continues to have a foreboding prognosis for long-term survival, gamma knife radiosurgery seems to be a relatively safe, noninvasive, palliative therapy, halting or reversing neurological progression in 77.8% of treated patients (35 of 45 patients). The survival rate matches or exceeds those previously reported for surgery and other forms of radiotherapy. Only 7.7% of the patients in our study population who died as a result of metastatic melanoma (2 of 26 patients) died as a result of neurological disease. The routine use of therapeutic level antiseizure medication is emphasized, considering the findings of our review.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Melanoma/secundario , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Examen Neurológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab ; 18(1): 52-8, 1998 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9428305

RESUMEN

The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) in brain injury is controversial. We studied the effect of anti-TNF-alpha antibody in a rat model of reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion. During focal ischemia and early reperfusion, TNF-alpha was rapidly and transiently released into circulation. Pretreatment with intravenous anti-TNF-alpha antibody reduced cortical (71%, P < 0.015) and subcortical (58%, P < 0.007) injury, enhanced the cerebral blood flow during reperfusion, and improved the neurologic outcome. This further supports the contention that TNF-alpha is a deleterious cytokine in stroke, whereas circulating antibody against TNF-alpha may protect brain from reperfusion injury.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/administración & dosificación , Isquemia Encefálica/inmunología , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Daño por Reperfusión/inmunología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos/sangre , Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control
15.
J Neurosurg ; 87(6): 817-24, 1997 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9384389

RESUMEN

The risk of focal infarction secondary to the induced reversible arrest of local arterial flow during microsurgical dissection of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms was evaluated further to define the optimal approach to temporary arterial occlusion. To compare the effectiveness of potential brain-protection anesthetics, a group of patients treated with the intravenous agents propofol, etomidate, and pentobarbital, administered individually or in combination, was compared to a group treated with the inhalational agent isoflurane. Forty-nine consecutive MCA aneurysm surgeries involving the temporary clipping of the parent vessel were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-eight patients received intravenous brain-protection (IVBP) anesthesia. Groups of patients with and without infarctions, and receiving and not receiving IVBP anesthesia, were compared based on the duration and nature of temporary arterial occlusion. Postoperative radiographic evidence of new infarction was used as the threshold for failure of occlusion tolerance. The overall infarction rate was 22.4% (11 of 49 patients), including 15.8% (six of 38 patients) in the IVBP group versus 45.5% (five of 11 patients) in the group that did not receive brain protection (NBP). In the NBP group, the mean duration of temporary occlusion was 3.9 +/- 2.2 minutes for patients without infarction versus 12.2 +/- 4.3 minutes for patients with focal infarction (p < 0.01). In contrast, the mean duration was 13.6 +/- 10.6 minutes for patients without infarction and 18.5 +/- 9.9 minutes for patients with infarction in the IVBP group. All patients (four of four) in the NBP group who underwent occlusion lasting 10 minutes or longer suffered an infarction versus five of 23 patients in the IVBP group (p < 0.0001). Patients with multiple aneurysms were found to be at increased risk of developing focal infarction, whereas those treated with intermittent temporary clip application were at decreased risk. It is concluded that patients in whom focal iatrogenic ischemia is induced during MCA aneurysm clip ligation have a significant advantage compared with those receiving isoflurane when they are given pentobarbital as the primary neuroprotective agent or when they receive propofol or etomidate titrated to achieve electroencephalographic burst suppression, particularly if more than 10 minutes of occlusion time is required. It is also concluded that 10 minutes is a general guideline for safe, temporary occlusion of the MCA. The use of intermittent temporary arterial occlusion and its use in patients with multiple aneurysms need further evaluation before specific recommendations can be made.


Asunto(s)
Arterias Cerebrales/cirugía , Infarto Cerebral/prevención & control , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Intravenosa , Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Aneurisma Roto/cirugía , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto Cerebral/etiología , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Constricción , Electroencefalografía/efectos de los fármacos , Etomidato/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Isoflurano/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Microcirugia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pentobarbital/administración & dosificación , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Neurosurg Focus ; 2(6): e4, 1997 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15099051

RESUMEN

The risk of focal infarction secondary to the induced reversible arrest of local arterial flow during microsurgical dissection of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms was evaluated further to define the optimal approach to temporary arterial occlusion. To compare the effectiveness of brain-protection anesthetics, a group of patients treated with the intravenous agents, propofol, etomidate, and pentobarbital, administered individually or in combination, was compared to a group treated with the inhalational agent isoflurane. Forty-nine consecutive MCA aneurysm surgeries involving the temporary clipping of the parent vessel were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-eight patients received intravenous brain-protection (IVBP) anesthesia. Groups of patients with and without infarctions, and receiving and not receiving IVBP, were compared based on the duration and nature of temporary arterial occlusion. Postoperative radiographic evidence of new infarction was used as the threshold for failure of occlusion tolerance. The overall infarction rate was 22.4% (11 of 49 patients), including 15.8% (six of 38 patients) in the IVBP group versus 45.5% (five of 11 patients) in the isoflurane (ISO) group. In the ISO group, the mean duration of temporary occlusion was 3.9 +/- 2.2 minutes for patients without infarction versus 12.2 +/- 4.3 minutes for patients with focal infarction (p < 0.01). In contrast, the mean duration was 13.6 +/- 10.6 minutes for patients without infarction and 18.5 +/- 9.9 minutes for patients with infarction in the IVBP group. All patients in the ISO group who underwent occlusion lasting 10 minutes or longer suffered an infarction versus five of 23 patients in the IVBP group. Patients with multiple aneurysms were found to be at increased risk of developing focal infarction, whereas those treated with intermittent temporary clip application were at a decreased risk. It is concluded that patients in whom focal iatrogenic ischemia is induced during MCA aneurysm clip ligation have a significant advantage compared with those receiving ISO when they are given pentobarbital as the primary neuroprotective agent or when they receive propofol or etomidate titrated to achieve electroencephalographic burst suppression, particularly if more than 10 minutes of occlusion time is required. It is also concluded that 10 minutes is a general guideline for safe, temporary occlusion of the MCA. The use of intermittent temporary arterial occlusion and patients with multiple aneurysms need further evaluation before specific recommendations can be made.

17.
Neurosurg Clin N Am ; 6(4): 701-14, 1995 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8527912

RESUMEN

Even this information is only partial. To study fully the effects of treatment would require optimal care at all points from time of injury, including rapid prehospital resuscitation, rapid transport to an optimally equipped and staffed hospital, immediate evaluation and treatment of the initial injury and all complications, rapid and comprehensive rehabilitation, and supportive and flexible home and work settings for the patient on discharge. Patients would need to be stratified for premorbid characteristics, including intelligence, personal traits, and training. Prolonged follow-up, possibly for several years, would be required to determine true outcome. No current study contains sufficient numbers of patients treated optimally and studied for prolonged periods, but this should be done. One way of looking at such patients is to decide that many should be treated to salvage a few. The other way of looking at them is that so many must receive care, at great emotional and economic cost to themselves and others, that such treatment is inappropriate for any of them. Treating all such patients would be a major undertaking. If most of these patients were treated vigorously, a great proportion of them would still die but probably not for a number of days. During this period, their families would be under extreme stress. Once stabilized and receiving ongoing care, some patients would enter a permanent vegetative state and survive for prolonged periods until their prognosis was clear and care was withdrawn, again causing family stress as well as high cost. Some would likely survive although impaired. The charges and real costs of care for all these patients would be tremendous. The question therefore arises as to how to decide what to do about caring for a large group of patients whose maximal care would be costly in emotional and financial terms, particularly at a time when it is recognized that resources for medical care are going to be limited. When discussing such patients as a group with a view toward developing practice guidelines, many considerations must be brought to bear. One consideration is the certainty of the prognosis in both a quantitative and a qualitative sense in an individual case. It is not clear that one can be certain in patients except when there are overwhelmingly unfavorable features. As has been noted, even patients who have been shot through the geographic center of the brain and are posturing can make excellent recoveries. This would push toward aggressive treatment for many patients. Decision making must therefore be considered in terms of bioethics. The major principle-based systems of bioethics are deontologic, arising from accepted principles, and utilitarian, arising from effect on outcome. A virtue-based ethic for physicians arising from "the caring bond and the public trust" is being revived as a balance to analytical ethics. A similar orientation from the point of view of patients is communitarian ethics, that is asking for only what is reasonable and not so much as might harm others. Some of the issues to be considered include the sanctity of life while taking into account the criteria for life--vegetative function versus some level of mental function. One must also review each decision from the viewpoints of all the parties involved--patients, family and friends, physicians, and society--in the context of a heterogeneous society in which individual rights and tolerance enforced by law are primary features. In the patients' terms, there is a desire and right to medical care to maintain a healthy productive life. Even if impaired to some extent, patients may still have an interest in living. Balancing benefits and burdens of life is a complex problem. There is also the right, based on patients' values, to refuse care if there is the wish not to take a chance of having a significantly compromised existence. Such declaration before injury should be honored...


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/fisiopatología , Lesiones Encefálicas/terapia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapia
18.
Neurosurgery ; 35(2): 335; discussion 335-6, 1994 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7969848

RESUMEN

The use of a small-diameter, rigid ventriculoscope as a stylet to place a catheter optimally within cerebrospinal fluid-containing spaces, is described.


Asunto(s)
Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/instrumentación , Endoscopios , Ventriculostomía/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...