Can we predict the influence of inflammation on voriconazole exposure? An overview.

Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal indicated for invasive fungal infections that exhibits a high degree of inter-individual and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics is non-linear, making dosage adjustments more difficult. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended by measurement of minimum plasma concentrations. Several factors are responsible for the high pharmacokinetic variability of voriconazole: age, feeding (which decreases absorption), liver function, genetic polymorphism of the CYP2C19 gene, drug interactions and inflammation. Invasive fungal infections are indeed very frequently associated with inflammation, which engenders a risk of voriconazole overexposure. Many studies have reviewed this topic in both the adult and paediatric populations, but few studies have focused on the specific point of the prediction, to evaluate the influence of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics. Predicting the impact of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics could help optimize antifungal therapy and improve patient management. This review summarizes the existing data on the influence of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics in adult populations. We also evaluate the role of C-reactive protein, the impact of inflammation on patient metabolic phenotypes, and the tools that can be used to predict the effect of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics.

Amoxicillin therapeutic drug monitoring for endocarditis: A comparative study (EI-STAB).

INTRODUCTION: International guidelines recommend high doses of ß-lactams for most cases of infective endocarditis (IE). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used to adjust ß-lactam dose based on plasma concentrations, although there are no comparative studies to support this practice. The benefit of amoxicillin TDM during IE was evaluated. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, cohort study of adults treated with high-dose amoxicillin for enterococcal or streptococcal IE was conducted in two referral centers. Patients with, or without TDM were compared. The primary outcome was mean daily amoxicillin dose. RESULTS: A total of 206 cases of streptococcal (n=140, 68%) or enterococcal (n=66, 32%) IE were included. IE occurred on prosthetic valves in 77 (37%) cases, and on intracardiac devices in 28 (14%) cases. Aortic valve was involved in 136 (66%) cases. There were 154 men (75%), mean age was 70 ± 14 years, valve surgery was performed in 81/206 (39%) patients, and in-hospital mortality was 8% (17/206). All patients in the TDM group and most patients in the group without TDM received amoxicillin as continuous infusion. Amoxicillin TDM was performed for 114 patients (55.3%), with a mean of 4.7 ± 2.3 measures per patient, a mean plasma steady-state concentration of 41.2 ± 19 mg/L, most (82/114, 72%) being within the therapeutic target (20-80 mg/L). Mean amoxicillin dose was lower in patients with TDM (10.0 ± 3.3 g/day) than those without TDM (11.3 ± 2.0 g/day) (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Amoxicillin TDM was associated with a reduction in daily doses, with no impact on adverse events and prognosis. Individualized treatment of IE through TDM may contribute to decreased use of antibiotics.

Time to negative PCR conversion amongst high-risk patients with mild-to-moderate Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 COVID-19 treated with sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare the clinical and virological outcomes in Omicron BA.1- and BA.2-infected patients who received sotrovimab with those in patients who received nirmatrelvir for the prevention of severe COVID-19. METHODS: In this multi-centric, prospective ANRS 0003S CoCoPrev cohort study, patients at a high risk of progression of mild-to-moderate BA.1 or BA.2 COVID-19 who received sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir were included. The proportion of patients with progression to severe COVID-19, time between the start of treatment to negative PCR conversion, SARS-CoV-2 viral decay, and characterization of resistance variants were determined. A multi-variable Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the time to negative PCR conversion and a mixed-effect model for the dynamics of viral decay. RESULTS: Amongst 255 included patients, 199 (80%) received ≥3 vaccine doses, 195 (76%) received sotrovimab, and 60 (24%) received nirmatrelvir. On day 28, new COVID-19-related hospitalization occurred in 4 of 193 (2%; 95% CI, 1-5%) sotrovimab-treated patients and 0 of 55 nirmatrelvir-treated patients (p 0.24). One out of the 55 nirmatrelvir-treated patients died (2%; 95% CI, 0-10%). The median time to negative PCR conversion was 11.5 days (95% CI, 10.5-13) in the sotrovimab-treated patients vs. 4 days (95% CI, 4-9) in the nirmatrelvir-treated patients (p < 0.001). Viral decay was faster in the patients who received nirmatrelvir (p < 0.001). In the multi-variable analysis, nirmatrelvir and nasopharyngeal PCR cycle threshold values were independently associated with faster conversion to negative PCR (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.56-3.56; p < 0.0001 and hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; p 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of nirmatrelvir in high-risk patients compared with that of sotrovimab was associated with faster viral clearance. This may participate to decrease transmission and prevent viral resistance.

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of reflux cholangitis following bilio-enteric anastomosis.

Twenty-five patients with reflux cholangitis (RC) defined as acute cholangitis (AC) with normal abdominal imaging occurring > 3 months after bilioenteric anastomosis were described and compared to 116 AC patients with biliary obstruction (tumoral, lithiasis). RC episodes occurred a median 4.5 months after surgery; 18 (72%) had recurrent RC (n ≥ 3). RC episodes were less severe than obstructive AC; the outcome was favorable with short antibiotic courses and no selection of antibiotic-resistance. However, multiple recurrent RC occurred in 20 patients (80%). Prophylactic or pre-emptive antibiotics were successful in 3 and 11 patients. Revision surgery for jejunal loop lengthening was successful in 2/4 patients.

The Regulatory RNA ern0160 Confers a Potential Selective Advantage to Enterococcus faecium for Intestinal Colonization.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the regulatory small RNA (sRNA) Ern0160 in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) colonization by Enterococcus faecium. For this purpose, four strains of E. faecium were used, Aus0004 (WT), an ern0160-deleted Aus0004 mutant (Δ0160), a trans-complemented Δ0160 strain overexpressing ern0160 (Δ0160_0160), and a strain Δ0160 with an empty pAT29 vector (Δ0160_pAT29). Strains were studied both in vitro and in vivo, alone and in competitive assays. In in vitro experiments, no difference was observed between WT and Δ0160 strains cultured single while Δ0160_0160 strain grew more slowly than Δ0160_pAT29. In competitive assays, the WT strain was predominant compared to the deleted strain Δ0160 at the end of the experiment. Then, in vivo experiments were performed using a GIT colonization mouse model. Several existing models of GIT colonization were compared while a novel one, combining ceftriaxone and amoxicillin, was developed. A GIT colonization was performed with each strain alone, and no significant difference was noticed. By contrast, significant results were obtained with co-colonization experiments. With WT + Δ0160 suspension, a significant advantage for the WT strain was observed from day 5 to the end of the protocol, suggesting the involvement of ern0160 in GIT colonization. With Δ0160_0160 + Δ0160_pAT29 suspension, the strain with the empty vector took the advantage from day 3 to the end of the protocol, suggesting a deleterious effect of ern0160 overexpression. Altogether, these findings demonstrate the potential implication of Ern0160 in GIT colonization of E. faecium. Further investigations are needed for the identification of sRNA target(s) in order to decipher underlying molecular mechanisms.

[Side effects of longterm oral corticosteroid therapy]. / Effets indésirables de la corticothérapie orale au long cours.

Side effects of long-term oral corticosteroid therapy. Systemic corticosteroid therapy has been used for over 70 years, and is still the cornerstone of the treatment of many conditions, in particular systemic, autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. Side effects of corticosteroids are numerous, and for most of them well known by prescribers. Nonetheless, guidelines for the prevention of corticosteroids toxicity are scarce, and the implementation of protective measures by prescribers is heterogenous. Hence, corticosteroids related complications entail a significant morbidity, which, importantly, could be largely prevented. We conducted therefore a systematic literature, through the Medline database, the Cochrane database and the grey literature until January 2021. After recalling the history of the discovery of corticosteroid therapy and its main pharmacological properties, we present the various complications associated with long-term corticosteroid therapy, and discuss the relevance of the preventive measures that may be proposed in daily practice in the light of available scientific evidence. This work highlights the importance of multidisciplinary follow-up, but above all of a thorough screening of the risk factors of complications at treatment initiation, and of a repeated evaluation of the complications all along the treatment course, in order to reduce the significant burden of morbidity associated with long-term corticosteroid therapy and to improve patient quality of life.

Effets indésirables de la corticothérapie orale au long cours. La corticothérapie systémique est utilisée depuis plus de 70 ans et reste la pierre angulaire du traitement de nombreuses affections. Ses effets indésirables sont nombreux et, pour la plupart, bien connus. Pour autant, les recommandations concernant leur prévention sont parfois manquantes, et souvent hétérogènes, y compris dans leur mise en œuvre par les prescripteurs. De ce fait, les complications induites par la corticothérapie sont à l'origine d'une morbidité importante, la plupart du temps évitables. Nous avons donc réalisé une revue systématique de la littérature, à travers les bases Medline, Cochrane et la littérature grise, jusqu'à janvier 2021. Après avoir rappelé l'histoire de la découverte de la corticothérapie et ses principales caractéristiques pharmacologiques, nous présentons les différentes complications associées à une corticothérapie au long cours et les mesures de prévention disponibles, en discutant leur efficacité et leur pertinence à la lumière des recommandations actuelles ou, à défaut, des dernières données scientifiques disponibles. Ce travail met en évidence l'importance du suivi multidisciplinaire des patients traités par corticothérapie systémique au long cours, mais surtout celle d'un dépistage préalable des facteurs associés à la survenue de complications et de réévaluations répétées de ces complications sous traitement, afin de diminuer le poids très important de la morbidité qui y est associée et ainsi d'améliorer la qualité de vie des patients.

SARS-CoV-2-Induced ARDS Associates with MDSC Expansion, Lymphocyte Dysfunction, and Arginine Shortage.

PURPOSE: The SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with prolonged mechanical ventilation and high mortality rate. Interestingly, COVID-19-associated ARDS share biological and clinical features with sepsis-associated immunosuppression since lymphopenia and acquired infections associated with late mortality are frequently encountered. Mechanisms responsible for COVID-19-associated lymphopenia need to be explored since they could be responsible for delayed virus clearance and increased mortality rate among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: A series of 26 clinically annotated COVID-19 patients were analyzed by thorough phenotypic and functional investigations at days 0, 4, and 7 after ICU admission. RESULTS: We revealed that, in the absence of any difference in demographic parameters nor medical history between the two groups, ARDS patients presented with an increased number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and a decreased number of CD8pos effector memory cell compared to patients hospitalized for COVID-19 moderate pneumonia. Interestingly, COVID-19-related MDSC expansion was directly correlated to lymphopenia and enhanced arginase activity. Lastly, T cell proliferative capacity in vitro was significantly reduced among COVID-19 patients and could be restored through arginine supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports a critical role for MDSC in COVID-19-associated ARDS. Our findings open the possibility of arginine supplementation as an adjuvant therapy for these ICU patients, aiming to reduce immunosuppression and help virus clearance, thereby decreasing the duration of mechanical ventilation, nosocomial infection acquisition, and mortality.

Is Rifampin Use Associated With Better Outcome in Staphylococcal Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis? A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend rifampin-based combinations for staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). However, no robust clinical data support this recommendation, and rifampin tolerability is an issue. We aimed to evaluate the impact of rifampin for the treatment of staphylococcal PVE. METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study of all adults with staphylococcal PVE (modified Duke criteria) was conducted in 3 referral centers for endocarditis, during years 2000-2018. Primary outcome measurement was 1-year mortality. RESULTS: We enrolled 180 patients with PVE due to Staphylococcus aureus (n = 114, 63.3%), or coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 66, 36.7%), on bioprosthesis (n = 111, 61.7%), mechanical valve (n = 67, 37.2%), or both (n = 2). There were 132 males (73.3%), and mean age was 70.4 ± 12.4 years. Valvular surgery was performed in 51/180 (28.3%) cases. Despite all isolates were susceptible to rifampin, only 101 (56.1%) were treated with rifampin, for a median duration of 33.0 days, whereas 79 (43.9%) received no rifampin. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. One-year mortality was, respectively, 37.6% (38/101), and 31.6% (25/79), in patients treated with, or without, rifampin (P = .62). Relapse rates were 5.9% (6/101), and 8.9% (7/79), P = .65. Patients treated with rifampin had longer hospital length-of-stay: 42.3 ± 18.6 vs 31.3 ± 14.0 days (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, only cerebral emboli (odds ratio [OR] 2.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-6.70, P = .009), definite endocarditis (OR 7.15, 95% CI, 1.47-34.77, P = .018), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (OR 6.04, 95% CI, 1.34-27.26, P = .019), were associated with 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion (43.9%) of staphylococcal PVE received no rifampin. One-year survival and relapse rates were similar in patients treated with or without rifampin.

Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To assess post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients hospitalized in a COVID-19 ward unit more than 100 days after their admission. METHODS: All eligible patients were contacted by phone by trained physicians and were asked to answer to a dedicated questionnaire. Patients managed in hospital ward without needing intensive care were compared with those who were transferred in intensive care units (ICU). RESULTS: We included 120 patients after a mean (±SD) of 110.9 (±11.1) days following admission. The most frequently reported persistent symptoms were fatigue (55%), dyspnoea (42%), loss of memory (34%), concentration and sleep disorders (28% and 30.8%, respectively). Comparisons between ward- and ICU patients led to no statistically significant differences regarding those symptoms. In both group, EQ-5D (mobility, self-care, pain, anxiety or depression, usual activity) was altered with a slight difference in pain in the ICU group. CONCLUSION: Most patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 still have persistent symptoms. While there were few differences between HRQoL between ward and ICU patients, our findings must be confirmed in larger cohorts, including more severe patients.

COVID-19 in Patient with Sarcoidosis Receiving Long-Term Hydroxychloroquine Treatment, France, 2020.

Because of in vitro studies, hydroxychloroquine has been evaluated as a preexposure or postexposure prophylaxis for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and as a possible COVID-19 curative treatment. We report a case of COVID-19 in a patient with sarcoidosis who was receiving long-term hydroxychloroquine treatment and contracted COVID-19 despite adequate plasma concentrations.