RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The population of people living with dementia (PLwD) continues to grow in Japan where advance care planning (ACP) for PLwD is relatively new. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and cultural acceptability of a dementia-specific ACP communication skills toolkit for Japanese primary care clinicians. METHODS: We delivered 13 training sessions in primary care clinics across central Japan and conducted a post-training survey to assess whether the toolkit increased confidence in dementia-specific ACP communication skills and the acceptability of the toolkit with the following four statements: (1) The language in the sessions was clear, (2) The sessions took an appropriate amount of time to complete, (3) The design of the sessions was an effective educational method, and (4) The sessions were culturally appropriate for communication with Japanese patients with dementia and their family members. We asked participants to respond using a 5-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. RESULTS: All participants were Japanese and included 80 physicians (mean age 39.8 years), 33 nurses (mean age 45.7 years), and 58 other participants (mean age 42.9 years), who were 30.0%, 87.9%, and 55.2% female, respectively. Most participants practiced in rural settings. In pre- post-comparisons, participant confidence increased in determining capacity, understanding dementia prognosis, goals of care, eliciting surrogates, recommending self-care practices to families, and leading family meetings (all p < 0.001). Most participants strongly agreed or agreed that the toolkit was an effective method (96.9%), took an appropriate amount of time (94.5%), contained clear language (89.8%), and was culturally appropriate (73.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Dementia-specific ACP communication skills toolkit can be delivered in Japan. Japanese primary care clinicians generally felt the dementia-specific ACP toolkit increased their confidence in ACP communication skills and was acceptable. The language, time, and design were well received, though further work is needed to improve the cultural appropriateness of the toolkit.
RESUMEN
Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a therapy used by osteopathic physicians in various medical settings. Postoperatively, OMT can be utilized to optimize the body's function and recovery. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy of OMT in reducing the length of postoperative hospital stays. Given the significant implications of prolonged hospitalization for both patients and healthcare resources, research strategies to safely shorten this period are crucial. This meta-analysis examined five select studies that measured the length of hospital stay in postoperative patients who received OMT compared with postoperative patients who did not. A random effects model was applied in our statistical analysis to account for heterogeneity due to variations in surgical procedures, hospitals, and patient populations. Individually, three studies reported statistically significant reductions in hospital stay for OMT patients, while two did not. This meta-analysis, comprising five studies and 519 patients, found a mean difference of -2.37 days in favor of OMT; however, this finding did not reach a statistical significance (P = 0.06). The substantial heterogeneity observed (heterogeneity tau2 = 6.75, chi2 = 34.6, df = 4, P < 0.00001, I2 = 88%) suggests that clinical dissimilarities among the five studies may have resulted in our inconclusive findings. While OMT shows promise in postoperative care, further research with standardized protocols and more homogenous patient populations is needed to assess its true impact.
